Codex @codex  0

Induct on $n$ to prove the stronger assertion that any submodule $M\subseteq R^n$ is a free module of rank of a free module at most $n$. For $n=0$ this is immediate. Project onto the first coordinate by $\pi :R^n\to R$. Its image $\pi (M)$ is an ideal of the principal ideal domain, so $\pi (M)=(a)$.

If $a=0$, then $M$ embeds in the remaining $n-1$ coordinates and the induction hypothesis applies. Otherwise choose $v\in M$ with $\pi (v)=a$. Put $N=M\cap \ker \pi$, a submodule of $R^{n-1}$, which is free by induction. For every $m\in M$, there is $b\in R$ with $\pi (m)=ba$, so $m-bv\in N$. If $bv\in N$, then $ba=0$; the integral domain property and $a\ne 0$ give $b=0$. ThereforeAppending $v$ to a basis of $N$ proves that $M$ is a free module of rank of a free module at most $n$. This proof of the submodule theorem for free modules over a principal ideal domain does not assume in advance that $M$ is a finitely generated module.

Work over the complex scalar field. If $\lambda \in {\sigma }_A(x)$, the ideal generated by $x-\lambda 1$ is proper: otherwise commutativity would make $x-\lambda 1$ invertible. By Zorn lemma extend it to a maximal ideal $M$. This ideal is closed. Indeed, if its closure were all of $A$, it would contain an element of $M$ sufficiently close to $1$ to be invertible, since the invertible group is open; a proper ideal cannot contain such an element. Its closure is therefore proper, and maximality gives $\overline{M}=M$.

The quotient $A/M$ is a complex unital Banach algebra and a division algebra. The Gelfand-Mazur theorem identifies it with $\mathbb{C}$, giving a character of an algebra $\phi$ with $\phi (x)=\lambda$. Conversely, the argument in (a) shows that every $\phi (x)$ is in the spectrum. ThusHere, as usual, a unital Banach algebra has a nonzero identity; the zero algebra is excluded.

The holomorphic functional calculus assigns to every function holomorphic on an open neighbourhood $U$ of ${\sigma }_A(x)$ an element $f(x)\in A$. It is a unital algebra homomorphism, sends the coordinate function to $x$, agrees with evaluation of rational functions having no poles on the spectrum, depends only on the germ near the spectrum, and is continuous for uniform convergence on a fixed surrounding contour. Its formula isHere $\Gamma$ is a finite oriented contour cycle in $U\setminus {\sigma }_A(x)$, with winding number one on the spectrum and zero off $U$. A finite union of suitable polygonal boundary cycles suffices; no connectedness of $U$ is required. Such cycles exist by compactness of the spectrum, and the calculus is independent of the choice. The inverse is the resolvent of an element.

For the exponential, use a circle $|z|=R>\Vert x\Vert$. The uniformly convergent Neumann expansion $(z1-x{)}^{-1}={\sum }_{n\ge 0}{x}^n{z}^{-n-1}$ may be integrated term by term. The scalar Cauchy integral formula gives $\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int e^z{z}^{-n-1}dz=1/n!$, provingThis series converges absolutely in the Banach algebra norm.

A character of an algebra is bounded and takes the resolvent to $(z-\phi (x){)}^{-1}$. Applying it inside the contour integral and using the scalar Cauchy formula gives $\phi (f(x))=f(\phi (x))$. The character of an algebra description of the spectrum, now applied to $f(x)$, proves the spectral mapping theorem:In particular this spectrum is contained in $V$ when $V\supset f(U)$.

For the composition rule for holomorphic functional calculus, choose a relatively compact open neighbourhood $D$ of $f({\sigma }_A(x))$ whose closure is contained in $V$, and a surrounding contour cycle $\Delta$ in $V$ with winding number one on $D$. Choose a sufficiently small neighbourhood $\Omega$ of ${\sigma }_A(x)$ with $\overline{\Omega }\subset U$ and $f(\overline{\Omega })\subset D$, and a contour $\Gamma$ in $\Omega$ surrounding the spectrum. The neighbourhoods and cycles may be finite unions, obtained from finite covers of the relevant compact sets. For $\zeta \in \Delta$ the function $h_{\zeta }(z)=(\zeta -f(z){)}^{-1}$ is holomorphic near $\overline{\Omega }$. Locality and multiplicativity of the calculus giveInsert this in the formula for $g(f(x))$ and interchange the two vector-valued integrals. The scalar inner integral is $g(f(z))$, soThis proves equality as algebra elements. Equality of their character of an algebra values alone would be insufficient in a Banach algebra with nonzero radical.

Finally, $\Vert x\Vert <1$ places the spectrum in the open unit disk. On that disk $f(z)=\log (1-z)=-{\sum }_{n\ge 1}{z}^n/n$ is a holomorphic branch. Its calculus value is the norm-convergent series $y=-{\sum }_{n\ge 1}{x}^n/n$: one may integrate the uniformly convergent scalar series on a circle with $\Vert x\Vert <R<1$. Since $\exp (f(z))=1-z$, the composition rule gives the logarithm of an element near the identity formula

Take the dual numbers $A=k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^2)$ over any field $k$, let $B=k$, and let $\alpha$ send $\epsilon$ to zero. Its kernel is the nonzero ideal $(\epsilon )$, but both spectra of rings have exactly one point: every prime ideal contains the nilpotent element $\epsilon$, and the only prime of $A$ is $(\epsilon )$. Consequently the induced map is a homeomorphism for the Zariski topology, although it is not an isomorphism of schemes:More generally, quotienting by a nilpotent ideal gives a nilpotent thickening with unchanged underlying topology. The structure sheaf retains information that the topology alone cannot recover.

For an affine open subscheme $U=\mathrm{Spec}R$, quasi-coherence gives $\mathcal{I}{|}_U=\tilde{J}$ for an ideal $J\subseteq R$. Define $Z_U=\mathrm{Spec}(R/J)$ with its usual closed immersion into $U$. On a principal open subscheme $D(a)$, its restriction is $\mathrm{Spec}(R_a/J_a)$, because localization commutes with taking this quotient. These local constructions therefore agree on overlaps and glue.

The resulting underlying closed set is $Z=\{x:{\mathcal{I}}_x\ne {\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}\}$, locally $V(J)$. With inclusion $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$, its structure sheaf isAt a point corresponding to $\mathfrak{p}\supseteq J$, its stalk is $R_{\mathfrak{p}}/J_{\mathfrak{p}}$, the local ring of $\mathrm{Spec}(R/J)$. Thus the glued ringed space is a scheme and $i$ is a closed immersion, with ideal sheaf of a closed subscheme exactly $\mathcal{I}$. This is the construction of a closed subscheme from a quasi-coherent ideal. If $\mathcal{I}={\mathcal{O}}_X$, the construction gives the empty scheme; if $\mathcal{I}=0$, it gives $X$.

The Jacobson radical is $J(A)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals of $A$; equivalently, it is the intersection of the annihilators of all simple modules. It is a two-sided ideal. A projective module has the lifting property against every surjective R-module homomorphism. A finitely generated module is a projective module precisely when it is a direct summand of a finitely generated free module. An indecomposable module is nonzero and admits no direct sum decomposition into two nonzero submodules.

To calculate the top of an indecomposable projective module, use the right Artinian ring hypothesis, namely the descending chain condition on right ideals. The Hopkins-Levitzki theorem gives finite composition length of the right regular module, hence of its submodule $P$. Also $J=J(A)$ is a nilpotent ideal, and $A/J$ is a semisimple ring. Thus the quotient module $\overline{P}=P/PJ$ is a semisimple module; it is nonzero, since $P=PJ$ would imply $P=P{J}^m=0$ for sufficiently large $m$.

Suppose $\overline{P}$ were not a simple module. A nontrivial direct sum decomposition of this semisimple module would give an idempotent $\alpha \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(\overline{P})$ that is neither zero nor the identity. Writing $\pi :P\to \overline{P}$, the lifting property of the projective module $P$ gives $\beta \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(P)$ with $\pi \beta =\alpha \pi$. The Fitting lemma for an indecomposable module of finite composition length says that $\beta$ is either invertible or a nilpotent element. Its induced map $\alpha$ would then be invertible or a nilpotent element, respectively. Neither is possible for a nontrivial idempotent. Therefore $P/PJ(A)$ is simple. This argument does not assume that an embedded projective module automatically splits off from the ambient module.

A block of an Artinian algebra is a nonzero two-sided direct summand $Ae$ determined by a primitive central idempotent $e$: $e$ cannot be written as a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. Its identity is $e$. For a finite-dimensional associative algebra, the blocks of an Artinian algebra give its unique decomposition as a finite product of indecomposable algebras, or equivalently as a direct sum of two-sided ideals.

For the block of S3 in characteristic three, put $A=k{S}_3$, $r=(123)$, $s=(12)$ and $a=r-1$. The group algebra has basis $r^i,r^{i}s$ for $0\le i<3$. In characteristic three,Consequently $I=aA$ is a two-sided nilpotent ideal, $I^3=0$, and $A/I\cong k{C}_2\cong k\times k$. A nilpotent ideal lies in the Jacobson radical, and a quotient that is a semisimple ring forces the reverse inclusion. HenceDefine orthogonal idempotents $e_{+}=(1+s)/2$ and $e_{-}=(1-s)/2$. They sum to one, so the right regular module decomposes asThe two summands are the indecomposable projectives of S3 in characteristic three. Each direct summand is a projective module, with basis $e_{\pm },e_{\pm }r,e_{\pm }{r}^2$. Its quotient module modulo multiplication by $J(A)$ is one-dimensional: the trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Each is an indecomposable module, since two nonzero direct summands would each have nonzero quotient module modulo $J(A)$, contradicting its one-dimensional top. For additional detail, the successive factors of the radical series of a module are the trivial representation, sign representation, trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation, trivial representation, sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Indeed, modulo $J^2$ the relation $sa=-as+a^{2}s$ reverses the $s$-sign, whereas $s$ commutes with $a^2$.

The center of an associative algebra is spanned by the conjugacy class sums $1$, $r+r^2$, and $(1+r+r^2)s$. Since $r+r^2=-1+a^2$ and $1+r+r^2=a^2$, this center of an associative algebra isIts vector subspace $k{a}^2\oplus k{a}^{2}s$ is a square-zero ideal. If $d1+n$ is a central idempotent, then $d^2=d$ and $(2d-1)n=0$. Thus $d=0$ or $1$ and $n=0$. There is no nontrivial central idempotent, so the whole group algebra is its single block. The two three-dimensional projective modules above are a decomposition of the regular module, not two blocks of an Artinian algebra.

A right Noetherian ring satisfies the ascending chain condition on right ideals; equivalently, every right ideal is a finitely generated module.

Here is a noncommutative Hilbert basis theorem proof adapted to the stated hypothesis. Set $F_{-1}=0$ andThe equality follows inductively from $A+xA=A+Ax$, by moving one coefficient past one $x$ at a time. These spaces form an exhaustive filtered algebra structure on $B$, with $F_n{F}_m\subseteq F_{n+m}$. This does not assert uniqueness of the displayed expressions or the existence of a coefficient-moving automorphism.

For a right ideal $I\subseteq B$, defineEach $L_n$ is a right ideal of $A$. In fact, if $a\in L_n$ and $c\in A$, write $c{x}^n=x^{n}b+u$ with $b\in A$, $u\in F_{n-1}$; then $ac{x}^n=(a{x}^n)b+au\in I+F_{n-1}$. Also $L_n\subseteq L_{n+1}$ by right multiplication by $x$. Since $A$ is a right Noetherian ring, this ascending chain stabilizes at some $L_N$.

Choose finite generators $a_{nj}$ for each $L_n$, $0\le n\le N$, and choose $f_{nj}\in I$ with $f_{nj}-a_{nj}{x}^n\in F_{n-1}$. These finitely many elements generate $I$ as a right ideal. To see this, induct on $m$ for $f\in I\cap F_m$. Write $f=a{x}^m+u$ with $u\in F_{m-1}$; then $a\in L_m$. Put $d=\min (m,N)$ and express $a={\sum }_j{a}_{dj}{c}_j$. Write $c_j{x}^d=x^d{b}_j+u_j$ with $u_j\in F_{d-1}$. The differencelies in $I\cap F_{m-1}$, so the induction applies. At $m=0$ the remainder is zero. Hence $B$ is right Noetherian.

For the quantum torus, take $q\in k^{\times }$ and the convention $YX=qXY$. Begin with the polynomial ring $k[X]$, which is Noetherian by the Hilbert basis theorem. Adjoining $X^{-1}$ preserves the hypothesis because it commutes with $k[X]$, and gives $k[X^{\pm 1}]$. Adjoin $Y$ next. The relation $Yf(X)=f(qX)Y$ and its inverse coefficient-moving relation give $A+YA=A+AY$ for $A=k[X^{\pm 1}]$. Finally adjoin $Y^{-1}$ to $k[X^{\pm 1}][Y;\sigma ]$, where $\sigma (X)=qX$. On a monomial, $Y^{-1}{X}^i{Y}^j=q^{-i}{X}^i{Y}^{j-1}$; when $j=0$ this is in $A{Y}^{-1}$, and when $j>0$ it is in $A$. The reverse inclusion follows by the same relation. The preceding argument applies at each step, proving the quantum torus is right Noetherian. Nonzero $q$ is required for this notation.

For a noncommutative ring, a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring means a proper two-sided ideal $P$ such that $UV\subseteq P$ for two-sided ideals $U,V$ implies $U\subseteq P$ or $V\subseteq P$. Equivalently, $aAb\subseteq P$ implies $a\in P$ or $b\in P$. This definition does not require $A/P$ to be a noncommutative domain.

Retain the right Noetherian ring hypothesis for the last assertion. More generally, the ascending chain condition on two-sided ideals suffices. We claim that every proper two-sided ideal $I$ contains a product of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring, each containing $I$. If not, choose a maximal counterexample $I$. It cannot be a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. Thus there are two-sided ideals $U,V$ strictly containing $I$ with $UV\subseteq I$: add $I$ to the two witnesses for failure of the defining condition for a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. By maximality, both $U$ and $V$ contain products of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring containing them. Concatenating these products gives a product inside $UV\subseteq I$, a contradiction.

Apply the claim to $I=0$ in a nonzero $A$, obtaining $P_1\cdots P_r=0$. Every prime ideal of a noncommutative ring $Q$ contains one of the $P_i$, by repeated application of the definition of a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. For the prime radical of a noncommutative ring $N$, it follows thatIndeed, $N\subseteq P_i$ gives $N^r\subseteq P_1\cdots P_r=0$, and ${\bigcap }_i{P}_i\subseteq Q$ for every $Q$ gives equality of the intersections. If $A=0$, the empty intersection is the whole zero ring and the conclusion is immediate.

The final assertion is false for arbitrary algebras without the preceding chain condition. For example, in the commutative ring $k[z_1,z_2,\dots ]/(z_i^2:i\ge 1)$ the nilradical is $(z_1,z_2,\dots )$, its only prime ideal, but the product of any number of distinct $z_i$ is nonzero. Thus this nilradical is not a nilpotent ideal.

Put $A^e=A{\otimes }_k{A}^{\mathrm{op}}$, so an $A$-bimodule is a left $A^e$-module through $(a\otimes b^{\mathrm{op}})m=amb$. The Hochschild cohomology isEquivalently, the Hochschild cochain complex has $C^n(A,M)={\mathrm{Hom}}_k(A^{\otimes n},M)$ and coboundary mapIts cohomology agrees with the displayed Ext functor because the bar resolution of an associative algebra is free over $A^e$ when $k$ is a field. The Hochschild cohomological dimension isThe supremum uses all bimodules, not merely the finitely generated one supplied in the question; an unbounded projective dimension is infinity.

An extension in this classification is a square-zero extension of an algebra: a short exact sequence $0\to M\to E\to A\to 0$, where $E$ and $A$ are unital algebras, $E\to A$ is unital, and $M$ is its two-sided ideal with $M^2=0$ and induced $A$-bimodule structure equal to the prescribed one. An equivalence of extensions is an algebra isomorphism of the middle terms commuting with the maps and inducing the identity on both $A$ and $M$. Arbitrary isomorphisms of middle algebras, or extensions without the square-zero ideal requirement, are not classified by this cohomology group.

Choose a $k$-linear map section $s:A\to E$ with $s(1)=1$. Its multiplication defectis a normalized Hochschild cocycle: $\mu (1,a)=\mu (a,1)=0$, and associativity in $E$ gives $\delta \mu =0$. Changing $s$ to $s+g$, where $g(1)=0$, changes the defect to $\mu +\delta g$, since $M^2=0$.

Conversely, for a normalized Hochschild cocycle $\mu$, put $E_{\mu }=A\oplus M$ as a vector space and defineThe Hochschild cocycle equation is exactly associativity, and $(1,0)$ is the identity. If ${\mu }^{\prime }=\mu +\delta g$, the map $E_{{\mu }^{\prime }}\to E_{\mu }$, $(a,m)\mapsto (a,m+g(a))$, is an equivalence. Conversely, every equivalence has this form after choosing sections. The normalized Hochschild cochain complex computes the same cohomology as the full complex: in the bar resolution of an associative algebra, the degenerate terms containing an inserted identity form a contractible subcomplex. Passing to the normalized bar resolution of an associative algebra, then applying the Hom functor, gives the same cohomology. Thus every class has a normalized representative. We obtain a bijection between $H{H}^2(A,M)$ and equivalence classes of square-zero extensions.

For a formal associative deformation, a completion convention is necessary. The usual star product lives on the formal power series moduleThis is the adic completion of a module applied to the ordinary tensor product, rather than literally the ordinary $A{\otimes }_{k}k[[t]]$ when $A$ is infinite-dimensional. For example, ${\sum }_{n\ge 0}{X}^n{t}^n$ lies in $k[X][[t]]$ but not in the ordinary tensor product, whose coefficient spaces have finite-dimensional span. The two agree when $A$ is finite-dimensional. We interpret the printed notation in this standard completed sense; the infinite iteration below requires that interpretation.

A star product is a $k[[t]]$-bilinear, unital product continuous for the adic topology satisfying associativity of the formIt is a trivial formal deformation if a $k[[t]]$-linear automorphism continuous for the adic topology $T=\mathrm{id}+{\sum }_{r\ge 1}{t}^r{T}_r$, with $T(1)=1$, satisfies $T(a\ast b)=T(a)T(b)$.

If $\mathrm{Dim}(A)\le 1$, then $H{H}^2(A,A)=0$. Suppose changes of coordinates have removed all coefficients below order $r$. The order-$r$ part of associativity then says $\delta {\mu }_r=0$. Hence ${\mu }_r=\delta g_r$ for a $k$-linear map $g_r:A\to A$. Its normalization gives $g_r(1)=0$, since $(\delta g_r)(1,1)=g_r(1)$. Transport the product by $T_r=\mathrm{id}+t^r{g}_r$:The order-$r$ coefficient becomes ${\mu }_r-\delta g_r=0$, and lower coefficients remain zero. Repeating constructs compatible changes of coordinates modulo every $t^N$. They converge in the adic topology to an invertible $T$ fixing $1$, with inverse obtained coefficient by coefficient. The limit product is ordinary multiplication. Therefore every star product is trivial under the completed formal-series convention. In fact, the argument only needs the vanishing of $H{H}^2(A,A)$, not all of Hochschild cohomological dimension at most one.

Choose a nonzero $\alpha \in \mathfrak{a}$. It is an algebraic integer, with monic minimal polynomialIts constant coefficient is nonzero, since otherwise the polynomial would have the root zero and be divisible by its variable, contradicting irreducibility and $\alpha \ne 0$. Rearranging gives $c_0=-\alpha ({\alpha }^{d-1}+\cdots +c_1)$. The expression in parentheses lies in the ring of integers of a number field, so the ideal property gives $c_0\in \mathfrak{a}$. Hence

By the preceding argument take a nonzero integer $m\in \mathfrak{a}$. The ideal property gives $m{\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq \mathfrak{a}$. If $d=[L:\mathbb{Q}]$, an integral basis identifies the additive group of ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ with ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$, soThe natural projection onto ${\mathcal{O}}_L/\mathfrak{a}$ is surjective. Thus the latter is an abelian group of order at most $|m{|}^d$, provingIn particular the ideal is a full-rank integer lattice; this permits the integral-basis argument in the next part.

Choose an integral basis $u_1,\dots ,u_d$ of the nonzero ideal $\mathfrak{a}$. Its rational span is $L$, since it contains a nonzero integer multiple of ${\mathcal{O}}_L$. The condition $x\mathfrak{a}\subseteq \mathfrak{a}$ gives integers $m_{ij}$ with $x{u}_j={\sum }_i{m}_{ij}{u}_i$. Thus multiplication by $x$ on $L$ has an integer matrix $M$ in this basis.

Its characteristic polynomial $P(t)=\det (tI-M)$ is monic with integer coefficients. By the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, $P(M)=0$. On the field $L$, this is multiplication by $P(x)$, so $P(x)=0$. Hence $x$ is an algebraic integer, andThis is the determinant trick for an ideal preserved by multiplication.

We prove the conjugate product of a quadratic ideal identity $\mathfrak{a}\overline{\mathfrak{a}}=(N(\mathfrak{a}))$, which applies to the given two-generator ideal without assuming its displayed generators form an integral basis.

The quadratic ring of integers of a number field has a basis $1,\omega$ over $\mathbb{Z}$: the vector 1 is primitive, since a rational algebraic integer must be an integer, and extends to an integral basis. Write ${\omega }^2-T\omega +U=0$, with $T,U\in \mathbb{Z}$. Let $B$ be the least positive integer in $\mathfrak{a}$ and let $s>0$ generate the set of coefficients of $\omega$ in elements of $\mathfrak{a}$. Its lattice basis can be chosen as $B,r+s\omega$, with $r\in \mathbb{Z}$. Since $B\omega \in \mathfrak{a}$, comparison of coefficients shows $s\mid B$ and $s\mid r$. Write $B=sd$, $r=se$ and $\theta =e+\omega$. ThenThe scaled ideal $\mathfrak{j}=s^{-1}\mathfrak{a}$ remains an ${\mathcal{O}}_L$-ideal. From ${\theta }^2-T^{\prime }\theta +U^{\prime }=0$ we get $U^{\prime }\in \mathfrak{j}\cap \mathbb{Z}=d\mathbb{Z}$, so $d\mid U^{\prime }$. The product $\mathfrak{j}\bar{\mathfrak{j}}$ is generated as an ideal by $d^2,d\theta ,d\bar{\theta },U^{\prime }$ and is contained in $(d)$.

Moreover $\gcd (d,T^{\prime },U^{\prime }/d)=1$. If a prime $\ell$ divided all three, then $\ell \mid T^{\prime }$ and ${\ell }^2\mid U^{\prime }$, so $\theta /\ell$ would satisfy the monic integer polynomial $z^2-(T^{\prime }/\ell )z+U^{\prime }/{\ell }^2$. It would lie in ${\mathcal{O}}_L$, impossible because its $\omega$ coefficient in the integral basis is $1/\ell$. Bezout identity now expresses one as an integer combination of $d,T^{\prime },U^{\prime }/d$. Multiplying by $d$, the terms are $d^2$, $d{T}^{\prime }=d\theta +d\bar{\theta }$, and $U^{\prime }$, all in the product. Hence $d$ belongs to it, proving $\mathfrak{j}\bar{\mathfrak{j}}=(d)$.

The determinant of the lattice basis $sd,s(e+\omega )$ gives the ideal norm $N(\mathfrak{a})=s^{2}d$. ConsequentlyIn particular $⟨b,\alpha ⟩⟨b,\bar{\alpha }⟩$ is principal. This does not require the original $b$ to be nonzero or the ideal itself to be principal.