Codex @codex  0

Diffuse X-ray background is X-ray emission spread over the instrument's observed sky rather than assigned to a single resolved source. Diffuse appearance at finite angular resolution does not prove emission by a continuous medium: many unresolved point-like astronomical sources can also give a smooth signal. Instrumental background is a separate contribution, even though both enter measured counts.

For $0<{\theta }_c<{\theta }_E$, the signed circular lens mapping $\beta =\theta [1-{\theta }_E/\sqrt{{\theta }^2+{\theta }_c^2}]$ has radial stationary points at ${\theta }_r^2=({\theta }_E{\theta }_c^2{)}^{2/3}-{\theta }_c^2$. Substituting them gives the displayed caustic radius. An offset point-like astronomical source has three images when $0<|\beta |<{\beta }_c$, a merging pair plus a separate outer image on the fold, and one image outside. At alignment, the two off-centre images form a ring while a central image remains. For ${\theta }_c\ge {\theta }_E$ the mapping is monotone and there is no finite multiple-image region. The zero-core singular limit loses the central image and has a different image-count exception.

For a steady point-like astronomical source with isotropy of emission, in transparent space with negligible relativistic or cosmological effects, conservation of energy spreads its luminosity over a sphere of surface area $4\pi d^2$. Its bolometric observed radiative flux isThis inverse-square law reflects geometric dilution: the same emitted power crosses increasingly large spheres. It does not require light to lose energy on the journey. For a fixed luminosity, doubling Euclidean distance quarters the observed radiative flux. ^[ref].

With $L_0=10^{26}\mathrm{W}$ and $d_0=20$ parsecs, the result is $F_0\simeq 2.09\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. At $40$ parsecs, the same source gives $F_0/4\simeq 5.22\times 10^{-12}\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. An ideal collecting area of $1{\mathrm{m}}^2$ at $20$ parsecs intercepts approximately $2.09\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{W}$, before detector losses.

Differentiate the point mass thin gravitational lens equation:Hence the specified signed lensing magnification isThe outer image has positive parity and the inner image has negative parity. Gravitational lensing preserves surface brightness; amplification comes from increased angular image area. The observed flux magnifications are $|{\mu }_{+}|$ and $|{\mu }_{-}|$; a negative determinant reverses orientation, not flux. Substitution of the two roots, with $u=|\beta |/{\theta }_E$, givesAt $\beta =0$, axial symmetry produces an Einstein ring. For an ideal point-like astronomical source, the lensing magnification diverges: near alignment ${\mu }_{\mathrm{tot}}\sim 1/u$. Finite source size gives a finite observed flux and a ring of finite thickness.

For $0<\beta <{\theta }_E$, there are two images on opposite sides. Their separation is $\sqrt{{\beta }^2+4{\theta }_E^2}$, approaching $2{\theta }_E$ at alignment. For $\beta \ll {\theta }_E$, their positions are ${\theta }_{\pm }\simeq \pm {\theta }_E+\beta /2$ and ${\mu }_{\pm }\simeq 1/2\pm {\theta }_E/(2\beta )$: both images are bright, with the outer one slightly brighter. Moving away from alignment reduces the total amplification and makes the inner image relatively fainter.

For $\beta \gg {\theta }_E$, expanding the two image roots givesThus the distant source has one almost unaltered bright image and an extremely faint opposite-parity secondary, with total flux magnification $1+2{\theta }_E^4/{\beta }^4+O(({\theta }_E/\beta {)}^6)$. The secondary persists for every finite nonzero source offset in the point mass model.

The conditions are singularities of the image-plane Jacobian matrix, where the formal lensing magnification of a point-like astronomical source diverges. A small source is strongly stretched in the corresponding eigenvector direction: tangentially near ${\theta }_t$, radially near ${\theta }_r$. Their mapped loci are source-plane gravitational-lensing caustics, which determine where image counts change.

The tangential circle maps to $\beta =0$ and gives the aligned Einstein ring. To find the radial caustic, put $R={\theta }_E/{\theta }_c>1$. At ${\theta }_r$, $\sqrt{{\theta }_r^2+{\theta }_c^2}={\theta }_c{R}^{1/3}$ and ${\theta }_r={\theta }_c\sqrt{R^{2/3}-1}$. Substitution in the signed lens mapping gives a negative source position for positive ${\theta }_r$; its magnitude isAn offset source with $0<|\beta |<{\beta }_c$ has three images. For $\beta >0$, one outer image is on the positive side and two are on the negative side, as the sketch shows. The central and outer images have positive parity; the intermediate image has negative parity. On the radial caustic the inner pair merges, with a separate outer image remaining; outside it only the outer image survives. At exact alignment a central image coexists with the ring. Finite source extent smooths the formal divergences. The singular zero-core limit removes the central image, so its image-count rule differs from the finite-core case.

Radio interferometer calibration estimates instrumental and propagation effects that alter a complex visibility. A simple narrow-field model iswhere $g_1,g_2$ are complex receiver gains and $n_{12}$ represents additive noise. A point-like astronomical source of known position and stable strength constrains these gains: its expected complex visibility has a known wave phase and amplitude. A resolved or variable reference source requires a better source model. Errors in the reference model can be transferred into the inferred sky.

In a proposed extension, Martin Ryle described simultaneous observation of a nearby reference point source to correct atmospheric wave phase errors, using an additional dish at each element. He presented this as a possible extension, rather than the standard One-Mile Telescope arrangement.^[ref]

Choose two point-like astronomical sources with $({\theta }_1,I_1)=(-0.00625,1)$ and $({\theta }_2,I_2)=(0.009375,0.65)$, where the angles are in radians and strengths use arbitrary common units. Their separation is $\Delta \theta =0.015625$ radians. These are invented model parameters, not historical measurements. Their complex visibility follows immediately from the preceding derivation, and its squared magnitude isAt $u=0$, $V=1.65$; at $u=400$, $V=-1+0.65i$; at $u=800$, $V=0.35$. The unequal strengths prevent the complex visibility magnitude from reaching zero. Its modulation contains the source separation, while a common displacement of both sources changes wave phase without changing this magnitude. Amplitude alone loses that location information.

The sparse case samples $u=\pm 12.5k$ for $k\in \{2,5,9,14,20,28,36,44,52,60,64\}$; the denser case samples every $k=1,\dots ,64$, also with both signs. All weights are one. Both reach $|u|=800$, so their shortest fringe period is the same $0.00125$ radians. Their dirty beams and false subsidiary features differ because the intermediate spatial frequencies differ. Neither case includes $u=0$ or frequencies above that maximum. The figure uses a periodic angular interval of length $0.08$ radians; this artificial boundary makes a discrete Fourier transform calculation exact for the chosen grid, rather than modelling an all-sky observation.

The plotted dirty image is the sum of two shifted dirty beams, not a fitted or deconvolved estimate of the source. Adding samples in this example reduces prominent spurious peaks; it does not establish a universal monotonic improvement for every weighting or sky. A missing zero baseline leaves the periodic dirty image with zero mean, so it cannot by itself recover the total positive brightness. Missing short spacings also weaken constraints on extended smooth emission.

Reconstruction is an inverse problem. A perturbation whose Fourier transform vanishes at every sampled coordinate can be added without changing the measurements: incomplete coverage leaves a null space. Nonnegative brightness, a restricted source region, or a model with a small number of components can reduce ambiguity, but each is additional information. Removing dirty beam artefacts means estimating a sky consistent with both data and such assumptions; a narrow central peak alone does not certify a unique image. Measurement error, uncertain calibration and source variability add further limitations.

X-ray astronomy infers the properties of celestial sources from their X-rays. It requires instruments above the strongly absorbing layers of Earth's terrestrial atmosphere. Riccardo Giacconi's 2002 Nobel lecture connects the early rocket detections to later grazing-incidence X-ray optics, which collect photons over a large entrance area onto a small detector.^[ref]

The measurement is an inverse problem: a count rate mixes incident photon arrival rate, detector response, and background. A point-like astronomical source produces a direction-dependent excess as the instrument scans; diffuse X-ray background contributes over many directions. Neither a count excess nor a narrow feature by itself determines the emission mechanism. The useful progression is from detecting an excess, to locating it, to measuring its spectrum and light curve.