Past exam of the chemistry course of the year 4 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge / 2022 / Paper 3 / Section A

Only one bromine is replaced by hydrogen. Writing the unchanged protected chain as $R=\mathrm{THPOC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{Me})$, the product is $R\mathrm{CH}=\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{Me})\mathrm{CH}=\mathrm{CHBr}$, retaining the original internal alkene geometry and forming predominantly the $Z$ terminal bromoalkene: bromine and the carbon chain lie on the same side of that new stereodefined double bond. The formula is consequently ${\mathrm{C}}_{13}{\mathrm{H}}_{21}\mathrm{Br}{\mathrm{O}}_2$.

Phosphine dissociation exposes Pd(0), which undergoes preferential oxidative addition into the less hindered C–Br bond, the bromine trans to the carbon chain in the gem-dibromoalkene. hydride transfer from tributyltin hydride replaces the palladium bromide ligand, producing tributyltin bromide and an alkenyl–Pd–H intermediate. reductive elimination joins the alkenyl carbon and hydride, regenerating Pd(0). Retention of the alkenyl geometry through this sequence puts the surviving bromine cis to the chain. The conjugated carbon skeleton and protecting group remain intact; this is not addition of tin hydride across either alkene. The stereoselective monohydrogenolysis is established for this reagent combination.^[ref]

The first equivalent of titanocene methylidene methylenates the ester: the carbonyl oxygen and titanium form an oxatitanacyclobutane, whose fragmentation gives $\mathrm{PhC}(\mathrm{OMe})=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$ and a titanium–oxygen product. The second equivalent adds across this electron-rich double bond. The initial adduct is a titanacyclobutane with cyclic connectivity $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{p}}_2\mathrm{Ti}-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{Ph})(\mathrm{OMe})-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-$, closing from the last methylene to titanium. The ester's phenyl-substituted carbon lies opposite Ti; the two new methylenes originate from the two methylidene equivalents.

Beta-methoxy elimination opens that metallacycle to B, $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{p}}_2\mathrm{Ti}(\mathrm{OMe})[\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{Ph})=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2]$, the allyltitanium reagent. The C–OMe bond breaks, OMe transfers to Ti, one Ti–C bond becomes the new C=C bond, and the other Ti–C bond remains as the allylic nucleophile. The cyclic adduct is therefore a precursor to the opened reagent B; treating B as merely the one-equivalent enol ether loses the second reagent carbon.

The aldehyde oxygen coordinates to titanium. Allylic carbon transfer to its carbonyl carbon, accompanied by movement of the C=O pi electrons to oxygen, gives the titanium alkoxide $\mathrm{PhC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{Ti})\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{Ph})=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$. Acidic aqueous workup cleaves O–Ti and protonates oxygen, giving $\mathrm{PhC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{OH})\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{Ph})=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$. A six-membered allyl-transfer arrangement is a convenient mechanistic model. No enantioselectivity is imposed by these achiral reagents.

Schwartz reagent adds syn across the terminal alkene, placing zirconium at its terminal carbon and hydrogen at the substituted carbon. The organozirconium intermediate is $\mathrm{PhCH}(\mathrm{OMe})\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{Me})\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{ZrC}{\mathrm{p}}_2\mathrm{Cl}$. The two faces of the achiral starting alkene give enantiomeric organometallic intermediates.

Boron trifluoride coordinates the ether oxygen, making the benzylic C–OMe bond susceptible to cleavage. The C–Zr bond then transfers its carbon terminus intramolecularly to the benzylic carbon as the activated methoxy group departs, closing a cyclopropane. This can be represented as a concerted, strongly assisted displacement rather than requiring a freely equilibrating long-lived benzylic carbocation. hydrozirconation fixes the relative disposition of the new C–H and C–Zr bonds, and the preferred closure conformation places the bulky phenyl and methyl groups on opposite faces. The result is racemic trans-1-methyl-2-phenylcyclopropane, with much less steric crowding than the cis alternative. The ring contains the original two alkene carbons and the original benzylic carbon; no carbene carbon is added.

Let $\mathrm{Ar}=2,6$-dimethylphenyl and $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{r}}^{\prime }=2$-methoxyphenyl. After conversion of the Pd(OAc)${}_2$ precatalyst into an active phosphine–Pd(0) species, oxidative addition of $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{r}}^{\prime }\mathrm{Cl}$ gives ${\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{n}}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{d}}^{\mathrm{II}}(\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{r}}^{\prime })\mathrm{Cl}$. Carbonate-assisted replacement of chloride by the alcohol's alkoxide produces ${\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{n}}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{d}}^{\mathrm{II}}(\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{r}}^{\prime })[\mathrm{OC}(\mathrm{Me}{)}_2\mathrm{Ar}]$.

In the key beta-carbon elimination, the alkoxide oxygen forms a C=O bond while the bond between its carbinol carbon and $\mathrm{Ar}$ cleaves, transferring $\mathrm{Ar}$ to palladium. This gives acetone and a diarylpalladium(II) complex, ${\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{n}}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{d}}^{\mathrm{II}}(\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{r}}^{\prime })(\mathrm{Ar})$. reductive elimination creates the new biaryl bond and regenerates Pd(0). Thus the tertiary alcohol functions as an aryl donor by carbon–carbon bond cleavage, rather than being incorporated as a carbinol substituent. The overall organic products are the cross-coupled biaryl and acetone. The carbinol carbon has no hydrogen, so ordinary beta-hydride elimination from this alkoxide cannot explain the observed aryl transfer. The bulky electron-rich phosphine helps access the aryl-chloride oxidative addition and the sterically congested biaryl-forming elimination.

Both free primary allylic alcohols undergo Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation. With slightly more than two equivalents of hydroperoxide, the expected fully oxidized product is the diepoxide, with both original C=C bonds converted to epoxides and both primary alcohols retained. The two central pre-existing stereocentres and their ether substituents are retained.

The stereochemical construction is unambiguous by applying the L-(+)-tartrate mnemonic separately at each end: orient that alkene horizontally with its CH${}_2$OH group at lower right, and deliver oxygen from the back face. In the source's original in-plane orientation this gives the left epoxide oxygen behind the plane and the right epoxide oxygen in front. The methyl and hydroxymethyl groups retain their original relative arrangement about each former double bond. One cannot simply draw both oxygens on the same face of the original extended chain: the two allylic-alcohol ends have opposite drawing orientations. titanium binding to each free hydroxyl directs oxygen transfer; the pre-existing stereocentres can create matched/mismatched rate differences, but the stated reagent control predicts the stereochemistry of both epoxidations. Molecular sieves maintain a dry active titanium–tartrate system.^[ref]

acetone first forms a proline enamine by reversible iminium formation and alpha-deprotonation. The enamine attacks the aromatic aldehyde in a hydrogen-bonded arrangement involving the catalyst's carboxylic acid. hydrolysis of the resulting iminium releases the beta-hydroxyketone and regenerates proline. The usual L-proline arrangement gives the $R$ secondary alcohol.

The sterically crowded aryl–amide axis is selected at the same bond-forming step: rapid rotation in the aldehyde permits the catalyst to react preferentially with the conformer that puts the smaller carbonyl-oxygen side of the amide towards the approaching aldol transition structure and the bulky diisopropylamino side away. A chair-like enamine–aldehyde model minimizes the interaction of the amide with the catalyst-side axial hydrogen; reversing the amide orientation creates the less favourable diastereomeric transition state. Replacing planar CHO by tetrahedral CH(OH)CH${}_2$COMe then raises the rotation barrier and traps the axis. This is a dynamic kinetic resolution, not resolution of two configurationally stable starting atropisomers.

To specify the predicted major axis without relying on a flat bond-line formula, look from the aromatic ipso carbon towards the amide carbonyl carbon. Put the higher-priority aryl path, the trimethylsilyl-bearing ortho side, at nine o'clock. The preferred model puts the carbonyl oxygen at approximately six o'clock and the diisopropylamino group at twelve o'clock. This is $S_a$ using the near-to-far high-priority convention; oxygen outranks nitrogen at the far end. Coupled with the alcohol assignment, the model predicts $(R,S_a)$. The drawing defines the configuration even if an alternative viewing direction is used. The dynamic-resolution mechanism is established by the primary aldol study; the product-axis assignment here is a stereochemical-model prediction for the printed substrate.^[ref]

An unsaturated Rh(I)–BINAP complex undergoes oxidative addition of the aldehydic C–H bond, giving a Rh(III) acyl hydride. Coordination of the tethered alkene brings it into the chiral coordination sphere. hydride migration to the internal, tert-butyl-substituted alkene carbon places Rh on the terminal methylene. The resulting acyl–alkyl complex has the connectivity required for a five-membered ring. reductive elimination between its acyl and alkyl carbons closes the C–C bond, releases the cyclopentanone and regenerates Rh(I).

The aldehyde carbon becomes the ketone carbonyl carbon; its hydrogen ultimately reaches the alkene-derived internal carbon. The original tert-butyl substituent remains attached to the internal alkene carbon, which becomes the beta stereocentre of the cyclopentanone. alkene coordination and insertion favour the chiral pocket arrangement with the bulky tert-butyl group in the less crowded region of the BINAP complex. For the stated (S)-BINAP system the observed product is the $R$ beta-tert-butylcyclopentanone, equivalently the product with tert-butyl on the solid-wedge face in the supplied ring orientation. Its priorities are tert-butyl, the shorter carbonyl-side ring path, the other ring path, and hydrogen. The ligand's S label alone is not a general rule that every product stereocentre must be S; the substrate orientation in the catalyst must also be specified. No decarbonylation is needed in the productive hydroacylation cycle.

One valid asymmetric route uses N-Boc-(R)-proline as a chiral starting material. Convert its acid to the Weinreb amide with N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine and a coupling reagent such as EDC, then add phenylmagnesium bromide at low temperature. chelation of the magnesium tetrahedral intermediate prevents a second addition; aqueous workup releases the phenyl ketone. Reduce it with sodium borohydride, separate the resulting alcohol diastereomers, and retain the one with $R$ configuration at both pyrrolidine C2 and the benzylic carbinol. This is an asymmetric synthesis through a pre-existing enantiopure centre, even though the final reduction need not be perfectly diastereoselective. If the other protected alcohol is isolated, Mitsunobu esterification with a carboxylic acid followed by ester hydrolysis inverts just the carbinol centre. Keeping nitrogen Boc-protected during that inversion avoids neighbouring-amine participation. Mild Boc removal followed by reductive benzylation with benzaldehyde and sodium triacetoxyborohydride gives D, the $(R,R)$ amino alcohol. Use conditions that avoid epimerizing the amino ketone.

For ring expansion, activate D's alcohol with methanesulfonyl chloride and a tertiary amine base. Its own tertiary nitrogen attacks the benzylic carbon from the back, displacing mesylate with inversion and making a fused aziridinium ion. Acetate, supplied as a soluble acetate salt, attacks the original pyrrolidine C2 from the opposite face and breaks the old C2–N bond. The new N–benzylic-C bond is retained, incorporating that side-chain carbon into the six-membered ring. Inversion at the two successively attacked carbons gives the cis acetate/phenyl piperidine E in the displayed orientation. Attack at the benzylic carbon instead would simply open the three-membered ion back to a five-membered-ring derivative; specifying the attacked carbon is the crucial regiochemical step.