Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 3 36A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 ib Paper 1 5A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
The divergence is , while the scalar vorticity is . The flow is therefore incompressible flow and irrotational flow. Integrating the streamfunction equations givesThe time dependence must be retained: no time-independent function represents this unsteady field for every . At the streamlines are , with the coordinate axes as separatrices. Their arrows point towards increasing and decreasing , as shown below.
A pathline solves the material ODEs, givingFor , elimination of time yieldsIf , the pathline stays on the axis and the parametric expression remains valid; it cannot in general be written as a single-valued along that vertical trajectory. For , the path is : it initially descends, reaches its minimum , then rises. Unlike a frozen streamline, it records the time-varying flow.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 ib Paper 4 18A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
Irrotational flow permits , and incompressible flow imposes , hence . In the laboratory frame, the no-penetration condition at the translating sphere is .
For separation of variables, take the angular factor , which satisfies . The radial equation iswith solutions and . Rest at infinity excludes the term. The normal boundary condition fixes the remaining coefficient, giving the potential flow around a translating sphereThere is no azimuthal velocity. With fluid density , the kinetic energy isThe angular integral is , and the radial integral is , so . Since and , . Thus the added mass of a sphere is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 68 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For an incompressible flow, write the Newtonian fluid stress tensor as , where is the rate-of-strain tensor. The Stokes equation gives . Symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor therefore givesIntegrating and applying the divergence theorem expresses the viscous dissipation as boundary power:At a moving rigid body, the surface velocity is . Its boundary-power contribution is , with the force and torque evaluated using the fluid's outward normal vector. Both resultants vanish for a force-free, torque-free inclusion. Thus the new viscous dissipation comes entirely from the unchanged outer boundary velocity. Subtracting the particle-free boundary power givesApply the Lorentz reciprocal theorem to and in the fluid outside the inclusion. On the outer boundary , soWriting for the particle's outward normal vector gives the required extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion:This subtraction already accounts for the fluid volume displaced by the inclusion; it is not just the integral of the disturbance's local viscous dissipation.
For the sphere, the ambient rate-of-strain tensor is symmetric and trace free. The sphere in a uniform straining Stokes flow has zero translational and rotational velocity: inversion symmetry eliminates its force, and symmetry of eliminates its torque. To derive the disturbance, put , and seekThe incompressible flow condition and Stokes equation reduce toA decaying family satisfying these equations is , , . The no-slip boundary condition requires and , so and . ConsequentlyThe total velocity is zero at , and the disturbance decays as . The pressure constant has been set to zero. These boundary and far-field conditions, together with Uniqueness of Stokes flow, establish the solution. There is no rotational background in a pure strain flow.
On the sphere . Contracting the supplied Newtonian fluid stress tensor with makes its two terms proportional to cancel, leaving . Hence the extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion isHere . Taking the large outer boundary limit only after using the fixed-boundary power identity avoids replacing that prescribed boundary by an uncontrolled boundary at infinity.
If denotes the number of spheres per unit volume, . ThusAdd this to the particle-free viscous dissipation density . Comparing with gives the Einstein viscosity formula for a dilute suspension:to first order in . The hydrodynamic interactions neglected here contribute beyond that dilute order.
