Past exam of the nonlinear Optics and Quantum States of Light course of the University of Cambridge / 2014 / Paper 1 / 3

An optical soliton maintains a localized profile because nonlinear refraction compensates linear spreading. A temporal optical soliton balances group velocity dispersion against self-phase modulation; a spatial optical soliton balances diffraction against self-focusing. The relevant coordinate and sign of nonlinearity must be specified.

For anomalous group velocity dispersion and positive $\gamma$, a fundamental temporal bright soliton isThe identity $(\mathrm{sech}u{)}^{\prime \prime }=\mathrm{sech}u-2{\mathrm{sech}}^{3}u$ verifies both the width relation and propagation phase. Its dispersion length $L_D=T_0^2/|{\beta }_2|$ equals its nonlinear length $L_{\mathrm{NL}}=1/(\gamma P_s)$. Bright pulses decay to zero background. dark solitons are intensity depressions on a nonzero background with a phase change across the dip; black dips reach zero intensity, while grey dips do not. For positive $\gamma$ the corresponding temporal defocusing regime has normal group velocity dispersion.

A higher-order temporal soliton has soliton order $N_s=\sqrt{\gamma P_s{T}_0^2/|{\beta }_2|}$ equal to an integer greater than one for the special initial $N_s\mathrm{sech}$ profile in normalized units. It breathes through compression and splitting/recombination, rather than keeping one fixed shape. Separated fundamental solitons can interact and acquire collision shifts. An arbitrary pulse with noninteger $N_s$ is not automatically a pure higher-order soliton; dispersive radiation can carry part of its energy.

In ideal one-dimensional cubic propagation, dispersion and nonlinearity support stable fundamental bright pulses. Loss, higher-order dispersion, delayed nonlinear response and finite bandwidth change real-fibre propagation. A one-dimensional spatial bright solution also does not guarantee stability against two-dimensional collapse. Profile preservation, finite-energy background conditions and robustness should be checked rather than inferred from any solitary-looking peak.

A detector too slow to resolve a femtosecond field can measure its integrated nonlinear response instead. Split the pulse, delay one replica, overlap both in a thin phase-matched crystal, and select the sum-frequency signal. For negligible depletion and sufficiently broad phase matching, the cross-generated field is proportional to $A(t)A(t-\tau )$; integrated signal gives the second-harmonic intensity autocorrelationA noncollinear geometry can reject each replica's individual second harmonic. The optical response supplies the fast gate while the detector integrates slowly. Crystal thickness, group-velocity mismatch, spectral acceptance, beam overlap and delay calibration limit resolution.

For a Gaussian pulse specified by its intensity profile, the autocorrelation's full width at half maximum is $\sqrt{2}$ times the intensity full width at half maximum. For a sech-squared intensity profile the ratio is about $1.543$. These are model-dependent conversion factors. An intensity autocorrelation is symmetric in delay and loses phase information; different pulses can share it. An interferometric autocorrelation retains rapid carrier fringes but still does not generally reconstruct an arbitrary complex field uniquely.

frequency-resolved optical gating also resolves the gated signal's spectrum, giving a two-dimensional delay-frequency record. For second-harmonic frequency-resolved optical gating,where $\omega$ is measured relative to the signal's carrier. An iterative retrieval seeks an envelope whose predicted record matches the measurement. Alternatively, polarization-gating frequency-resolved optical gating uses the optical Kerr effect to gate the probe by a delayed replica's intensity, with signal envelope proportional to $A(t)|A(t-\tau ){|}^2$. The original FROG work introduced nonlinear optical gating plus spectral resolution to characterize arbitrary femtosecond pulses.^[ref]

Absolute wave phase and absolute time origin remain undetermined by these intensity records. The SHG record also cannot distinguish $A(t)$ from $A^{\ast }(-t)$, so its time-direction ambiguity remains. Retrieval agreement, an independently measured spectrum, adequate signal dynamic range and gate-response calibration are practical consistency checks. A pulse train that changes between shots can yield an averaged record that no single pulse faithfully represents. Thus nonlinear gating solves the detector-speed problem but does not remove inverse problem ambiguities or experimental limitations.

For $X=(a+a^{†})/2$ and $Y=(a-a^{†})/(2i)$, $[X,Y]=i/2$, so $\Delta X\Delta Y\ge 1/4$. Vacuum and coherent states have variance $1/4$ in either optical quadrature. quadrature squeezing means that some rotated optical quadrature has variance below this reference, with compensating noise elsewhere. A reduced second moment about zero is not the correct test when the field's mean is displaced.

For $S(\zeta )=\exp [({\zeta }^{\ast }{a}^2-\zeta a^{†2})/2]$ and $\zeta =r{e}^{i\theta }$, the quiet principal axis of the optical squeezed vacuum is at angle $\theta /2$ under the squeeze-operator convention used above, andThe pure Gaussian quantum state saturates the uncertainty product. Displacement moves its centre without changing its covariance ellipse; squeezed thermal states instead have a larger uncertainty product. The optical squeezed vacuum has zero mean field, even photon-number parity and mean occupation ${\sinh }^{2}r$; it need not have sub-Poissonian photon statistics. number squeezing and quadrature squeezing are different conditions.

Degenerate parametric amplification generates single-mode squeezing; a two-mode squeezed vacuum instead has correlated occupations and joint quadrature squeezing. Either individual mode of an ideal two-mode state is thermal after the other is ignored, not individually squeezed. balanced homodyne detection measures the noise versus local oscillator phase. Reference phase drift admixes the anti-squeezed optical quadrature, while electronic noise and detector imbalance need separate checks.

For an optical loss channel with efficiency $\eta$ and vacuum entering the unused port, optical squeezing degradation by loss givesThe linear-loss limit follows directly by writing the output field as $\sqrt{\eta }a+\sqrt{1-\eta }v$ with independent vacuum mode $v$. Loss therefore places a floor under measured squeezing. Squeezed input can improve phase-sensitive measurements when aligned with the measured optical quadrature; it does not reduce every noise source or both conjugate uncertainties at once.