Introduce the slow time and treat independently in the method of multiple scales. Write
At the next order,
For fixed define the period average by
Here inside the averages is evaluated at the leading position and velocity . Orthogonality to both fundamental harmonics is the solvability condition in the method of multiple scales: it removes the resonant forcing that would otherwise generate a secular term. Since the squared sine and cosine averages are , the amplitude-phase equations are
Equivalently and at first order. These equations describe a bounded, weakly perturbed oscillation over while the amplitude remains in a range where the expansion is ordered. At zero amplitude the oscillation phase coordinate is singular; Cartesian harmonic coefficients or an equilibrium analysis should replace it.
For conservative forcing in averaged oscillator equations, , the average determining vanishes. If , then
whose period average is zero. Thus to this order, while a position-dependent force generally shifts the oscillation phase and frequency. The exact equation also conserves the energy , consistent with the absence of amplitude drift for bounded orbits.
For the cubic position force, . Therefore
The leading oscillation is . For positive it is a softening cubic oscillator, obtained by weakly perturbing a harmonic oscillator. The weak-force condition is ; the constant is the leading harmonic amplitude, not a claim that the exact waveform remains sinusoidal.
For velocity-only forcing in averaged oscillator equations, , the oscillation phase average vanishes: is a periodic total derivative, using an antiderivative of . Hence to first order, although the amplitude may change.
In the cubic case, , so
With , integration gives
For positive this is cubic velocity anti-damping, not damping: the exact energy derivative is . The slow solution grows and formally diverges at . The weakly nonlinear approximation loses validity before its amplitude becomes so large that is not small; its divergence is not a controlled prediction of the exact late-time solution. If , the exact zero solution should be used separately.
Let . This is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind in parameter notation; the modulus used in some definitions is . Near the endpoint, gives
Use matched asymptotic expansion with an intermediate cutoff satisfying . Away from the endpoint the leading integral is
while the endpoint integral is
Adding them removes the arbitrary cutoff and gives the logarithmic endpoint asymptotic of the complete elliptic integral
The order of the next term is therefore , rather than merely . More explicitly, if ,
The logarithmic correction arises from the next terms integrated through the overlap. Its coefficient can also be found by substituting into the Gauss hypergeometric equation satisfied here, , giving , .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.