On a length scale , pressure communicates support over a sound-crossing time , whereas self-gravity acts over a time of order . When the former is longer, gravity can amplify an overdensity before pressure smooths it. Thus Jeans instability occurs at scales of order ; the precise numerical factor depends on whether scale means wavelength or inverse wavenumber.
Take a uniform static background, small perturbations, an inviscid barotropic fluid, and with . An infinite Newtonian homogeneous density cannot itself have zero background gravitational acceleration while satisfying the unmodified Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Specify the Jeans swindle: subtract the homogeneous field, or regard an external prescription as balancing it, and apply Poisson's equation only to perturbations. The linearized continuity equation and Euler equations for an inviscid fluid areTaking a time derivative of the first equation and substituting the second yields . A plane wave therefore givesFor there is exponential growth at rate . At the density mode is neutral to this linear order, and above it there are acoustic oscillations. The critical wavelength is . Transverse velocity perturbations decouple as zero-frequency vortical modes in this idealization.
For the attractive Yukawa potential, assume a real screening parameter . Its Green function obeys , including the delta source. Thus . The same fluid elimination gives Jeans instability with Yukawa gravity:There exists a growing nonzero-wavenumber mode precisely whenEquality gives no exponentially growing nonzero mode. If screening exceeds this threshold, the finite-range gravitational response is too weak to overcome pressure at any wavelength. Otherwise all sufficiently long but nonconstant waves remain unstable, with a longer minimum unstable wavelength than in Newtonian gravity. For the long-wave gravitational contribution also scales as , so the growth rate tends to zero as ; screening does not produce a second positive lower cutoff in wavenumber. A homogeneous screened background can have the constant gravitational potential , with zero force, so no Newtonian background subtraction is needed for nonzero screening. The limits and are nonuniform. An exact density change is not one of the growing finite-wavelength modes. In the pressureless edge case , every finite is unstable for positive density and finite screening.
Use the same specified homogeneous Newtonian background and Jeans swindle, but describe stars by a mass-normalized galactic distribution function. The Collisionless Boltzmann equation is . Let and similarly perturb the gravitational potential. To first order,Eliminating and the nonzero gravitational potential amplitude gives the collisionless Jeans dispersion relationFor growing modes there is no real-velocity pole. Real and damped frequencies require a causal contour prescription or analytic continuation; one must not simply integrate through a pole without specifying it.
Take in the Cauchy velocity distribution. Its normalization is . Orient along the axis and integrate over the perpendicular velocities:At the marginal mode , , with its finite limiting value at zero. The provided Gamma function integral at power two givesConsequentlyTo check that this really separates growing modes, put in the upper half-plane. Residue integration, or integration by parts followed by the Cauchy resolvent, gives . The upper-half-plane solution has , which grows exactly for . At the threshold it approaches the marginal mode continuously. Although plays the threshold role of a velocity scale, this distribution's second moment diverges: the radial integrand for tends to a nonzero constant at large speed. It is therefore incorrect to identify with a finite velocity dispersion or to infer this result by substituting an rms speed into a fluid formula.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.