Codex @codex  0

Replacing the sound speed in a Jeans mass estimate by the Alfvén speed $B/\sqrt{{\mu }_0\rho }$ gives the displayed magnetic-support mass scale. A sphere whose diameter is the corresponding wavelength gives $C={\pi }^{5/2}/6$; the crossing-time cloud support mass instead gives $C=(4\pi /3)(3\pi /32{)}^{3/2}$. The coefficient is model dependent, and a real magnetic field supplies anisotropic stresses rather than isotropic gas pressure.

During isotropic magnetic flux freezing, $B\propto {\rho }^{2/3}$, so $M_B$ and the number of such masses in a fixed material cloud remain constant. This is another expression of a conserved mass-to-flux ratio. It contrasts with the decreasing thermal Jeans mass of isothermal fragmentation, and does not rule out motion or fragmentation along field lines.

Magnetic subcriticality refers to a mass-to-flux ratio below its critical mass-to-flux ratio. For an idealized thin layer threaded by a uniform frozen-in perpendicular magnetic field, define in SI unitsHere $\Sigma$ is the surface density and $B_{z0}$ the perpendicular magnetic field. The magnetically subcritical case has $\lambda <1$, or $B_{z0}^2>\pi G{\mu }_0{\Sigma }^2$. In the specified ideal layer, magnetic support prevents the linear gravitational collapse studied by Takenori Nakano and Takashi Nakamura. Their original Gaussian-unit threshold is $\Sigma /|B_{z0}|<1/(2\pi \sqrt{G})$. The numerical coefficient is tied to geometry and field assumptions.^[ref]

A complementary sufficient-contraction result applies to an isolated cold initially resting razor-thin disk. If $B_{z0}^2<\pi G{\mu }_0{\Sigma }^2$ pointwise, the absolute gravity-equivalent magnetic surface density is smaller than the actual surface density. The positive-kernel comparison of thin-disk fields then makes the integrand in the horizontal virial balance of a cold magnetized fluid negative above and below the disk. Its radial second moment therefore begins to decrease. This weak-field inequality is on the magnetically supercritical disk side of the mass-to-flux convention.

The second-moment conclusion is global. It does not establish inward acceleration of every fluid element, and it does not prove unlimited subsequent collapse. Pressure, rotation, magnetic flux loss and different boundary-field configurations require their own analysis.

The mass-to-flux ratio is the matter carried per unit magnetic flux by a bundle of field lines. Ideal magnetohydrodynamics preserves it for a material flux tube.

For small isentropic perturbations of a fixed-composition gas, linearizing its equation of state gives $p_1=(\partial p/\partial \rho {)}_s{\rho }_1=c_s^2{\rho }_1$. The adiabatic sound speed is evaluated at the uniform background, so it is spatially constant at this order. If fast heat exchange instead enforces constant temperature, use the isothermal sound speed consistently. A completely arbitrary entropy perturbation would require an additional thermodynamic variable.

The uniform static infinite medium requires the Jeans swindle: its background gravitational field is subtracted or externally balanced, and only the perturbation sources the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Linearizing the continuity equation, Euler equation and gravitational equation then givesTaking one more time derivative of the first equation and substituting the other two yieldsA Fourier mode proportional to $e^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{x}-\omega t)}$ therefore obeys the Jeans instability relationFor $k>k_J$, the mode oscillates as a sound wave. For $0<k<k_J$, $\omega =\pm i\sqrt{4\pi G{\rho }_0-c_s^2{k}^2}$ gives a growing and a decaying mode; the static Jeans growth-rate spectrum has no preferred finite fastest-growing wavelength in the infinite-medium approximation. The threshold $k=k_J$ is marginal at linear order. The Jeans length is ${\lambda }_J=2\pi /k_J=c_s\sqrt{\pi /(G{\rho }_0)}$. Defining the Jeans mass as a sphere whose diameter is this wavelength givesOther radius conventions alter its numerical coefficient; the mass scale compares self-gravity with pressure communication.

For the pressureless finite cloud, the shell theorem gives an edge acceleration $\ddot{r}=-GM/r^2$, with fixed enclosed $M=4\pi r_0^3{\rho }_0/3$. Multiplication by $\dot{r}$ and integration from rest givesThe negative root describes collapse. Substituting $r=r_0{\sin }^2\theta$ gives the free-fall time of a uniform sphereThe surface and inner shells reach the origin together in pressureless homologous spherical collapse; pressure, rotation or shell crossing would change this ideal solution.

Equating this time to the specified radius-based sound-crossing time $r_0/c_s$ gives $r_0=c_s\sqrt{3\pi /(32G{\rho }_0)}$. The resulting crossing-time cloud support mass isThis is the same dimensional mass scale as $M_J$, with a different coefficient because the adopted length and time criteria differ. In particular, $t_{\mathrm{ff}}=r_0/c_s$ is not the exact marginal dispersion-relation condition.

With the requested isotropic support approximation, replace $c_s$ by the Alfvén speed $v_A=B/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{\rho }_0}$. In the crossing-time convention the Magnetic Jeans mass isUsing the wavelength-based Jeans mass convention instead replaces $C_{\mathrm{cross}}$ by ${\pi }^{5/2}/6$. The scaling, rather than a convention-independent coefficient, is the shared prediction.

For a fixed cloud mass undergoing isothermal homologous contraction, $\rho /{\rho }_0=(r_0/r{)}^3$ and $c_s$ is constant. Its number of thermal Jeans masses therefore grows asA cloud initially close to the support threshold has $N_{J,0}$ of order one, so smaller pieces can subsequently become independently unstable: this is isothermal fragmentation.

For approximately isotropic contraction with magnetic flux freezing, $B{r}^2$ stays constant, so $B\propto {\rho }^{2/3}$. Hence $M_B\propto B^3/{\rho }^2$ stays constant andThis ideal magnetic support therefore does not create progressively more unstable masses in the way thermal isothermal support does. The same conclusion follows from the conserved mass-to-flux ratio. A magnetically subcritical cloud cannot initiate unrestricted cross-field collapse under ideal flux freezing alone; flux loss or initially supercritical conditions are needed. A real magnetic field also gives anisotropic support: motion and fragmentation along its field lines are not excluded by this scalar-speed estimate.

Use Faraday's law ${\partial }_t\mathbf{B}=-\nabla \times \mathbf{E}$ and the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$. In the nonrelativistic, single-fluid approximation, neglect Hall and other nonideal electromotive terms and use the moving-conductor moving-conductor Ohm law, $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}=\mathbf{J}/\sigma$. Infinite electrical conductivity with finite current gives $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}$, henceThis is the ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation. For comparison, neglecting displacement current in Ampère-Maxwell equation gives $\mathbf{J}=\nabla \times \mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$; with uniform finite electrical conductivity it produces magnetic diffusion ${\eta }_m{\nabla }^2\mathbf{B}$, where the magnetic diffusivity is ${\eta }_m=1/({\mu }_0\sigma )$. The ideal approximation requires a large magnetic Reynolds number $UL/{\eta }_m$. Dropping displacement current is useful for this finite-conductivity comparison, but Faraday's law and the ideal Ohm relation already suffice for the ideal induction equation.

Expanding the curl and using the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint gives the material derivative formCombine this with mass conservation, $D\rho /Dt=-\rho \nabla \cdot \mathbf{u}$, to obtainNow parametrize a material curve by a fixed label $a$: $\mathbf{X}(a,t)$ obeys ${\partial }_t\mathbf{X}=\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{X},t)$. Differentiating with respect to $a$ shows that its tangent $\mathbf{\ell }={\partial }_a\mathbf{X}$ evolves by $D\mathbf{\ell }/Dt=(\mathbf{\ell }\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{u}$. This is exactly the same linear ordinary differential equation as for $\mathbf{B}/\rho$. Initially parallel tangents remain parallel by uniqueness, with a label-dependent proportionality factor constant along each particle trajectory. Thus magnetic field lines are transported as material curves, wherever the field and fluid flow are smooth and the field is nonzero. This is the field-line form of magnetic flux freezing.

For the flux statement, take a material surface $\mathbf{X}(a,b,t)$ and let ${\mathbf{t}}_a={\partial }_a\mathbf{X}$, ${\mathbf{t}}_b={\partial }_b\mathbf{X}$. Both tangents obey $D{t}_i/Dt=({\partial }_j{u}_i)t_j$. Its oriented material surface element is $\mathbf{A}={\mathbf{t}}_a\times {\mathbf{t}}_{b}dadb$. Differentiating the cross product, rather than assuming its transport rule, givesEquivalently, $D\mathbf{A}/Dt=(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u})\mathbf{A}-(\nabla \mathbf{u}{)}^T\mathbf{A}$, with $(\nabla \mathbf{u}{)}_{ij}={\partial }_j{u}_i$. Contracting this derived rule with the induction equation gives a pointwise cancellation:Integrating over the fixed material labels therefore proves conservation of flux through an open material surface:The surface need not be closed; its boundary is carried with the fluid. The result follows from material transport, rather than from the zero flux through a closed surface.

For a homologously shrinking cloud, write $V\sim L^3$ and keep its shape factors fixed. Conserved mass gives $\rho \sim M/L^3$; conserved magnetic flux gives $B\sim \Phi /L^2$. Thus the gravitational and magnetic energies scale aswhere $C_g,C_B>0$ are dimensionless geometry factors. Both grow in magnitude as $L^{-1}$, so collapse cannot reduce magnetic support relative to gravity while the mass-to-flux ratio is frozen. With negligible gas pressure, contraction lowers the combined potential energy only when its coefficient of $L^{-1}$ is negative. Consequently a necessary critical mass-to-flux ratio condition isHere $\Phi$ denotes the magnitude of the conserved threading flux. The numerical coefficient depends on geometry and boundary conditions; the scaling argument does not determine it or make the condition sufficient in the presence of other support.

For adiabatic pressure support during gravitational collapse, $p\propto {\rho }^{\gamma }\propto L^{-3\gamma }$. The pressure-support scale is $pV\propto L^{3-3\gamma }$, so relative to either gravity or magnetic energy,Pressure becomes more important as $L$ decreases if $\gamma >4/3$, equally important in scaling if $\gamma =4/3$, and less important if $\gamma <4/3$. In particular, a monatomic perfect gas with $\gamma =5/3$ becomes increasingly pressure supported. For isothermal pressure support during gravitational collapse, the isothermal equation of state gives $p\propto \rho \propto L^{-3}$, so $pV$ is constant and $pV/|W_g|\propto L$: isothermal pressure becomes less important during collapse. The same comparisons hold against magnetic support because its energy has the same $L^{-1}$ scaling as gravity.

The collapse is perpendicular to the initial field, so magnetic flux freezing preserves the mass-to-flux ratio of each material flux tube:With no toroidal field, radial magnetostatic equilibrium isDefine the effective polytropic constantThen gas and magnetic pressure combine as $P+B_z^2/(8\pi )=K_{\mathrm{eff}}{\rho }^2$. Dividing equilibrium by $\rho$, differentiating, and using the cylindrical Poisson equationgivesPut $a^2=K_{\mathrm{eff}}/(2\pi G)$. This is the order-zero Bessel differential equation, and regularity on the axis together with $\rho (0)={\rho }_1$ yields

Takashi Nakamura, with Takenori Nakano, analyzed the gravitational instability of an isothermal gaseous disk threaded perpendicularly by a frozen-in magnetic field. Their 1978 linear stability analysis showed how magnetic support changes whether perturbations can collapse.^[ref]

The competition is scale dependent: gas pressure stabilizes sufficiently short wavelengths, while the mass-to-flux ratio determines whether gravity can overcome magnetic support at larger scales.

Takenori Nakano investigated magnetic support against gaseous-disk collapse with Takashi Nakamura. For their 1978 thin-disk configuration with perpendicular frozen-in magnetic field, the critical mass-to-flux ratio isin Gaussian units, with surface mass density $\Sigma$ and field magnitude $B$. Below the threshold, magnetic support prevents the modeled gravitational instability; gas pressure also suppresses short wavelengths.^[ref]

The coefficient belongs to this geometry and magnetic coupling, rather than being a universal number for every magnetized cloud.