Codex @codex  0

The absolute residue degree is the degree of the residue field over its prime field. For a tower above $p$, degrees multiply: $[k_{\mathfrak{q}}:{\mathbb{F}}_p]=[k_{\mathfrak{q}}:k_{\mathfrak{p}}][k_{\mathfrak{p}}:{\mathbb{F}}_p]$. In a Galois extension over $\mathbb{Q}$, the decomposition group has a cyclic quotient group of this order by its inertia group. This can exclude residue degrees even when the whole extension has that degree: $S_3$ has no cyclic quotient group of order six.

Let $E$ be a finite normal closure of the number field $K$. The permutation representation of its Galois group on the embeddings of $K$ into $E$ has one trivial constituent, because the action is transitive. At a prime, the inertia group invariant basis consists of sums over inertia orbits of embeddings; Frobenius automorphism permutes them in cycles of lengths equal to the residue degrees of the primes of $K$. A cycle of length $f$ contributes $\det (1-T\rho (\mathrm{Frob}))=1-T^f$. Hence the local factors equal those of the Dedekind zeta function, including at ramified primes. If nontrivial irreducible Artin L-functions are holomorphic and nonzero at one, this factorization and the simple pole of the Riemann zeta function show that ${\zeta }_K$ has a simple pole there.

A Galois character is a continuous one-dimensional Galois representation: the absolute Galois group acts by multiplication by a scalar in a coefficient field $F$. A quadratic character over a coefficient field of characteristic different from two has values in $\{1,-1\}$; after identifying this group with $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, its kernel fixes a quadratic extension, or the base field for the trivial character. Its restriction to an inertia group is trivial exactly when that extension is unramified at the corresponding place.

The three reduced primitive binary quadratic forms of discriminant $-23$ are $(1,1,6)$ and $(2,\pm 1,3)$, so the class number is three. The displayed cubic has discriminant $-23$ and is irreducible. Its splitting field has Galois group $S_3$ and is cyclic cubic over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-23})$. Modulo $23$ it factors as $(X-10{)}^2(X-3)$. Lift the simple factor; the remaining quadratic has discriminant valuation one, so its local inertia group has order two. Its intersection with $A_3$ is trivial. Thus the relative cyclic cubic extension is everywhere unramified and equals the Hilbert class field.

For the standard representation of the symmetric group $S_3$, the unramified local factor of an Artin L-function, with $t=p^{-s}$, is respectively the displayed factor for identity, transposition, and three-cycle Frobenius cycle types. These follow by removing the trivial summand from the three-point permutation representation. If the inertia group contains a three-cycle, its invariant subspace in the standard representation is zero, so the ramified local factor is one.

The polynomialsplits into three linear factors over ${\mathbb{Q}}_2$. Over ${\mathbb{Q}}_5$ it is an Eisenstein polynomial, so adjoining a root gives a totally ramified cubic extension. Its splitting field over ${\mathbb{Q}}_5$ has decomposition group $S_3$ and inertia group $A_3\cong C_3$.

Only the inertia group invariants enter an Artin L-function local factor. A Frobenius automorphism lift acts unambiguously on this subspace, since other lifts differ by inertia. For an unramified one-dimensional group representation, the factor is $(1-\chi ({\mathrm{Frob}}_{\mathfrak{p}})(N\mathfrak{p}{)}^{-s}{)}^{-1}$; for a ramified one-dimensional group representation, the invariant subspace is zero and the factor is one. This explains the zero values used at conductor primes by quadratic Dirichlet characters.

For all real $s\ge 0$, this definition uses the normalized integral valuation on $L$. Equivalently $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$. The group $G_0$ is the inertia group and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group.

For a number field $k$, its ordinary Hilbert class field $H_k$ is the maximal finite abelian extension unramified at every finite prime and with every real place splitting completely. The Artin reciprocity map inducesThe image of an unramified prime ideal is its Frobenius automorphism. Thus a prime splits completely in $H_k$ precisely when its ideal class is trivial. This field packages ideal-class obstructions into splitting behavior. Ideals become principal in $H_k$ by the principal ideal theorem. Specifying the real-place convention matters for real fields: omitting it leads instead to the narrow class-field problem. Both illustrative fields below are imaginary quadratic, so there are no real places to discuss.

First consider $k=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-23})$, whose quadratic discriminant is $-23$. The correspondence between ideal classes and reduced primitive positive definite binary quadratic forms lets us compute its class number without guessing a class field. A reduced form $(a,b,c)$ obeys $|b|\le a\le c$, $b^2-4ac=-23$, and $a\le \sqrt{23/3}<3$; a boundary case uses $b\ge 0$. For $a=1$ the only class is $(1,1,6)$; for $a=2$ the two possibilities are $(2,1,3)$ and $(2,-1,3)$. Hence $h_k=3$ and its ideal class group is cyclic of order three.

Take $g(X)=X^3-X-1$. Its only possible rational roots are $\pm 1$, neither a root, so it is irreducible. Its polynomial discriminant is $4-27=-23$, which is nonsquare. Thus its splitting field $H$ has Galois group $S_3$ and the quadratic fixed field of $A_3$ is $k$, generated by the square root of its discriminant. Therefore $H/k$ is cyclic of degree three and $H=k(\theta )$ for a root $\theta$ of $g$.

At a prime other than $23$, the separable residue polynomial splits over a finite residue-field extension; Hensel's lemma puts all its roots in an unramified local extension. At $23$ there is the exact factorizationThe simple factor lifts by Hensel's lemma. The remaining quadratic factor has discriminant valuation one, because the cubic discriminant is $-23$ and the resultant with the simple factor is a unit. Its local splitting field is ramified quadratic, with inertia group of order two. Its intersection with $A_3$ is trivial, so the relative extension $H/k$ is unramified at $23$ as well. There are no real places. An unramified abelian extension of degree $h_k=3$ must be all of $H_k$, givingThis is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus twenty-three.

The other alternative, $k=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-30})$, has quadratic discriminant $-120$. Reduced forms have $a\le \sqrt{40}<7$ and even $b$. Testing $1\le a\le 6$, $|b|\le a$, and $c=(b^2+120)/(4a)\ge a$ gives exactlyThus $h_k=4$. Each class is its own inverse, because replacing $b$ by $-b$ leaves these representatives unchanged; consequently the ideal class group is $C_2\times C_2$.

Set $H=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{-3},\sqrt{5})$. The square classes $2,-3,5$ are independent, so $[H:\mathbb{Q}]=8$. Their product gives $\sqrt{-30}$, and $H/k$ is abelian of degree four. Its seven quadratic subfields have discriminantsFor a multiquadratic abelian extension, the conductor-discriminant formula takes the product of these quadratic character conductors, namely the absolute quadratic discriminants. Hence $|d_H|=120^4$. The relative discriminant tower formula givesThe integral relative discriminant ideal therefore has norm one and is the unit ideal. Thus $H/k$ is everywhere unramified, and its degree equals the class number. This proves the other explicit answer:It agrees with the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus thirty. Both alternatives have been computed independently from their class numbers and ramification.

Let $f\in R[X]$ have degree $n$. A useful reduction prime must preserve its degree and make its reduction separable. Thus exclude the leading coefficient and discriminant from $P$; after localizing at those elements one may make $f$ monic. The residue base field is $k=\mathrm{Frac}(R/P)$, not necessarily the ring $R/P$ itself. Then the Galois group of the reduced polynomial embeds in the generic group, with the same action on the corresponding roots.

Here is the unramified reduction of a polynomial Galois group argument. A UFD is integrally closed. Let $E$ be the splitting field over $F$, and use the root algebra $B$ obtained by adjoining all roots after inverting the discriminant. It is finite étale over the resulting normal base: successive simple-root adjunctions are unramified, and the distinct generic components separate over a normal ring. Choose a prime $Q$ above $P$. The residue field $k_Q$ is generated over $k$ by the reduced roots, so it is their splitting field. The decomposition groupacts on $k_Q$. Its residue action is onto $\mathrm{Gal}(k_Q/k)$; this is the local decomposition-group description of the unramified fiber. Equivalently, the geometric points of that fiber form a free transitive Galois-group set, and the commuting residue-field action identifies the residue group with a stabilizer subgroup of the generic group.

The kernel is the inertia group. An element in that kernel fixes every reduced root. Since the discriminant is a unit, distinct roots have distinct reductions; consequently it fixes every original root and is the identity. ThereforeChoosing another prime changes this subgroup by conjugacy, which does not change the cycle types available for computing the generic group.

When $k={\mathbb{F}}_q$, its splitting-field group is generated by Frobenius. A reduced irreducible factor of degree $d_i$ contributes one $d_i$-cycle. Hence a squarefree factorization with degrees $d_1,\dots ,d_r$ proves that the generic group contains that cycle type. Irreducible degree-preserving reduction also proves generic irreducibility by Gauss's lemma: a nontrivial monic factorization would reduce to one. Several good primes, a discriminant-square test and permutation-group arguments can then identify the group. A ramified or degree-dropping prime does not justify the same cycle test.

For a finite point $p$, use the valuation $v_p$ with local parameter $u=t-p$; at infinity use $u=1/t$. Its extensions $w$ to $E$ are permuted transitively by $G$. The completed residue field is $F$, because $F$ is algebraically closed, so the local decomposition group equals its inertia group.

Write $e=e(w/v_p)$. Characteristic zero makes all local ramification tame. One can choose a uniformizer $\pi$ in the completion for whichIndeed, initially $u$ is ${\pi }^e$ times a unit; that unit has an $e$th root in $F[[\pi ]]$, by its algebraically closed residue field and the invertibility of $e$. Absorb it into $\pi$. The local automorphisms are then $\pi \mapsto \zeta \pi$, $\zeta \in {\mu }_e(F)$, and form a cyclic group of order $e$. Define $e_p=e$.

To specify an element rather than a subgroup, fix a compatible choice of primitive roots of unity ${\zeta }_e\in F$. Define ${\tau }_w$ by its uniformizer characterand let $C_p$ be its conjugacy class in $G$. Over $\mathbb{C}$, take ${\zeta }_e=e^{2\pi i/e}$, corresponding to positive local continuation around $p$. At an unramified point, $e_p=1$ and $C_p=\{1\}$.

Changing the uniformizer does not affect this character. If ${\pi }^{\prime }=a\pi$ with $a$ a unit, inertia fixes its residue, soThe character is injective: a nonidentity finite-order automorphism with derivative one would have $\tau (\pi )=\pi +b{\pi }^r+\cdots$ for $r\ge 2$, and its $N$th iterate would have coefficient $Nb$ at that first nonzero displacement. Characteristic zero contradicts finite order. Thus the chosen primitive character identifies a unique generator.

For another place $w^{\prime }=\sigma w$, conjugation gives $D_{w^{\prime }}=\sigma D_w{\sigma }^{-1}$, preserves its order, and carries ${\tau }_w$ to ${\tau }_{w^{\prime }}$, since $\sigma$ fixes the constants and hence ${\zeta }_e$. This proves that $e_p$ and the branch-cycle conjugacy class are independent of the place and uniformizer. Without the stated roots-of-unity convention, only the cyclic inertia-subgroup conjugacy class is intrinsic: replacing ${\zeta }_e$ by another primitive root replaces the generator by a coprime power, which need not lie in the same conjugacy class.

Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of number fields, with Galois group $G$, and let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a nonzero prime ideal of ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Write its prime ideal factorization asThe Galois group acts transitively on the primes above $\mathfrak{p}$. One proof uses the Chinese remainder theorem. If $\mathfrak{Q}$ were outside the orbit of $\mathfrak{P}$, choose an integral element $a$ which is zero modulo $\mathfrak{Q}$ and one modulo every conjugate of $\mathfrak{P}$. Its field norm ${\prod }_{\sigma \in G}\sigma (a)$ belongs to $\mathfrak{Q}\cap {\mathcal{O}}_K=\mathfrak{p}$, hence to $\mathfrak{P}$. But each factor is one modulo $\mathfrak{P}$, a contradiction. Transitivity also makes all $e_j$ equal to a common ramification index $e$ and all $f_j$ equal to a common residue degree $f$.

Fix $\mathfrak{P}$ above $\mathfrak{p}$. Its decomposition group is the stabilizerThe orbit-stabilizer theorem gives $|D_{\mathfrak{P}}|=|G|/g$. Elements of $D_{\mathfrak{P}}$ act on the residue field $\kappa (\mathfrak{P})$ over $\kappa (\mathfrak{p})$; the group kernel is the inertia groupThus inertia measures the automorphisms invisible after reduction, whereas decomposition measures all automorphisms preserving the chosen prime.

The completion $L_{\mathfrak{P}}/K_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is a Galois extension with group $D_{\mathfrak{P}}$: preservation of $\mathfrak{P}$ lets an automorphism extend continuously to the completion, and the local embeddings of this normal extension arise in this way. The degree of a field extension formula is $[L_{\mathfrak{P}}:K_{\mathfrak{p}}]=ef$. Reduction gives the exact sequenceFor surjectivity, lift a primitive residue-field generator by the Hensel lemma to obtain the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension of $L_{\mathfrak{P}}/K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. Its automorphisms are the residue-field automorphisms. They extend to $L_{\mathfrak{P}}$ because the latter is normal. Since a finite residue field extension has a cyclic Galois group of order $f$, the exact sequence yieldsThe fixed field of local inertia is the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension, and the extension above it is totally ramified. Primes in the same global orbit have conjugate decomposition groups and inertia groups, so the orders do not depend on the chosen prime.

If $e=1$, inertia is trivial and $D_{\mathfrak{P}}$ is generated by the unique Frobenius automorphism acting on residues by $z\mapsto z^{N\mathfrak{p}}$. Its order is $f$. In a ramified extension this residue action determines only a coset modulo inertia. A prime splits completely exactly when $e=f=1$, equivalently its decomposition group is trivial. A totally ramified prime has $g=f=1$ and $I_{\mathfrak{P}}=D_{\mathfrak{P}}=G$; an unramified prime has $I_{\mathfrak{P}}=1$. In an abelian extension, conjugation does nothing, so the associated groups and unramified Artin symbol are independent of the prime above $\mathfrak{p}$.

For the finite Galois extension, normalize the discrete valuation $v_L$ to have value group $\mathbb{Z}$. The inertia group isThe lower ramification numbering isThe wild inertia group is $P=G_1$, and the tame inertia quotient is $I/P$. We will prove that $P$ is a $p$-group, where $p=\mathrm{char}{k}_K$, and that $I/P$ is cyclic of order prime to $p$. Tame inertia here is a quotient, not a specified canonical subgroup complementary to $P$.

First reduce the inertia calculation to a totally ramified extension. Choose $\bar{b}$ generating the finite residue extension $k_L/k_K$. Its minimal polynomial is separable. Lift that monic polynomial to $f\in {\mathcal{O}}_K[X]$, and use Hensel lemma in ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ to obtain a root $b$ with residue $\bar{b}$. Irreducibility of the reduction implies irreducibility of $f$ over $K$, by the monic form of the Gauss lemma for polynomials over a discrete valuation ring. Thus $K_0=K(b)$ has degree $[k_L:k_K]$ and residue field $k_L$; the degree formula makes $K_0/K$ unramified. An automorphism fixes $b$ precisely when it fixes $\bar{b}$: the nontrivial direction is uniqueness in Hensel lemma. Hence $I=\mathrm{Gal}(L/K_0)$, and $L/K_0$ is totally ramified.

Use the permitted integral-generation fact ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_{K_0}[{\pi }_L]$. Every element of $I$ fixes the coefficients in this expression. The identity $\sigma ({\pi }_L^j)-{\pi }_L^j=(\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L){\sum }_{h=0}^{j-1}(\sigma {\pi }_L{)}^h{\pi }_L^{j-1-h}$ consequently proves the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups:Necessity follows by testing $x={\pi }_L$, and the displayed power identity proves sufficiency for every integral polynomial in ${\pi }_L$.

Define the uniformizer character of inertiaIt is multiplicative: writing $u_{\tau }=\tau {\pi }_L/{\pi }_L$, one has $\sigma \tau {\pi }_L/{\pi }_L=\sigma (u_{\tau })(\sigma {\pi }_L/{\pi }_L)$, and $\sigma$ acts trivially on residue units. Its kernel is exactly $v_L(\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L)\ge 2$, namely $G_1$. Changing the uniformizer to $u{\pi }_L$ leaves the residue character unchanged, since $\overline{\sigma (u)/u}=1$. ThereforeEvery finite subgroup of a field's multiplicative group is cyclic: if its exponent is $m$, every element is a root of $X^m-1$, so its order is at most $m$; a finite abelian group has an element of order its exponent, constructed by multiplying elements of maximal prime-power orders, so its order is at least $m$. Equality makes it cyclic. Here $k_L^{\times }$ has order $|k_L|-1$, prime to $p$. We have proved

To verify the assertion about wild inertia as well, for $i\ge 1$ defineWrite $\sigma {\pi }_L={\pi }_L+a{\pi }_L^{i+1}$ and $\tau {\pi }_L={\pi }_L+b{\pi }_L^{i+1}$. Composition gives $\sigma \tau {\pi }_L\equiv {\pi }_L+(a+b){\pi }_L^{i+1}(\mathrm{mod}{\pi }_L^{i+2})$, because inertia fixes residues and $i\ge 1$. Thus ${\theta }_i$ is additive with kernel $G_{i+1}$. Thus positive ramification quotients are elementary abelian: each $G_i/G_{i+1}$ is a subgroup of the additive finite field, hence an elementary abelian $p$-group.

Finally the filtration terminates: a nonidentity element of $I$ cannot fix ${\pi }_L$, since it already fixes $K_0$ and ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_{K_0}[{\pi }_L]$. Its displacement has finite valuation, and there are only finitely many automorphisms. Iterating the finite $p$-group quotients gives that $P$ is a $p$-group. It is normal in $I$ and has prime-to-$p$ quotient, so it is its unique Sylow $p$-subgroup, justifying the wild inertia terminology.

Realize the two-dimensional irreducible representation $\rho$ as the standard representation of the symmetric group onwith $S_3$ permuting coordinates. It is the complement of the trivial summand in the three-point permutation representation. For each prime the local factor of an Artin L-function iswhere $I_p$ is the inertia group and Frobenius means any lift of the residue-field Frobenius automorphism. On $V^{I_p}$ the lift is independent of that choice. At an unramified prime, put $t=p^{-s}$. The Local Artin factors of the standard representation of S3 areThe polynomial discriminant of $X^3-3$ is $-243=-3^5$, so only $3$ can ramify in its splitting field. For $p\ne 3$, the squarefree factorization of $X^3-3$ modulo $p$ determines the Frobenius cycle type on its roots.

At $p=2$,The quadratic is irreducible, so Frobenius is a transposition andThus $a_2=0$, $a_4=1$ and $a_8=0$. At $p=5$,The quadratic discriminant is $3(\mathrm{mod}5)$, a nonsquare, so this is again a transposition. Consequently $L_5(\rho ,s)=(1-5^{-2s}{)}^{-1}$ and $a_5=0$.

At $p=7$, the possible cubes are $0,1,-1$, so $X^3-3$ has no root modulo $7$. Being cubic, it is irreducible; Frobenius is a three-cycle. Thereforeand $a_7=-1$.

The ramified factor at $3$ must be computed on inertia group invariants. Write $\alpha =3^{1/3}$ and set $\pi =({\zeta }_3-1)/\alpha$. Using $({\zeta }_3-1{)}^2=-3{\zeta }_3$ givesThe Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$ over ${\mathbb{Q}}_3$ has degree six, so ${\mathbb{Q}}_3(\pi )$ is a totally ramified degree-six subfield of ${\mathbb{Q}}_3({\zeta }_3,\alpha )$. The latter has degree at most $[F:\mathbb{Q}]=6$, so the fields agree. This Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3 shows $D_3=I_3=S_3$. Since the only permutation-invariant vectors in ${\mathbb{C}}^3$ have all coordinates equal, their intersection with $V$ is zero. ThusIn particular $a_3=a_9=0$; an unramified degree-two factor at $3$ would give the wrong coefficients.

Finally the Euler product makes its Dirichlet series coefficients multiplicative for coprime indices. Its constant coefficient is $a_1=1$, and $a_6=a_2{a}_3=0$, $a_{10}=a_2{a}_5=0$. Every integer up to ten is now covered, giving

Let $d=[L:K]$, with normalized discrete valuations $v_K,v_L$. Suppose first that $L/K$ is totally ramified, so $e(L/K)=d$. Choose a uniformizer $x$ of $L$. The elements $1,x,\dots ,x^{d-1}$ are linearly independent over $K$: the nonzero terms $c_j{x}^j$ in any proposed relation have valuations $d{v}_K(c_j)+j$, distinct modulo $d$, and a sum with a unique least valuation cannot vanish by the ultrametric inequality. Hence $[K(x):K]\ge d$, proving $L=K(x)$.

Extend $v_K$ to an algebraic closure with values in $\mathbb{Q}$. Every conjugate of $x$ has valuation $1/d$, by uniqueness of the extended valuation on finite extensions of the complete field $K$. In its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $g(T)=T^d+a_{d-1}{T}^{d-1}+\cdots +a_0$, the coefficient $a_{d-j}$ is a sum of products of $j$ conjugates, counted with multiplicity. Thus $v_K(a_{d-j})\ge j/d>0$ for $j\ge 1$, so every nonleading coefficient is in ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$. The constant coefficient is the product of all $d$ conjugates, so has valuation exactly one. This proves that $g$ is an Eisenstein polynomial. This argument also works for inseparable finite extensions, since the conjugates can be counted with their multiplicities.

Conversely let $g$ be an Eisenstein polynomial of degree $d$, with root $x$ and $L=K(x)$. The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility. For completeness, monic factors would have integral coefficients; their reductions would be positive-degree powers of $T$, so both constant coefficients would be divisible by the uniformizer of $K$, contradicting $v_K(g(0))=1$. To determine the root valuation, put $t=v_K(x)$ in the extended valuation. If $t<0$, the leading term is the unique term of least valuation; if $t=0$, the leading term again has uniquely least valuation zero. Both are impossible. If $t>0$, every nonconstant lower term has valuation at least $1+jt>1$. Cancellation in $g(x)=0$ therefore requires the leading term and constant term to have equal valuation:Since $t=v_L(x)/e(L/K)$ and $v_L(x)$ is a positive integer, $e(L/K)=d{v}_L(x)\ge d$. The opposite inequality follows from $[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K)=d$. Hence $e=d$, $f=1$, and $v_L(x)=1$. We have proved both the equivalence and the uniformizer assertion:

Now take $q=p^a$ with $a\ge 1$ and $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^a}$. The translated cyclotomic polynomial isIn characteristic $p$, putting $U=T^{p^{a-1}}$ reduces this to ${\sum }_{j=0}^{p-1}(1+U{)}^j=U^{p-1}=T^{p^{a-1}(p-1)}$. Its constant coefficient over the integers is $p$. It is therefore Eisenstein at $p$, of degree $d=p^{a-1}(p-1)$. Consequently ${\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_{p^a})/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is totally ramified of degree $d$, with uniformizer ${\zeta }_{p^a}-1$. If $q=1$, the field is simply ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$, a trivial totally ramified extension.

For a general positive integer $n=p^{a}m$ with $p\nmid m$, the field generated by the prime-to-$p$ root of unity ${\zeta }_m$ is unramified. Indeed $T^m-1$ has distinct roots modulo $p$. In a finite unramified field whose residue field contains those roots, Hensel lemma lifts all of them uniquely. Reduction preserves their orders: a prime-to-$p$ root reducing to one must itself be one, by Hensel uniqueness at the root one of $T^m-1$. The arithmetic Frobenius therefore acts as ${\zeta }_m\mapsto {\zeta }_m^p$, and the extension degree is the multiplicative order of $p$ modulo $m$, with degree one when $m=1$.

The identityfollows by taking powers of a primitive nth root of unity and using the coprimality of $p^a,m$ in the opposite direction. The prime-to-$p$ field is unramified and the $p$-power field is totally ramified; unramified base change preserves total ramification proves that their compositum has the same residue degree as the prime-to-$p$ field. Thus the total ramification criterion for local cyclotomic extensions gives the full classification:This includes trivial extensions when $a=0$. For $p=2$ only $m=1$ is possible.

For a finite totally ramified Galois extension $L/K$ with Galois group $G$, define its lower ramification numbering byHere $G_0$ is the inertia group, which equals $G$, and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group. For a uniformizer $\pi$ the condition is equivalent to $v_L(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )\ge i+1$. To justify this uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, expand every $b\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$ as a convergent series ${\sum }_{j\ge 0}{c}_j{\pi }^j$ with the coefficients $c_j$ chosen from representatives of $k_K$ in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Such an expansion is obtained by successive subtraction of a residue representative and division by $\pi$, since total ramification gives $k_L=k_K$. The automorphism fixes each $c_j$, and $\sigma (\pi {)}^j-{\pi }^j$ is divisible by $\sigma (\pi )-\pi$. Thus the required valuation bound for $\pi$ implies it for every $b$, including the limit by completeness.

For $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_{p^a})$, all primitive conjugates lie in $L$ and the Eisenstein degree is $\phi (p^a)$. HenceIf ${\sigma }_b\ne 1$, put $s=v_p(b-1)$, so $0\le s<a$. The element ${\zeta }^{b-1}$ is a primitive $p^{a-s}$th root of unity. Applying the already proved uniformizer result to its field, and multiplying its valuation by the ramification index of $L$ over that field, givesThe identity automorphism has infinite valuation. Therefore the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension is explicitlyThe order of the middle group is $p^{a-j}$. At odd $p$, $G_0/G_1$ has order $p-1$; at $p=2$, the condition $b\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}2)$ is automatic, so $G_0=G_1$ when $a\ge 2$. The case $p=2,a=1$ has trivial Galois group, and the displayed formula remains valid. For $a=0$ all groups are trivial. The valuation calculation also provides the upper ramification numbering, if desired, by integrating the reciprocal indices with the Herbrand function; no change of numbering is implicit in the displayed answer.

Fix a non-Archimedean local field $K$, write $Q=|k_K|$, and use the arithmetic Frobenius normalization throughout: a uniformizer maps to the automorphism inducing $a\mapsto a^Q$ on the maximal unramified extension. The Local Artin map, or local reciprocity map, is the canonical continuous group homomorphismwhere $K^{\mathrm{ab}}$ is the maximal abelian extension inside a fixed algebraic closure with its separable part understood. Its finite projection to every finite abelian extension $L/K$ is onto and has kernel exactly the norm subgroup of a local field extension:In particular, the quotient has order $[L:K]$. This is how local class field theory turns abelian extension problems into computations inside a multiplicative group.

One precise definition of the finite reciprocity map uses the cup-product construction of local reciprocity. For a finite Galois extension with group $G$, the local fundamental class $u_{L/K}\in H^2(G,L^{\times })$ is specified by local Brauer invariant $1/[L:K]$. Cup product gives an isomorphismThe finite Local Artin map is its inverse, composed with the quotient map from $K^{\times }$. For abelian $G$ the target is $G$ itself. Taking the compatible inverse limit over finite abelian extensions defines ${\mathrm{Art}}_K$.

The essential inputs to this cohomological construction have concrete arithmetic content. The local Brauer invariant identifies $\mathrm{Br}(K)$ with $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$; restriction to $L$ multiplies the invariant by $[L:K]$, so its kernel is cyclic of that order and has the distinguished generator $u_{L/K}$. For every subgroup $H\subseteq G$, Hilbert theorem 90 gives $H^1(H,L^{\times })=0$, while the same invariant calculation over the fixed field gives $H^2(H,L^{\times })$ cyclic of order $|H|$. These are the hypotheses of the algebraic cup-product isomorphism in Tate cohomology of a finite group. It is obtained by dimension shifting in group cohomology with a projective resolution of the trivial module and the extension representing the fundamental class. Thus the norm-kernel statement comes from the degree-zero definition of Tate cohomology of a finite group, rather than from an arbitrary assignment of an automorphism to each element. In an unramified extension of degree $d$, the fundamental class is the cyclic algebra with arithmetic Frobenius generator and parameter a uniformizer; the isomorphism sends that Frobenius to the class of the uniformizer. This explains the chosen sign of reciprocity.

Several properties follow immediately from this construction. If $L\supseteq E\supseteq K$ are finite abelian extensions, restricting ${\mathrm{Art}}_{L/K}(a)$ to $E$ gives ${\mathrm{Art}}_{E/K}(a)$. The Local Artin map is therefore compatible with the finite projections defining its infinite target. For any finite separable extension $E/K$ and $a\in E^{\times }$, its norm compatibility isHere $K^{\mathrm{ab}}E/E$ is abelian, so the displayed restriction makes sense. An outline of the compatibility proof is to use the corestriction map in group cohomology: on multiplicative coefficients its degree-zero map is the norm. The cup-product projection formula, together with restriction and corestriction of the local fundamental class, gives exactly the commuting reciprocity diagram. The compatibility is an arithmetic instance of the functoriality of the cohomological definition.

The Local Artin map has dense image, because every finite abelian quotient receives a surjective map. Its kernel is trivial, and it extends to an isomorphismwhere this profinite completion uses the open finite-index subgroups of the topological multiplicative group. The original map is generally not onto: on the unramified quotient it sends the integer valuation into $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}$, rather than producing every profinite integer. Its units map onto the abelian inertia group. For a finite abelian extension, the corresponding unit image is its inertia group, while the valuation accounts for its residue extension. Indeed $v_K(Nz)=f(L/K)v_L(z)$, so the valuation quotient has order $f$; the full norm quotient has order $ef$, leaving unit image of order $e$. Since unit images act trivially on the residue field, they give precisely the inertia group. More finely, the image of the higher principal-unit group $1+{\mathfrak{m}}_K^r$ in a finite abelian extension is its rth upper ramification group, for each integer $r\ge 1$. The use of upper ramification numbering is essential for compatibility with quotients.

The existence theorem of local class field theory states that every open finite-index subgroup $H\subseteq K^{\times }$ is $N_{L/K}(L^{\times })$ for a unique finite abelian extension $L/K$. Inclusions are reversed: larger extensions have smaller norm subgroups. In the established reciprocity isomorphism, the proof is simply to take the fixed field of the open subgroup corresponding to $H$. Conversely a finite extension gives an open kernel of a finite continuous projection. Uniqueness follows because that kernel specifies its fixed field. The substantive existence problem is therefore to prove that the reciprocity isomorphism realizes all open finite-index subgroups; it is not just this final fixed-field argument.

The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity provides an explicit route to that existence problem. Choose a uniformizer $\pi$ and a Lubin–Tate series $f(T)=\pi T+T^Q$, with its associated Lubin–Tate formal group $F$. Solving $f(F(X,Y))=F(f(X),f(Y))$ successively by total degree constructs the law with linear part $X+Y$; the analogous equations construct the endomorphisms $[a]$ with linear coefficient $a$. The congruence $f(T)\equiv T^Q(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$ supplies the divisibility needed at each step. These endomorphisms satisfy $[a][b]=[ab]$ and make the torsion an ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-module.

If $f_r$ denotes the rfold iterate, the primitive level-r Lubin–Tate torsion points are roots ofReduction modulo $\pi$ is $T^{Q^{r-1}(Q-1)}$, and the constant term is $\pi$, so this is an Eisenstein polynomial. Its roots therefore generate a totally ramified extension $K_{\pi ,r}$ of degree $(Q-1)Q^{r-1}$. A primitive point generates the entire torsion module, and all points are its images under the integral convergent endomorphisms $[a]$. The torsion field is therefore a Galois extension of $K$. The action map into $({\mathcal{O}}_K/{\pi }^r{)}^{\times }$ is injective, and the computed degree equals the order of this unit group, proving it is an isomorphism. Passing to the inverse limit gives $\mathrm{Gal}(K_{\pi }/K)\simeq {\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$ for the Lubin–Tate tower $K_{\pi }$.

The unramified tower and $K_{\pi }$ are linearly disjoint field extensions: a finite common subextension would be both unramified and totally ramified, hence trivial. The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity on their compositum isThe inverse on the unit action goes with the arithmetic Frobenius convention; changing to geometric Frobenius inverts the whole reciprocity map. The reciprocity theorem identifies this explicit action with the finite cup-product maps, independently of the chosen uniformizer. Its proof compares the fundamental class with the norm relations between consecutive torsion fields. The construction makes the possible finite kernels concrete: on the compositum of the degree-d unramified field with $K_{\pi ,r}$ the kernel isThese subgroups are cofinal among open finite-index subgroups. Indeed any such $H$ contains $1+{\pi }^r{\mathcal{O}}_K$ for sufficiently large $r$, and contains ${\pi }^d$ for some positive $d$, since the class of $\pi$ in $K^{\times }/H$ has finite order. Taking the appropriate fixed subgroup in this explicit finite compositum realizes $H$. This proves the open-subgroup part of existence once the norm compatibility of the explicit and cohomological constructions is established. Together with the finite reciprocity maps it also shows that $K^{\mathrm{ab}}=K^{\mathrm{nr}}{K}_{\pi }$.

As a direct check, on a finite unramified extension the construction reduces toThe earlier elementary unit-norm proof shows its kernel is exactly ${\pi }^{d\mathbb{Z}}{\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$. At $K={\mathbb{Q}}_p$, the Lubin–Tate cyclotomic example takes $[p](T)=(1+T{)}^p-1$ and $F(X,Y)=X+Y+XY$. Its torsion is $\zeta -1$, so a unit $u$ acts by $\zeta \mapsto {\zeta }^{u^{-1}}$. These examples exhibit both the valuation and unit parts of local reciprocity with consistent signs.