Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 72 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
After removing the hydrostatic background pressure, the two-dimensional ideal Boussinesq equations arewith the buoyancy equation . The last equation follows by materially advecting total buoyancy with . Take the streamfunction conventionso the -component of vorticity is . Taking of horizontal momentum minus of vertical momentum cancels pressure. Incompressibility combines the remaining nonlinear terms into advection of , giving . Hence the full equations areThere is no vortex stretching in this genuinely two-dimensional velocity field.
Write , with and background buoyancy anomaly zero. The Linearized Boussinesq equations becomeFor a stationary disturbance with real and , the second equation gives . The first therefore reduces to the stationary Taylor–Goldstein equationThe restriction is used when cancelling ; a purely horizontally uniform alteration of the background is not this wave problem.
For the exponential-profile stationary stratified waves, defineSince and , all coefficients are constant. The complete vertical solution set isShifting the origin of simply changes the two constants. Vertical oscillation requires ; equality gives an affine structure; below that value the structure is evanescent or growing, with admissibility determined by the physical boundaries.
The Rayleigh quotient with one Neumann endpoint must retain its upper boundary term. On a finite interval with , choose a nonzero real vertical structure, so the denominator is strictly positive. Multiplication of the differential equation by and integration by parts givesWith only , it equals precisely when . A lower Neumann boundary condition alone does not ensure this.
For , the lower condition selects . Equality of the quotient requires for a positive integer : even gives an upper Neumann condition, odd an upper Dirichlet boundary condition. Thuswhich additionally restricts . If , the lower condition leaves a constant structure; it has quotient , possible for a genuine wave only when . If , the lower condition leaves , whose upper product is positive and whose quotient is strictly less than . On an infinite interval, none of these nonzero lower-Neumann structures is square-integrable, so the displayed ratio of integrals is not a defined finite-integral quotient there. Ratios of truncated integrals would be a different limiting prescription.
For every mode above, including the affine and exponential cases, the disturbance satisfiesThis statement concerns the disturbance, not the sum with the background streamfunction; the latter generally has a different Laplacian eigenvalue. Its buoyancy polarization isThus no nonzero mode has a constant buoyancy-to-streamfunction ratio when .
The nonlinear exactness test for a stratified streamfunction mode now distinguishes the two equations. The disturbance's vorticity self-advection vanishes because its Laplacian is proportional to itself. But its buoyancy self-advection isFor a nonzero real sinusoidal disturbance and , this is a nonzero second harmonic somewhere. Consequently none of the nontrivial modes with the stipulated positive is by itself an exact finite-amplitude solution of both nonlinear equations. Additional harmonics or mean corrections would be needed. In the limiting case , are constant; both self-interactions vanish, and these same single-wavenumber structures, or their superpositions with the same , do solve the full ideal equations wherever their boundary conditions are admissible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 77 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the streamfunction convention , , and take . With , the material derivative is . This convention differs from the horizontal quasi-geostrophic streamfunction convention used below. The nonlinear Boussinesq equations areThe component of vorticity is . Differentiate the first momentum equation in and subtract the derivative of the second. The pressure terms cancel; the derivatives of the advecting velocity cancel by . Thus , orConservation of total buoyancy, with background gradient , givesBoth equations retain the nonlinear advection terms.
Write , with , and take the background buoyancy anomaly to be zero. The linear equations for areFor a normal mode , the second equation gives . Substitute this into the first to obtain the Taylor–Goldstein equationHere and the calculation is initially away from critical levels . The first term is the restoring effect of stable buoyancy on vertically displaced parcels. The second comes from advection of the background vorticity gradient : a displacement creates a vorticity anomaly, whose induced velocity acts back on the displacement. This is the shear-flow counterpart of a Rossby wave restoring mechanism; its sign can also permit instability, so it is not invariably stabilizing.
Rigid boundaries imply , hence . For a real, regular normal mode, multiply the Taylor–Goldstein equation by , integrate, and integrate its second derivative by parts. The endpoint term vanishes, leavingFor a smooth real dispersion branch, differentiate this identity with respect to . The stated stationarity of removes the term involving , so . Direct differentiation at fixed givesSince the frequency is , the group velocity is , and thereforeThis is variational group velocity of a Taylor-Goldstein mode. Singular critical levels or a vanishing denominator require separate limiting analysis; no stationarity proof is needed here.
For the sinusoidal profiles, choose . In the interior,The profile ratios extend to the endpoints in this reduced equation. Thus always gives a nonzero real , with . For this normal mode,The denominator in the group velocity expression is . It follows thatAlthough vanishes at the endpoints, this weighted integral is finite; the vanishing of supplies the required cancellation. The formula is the limiting derivative approached from the regular real branch with , before any interior critical level is encountered.
If instead and are constant, still take . The same vertical eigenfunctions satisfy the Taylor–Goldstein equation, now withThere is no value of guaranteed to give real for arbitrary positive parameters: if , all these squared wavenumbers are negative. A nonzero real exists exactly when ; equality gives only the degenerate , limit. For a real branch the same group velocity calculation gives .
To test exact nonlinear validity, take a real normal mode and its corresponding buoyancy perturbation , where . Becausethe quadratic vorticity self-advection is zero: . The quadratic buoyancy self-advection, however, isThis nonlinear exactness test for a stratified streamfunction mode distinguishes the cases. For constant , is constant, so both quadratic terms vanish. The background-mode terms already satisfy the linear equations, hence the constant-profile modes are exact finite-amplitude solutions of the ideal Boussinesq equations. Pressure can be recovered from the momentum equations: the vorticity equation supplies their compatibility condition in this simply connected strip.
For the sinusoidal profiles, has a nonzero derivative in the interior. For every nonzero and nonzero real , is not identically zero; it produces a second horizontal harmonic that is absent from the proposed solution. Thus none of these nontrivial sinusoidal-profile modes is an exact finite-amplitude solution. A field is merely an added horizontal shear with no vertical motion and is a degenerate exception to the wave calculation, not a propagating member of it.