Use a mass-normalized galactic distribution function , so that and . Multiplying the stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and integrating over velocity space givesAssume the galactic distribution function decays sufficiently rapidly for the velocity boundary term to vanish. Integration by parts then gives , and therefore the Jeans equations areThe second moment includes both ordered motion and velocity dispersion; no assumption of zero mean velocity was needed.
To obtain the tensor virial theorem, multiply the th Jeans equation by and integrate over position. For an isolated, finite system with a vanishing spatial surface term,Since the left side is , . This convention puts all stellar second moments into ; it does not separate ordered and random kinetic energies.
For a self-gravitating system, the trace is the Newtonian gravitational potential energy. Indeed, symmetrizing the pair integral givesThus the trace of the tensor virial theorem is , and the total energy obeysThese identities require self-gravity without an additional external potential or an omitted confining boundary pressure.
Let now denote a mass-weighted average over the entire initial system. Then . The gravitational radius is defined by , so the virial theorem immediately yieldsThe gravitational radius measures total binding energy, rather than a particular geometric edge or half-mass radius.
For the accreted systems define the mass-weighted internal mean-square speed by . If each satellite initially satisfies the virial theorem, its internal energy contributes to . In parabolic dry-merger energy accounting, the orbital energy at large separation is zero. Assume a dry galaxy merger, no loss of mass or energy through escaping stars, no external work, and a final relaxed system satisfying the virial theorem. Then conservation of energy gives and . Energy transferred by Chandrasekhar dynamical friction remains part of the total energy under these assumptions. Consequently,Applying the final virial theorem and dividing by the initial relation givesFor a mass doubling, . A merger of two identical equilibrated galaxies has , hence . For accretion through many minor galaxy mergers whose satellites have much smaller internal mean-square speeds, , hence , tending to in the cold-satellite limit. Equivalently, nearly fixed total energy makes the gravitational radius scale as during cold minor-merger size growth. Small satellite mass alone does not logically imply : the factor four also requires this weak-binding assumption. Likewise, equal masses require comparable internal binding to give the factor two. These are the physical limits behind the two stated merger comparisons.
A phase-space distribution function describes the mass in a small cell of positions and velocities: is that mass. Its velocity integral is the spatial mass density, and at a fixed position is a normalized velocity probability density. A number-normalized galactic distribution function differs by the stellar mass convention.
Take and . For the cusped logarithmic spherical galaxy model, differentiate the gravitational potential and use the spherical Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity:ThusA circular orbit requires . Its galaxy rotation curve is thereforeIt rises as at small radius and approaches from below at large radius.
The outer flat galaxy rotation curve is qualitatively useful for galaxies. However, the density has an inner cusp and an outer tail, while diverges. The model therefore requires an outer truncation for a finite galaxy, and does not describe a central constant-density core. Its gravitational potential cannot be normalized to zero at infinity.
For a star, the specific energy is and the specific angular momentum is . Since the gravitational potential is stationary and spherical,Thus both the specific energy and the entire angular-momentum vector are conserved.
For Jeans theorem, follow a stellar trajectory in phase space. The Collisionless Boltzmann equation is preciselyIn a steady system , so the value of the galactic distribution function is constant along every trajectory: it is itself an integral of motion. Conversely, if are time-independent integrals of motion, then satisfies . Locally, a complete set of invariant orbit labels expresses any steady galactic distribution function this way. This is the weak form of Jeans theorem; a stronger assertion about a small set of isolating integrals needs additional orbital regularity or mixing assumptions. In particular, the theorem does not say that every steady galaxy must have a galactic distribution function depending on only and .
For the proposed constant-anisotropy distribution function, write and . Introduce a polar angle in the tangential velocity plane. Then , so the apparent singularity cancels against the velocity Jacobian. This inverse-angular-momentum velocity integration makes the density finite for every .
Let , , , and . Each exponential component contributesHere the two Gaussian integrals and the angular integral have product . Consequently,The galactic distribution function is nonnegative, gives the required density, and depends on conserved ; by Jeans theorem it is a self-consistent steady solution.
Differentiating the Gaussian integral with respect to shows that each component has , and the same value for . Angular averaging gives . Weighting these by yields the velocity dispersionsThe radial numerator includes , as in the original PDF. All mean velocities vanish by parity. The same parity, or the zero angular average of , gives .
The velocity-anisotropy parameter isThe constant-anisotropy distribution function therefore favors radial motion at every radius: the radial variance is twice either individual tangential variance. It still has a substantial population with nonzero angular momentum, rather than exclusively radial orbits. The factor enhances low-angular-momentum stars. The radial velocity dispersion approaches at the centre and far out; each individual tangential variance is half as large. There is no mean rotation, despite the well-defined galaxy rotation curve for hypothetical circular orbits.
In a stationary axisymmetric gravitational potential, conservation of angular momentum gives . Eliminating introduces the effective potentialFor an equatorial circular orbit, radial balance is , givingVertical balance also requires .
For epicyclic motion, assume a twice differentiable stationary gravitational potential symmetric under , small displacements , and a stable circular orbit. Choose the epicyclic guiding center using the conserved . Reflection symmetry makes , eliminating radial-vertical coupling at first order. Expanding the equations about givesThe derivatives are evaluated at the guiding centre, and stability requires . Without midplane symmetry, a mixed Hessian term can couple the two oscillations. The radial epicyclic frequency and vertical epicyclic frequency are the frequencies of these independent linear oscillations.
Set . Along the family of equatorial circular orbits, . Differentiating this relation and adding the centrifugal contribution givesTo interpret the common frequency range, let . Since , one has . A Keplerian disk has and , a flat galaxy rotation curve has and , and solid-body rotation has and . Typical galactic rotation curves lie between these slopes. Thus is a useful galactic range, not a theorem for every possible axisymmetric potential. As a precise sufficient example, epicyclic frequency bounds for monotone spherical density follow from and .
Use a Cartesian frame rotating with the epicyclic guiding center, with pointing radially outwards and in the direction of rotation. To first order, conservation of angular momentum givesThe radial harmonic oscillator solution and its azimuthal integral areA constant in merely changes the azimuthal origin of the guiding centre. The epicyclic ellipse obeys . In the usual frequency range it is elongated azimuthally, and the star travels clockwise when points right and up: its small motion relative to the prograde guiding centre is retrograde.
For the Oort constants, subtract the defining expressions to obtain and insert into the radial epicyclic frequency formula:The solar-neighbourhood values give , , andThe solar epicyclic ellipse is therefore about times longer azimuthally than radially.
A complete radial oscillation takes . The oscillatory part of has zero average over this interval, so the epicyclic azimuthal advance isThis describes the advance between consecutive radial turning points of the same type; it need not be a full revolution. For the Sun,The azimuthal advance estimate uses the same linear epicyclic motion approximation as the axis ratio.
For a spherical system, use the spherical shell theorem with shell mass . Inner shells contribute to the gravitational potential, while an outer shell contributes its constant interior potential . With , assuming the required integrals converge,On differentiation, the two terms containing cancel. Hence , where . Radial balance for a circular orbit gives .
For a razor-thin axisymmetric astrophysical disk, the element of mass is , where is the surface density. Superposing Newtonian gravitational potentials therefore givesAxisymmetry permits . Unlike the spherical case, an exterior annulus generally exerts a radial force: enclosed mass does not determine a disc rotation curve.
For the Legendre expansion of thin-disk gravity, split the radial integral at . In the inner part the kernel expands in , while in the outer part it expands in . The angular integrals of odd Legendre polynomials vanish, and those of even degree equal , whereIntroduce and . The gravitational potential becomesWhen differentiating each bracket, the moving-limit terms cancel: and . Since , this givesThe zeroth term has and . Separating it provesThe inner correction is inward, while the exterior correction is outward. For a smooth surface density, the original potential singularity at coincident points is integrable. Its radial force is understood through a symmetric Cauchy principal value or a vanishing-thickness regularization; the paired interior and exterior terms above retain the cancellation at . This avoids treating the two singular local force contributions separately.
For an exponential galactic disk, write , so and . At large , the missing mass and exterior-ring terms are exponentially small. The leading nonspherical interior term is , with and . Consequently the exponential-disk Keplerian asymptotic isThe positive leading correction shows that the rotation curve approaches the Keplerian limit from above. The finite-order large-radius expansion is sufficient here; an infinite moment expansion need not converge for a disk extending to infinity.
A useful special example is the Mestel disk, with surface density for , . It has . For every positive even ,All the nonspherical corrections cancel, givingThus the Mestel disk has a perfectly flat galaxy rotation curve.
This example has infinite total mass and a singular central surface density. The absolute gravitational potential cannot be set to zero at infinity, but the radial force exists as a limit of disks with increasing outer cutoff. Potential differences are . The earlier potential integral is therefore interpreted up to a radius-independent divergent constant for this example; the force calculation remains valid. Truncating the Mestel disk gives a more physical finite system but changes the exact flat curve near its edges.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.

