Pointwise,
Taking expectations and dividing by gives the second-moment form of Markov's inequality:
The inverse transformation is , , with support , . Its absolute Jacobian determinant is
The original joint probability density function, by independence, is on the positive quadrant. The change of variables formula therefore gives
Integrating over gives
the gamma distribution of shape two and rate . Integrating over gives on . The factorization also shows that and are independent.
The preceding marginal calculation makes each uniformly distributed on , with expectation and variance . By independence,
Apply part (a) to the centred random variable to obtain
This is Chebyshev's inequality in this setting.
For , the conditional transition probabilities are , the entries of ; for the assertion is the definition of . For the induction step, condition on the state at time and use the Markov property and time-homogeneity:
The countable sum is justified by the law of total probability; all terms are nonnegative. Thus the formula follows for every by induction. It is the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation for repeated one-step transitions.
Let . Conditioning on gives
The fixed value is . Subtracting it and iterating the scalar recurrence yields
The formula includes . If , its value at is interpreted directly as , while for all . Since , the limiting probability is .
At the first step, the chain enters state two with probability and state four with probability . The classes and are closed and disjoint, so only the first branch can reach state three. On the transition matrix is exactly the two-state matrix from part (b). Thus after the remaining steps, the probability of the second state in that class is
For it is zero, as the original matrix requires; this statement covers the zero-base exponent case without ambiguity.
State one is left after one step and never revisited. The eventual probability mass in the closed class is
Within this class the stationary distribution is , because the balance equation is . The two-state recurrence shows convergence from either starting state, since . The other closed class never reaches state five. Therefore

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.