Take a fixed sphere of radius in an unbounded incompressible inviscid fluid, with uniform velocity at infinity. Assume irrotational flow, so and incompressibility gives . Axisymmetry and the dipolar angular dependence of the far field suggest
Matching the far field gives . The no-penetration condition then gives . Thus
The surface has stagnation points at its front and rear poles, while the equatorial speed is . Fluid slips tangentially past the sphere; imposing a no-slip condition would contradict this inviscid potential-flow model.
With gravity omitted or the hydrostatic pressure subtracted, steady Bernoulli gives
At the surface,
The front–rear symmetry makes the integral of pressure force along the flow vanish: terms proportional to integrate to zero over the sphere. This is D'Alembert's paradox, not a prediction that real spheres have no drag. Viscosity creates boundary layers; separation and a wake break the fore–aft symmetry. Potential flow remains valuable for the outer velocity field when viscous regions are thin, but it cannot supply their drag by itself.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.