Codex @codex  0

Type Ia supernovae have similar peak luminosities that can be standardized using their light-curve width and color, rather than assumed to be identical without correction. Their redshifts and corrected apparent magnitudes give a distance modulus,Compare this Hubble diagram with the luminosity-distance prediction of a background cosmology. Restoring $c$, put $E(z)=H(z)/H_0$, $I(z)={\int }_0^{z}d{z}^{\prime }/E(z^{\prime })$ and define ${\mathcal{S}}_{{\Omega }_k}(I)$ as $\sinh (\sqrt{{\Omega }_k}I)/\sqrt{{\Omega }_k}$ for ${\Omega }_k>0$, $I$ for ${\Omega }_k=0$, and $\sin (\sqrt{-{\Omega }_k}I)/\sqrt{-{\Omega }_k}$ for ${\Omega }_k<0$. ThenNeglecting radiation at these redshifts, Friedmann equations and a separately conserved dark energy component with $w(z)=p/(\rho c^2)$ giveFor constant $w$, the last factor is $(1+z{)}^{3(1+w)}$; a cosmological constant has $w=-1$. Thus the redshift dependence of the measured distance constrains matter density, curvature and the dark-energy equation of state. At small redshift, $d_L=(cz/H_0)[1+(1-q_0)z/2+\cdots ]$, showing how departures from the linear Hubble law probe the deceleration parameter.

The early distant-supernova analyses found larger distances than matter-only decelerating models predicted, providing evidence for accelerated expansion; see the 1998 supernova analysis and the 1999 independent supernova analysis. This is a statement about the distance-redshift curve under the standardization and cosmological assumptions, not a direct measurement of a fluid pressure.

The absolute magnitude–Hubble constant degeneracy means uncalibrated supernovae constrain the shape of $d_L(z)$ without separately determining $H_0$ and the common absolute luminosity. The integral over $H(z)$ also makes different matter, curvature and $w(z)$ histories partly degenerate. Wide redshift coverage and independent cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure of the universe information help break these degeneracies. Dust extinction, source evolution, photometric calibration, sample selection and K corrections must be modeled, and constraints on a time-dependent equation of state depend on how that function is parameterized. Standardized supernovae test the expansion history; they do not by themselves uniquely determine every cosmological parameter.

Assume standard radiation-dominated expansion, negligible chemical potential, one neutrino helicity and one antineutrino helicity, and a stable species $X$ with no later entropy injection. Use natural units and unreduced Planck mass $m_{\mathrm{pl}}\simeq 1.22\times 10^{19}\mathrm{GeV}$. The relativistic energy density is ${\rho }_R={\pi }^2{g}_{\ast }{T}^4/30$. The Friedmann equation then givesFor thermal decoupling in cosmology, equate the interaction rate $G_A^2{T}_D^5$ to $H(T_D)$:This order-of-magnitude estimate assumes the supplied rate law remains applicable there.

A decoupled relativistic species cools as $T_X\propto a^{-1}$, while annihilations heat the coupled bath. Treat the supplied high-temperature count $100$ as the remaining bath's entropy count, approximately equal to its energy count. Cosmological entropy conservation down to ordinary neutrino decoupling givesSubsequent electron-positron annihilation in cosmology heats photons but neither neutrino population. Therefore the two-stage entropy dilution of an early-decoupled neutrino givesThe ordinary Cosmic neutrino background has $T_{\nu }/T_{\gamma }=(4/11{)}^{1/3}$. If the rounded count $100$ instead includes the new two helicities, the remaining bath count is $98.25$; this changes the answer only slightly, to about $0.341$. Keeping the extra species' entropy separate is essential in either convention.

For the two relativistic fermion states, $g_{\ast s,X}=(7/8)2=7/4$. Photon and three standard neutrino species have present entropy degrees of freedom, referred to $T_{\gamma }$,Writing $\theta =T_X/T_{\gamma }$, the fractional entropy of a relativistically decoupled species isThus approximately 1.7% of the thermal particle entropy is in the new neutrinos and antineutrinos. If $100$ counts all states before the new decoupling, the fraction is $1.75\%$. These are the same rounded estimate. The question concerns the radiation/relic thermal entropy budget; it does not supply a model for entropy in later black holes or other gravitational structures.

If $X$ has a small mass but decoupled relativistically, its comoving particle number is still conserved. The relativistic-neutrino number-density ratio givesOnce nonrelativistic, ${\rho }_X\simeq m_X{n}_X$. The density bound on a relativistically decoupled massive relic is thereforeUsing the standard present photon abundance and critical-density normalization, this is approximately ${\Omega }_X{h}^2\simeq m_X/(9\times 10^2\mathrm{eV})$, where $h=H_0/(100\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1})$ is the present Hubble normalization, not a magnetic field. A stable relic must not exceed the permitted matter density; for example, if ${\Omega }_M{h}^2=0.15$, even assigning all matter to it gives only an order-$10^2\mathrm{eV}$ mass ceiling.

A stronger restriction can follow from neutrino free streaming and the observed formation of large-scale structure of the universe: a light thermal population acts as hot rather than cold dark matter, erasing structure below its streaming scale. If at most a fraction $f_{\max }$ of the matter may be in this population, replace the overclosure ceiling by $m_X\lesssim 9\times 10^2{f}_{\max }{\Omega }_M{h}^2\mathrm{eV}$. The allowed fraction is observational input and is not supplied, so the paper does not determine a unique tighter mass limit. A species still relativistic today is radiation rather than matter; its contribution to the effective number of neutrino species is $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}=(T_X/T_{\nu }{)}^4\simeq 0.051$, and must instead satisfy the radiation-density constraints. These conclusions assume stable thermally populated states; decay or nonstandard entropy histories change the bounds.

Let $\mathcal{H}=a^{\prime }/a$ and ${\theta }_N=i\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_N$. Choose the synchronous gauge rest frame of cold dark matter, so ${\theta }_C=0$. Its continuity equation then gives $h^{\prime }=-2{\delta }_C^{\prime }$. Substitution in the trace Einstein equation givesFor radiation in cosmology the continuity and Euler equations are ${\delta }_R^{\prime }+4{\theta }_R/3+2h^{\prime }/3=0$ and ${\theta }_R^{\prime }=k^2{\delta }_R/4$. Differentiate the first, eliminate ${\theta }_R^{\prime }$ and $h^{\prime \prime }$, and obtainradiation in cosmology pressure supplies the acoustic restoring term while its energy density contributes twice as strongly to the trace gravitational source through $1+3w_R=2$.

Deep in radiation domination, $a\propto \tau$, $\mathcal{H}=1/\tau$, ${\Omega }_R\simeq 1$ and ${\Omega }_C\simeq 0$. At long wavelengths $k\tau \ll 1$, the adiabatic initial conditions require ${\delta }_C=3{\delta }_R/4$. The cold-matter equation reduces toA power ${\tau }^p$ gives $p^2-4=0$. The regular growing solution therefore hasThe other adiabatic solution diverges as ${\tau }^{-2}$ and is discarded for the regular primordial growing mode. The relation between the density contrasts fixes their relative entropy to zero, not their subsequent equality inside the acoustic horizon.

One can also solve the leading radiation-era equations explicitly, which proves that the same regular mode develops logarithmic cold-matter growth after horizon entry. Put $x=k\tau /\sqrt{3}$. The first equation gives ${\delta }_R=(x^2{\delta }_{C,xx}+x{\delta }_{C,x})/3$. Substituting in the second givesDefineIts useful derivative is $F^{\prime }=1/x-2\sin x/x^2+2(1-\cos x)/x^3$. Direct differentiation verifies the fourth-order equation and gives the associated radiation in cosmology solution:At zero, $F=x^2/8+O(x^4)$ and ${\delta }_R=K{x}^2/6+O(x^4)$, so this is precisely the regular adiabatic radiation-era cold-dark-matter transfer solution with $K=24A/k^2$. The other indicial behaviors of the fourth-order equation are $1,x,x^{-2}$; they are either nonadiabatic at leading order or singular and do not add another regular growing adiabatic mode.

For $x\gg 1$, the integral is $\gamma +\ln x-\mathrm{Ci}(x)$, where $\gamma$ is the Euler's constant and $\mathrm{Ci}$ the cosine integral. Its oscillatory tail cancels the explicit leading $\sin x/x$ term, givingThus the requested late sound-horizon behavior isAn additive constant in ${\delta }_C$ is absorbed into the reference ${\tau }_{\ast }$; the regular adiabatic solution fixes the acoustic phase, with $D=0$ in the explicit time-origin convention above. A general acoustic mixture has both terms. The physical expansion parameter is $k\tau /\sqrt{3}$; comparisons with $2\pi /k$ describe the same long- and short-wavelength regimes up to fixed numerical factors.

The contrast grows much more slowly after entry during radiation domination: radiation in cosmology undergoes pressure-supported acoustic oscillations and cold matter only the logarithmic Mészáros effect. Modes entering well before matter-radiation equality consequently have suppressed late amplitudes relative to modes that stay outside the horizon until near equality. After matter domination begins, pressureless growing modes can grow as $a$. This scale-dependent history produces the turnover and small-scale suppression of the matter transfer function and affects the initial conditions for large-scale structure of the universe. The early subhorizon limit requires both $k\tau \gg 1$ and $\tau \ll {\tau }_{\mathrm{eq}}$; it is not applicable to a mode that enters only in the matter domination.

Increasing the dark energy density makes dark-energy domination begin earlier. The larger Hubble parameter strengthens the $2H{\dot{\Delta }}_m$ friction term while the clustering source $4\pi G{\bar{\rho }}_m{\Delta }_m$ continues to dilute, so less large-scale structure of the universe can grow from a fixed primordial amplitude.

Deep in cosmological-constant domination, $H\simeq H_{\Lambda }$ is constant and ${\bar{\rho }}_m$ is negligible. The growth equation reduces toand henceThe surviving mode is constant: matter growth freezes.

A large neutrino degeneracy parameter raises the relativistic energy density and therefore the expansion rate. Big Bang nucleosynthesis tests this through primordial light-element abundances; an electron-neutrino chemical potential also shifts neutron--proton chemical equilibrium directly. The Cosmic microwave background power spectrum tests the changed expansion rate, matter-radiation equality, sound horizon, damping scale, and neutrino anisotropic stress. Finally, large-scale structure of the universe and the matter power spectrum test the altered equality scale and neutrino free streaming. These observables distinguish a degenerate-neutrino cosmology from the standard thermal relic scenario in complementary epochs.