The Schur multiplier of a group is
the second group homology group with trivial integral coefficients. If is a free presentation, Hopf's formula states that
Write for the augmentation ideal. The presentation relation sequence is
where . If is free on a set , then is free as a left -module on the elements , so the two modules immediately preceding are free -modules. Resolving the relation module by free modules and splicing produces a free resolution of .
Apply the right-exact functor to this partial resolution. Its degree-two homology is the kernel of
The coinvariant module on the left is . On the right, the map identifies the coinvariants with the abelianization . The displayed map is induced by the inclusion , so its kernel is
This proves Hopf's formula.
For an abelian group , the Schur multiplier of an abelian group is . One way to see the direct-sum rule is the degree-two Künneth theorem:
A cyclic group has zero second integral group homology, while
Consequently
The hidden subgroup problem for a group is specified by an oracle that hides an unknown subgroup : it is constant on each left coset of and takes distinct values on distinct cosets. The task is to determine , usually by finding a generating set for it.
A complex representation of is a complex vector space together with a homomorphism
It is faithful when , equivalently when is injective. Every finite group has a faithful complex representation: in the regular representation, permutes the basis by
and a group element fixing every basis vector must be the identity.
If is conjugate to , then is similar to . Thus the two matrices have the same spectrum, while an eigenvalue of gives the eigenvalue of . Hence
Now take a -cycle . It is conjugate to for every . Faithfulness makes have order , so its spectrum contains a nontrivial th root of unity . The preceding implication puts all the distinct values
in the spectrum. Therefore . This is the spectrum orbit bound for a faithful symmetric-group representation.
Finally let be the group of all permutations of . It has no faithful finite-dimensional complex representation. For every , contains a subgroup generated by disjoint transpositions. In a -dimensional complex representation, commuting involutions are simultaneously diagonalizable and hence map into the group of diagonal sign matrices, which has order . A faithful restriction would require for every , an impossibility.
A covering map is locally a disjoint union of homeomorphisms onto the base. A space is simply connected when it is path-connected and every loop is null-homotopic. By the uniformization theorem, the simply connected Riemann surfaces are
up to analytic isomorphism.
A lattice is a discrete subgroup
with . The Weierstrass elliptic function
converges normally on compact subsets of , defines a meromorphic map , and is nonconstant because it has a double pole at every lattice point. Reindexing the normally convergent derivative series shows that is -periodic; evenness fixes the integration constants, so .
The invariance makes
well-defined and unique on . It is analytic because the quotient projection is locally biholomorphic.
Neither map is a covering. For any nonzero , periodicity and oddness of give
so . The map is not a local homeomorphism there; since the quotient projection is locally biholomorphic, the descended map fails for the same reason.
There is no covering . The torus is connected, while every connected covering of the simply connected sphere is a homeomorphism. A torus is not homeomorphic to a sphere, for example because their fundamental groups are and .
The character of is
The stated action is a representation because successive action by and gives
Identifying with gives the character of a Hom representation
Here the final equality follows after unitarizing the finite-group representation.
The permutation character of counts fixed points:
Thus
On the other hand, the character of
is
The column form of character orthogonality says that this has exactly the same two values above. Complex representations of a finite group are semisimple, and semisimple representations with the same character are isomorphic. Hence the two-sided regular representation decomposition is
as a representation.
The Dirichlet unit theorem states that for a number field of signature ,
For ,
The field is real quadratic, so the unit rank is one and its only roots of unity are . To see that is fundamental, suppose a positive unit satisfies . If its norm is , its integral trace lies strictly between and ; if its norm is , its trace lies strictly between and . Neither interval contains an integer. Reducing any positive unit by a suitable power of now proves the units of the quadratic field Q square root of five formula
If is finite, the two unit groups have the same rank, namely one. Put and let be the signature of . Then
Therefore and . For a proper extension, nonnegativity forces
with signature .
This degree occurs: take . It is a totally imaginary quadratic extension of , so the unit ranks agree and the quotient is finite. It is nontrivial because but (and its coset has order two). This is the finite relative unit quotient over a real quadratic field example.
The Seifert-van Kampen theorem says that if , where are path connected open sets containing , then
The cell attachment is the quotient
with the image of as base point. For , take one open set that deformation retracts onto together with a boundary collar, and another that consists of the interior of the disc with a collar and is contractible. Their intersection deformation retracts onto . Its generator maps to in the first set and to the identity in the second. Van Kampen therefore proves the fundamental group after attaching a 2-cell formula
Applying van Kampen to the two circles gives
Attach three discs along loops representing , , and . The resulting presentation complex for the symmetric group on three letters has group
Sending to and to gives a surjection onto . The relations imply , so every word reduces to one of
The presented group has at most six elements and surjects onto the six-element group , so this map is an isomorphism.
Since
the phase and group velocities are
The primitive root is a zero of the cyclotomic polynomial , of degree . Its minimal polynomial over divides , so
where divisibility also follows from the embedding of the Galois group of the cyclotomic field into . Over , Gauss's irreducibility theorem for cyclotomic polynomials says that is irreducible. Therefore
Let
Both have splitting field . On the roots of , the Galois group has two orbits of size two and embeds as
The roots of , namely , form one orbit and give the regular Klein-four subgroup
The subgroups are not conjugate because their orbit decompositions differ.
Let be the splitting field over of . Its derivative is , so it has distinct roots. The roots are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and inversion, using and . They therefore form a field with elements.
Every field with elements has multiplicative group of order , so every element satisfies ; it is therefore a splitting field of the same polynomial and is unique up to isomorphism. If an irreducible factor over has a root , its degree is , which divides by the tower law. In particular it is at most .
Dedekind's factorization/Frobenius theorem says that for a prime not dividing the discriminant, the degrees of the distinct irreducible factors modulo give the cycle lengths of an element of the Galois group.
The polynomial is irreducible over by the rational-root test followed by a comparison of possible monic quadratic factors. Its discriminant is , a square, so its transitive Galois group lies in . Modulo five,
and the cubic has no root in , giving a three-cycle. A transitive subgroup of containing a three-cycle cannot be the Klein four group; hence
The topological group has complex multiplication and the subspace topology. It is compact and abelian, so every finite-dimensional irreducible complex representation is one-dimensional. A continuous character lifts along to a continuous homomorphism , hence has the form . Periodicity by forces , giving precisely .