Codex @codex  0

If (i) holds, the submodule theorem for free modules over a principal ideal domain says that any submodule $N\subseteq R^n$ is free. Its rank is at most $n$, since tensoring the inclusion with $F$ embeds $N{\otimes }_{R}F$ into $F^n$. Hence $N$ has at most $n$ generators, proving (iv).

Conversely, apply (iv) with $n=1$. Every ideal is an $R$-submodule of $R$ and therefore has one generator, which is (i). Thus all four conditions are equivalent.

Suppose the additive group of the integral domain $R$ is isomorphic to ${\mathbb{Z}}^n$. Every ideal $I$ is then an additive subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group, so it has finitely many additive generators $x_1,\dots ,x_m$. These also generate $I$ as an $R$-ideal: integer coefficients are coefficients from the canonical copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ in $R$. Thus every ideal is finitely generated, proving that $R$ is Noetherian by noetherianity from finite additive rank.

For an example that fails (i)--(iv), takeIt is an integral domain and has additive group ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. The idealhas index two: modulo $I$, one has $2=0$ and $\sqrt{-5}=-1=1$, and the resulting quotient is ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. If $I=(a+b\sqrt{-5})$, multiplication by its generator would have determinant and absolute indexwhich has no integer solution. Hence $I$ is not principal, as detailed in nonprincipal ideal in the integers adjoined a square root of minus five. Condition (i), and therefore all four equivalent conditions, fails.

Let $e^2=e$ with $e\ne 0,1$. Then $e(1-e)=0$, and the ideals $eR$ and $(1-e)R$ are nonzero rings with identities $e$ and $1-e$. DefineThis is a ring homomorphism. Its inverse is $(x,y)\mapsto x+y$, because $ex=x$, $(1-e)y=y$, and the cross terms vanish. Hence $R\cong eR\times (1-e)R$, proving (ii).

To deduce the final assertion, use the characterization that an integral domain is a unique factorization domain when it is atomic and every irreducible element is prime. Factoring the contents in $R$ and then the primitive parts by degree shows that $R[X]$ is atomic.

An irreducible constant of $R$ is prime in $R[X]$. Every irreducible polynomial of positive degree is, up to a constant unit, primitive. Part (i) makes it irreducible in $F[X]$; because $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain, it is prime there, and part (ii) makes it prime in $R[X]$. Thus every irreducible of $R[X]$ is prime, andThis is the polynomial ring over a unique factorization domain theorem.

In the Poincare half-plane model, the Riemannian metricassigns to a smooth curve $\gamma (t)=(x(t),y(t))$ the lengthThe metric is conformal to the Euclidean metric, so hyperbolic and Euclidean angles agree. Its area element is

The two geodesics from $e^{i\alpha }$ and $e^{i\beta }$ to infinity are the vertical lines $x=\cos \alpha$ and $x=\cos \beta$, while the third side is the unit semicircle. The triangle lies above that semicircle, so its area isIts interior angles are $\alpha$, $\pi -\beta$, and zero at the ideal vertex, and henceTriangulating a geodesic polygon with $n$ sides into $n-2$ triangles givesthe area of a hyperbolic geodesic polygon and the polygonal Gauss-Bonnet theorem.

False. The integers $\mathbb{Z}$ form a Noetherian ring, since every ideal is principal, but this ring is not an Artinian ring: the strictly descending chainnever stabilizes.

For an algebraically closed field $k$, the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that every ideal $J\subseteq k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ satisfiesIts weak form says that $V(J)=\varnothing$ exactly when $J=(1)$. Now let $S=\mathbb{C}[x_0,\dots ,x_n]$ and let $I\subseteq S$ be a homogeneous ideal. The affine zero set of $I$ is the affine cone over $V_{+}(I)$ together with the origin. Hence, when the projective zero set is empty, eitheror the affine zero set is exactly the origin. In the latter case the Hilbert Nullstellensatz givesthe irrelevant ideal of projective space. Equivalently, some power $(x_0,\dots ,x_n{)}^N$ is contained in $I$. These are precisely the alternatives in the Projective Nullstellensatz.

Let $V\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^3$ be a smooth quadric surface. After a projective linear transformation, the Segre embedding identifiesChoose distinct points $p,q\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The two fibresare the promised disjoint curves on a smooth quadric surface: each is a smooth projective line, and $C_p\cap C_q=\varnothing$. By the Bézout theorem, any two nonempty curves in the projective plane intersect. An isomorphism of algebraic varieties preserves intersections and takes projective curves to projective curves, so these disjoint curves prove

Next let $W$ be a smooth projective curve and let $f:W⇢Y\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^N$ be a rational map to a projective variety. At a point $P$ outside its initial domain, writeusing elements of the function field $\mathbb{C}(W)$. The local ring of a smooth algebraic curve at $P$ is a discrete valuation ring. If $m={\min }_i{v}_P(f_i)$, multiplying every coordinate by a function of valuation $-m$ makes all coordinates regular at $P$ and at least one a unit there. They therefore define a morphism near $P$. Repeating this at the finitely many missing points proves the extension of a rational map from a smooth projective curve.

Smoothness is essential. Let $\nu :{\mathbb{P}}^1\to C$ be the normalization of a nodal curve for a rational nodal cubic $C$. The inverse is a rational map $C⇢{\mathbb{P}}^1$ on the smooth locus. If it extended to a morphism $g:C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$, then $g\circ \nu$ would agree with the identity on a dense Zariski-open subset of ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and hence everywhere. But the two distinct points $a,b\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$ above the node would satisfya contradiction. This is the failure of rational-map extension on a singular curve.

Finally take the Fermat cubic curveand define the projective hypersurfaceBecause $F$ and $xyz$ have no common irreducible factor, the bihomogeneous polynomial $sF+txyz$ is irreducible, so $Z$ is an algebraic variety. Letbe the second coordinate projection. Every homogeneous cubic in three variables has a projective zero over $\mathbb{C}$, so every fibre is nonempty and $\pi$ is a surjective morphism. Over $p=[1:0]$ the fibre is the Fermat cubic curve, which is smooth and has genusOver $q=[0:1]$ the fibre isthe union of exactly three distinct projective lines, hence exactly three irreducible components. This is the cubic pencil with a triangular member required by the question.

An ideal of $R/I$ has the form $J/I$ for an ideal $J\supseteq I$ of $R$. If $R$ is Noetherian, writeThenso every ideal of $R/I$ is finitely generated. Hence

The Hilbert basis theorem states that $R[X]$ is Noetherian whenever $R$ is Noetherian. The integers form a principal ideal domain, so every ideal of $\mathbb{Z}$ has one generator and $\mathbb{Z}$ is Noetherian. It follows that $\mathbb{Z}[X]$ is Noetherian.

For a nonsquare integer $d$, evaluation at $\sqrt{d}$ givesIt is surjective and its kernel is $(X^2-d)$. Therefore is Noetherian by the quotient result. This is the noetherianity of a quadratic integer order.

The coefficient condition says precisely that every nonconstant monomial has positive powers of both variables. ThusIf $c+XYf$ and $d+XYg$ lie in $R$, so do their sum and their productso $R$ is a subring of $K[X,Y]$.

For $n\ge 1$, letThen $I_n\subseteq I_{n+1}$. The containment is strict because $X{Y}^{n+1}\notin I_n$: multiplying a generator $X{Y}^j$ by an element of $R$ produces either a scalar multiple of $X{Y}^j$, or terms divisible by $X^2$. It cannot produce the monomial $X{Y}^{n+1}$ when $j\le n$. Henceis a strictly increasing ideal chain. The constant-plus-ideal non-Noetherian subring therefore satisfies

Take $R=\mathbb{Z}$ and $I=(2)$. The ideal $I$ is maximal, butis not a field, since $X$ is nonzero and not invertible. Therefore

An $R$-module is free if it has a basis: a subset $B$ such that every element has a unique expression as a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $B$.

Choose a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of the nonzero ring $R$. If $R^n\cong R^m$, quotienting by $\mathfrak{m}$ givesThese are vector spaces over the field $R/\mathfrak{m}$, so equality of dimension gives $n=m$. This proves invariant basis number for a commutative ring.

A direct summand of a free module need not be free. Take $R=\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$. Its ideals $P=(2)$ and $Q=(3)$ satisfyso $P\oplus Q\cong R$. But $P$ has three elements, whereas a finite-rank free $R$-module has $6^r$ elements; hence $P$ is not free.

We prove by induction on $n$ that every submodule $N\subseteq R^n$ is free. The case $n=0$ is immediate. Let $\pi :R^n\to R$ be projection onto the first coordinate. Since $R$ is a principal ideal domain,for some $d$. If $d=0$, then $N\subseteq R^{n-1}$ and induction applies. Otherwise choose $x\in N$ with $\pi (x)=d$. For every $y\in N$, write $\pi (y)=rd$; then $y-rx\in \ker (\pi {|}_N)$. Also $Rx\cap \ker (\pi {|}_N)=0$ because $R$ is a domain and $d\ne 0$. ThereforeThe kernel is a submodule of $R^{n-1}$ and is free by induction, while $Rx\cong R$. Hence $N$ is free. This is the submodule theorem for free modules over a principal ideal domain.

If $P$ is finitely generated and projective, choose a surjection $f:R^n\to P$. Projectivity supplies $h:P\to R^n$ with $f\circ h={\mathrm{id}}_P$, soThus $P\cong h(P)$ is a submodule of the finitely generated free module $R^n$, and the result just proved shows that $P$ is free.

A nonempty topological space is irreducible when it is not the union of two proper closed subsets, equivalently when any two nonempty open subsets intersect.

The Zariski topology on ${\mathbb{A}}^n$ is Noetherian because $k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals. Suppose a closed set $X$ that is not a finite union of irreducible closed sets were minimal among such counterexamples. It is reducible, say $X=X_1\cup X_2$ with both $X_i$ proper closed subsets. Minimality expresses each $X_i$ as a finite union of irreducible closed sets, and combining those decompositions contradicts the choice of $X$. Thus every closed $X$ has a finite irreducible decomposition.

Using $x_3=x_2^2$, the second defining polynomial reduces toConsequentlyEach component is the image of $t\mapsto (\pm t,t,t^2)$ and is isomorphic to ${\mathbb{A}}^1$, hence irreducible. In characteristic two the two displayed components coincide.

Suppose a polynomial $P(x,y)={\sum }_{j=0}^m{p}_j(x)y^j$ vanishes on every $(x,e^x)$. Thenas an entire function. These exponential-polynomial functions are linearly independent: applying $(D-m{)}^{\mathrm{deg}{p}_m+1}$ kills the term with largest exponent, while it acts injectively on $p_j(x)e^{jx}$ for $j<m$; induction on the number of terms finishes the proof. Hence every $p_j$ is zero, so no nonzero polynomial vanishes on the graph. Its Zariski closure is all of ${\mathbb{A}}^2$.

Finally refine an open cover of an affine variety $X$ by distinguished opens $D(f_j)$, choosing one inside an original member around each point. Since these distinguished opens cover,The Hilbert Nullstellensatz implies that the $f_j$ generate the unit ideal. Thusfor finitely many of them, so $D(f_{j_1}),\dots ,D(f_{j_r})$ cover $X$. The corresponding original open sets form a finite subcover. This is quasi-compactness of an affine variety.