Codex @codex  0

An extension cocycle is the two-cocycle obtained from a section of a group extension. It measures the failure of the section to be a group homomorphism.

For homomorphisms $E\to H$ and $G\to H$, their fiber product isIt is a subgroup of $E\times G$. Pulling a group extension back along $G\to H$ uses this fiber product as its middle group.

Every virtually soluble group $K$ has a soluble characteristic subgroup of finite index. First take a soluble normal subgroup $K_0$ of finite index by the subgroup core construction. Choose a soluble normal subgroup $R\supseteq K_0$ maximizing its image size in the finite quotient $K/K_0$. For every soluble normal subgroup $S$, the product $RS$ is soluble, because its quotient by $R$ is a quotient of $S$. Maximality forces $S\le R$. Hence $R$ is the unique largest soluble normal subgroup and is invariant under all automorphisms. This avoids incorrectly intersecting infinitely many conjugates when proving closure under group extensions.

With a fixed identification of the kernel with $\mathbb{Z}$ and quotient with ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$, these central group extensions are classified by $n\in \mathbb{Z}$. Choose lifts $x,y$ of the quotient generators; their commutator is $z^n$ and is unchanged by central changes of lifts. Every element has unique normal form $z^m{y}^b{x}^a$, proving this invariant is complete. A cocycle representative is $c((a,b),(c,d))=nad$, whose cocycle identity follows from bilinearity. Its extension multiplication is $(a,b,m)(c,d,l)=(a+c,b+d,m+l+nad)$. The zero parameter gives ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$ and parameter one gives the integer Heisenberg group. The Koszul resolution for a rank-two free abelian group independently computes $H^2({\mathbb{Z}}^2,\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}$.

A group has the maximal condition on subgroups when every ascending sequence of subgroups eventually stabilizes. Equivalently, every subgroup is a finitely generated group. If a subgroup were not finitely generated, repeatedly adjoining an element outside the previously generated subgroup would give a strictly ascending sequence. Conversely, generators of the union of an ascending sequence all lie in one term, making that term the whole union. This condition is preserved by group extensions because each subgroup is an extension of its intersection with the kernel by its image in the quotient.

A subnormal series is a finite chain $1=G_r⊴G_{r-1}⊴\cdots ⊴G_0=G$, in which each term is normal in the preceding term. Its factors are the quotient groups $G_i/G_{i+1}$. A normal series of a group imposes the stronger condition that every term be normal in $G$. These conditions should not be conflated: inserting a subgroup normal in an intermediate term need not preserve normality in the whole group. A refinement inserts additional terms, and two series are equivalent when their nontrivial factors can be paired by group isomorphisms.

The basic refinement mechanism is the Zassenhaus butterfly lemma. For $A^{\prime }⊴A$ and $B^{\prime }⊴B$, let $C=A\cap B$ and $D=(A^{\prime }\cap B)(A\cap B^{\prime })$. Both factors of $D$ are normal in $C$, so $D⊴C$. The map from $C$ onto $A^{\prime }C/A^{\prime }(A\cap B^{\prime })$ has kernel $D$: if an element of $C$ equals $a^{\prime }{b}^{\prime }$ with $a^{\prime }\in A^{\prime }$ and $b^{\prime }\in A\cap B^{\prime }$, then $a^{\prime }=c{b}^{\prime -1}\in A^{\prime }\cap B$. Conversely each product in $D$ is in the kernel. The first isomorphism theorem therefore givesThe denominators are normal in their numerators: conjugation by $C$ preserves them, while conjugation by $A^{\prime }$ or $B^{\prime }$ changes their elements only by a factor already in that normal subgroup.

Given two subnormal series $(G_i)$ and $(H_j)$, refine the first by $G_{i+1}(G_i\cap H_j)$, and the second by $H_{j+1}(H_j\cap G_i)$. The endpoints are $G_i,G_{i+1}$ and $H_j,H_{j+1}$ respectively, and the Zassenhaus butterfly lemma pairs the successive factors indexed by $(i,j)$ and $(j,i)$. This proves the Schreier refinement theorem.

A composition series is a strict subnormal series all of whose factors are simple groups. Every finite group has one: choose a maximal proper normal subgroup, repeat inside it, and use decreasing orders to terminate. A simple factor cannot admit a nontrivial refinement. Applying the preceding refinement theorem to two composition series proves the Jordan–Hölder theorem: their lengths and multisets of simple factors agree, up to group isomorphism. The factors are the Jordan–Hölder factors, and their number is the composition length. If $N⊴G$, lifting a composition series of $G/N$ and adjoining one for $N$ gives

These factors do not determine the whole group, because they do not determine how its group extensions are assembled. For example, $C_4$ and the Klein four-group both have two factors $C_2$, but one contains an element of order four and the other does not. The symmetric group $S_3$ has a composition series $1<C_3<S_3$, with factors $C_3,C_2$, whereas the simple group $A_5$ has the single factor $A_5$.

A chief series is a maximal strict normal series of a group; each chief factor is a minimal nontrivial normal subgroup in the appropriate quotient of $G$. Finite chief factors are characteristically simple. To justify their structure, let $N$ be any nontrivial finite characteristically simple group and choose a minimal nontrivial normal subgroup $M$ of $N$. Its distinct images under automorphisms of $N$ are minimal normal subgroups, so distinct ones intersect trivially and commute. Choose a maximal family giving an internal direct product of groups. If any other image were not contained in that product, its intersection with the product would be trivial by minimality, and it could be added, a contradiction. Hence this product is characteristic and equals $N$. Each factor $M$ is simple: a proper nontrivial normal subgroup of $M$ would be normal in the whole direct product $N$, contrary to the choice of $M$. Thus $N$ is a direct product of groups of isomorphic finite simple groups. This applies to chief factors by conjugation from $G$.

Chief and composition factors need not coincide. In $A_4$, the chain $1<V_4<A_4$ is a chief series, since conjugation cycles the three order-two subgroups of $V_4$. A composition series instead inserts any one of those subgroups, giving factors $C_2,C_2,C_3$. Its inserted order-two subgroup is normal in $V_4$ but not in $A_4$. Chief series retain the ambient group's conjugation information that composition series discard.

The derived series gives a canonical criterion for a group to be soluble: put $G^{(0)}=G$ and $G^{(i+1)}=[G^{(i)},G^{(i)}]$. Its terms are characteristic, and each factor is Abelian. A finite group is soluble exactly when this series reaches the identity, equivalently when all its composition factors are cyclic of prime order. For one direction, the derived series supplies Abelian factors, whose simple refinements are cyclic of prime order. Conversely an extension of two soluble groups is soluble: if $(G/N{)}^{(r)}=1$, then $G^{(r)}\subseteq N$; if $N^{(s)}=1$, then $G^{(r+s)}=1$. Induction up a composition series with cyclic prime factors proves the other direction. In a finite soluble group, each minimal normal subgroup is elementary Abelian: its characteristic commutator subgroup must be trivial, its primary components force a single prime, and its characteristic subgroup of $p$th powers must be trivial. Thus every chief factor is a vector space over some ${\mathbb{F}}_p$. In a general finite group the Jordan–Hölder factors can instead be nonabelian simple groups.

The central series demand more than Abelian factors: each factor must be central in the corresponding quotient of the whole group. Define the upper central series by $Z_0=1$ and $Z_{i+1}/Z_i=Z(G/Z_i)$, and the lower central series by ${\gamma }_1=G$ and ${\gamma }_{i+1}=[{\gamma }_i,G]$. A group is nilpotent exactly when the upper series reaches $G$, equivalently when the lower series reaches the identity. Indeed, for any ascending central series $1=C_0\le \cdots \le C_c=G$, induction gives $C_i\subseteq Z_i$ and ${\gamma }_{c+1-i}\subseteq C_i$; reversing the lower series gives an ascending central series when it terminates. The least such $c$ is the nilpotency class. A central series has Abelian factors, so every nilpotent group is soluble; the converse fails, as $S_3$ is soluble but has trivial group center.

For a finite p-group, the class equation shows that the group center is nontrivial, since every noncentral conjugacy class has size divisible by $p$. Applying the same argument to successive central quotients makes the upper central series reach the group. More generally a finite group is nilpotent exactly when it is the direct product of groups of its Sylow subgroups. Here is the nontrivial direction. A central series gives the normalizer condition for nilpotent groups: for a proper subgroup $H$, choose the first $Z_i$ not contained in $H$. Then $[Z_i,H]\subseteq Z_{i-1}\subseteq H$, so $Z_i\subseteq N_G(H)$ and $N_G(H)>H$. If a Sylow subgroup $P$ had proper normalizer $N$, then $N_G(N)>N$; but $P$ is the unique Sylow subgroup of $N$, hence characteristic there, and $N_G(N)\subseteq N_G(P)=N$, a contradiction. Thus all Sylow subgroups are normal, different ones commute because their intersection is trivial, and they form an internal direct product. Conversely each finite Sylow subgroup is nilpotent, and products of their central series give a central series for their direct product.

Composition series record simple building blocks, chief series record ambient normal structure, derived series detect solubility, and central series detect nilpotence. Their associated factors and extension data explain why the same group can have very different useful series.

A soluble group is a group whose derived series $G^{(0)}=G$, $G^{(i+1)}=[G^{(i)},G^{(i)}]$ terminates at $1$. Equivalently, it has a finite subnormal series with abelian factors. For the reverse implication, if $G/N$ has derived length $r$, then $G^{(r)}\le N$; if $N$ has derived length $s$, then $G^{(r+s)}=1$. Iterating this observation through the series proves the equivalence. For a finite group, refining the abelian factors to composition factors says that solubility is equivalent to all composition factors being cyclic of prime order.

Subgroups and quotient groups of soluble groups are soluble, since their derived series lie in, or are images of, the original series. The same calculation proves closure under group extensions. Finite p-groups are nilpotent groups, hence soluble: their nontrivial centers allow induction to construct a central series. Every finite nilpotent group is a direct product of groups of its Sylow subgroups. The converse fails: $S_3$ has the abelian-factor series $1<C_3<S_3$, but its order-two Sylow subgroups are not normal. The symmetric group $S_4$ is also soluble, with series $1<V_4<A_4<S_4$ and abelian factors. A finite soluble group has elementary abelian minimal normal subgroups, by the argument in 1(c). In contrast, a nonabelian simple group is a perfect group and is not soluble.

The Fitting subgroup collects the normal nilpotent structure. For a nontrivial finite soluble group it is nontrivial, since it contains an elementary abelian minimal normal subgroup. Part 1(c) proves $C_G(F)\le F$, so conjugation embeds $G/C_G(F)$ in $\mathrm{Aut}(F)$. This shows why controlling a soluble group through normal abelian or nilpotent layers is effective, even when the whole group is not a nilpotent group.

For a set of primes $\pi$, a Hall subgroup of type $\pi$ has order divisible only by primes in $\pi$ and index divisible only by primes outside $\pi$. The Hall theorem for soluble groups says that a finite soluble group has such subgroups, any two are conjugate, and every subgroup of $\pi$-order is contained in one. These assertions generalize the Sylow theorems, which treat a single prime. Here is a proof of all three assertions.

First we need coprime splitting over an elementary abelian normal subgroup. Suppose $V⊴E$ is an elementary abelian p-group and $Q=E/V$ has order $h$ prime to $p$. A section $s:Q\to E$ defines an action on $V$ and an additive factor set $f(x,y)$ by $s(x)s(y)=f(x,y)s(xy)$. Associativity saysSumming over $z\in Q$ and dividing by $h$ in $V$ gives $f(x,y)=b(x)+xb(y)-b(xy)$, where $b(x)=h^{-1}{\sum }_{z}f(x,z)$. Replacing $s(x)$ by $-b(x)s(x)$ removes the factor set, giving a complement. Two complements differ by a map $d$ satisfying $d(xy)=d(x)+xd(y)$. Averaging over $y$ gives $d(x)=b-xb$, so the complements are conjugate by an element of $V$. This proves both splitting and conjugacy, without assuming that an arbitrary extension splits.

Induct on $|G|$, taking an elementary abelian minimal normal subgroup $V$ of exponent $p$. Choose a quotient Hall subgroup $\bar{H}\le G/V$ and let $K$ be its preimage. If $p\in \pi$, then $K$ itself is a Hall subgroup. If $p\notin \pi$, the preceding splitting argument gives a complement $H$ to $V$ in $K$, and that complement is a Hall subgroup of $G$.

For conjugacy, the images of two Hall subgroups are quotient Hall subgroups, so induction allows them to have the same image and lie in the same $K$. If $p\in \pi$, every Hall subgroup contains $V$: its product with $V$ is a $\pi$-subgroup and cannot be larger by the subgroup-order formula. Both are then $K$. If $p\notin \pi$, both are complements to $V$ in $K$, so the averaging argument conjugates them.

Finally let $U\le G$ be any $\pi$-subgroup. By induction its image lies in a quotient Hall subgroup, so $U\le K$. If $p\in \pi$, $K$ is already a Hall subgroup containing $U$. Otherwise write $K=V⋊H$. In $VU$, both $U$ and the inverse image in $H$ of the image of $U$ are complements to $V$. Complement conjugacy therefore places $U$ in a conjugate of $H$. This proves embedding and completes the induction.

Thus existence, conjugacy and containment all hold for every prime set in a finite soluble group. The solubility hypothesis matters: $A_5$ has no Hall subgroup for $\pi =\{2,5\}$. Such a subgroup would have index three; its coset action would give a nontrivial group homomorphism $A_5\to S_3$, impossible because $A_5$ is a simple group and has order $60$. This example also distinguishes a Hall subgroup from a merely arbitrary subgroup whose order uses the chosen primes.

For a finitely generated group $G=⟨x_1,\dots ,x_r⟩$, every quotient group is generated by the images of the $x_i$. Thus finite generation passes to quotients.

For a group extension $1\to N\to G\to Q\to 1$, suppose $N$ and $Q$ are finitely generated. Choose finite group generators of $N$ and lifts to $G$ of finite group generators of $Q$. For any $g\in G$, a word in the lifts has the same image as $g$ in $Q$, so their difference belongs to $N$. Thus the two finite sets together generate $G$, proving preservation under extensions.

For a subgroup $H\le G$ of finite index, choose representatives $T$ of the right cosets $H\backslash G$, with $1$ representing $H$, and a finite symmetric generating set $X$ for $G$. Write $\overline{g}$ for the chosen representative of $Hg$. The finitely many Schreier generatorsbelong to $H$. If $h=x_1\cdots x_k\in H$, set $t_j=\overline{x_1\cdots x_j}$, so $t_0=t_k=1$. ThenEach factor is a listed generator because $H{x}_1\cdots x_j=H{t}_{j-1}{x}_j$. Therefore $H$ is finitely generated. This proves Schreier's lemma directly.

An infinite locally finite group isIts elements are binary sequences of finite support, with coordinatewise addition. It is infinite because the unit vectors are distinct. Any finite collection of elements has its supports contained in one finite set of coordinates, and the subgroup it generates lies in the corresponding finite product of copies of $C_2$. Hence every finitely generated subgroup is finite.

Local finiteness passes to subgroups because a finitely generated subgroup of a subgroup is also one of the ambient group. It passes to quotients as well: lift finitely many group generators of a subgroup in the quotient; the subgroup generated by their lifts is finite, and its image is exactly the desired subgroup.

For local finiteness is closed under extensions, suppose $N$ and $Q=G/N$ are locally finite, and take a finitely generated subgroup $K\le G$. Its image $\overline{K}\le Q$ is finitely generated, hence finite. The map $K\to \overline{K}$ has kernel $K\cap N$, soThe finite-index result already proved makes $K\cap N$ finitely generated. Local finiteness of $N$ makes it finite, and thenSince $K$ was arbitrary, $G$ is locally finite. Thus finite generation is preserved by quotients, extensions and finite-index subgroups; local finiteness is preserved by subgroups, quotients and extensions.

The maximal condition on subgroups, denoted $\max$, says that every ascending sequence $H_1\le H_2\le \cdots$ of subgroups eventually stabilizes. Suppose a subgroup $H$ were not finitely generated. Starting with the trivial subgroup, repeatedly choose an element of $H$ outside the subgroup generated so far. This produces a strictly ascending sequence, contradicting $\max$.

Conversely, suppose every subgroup is a finitely generated group. The union $H={\bigcup }_i{H}_i$ of an ascending sequence is a subgroup. A finite generating set of $H$ lies in a single $H_m$, since the sequence is ascending. Thus $H=H_m$, and $H_i=H_m$ for all $i\ge m$. We have proved

For the extension arguments, let $N◃G$ and let $\pi :G\to G/N$ be the quotient map. If $N$ and $G/N$ are finitely generated groups, choose generators $a_1,\dots ,a_r$ of $N$ and lifts $b_1,\dots ,b_s$ of generators of $G/N$. For every $g\in G$, its image is a word $w(\pi (b_1),\dots ,\pi (b_s))$, so $w(b_1,\dots ,b_s{)}^{-1}g\in N$. ThereforeHere $d$ denotes the minimal number of generators. If instead $N$ and $G/N$ satisfy the maximal condition on subgroups, take any $H\le G$. Its intersection $H\cap N$ and its image $\pi (H)$ are finitely generated by the condition in those two groups. The exact sequence $1\to H\cap N\to H\to \pi (H)\to 1$ and the preceding argument make $H$ finitely generated. The equivalence already proved now gives $\max$ for $G$. Hence both finite generation and the maximal condition are preserved by group extensions.

An infinitely generated group of finite Prüfer rank is the additive group $\mathbb{Q}$. A finite set of rational numbers lies in $D^{-1}\mathbb{Z}$ for a common denominator $D$, and its generated subgroup is cyclic: after multiplying by $D$, use the greatest common divisor of the integer numerators. Every finitely generated subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}$ therefore needs at most one generator, while $\mathbb{Z}$ needs one. But no finitely generated subgroup contains $1/(2D)$ once its elements all lie in $D^{-1}\mathbb{Z}$. Thus

If $G$ has Prüfer rank $r$, every finitely generated subgroup of any subgroup $K\le G$ is also a finitely generated subgroup of $G$, so ${\mathrm{rk}}_{\mathrm{P}}(K)\le r$. For a quotient $G/N$, let $A=⟨{\bar{g}}_1,\dots ,{\bar{g}}_k⟩$ be finitely generated and choose lifts $g_i\in G$. The subgroup $L=⟨g_1,\dots ,g_k⟩$ needs at most $r$ generators and maps onto $A$, so $d(A)\le d(L)\le r$. This proves the rank bound for every subgroup and quotient.

Now suppose $N$ and $G/N$ have Prüfer ranks $r$ and $s$. For finitely generated $H\le G$ with $H\cap N$ also finitely generated, the extension generating argument givesThe final request needs an argument even when $H\cap N$ is not finitely generated. Write $H=⟨h_1,\dots ,h_k⟩$. Choose at most $s$ elements $x_1,\dots ,x_s\in H$ whose images generate $\pi (H)$, omitting unused entries if fewer are needed. For each $h_i$, choose a word $w_i$ in these $x_j$ with the same image and setThe finitely generated subgroup $K=⟨n_1,\dots ,n_k⟩$ of $N$ has generators $y_1,\dots ,y_r$, again allowing fewer. Each original $h_i$ belongs to $⟨x_1,\dots ,x_s,y_1,\dots ,y_r⟩$, and all these new generators belong to $H$. Thus $d(H)\le r+s$ without requiring finite generation of the full intersection. Taking the supremum proves the Prüfer rank bound for extensions:

For a left $\mathbb{Z}G$-module, group cohomology iswith $\mathbb{Z}$ the trivial module. Equivalently take a projective resolution $P_{\bullet }\to \mathbb{Z}$ and the cohomology of ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(P_{\bullet },M)$. This also describes the right-derived functors of the invariant-module functor $M\mapsto M^G$.

For an explicit model, the homogeneous bar free resolution has $P_n=\mathbb{Z}[G^{n+1}]$, with diagonal $G$-action and boundary the alternating sum of coordinate deletions. It is free over $\mathbb{Z}G$: each orbit has a unique representative with first coordinate $1$. The augmented complex is exact because inserting $1$ as a first coordinate supplies a contracting homotopy of underlying abelian groups; its lack of $G$-equivariance does not affect exactness. The associated inhomogeneous group cochains are functions $f:G^n\to M$, withFor group cochains of degree zero, $(dm)(g)=gm-m$. Adjacent deletions cancel in pairs, giving $d^2=0$ and hence $H^n=\ker d/\mathrm{im}d$.

In degree zero this givesIt is also ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(\mathbb{Z},M)$, since a map is determined by the invariant image of $1$.

In degree one the cocycle condition is $f(gh)=f(g)+gf(h)$, soThese are crossed homomorphisms modulo principal crossed homomorphisms. For trivial action they reduce to ordinary group homomorphisms, so $H^1(G,M)=\mathrm{Hom}(G_{\mathrm{ab}},M)$.

There are two further useful descriptions. If $I=\ker (\mathbb{Z}G\to \mathbb{Z})$ is the augmentation ideal, a crossed homomorphism gives an equivariant map $I\to M$ by $g-1\mapsto f(g)$, because $gh-1=(g-1)+g(h-1)$. Applying $\mathrm{Hom}(-,M)$ to $0\to I\to \mathbb{Z}G\to \mathbb{Z}\to 0$ therefore givesAlso a section of $M⋊G\to G$ has the form $g\mapsto (f(g),g)$ and is a group homomorphism exactly when $f$ is a crossed homomorphism. Conjugation of sections by an element of $M$ changes $f$ by a principal crossed homomorphism. Thus $H^1$ classifies the $M$-conjugacy classes of such sections, or equivalently of complements to $M$ in the semidirect product.

In degree two, a normalized two-cocycle $c:G\times G\to M$ satisfiesDefine multiplication on $M\times G$ byThe displayed cocycle identity is precisely associativity; normalization gives the identity and inverses exist. This produces a group extension $1\to M\to E_c\to G\to 1$ with the prescribed action on $M$.

Conversely a set-theoretic section $s:G\to E$, $s(1)=1$, gives $c(g,h)=s(g)s(h)s(gh{)}^{-1}$ in the additive kernel of a group homomorphism. Associativity gives the cocycle condition. Replacing $s(g)$ by $b(g)s(g)$ changes $c$ byThe resulting extensions are equivalent through a change of coordinates in $M\times G$. Conversely any extension equivalence preserving both kernel of a group homomorphism and quotient yields such a change of section. HenceThe zero class corresponds exactly to a split extension. With trivial action these are central group extensions; addition of classes corresponds to the Baer sum. This proves the second group cohomology classifies group extensions interpretation.

For $G={\mathbb{Z}}^2$ and trivial coefficients $\mathbb{Z}$, put $R=\mathbb{Z}[x^{\pm 1},y^{\pm 1}]$. The Koszul resolution for a rank-two free abelian group iswhere $d_1(a,b)=(x-1)a+(y-1)b$ and $d_2(c)=(-(y-1)c,(x-1)c)$. To check exactness at $R^2$, reduce $d_1(a,b)=0$ modulo $x-1$. Since $y-1$ is not a zero divisor in $\mathbb{Z}[y^{\pm 1}]$, write $b=(x-1)c$, and cancellation gives $a=-(y-1)c$. Injectivity of $d_2$ follows because $R$ is a domain. The augmentation kernel is generated by $x-1,y-1$, proving the other exactness statement.

Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(-,\mathbb{Z})$ makes both differentials zero, since $x,y$ act trivially. ThusDegree-one classes assign arbitrary integers to the two generators. Geometrically these are also the cohomology groups of the torus, a classifying space for ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$; its cohomology ring is the exterior algebra on the two degree-one classes.

The integer $n$ in degree two has an explicit extension representative. On triples $(a,b,m)\in {\mathbb{Z}}^3$, setThe bilinear term is a two-cocycle. With generators $x=(1,0,0)$, $y=(0,1,0)$ and central $z=(0,0,1)$,Every central extension of ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ by $\mathbb{Z}$ has this form: choose lifts of the two generators and the fixed generator of the kernel of a group homomorphism, then their group commutator determines $n$ and every element has a unique form $z^m{y}^b{x}^a$. Changing the lifts by central elements leaves that commutator unchanged. Thus distinct integers give inequivalent extensions, and the cocycles $nad$ add with $n$. The case $n=0$ is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$; $n=1$ is the integer Heisenberg group. This realizes the integral central extensions of a rank-two free abelian group concretely.

Use additive notation and take $G=\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$, $N=\{0,2\}$. Its quotient group is $C_2$. A group homomorphism from $C_2$ sends its generator to an element annihilated by $2$, so the image must be either $0$ or $2$. Both project to the identity coset $N$, and neither can project to the nonidentity generator of $G/N$. Therefore this quotient projection has no homomorphic section. It is a nonsplit group extension, despite both $G$ and $N$ being nontrivial finite groups.

A soluble group, also called a solvable group, has a terminating derived series:For a subgroup $S\le G$, induction gives $S^{(j)}\le G^{(j)}$, so subgroups of soluble groups are soluble. For a surjective group homomorphism $q:G\to Q$, $q(G^{(j)})=Q^{(j)}$, so quotients of soluble groups are soluble. Finally, in a group extension $1\to K\to E\to Q\to 1$, suppose $K^{(r)}=1$ and $Q^{(s)}=1$. Then $E^{(s)}\le K$ and $E^{(s+r)}=1$. Soluble groups are closed under subgroups, quotients and group extensions.

A virtually soluble group contains a soluble group as a finite-index subgroup. The finite-index facts proved in parts (i)–(iii) imply closure under subgroups and quotients: intersect a finite-index soluble subgroup with the chosen subgroup, or take its image under the quotient map.

For group extensions, no finite-generation hypothesis may be inserted. We first establish the finite-index characteristic soluble subgroup lemma. If $K$ is a virtually soluble group, the kernel of its action on the cosets of a finite-index soluble subgroup is a soluble normal subgroup $K_0$ of finite index. Among soluble normal subgroups containing $K_0$, choose $R$ with maximal $|R/K_0|$, possible because $K/K_0$ is finite. If $S$ is any soluble normal subgroup of $K$, then $RS$ is soluble: it is an extension of $R$ by $S/(R\cap S)$. Maximality forces $S\le R$. Thus $R$ is the unique largest soluble normal subgroup of $K$, making it a characteristic subgroup, and it has finite index.

Now suppose $1\to K\to G\stackrel{\pi }{\to }Q\to 1$ has both $K$ and $Q$ virtually soluble. Replace $G$ by the preimage $G_0$ of a finite-index soluble subgroup of $Q$. The subgroup $R$ just constructed is characteristic in $K$ and therefore normal in $G_0$. In $E=G_0/R$, the subgroup $A=K/R$ is a finite normal subgroup, and $E/A$ is a soluble group. The centralizer $C_E(A)$ has finite index in $E$, since conjugation gives a map $E\to \mathrm{Aut}(A)$ with finite image. Its intersection with $A$ is the center of a group $Z(A)$, an abelian group, while its quotient by $Z(A)$ embeds in the soluble group $E/A$. Thus $C_E(A)$ is a soluble group. Its preimage in $G_0$ is an extension by $R$, so it too is soluble and has finite index in $G$. Virtually soluble groups are closed under group extensions.

For the final example take the restricted direct sum of groupswhere $A_5$ is the nonabelian simple group of even permutations on five letters. Every finite collection of elements lies in a product of finitely many finite factors, so $D$ is a locally finite group and hence a torsion group. It cannot contain a nonabelian free group, which is a torsion-free group.

To show that $D$ is not a virtually soluble group, let $H$ be any finite-index subgroup and let $N\le H$ be the kernel of the finite coset action. Each coordinate $A_5$ maps either injectively or trivially into the finite quotient $D/N$, by Simplicity of the alternating group A5. The nontrivial images of distinct factors commute, and each has trivial centre, so any $k$ of them generate a direct product of groups of order $60^k$. Only finitely many such images can occur in a finite quotient. Therefore $N$, and hence $H$, contains a whole coordinate copy of $A_5$, which is not soluble: its nontrivial commutator subgroup is normal and therefore equals $A_5$. No finite-index subgroup of $D$ is soluble.

Choose a normalized set-theoretic section $s:H\to E$ of $\pi$, so $s(1)=1$. Define the extension cocycleAssociativity of $s(h)s(k)s(l)$ gives, in multiplicative notation for $M$,which is exactly the two-cocycle identity. Thus $\varphi$ represents the class of the group extension in $H^2(H,M)$.

A group extension of $G$ by the $\mathbb{Z}G$-module $M$ is an exact sequencewhose conjugation action on $i(M)$ agrees with the prescribed action of $G$ on $M$. It is a split group extension when $\pi$ has a group-homomorphic section $s:G\to E$. Two such extensions are equivalent group extensions when an isomorphism of their middle groups is the identity on $M$ and induces the identity on $G$. Transporting a section through that isomorphism proves that every extension equivalent to a split extension is split.

Choose a set-theoretic section $s$ with $s(1)=1$. Its failure to preserve multiplication is the normalized two-cocycleAssociativity gives the two-cocycle identity, and replacing $s$ changes $c$ by a group coboundary. The resulting class $[c]\in H^2(G,M)$ is therefore intrinsic to the extension, as expressed by second group cohomology classifies group extensions.

Now write $G=⟨x,y⟩\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^2$ and let $I$ be the augmentation ideal of $\mathbb{Z}G$. The Koszul resolution for a rank-two free abelian group gives, after applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(-,M)$, the last coboundaryIts image is $IM$. For $M=\mathbb{Z}G/I^2$ this yields the second cohomology of a rank-two free abelian group with truncated group-ring coefficients calculationThe canonical map $M\to \mathbb{Z}$ induces the identity on these final quotients, so $H^2(G,M)\to H^2(G,\mathbb{Z})$ is surjective; indeed it is an isomorphism.

Let $F_2=⟨x,y⟩$ and let ${\gamma }_i(F_2)$ be its lower central series. The class-two quotient $F_2/{\gamma }_3(F_2)$ is the Integer Heisenberg group. In the class-three free nilpotent group $N=F_2/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$, the module ${\gamma }_2(F_2)/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$ is cyclic over $\mathbb{Z}G$ on $[x,y]$ and is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}G/I^2$. Quotienting it by $I/I^2$ gives the central kernel $⟨[x,y]⟩\cong \mathbb{Z}$ of the Heisenberg group. The kernel ofis ${\gamma }_3(F_2)/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$, freely generated by $[[x,y],x]$ and $[[x,y],y]$, and is central. Thus it is ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. This is the central nonsplit extension of the integer Heisenberg group by ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. If it split, centrality would give $N\cong H(\mathbb{Z})\times {\mathbb{Z}}^2$, whose abelianization has rank four; but $N$ has abelianization ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. Hence the extension is nonsplit.

For $a,b\in I$, the square-zero ideal condition givesThus the square-zero unit subgroup $1+I$ is abelian, andis a group isomorphism from the additive group of $I$.

Use the specified ring isomorphism $R/I\cong \mathbb{Z}G$. For $x\in \mathbb{Z}G$, choose a lift $r\in R$ and define $x\cdot a=ra$ for $a\in I$. Two lifts differ by an element of $I$, whose product with $a$ vanishes, so this is well defined. Right multiplication is handled identically. The two actions commute by associativity, making $I$ a bimodule. If $u\in R$ lifts $g\in G$, then $u$ is a unit: a lift $v$ of $g^{-1}$ makes both $uv$ and $vu$ elements of $1+I$, hence units, and a ring element with both a left and a right inverse is invertible. Conjugation therefore definesChanging $u$ by an element of $I$ does not change this expression because $I^2=0$. Moreover,so $a\mapsto 1+a$ is an isomorphism of $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules for these conjugation actions.

Let $R^{\times }\to (R/I{)}^{\times }$ be reduction on unit groups, and define $U$ as the inverse image of the distinguished subgroup $G\subseteq (\mathbb{Z}G{)}^{\times }$. Every $g\in G$ has a unit lift by the preceding argument, and the kernel consists exactly of the units congruent to $1$, namely $1+I$. Multiplication in $R$ therefore gives the group extensionChoose a set-theoretic section $s:G\to U$ with $s(1)=1$. Its extension cocyclesatisfies the two-cocycle identity by associativity. A different section changes $c$ by a group coboundary, so second group cohomology classifies group extensions gives a well-defined classThe same construction for $(R_1,I_1)$ gives $U_1$, an extension cocycle $c_1$, and $x_1=[c_1]\in H^2(G,1+I_1)$.

The answer to the final question is no. An abstract ring isomorphism $R_1\cong R$ need not carry the distinguished ideal $I_1$ to $I$, need not induce the identity under the two chosen identifications of the quotient rings with $\mathbb{Z}G$, and need not induce the prescribed $\mathbb{Z}G$-module isomorphism $\theta$. Hence it need not give an isomorphism of the two displayed group extensions, so it imposes no equality $\varphi (x_1)=x$. That equality does hold if the ring isomorphism has all three compatibility properties, because it then carries one extension cocycle to the other up to a group coboundary.