Put
For every nonzero integer ,
Let
These are disjoint nonempty subsets of . If , then
so . Similarly, if , then
so .
The ping-pong lemma now identifies the subgroup generated by and with
Both generators have infinite order, so this is a free group of rank two inside the special linear group .
Use the injective group homomorphism from part (a). If , its image is an integral matrix . Choose a prime number that does not divide one nonzero entry of . The reduction modulo a prime in an integral matrix group homomorphism
then sends to a nonidentity element. Its target is a finite group, so the composite map separates from the identity. Hence is a residually finite group.
Write an element of the Integer Heisenberg group as . Matrix multiplication gives
The subgroup
is normal and isomorphic to . If , then
Thus, on the coordinate column , conjugation by is the linear map with matrix
Every element has a unique expression , so
The commutators fill the central subgroup of matrices , while the quotient by this subgroup is generated freely and abelianly by the images of and . Equivalently, is the second coordinate axis. Therefore the abelianization is
Let and let generate the other factor of . For ,
After abelianization, the image of is therefore
If is not an eigenvalue of , then . Hence is a full-rank sublattice of with finite index of a subgroup . The displayed quotient, and therefore the image of the factor in , is finite. In fact the abelianization of a semidirect product by the integers gives
Take
Its eigenvalues are
Neither is a root of unity, so is not an eigenvalue of for any positive .
Let be a finite-index subgroup of , let , and project onto its factor. Then has finite index in , while the image of is for some . Choose projecting to . Every element of has a unique expression with , and conjugation by on is the restriction of . Thus
Because is not an eigenvalue of , part (b), applied to the finite-rank lattice , shows that the image of in is finite. The quotient by that finite image is generated by the image of , so is a finite extension of an infinite cyclic group. It is therefore a virtually cyclic group.
For each generator , let be its length in the generating set , and put
A shortest -word for has letters. Replacing each letter by an -word of length at most gives
Thus inclusion of any finitely generated subgroup is Lipschitz continuous for the corresponding word metrics.
Let be a retraction. Part (a) supplies a constant such that
The finite set generates . Put
If a shortest -word represents , applying the group homomorphism gives a -word for the same element of length at most . Hence
The inclusion is therefore bilipschitz and in particular a quasi-isometric embedding. Thus every finitely generated retract subgroup is quasi-isometrically embedded.
This is the Baumslag-Solitar group . Its defining relation gives, by mathematical induction,
In the cyclic subgroup with generator ,
whereas in , with generators ,
If inclusion were a -quasi-isometric embedding, its lower bound would imply
for every , which is impossible because an exponential function eventually dominates every linear function. Hence is not quasi-isometrically embedded; it is an exponentially distorted subgroup.
Set
The triangle inequality makes Lipschitz continuous and hence a continuous function. Since is an isometric embedding,
so as . The function is therefore coercive, and the extreme value theorem on a sufficiently large compact interval gives a minimizing parameter.
Suppose both minimize , put and , and let
The restriction of between the two parameters is a geodesic from to . Let be its midpoint. In the geodesic triangle with vertices , the thin geodesic triangle condition gives a point on one of the other two sides with . By symmetry suppose . Then
so
But lies on and is a closest point, so . Therefore , which is stronger than the required
This is the closest point on a geodesic line in a hyperbolic metric space estimate.
The defining formulas imply the matching-distance identities
For example,
and the other two follow cyclically. Thus are the tripod points of a geodesic triangle.
By the thin geodesic triangle condition, lies within of some point on or . If , then the triangle inequality gives
Since is the point of at distance from , the geodesic parametrization gives , and hence . If instead , comparison of distances from gives .
Applying the same argument cyclically, each of lies within of at least one of the other two. The graph on these three points whose edges join pairs at distance at most therefore has no isolated vertex, so it is connected. Any two vertices are joined by at most two edges, and the triangle inequality yields

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.