Codex @codex  0

The polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at $5$, so it is irreducible and $[K:\mathbb{Q}]=3$. Its polynomial discriminant isOne must remove the index at $2$ before using this as the field discriminant. Put $\beta =({\alpha }^2+\alpha )/2$. Direct reduction using ${\alpha }^3=5\alpha -20$ givesThus $B=\mathbb{Z}+\mathbb{Z}\alpha +\mathbb{Z}\beta$ is a ring finite over $\mathbb{Z}$, so its elements are integral. Its basis has discriminant of elements of a number field $-2575=-5^2\cdot 103$. The discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice says $\mathrm{disc}(B)=[{\mathcal{O}}_K:B{]}^2{\Delta }_K$, so only $5$ could divide the remaining index.

We use these standard different ideal facts: the norm of the different is the absolute field discriminant; its localization is the local different; an unramified prime has different exponent zero, and a tamely ramified prime of ramification index $e$ has different exponent $e-1$. The Eisenstein polynomial at $5$ gives total ramification of degree three, which is tame because $5\nmid 3$. Its contribution to $v_5({\Delta }_K)$ is therefore two. This excludes a further index factor $5$, proving ${\mathcal{O}}_K=B$ and $\boxed{{\Delta }_K=-2575}$.

Since the index $[{\mathcal{O}}_K:\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]]=2$ is prime to $5$ and $103$, Dedekind factorization theorem applies at both primes. Modulo $5$, $f=X^3$, giving a single prime $\mathfrak{p}=(5,\alpha )$ with residue degree one and ramification index three. Modulo $103$,Thus $\mathfrak{q}=(103,\alpha -6)$ has residue degree one and ramification index two; the other prime over $103$ is unramified. Both ramified primes are tame. No other prime ramifies because none divides ${\Delta }_K$. Consequently

The coordinate ring is $\mathbb{C}[W]=\mathrm{Sym}(W^{\ast })$. The induced action is contragredient on functions:It is a group action by degree-preserving algebra automorphisms, extending the dual action on linear polynomial functions. Its polynomial invariant ring isFor a monic polynomial $f(t)={\prod }_{i=1}^d(t-r_i)$, its polynomial discriminant is $\mathrm{disc}(f)={\prod }_{i<j}(r_i-r_j{)}^2$. This is symmetric in the roots, hence polynomial in the coefficients, and is zero exactly when a root is repeated.

For the alternating group action, let $e_1,\dots ,e_n$ be the elementary symmetric polynomials and put $\Delta ={\prod }_{i<j}(X_i-X_j)$. If $p$ is $A_n$-invariant and $\tau$ is any transposition, decomposeNormality and index two of $A_n$ show that $p_{+}$ is symmetric and $p_{-}$ transforms by the sign character of $S_n$. Any alternating polynomial vanishes when $X_i=X_j$, so every $X_i-X_j$ divides it. These pairwise nonassociate prime factors have product $\Delta$, so $p_{-}=\Delta q$ with $q$ symmetric. The Fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials yieldsThe sum is direct, since a polynomial that is both symmetric and alternating is zero in characteristic zero. Also ${\Delta }^2=D(e_1,\dots ,e_n)$, where $D$ is the discriminant polynomial ofThus, more precisely than the requested quotient assertion,Surjectivity follows from the direct-sum expression. Divide any putative kernel element by the monic quadratic in $Z$; its remainder is $a(T)+Zb(T)$. The direct sum forces $a(e)=b(e)=0$, and algebraic independence of the $e_i$ gives $a=b=0$. Hence the displayed relation is the entire kernel. The argument also covers $n=2$, where $A_2$ is trivial.

Now let $G$ be finite with no nontrivial linear characters, and write $R=\mathbb{C}[W]$, $S=R^G$. The polynomial ring $R$ is a unique factorization domain. Factor a nonzero invariant $f$ in $R$; invariance permutes the associate classes of its irreducible factors and makes their exponents constant on each orbit. For an orbit $\mathcal{O}$, choose representatives and form its orbit product of polynomial factorsFor every $g$, $g\cdot q_{\mathcal{O}}=\theta (g)q_{\mathcal{O}}$ for a nonzero scalar $\theta (g)$. Applying two group elements proves that $\theta :G\to {\mathbb{C}}^{\times }$ is a homomorphism. The hypothesis forces $\theta =1$, so $q_{\mathcal{O}}\in S$.

This orbit product is prime in $S$. If it divides $ab$ with $a,b\in S$, one factor $p\in \mathcal{O}$ divides $a$ or $b$ in $R$. Invariance of that chosen polynomial makes every factor in the orbit divide it. Their product therefore divides it in $R$, and the quotient is invariant because numerator and denominator are invariant and cancellation is valid in the integral domain $R$. Thus $q_{\mathcal{O}}$ divides $a$ or $b$ in $S$. Every nonzero $f\in S$ is a scalar times a product of these prime orbit products, and the only units of $S$ are nonzero constants, as they are units in $R$. Therefore $\mathbb{C}[W{]}^G$ is a unique factorization domain. This gives a direct proof, without assuming a divisor-class-group theorem.

For a failure in characteristic zero, let the cyclic group of order two act on ${\mathbb{C}}^2$ by $-I$. Its coordinate invariants areEvery invariant monomial has even total degree: its exponents are either both even, or both odd, giving the indicated generators. Reducing powers of $b$ to at most one shows that $ac-b^2$ is the only relation, since $a^i{c}^j$ and $b{a}^i{c}^j$ map to distinct monomials. The three quadratic invariants are irreducible in $S$: each nonconstant invariant has degree at least two, so a product of two nonunits has degree at least four. They are pairwise nonassociate, butgives two different irreducible factorizations. Hence this invariant ring is not a unique factorization domain. The nontrivial sign character is precisely the kind of character excluded in the preceding theorem.

A set $S$ of prime numbers has Dirichlet density $\delta$ if the following limit exists:Equivalently, the denominator can be ${\sum }_p{p}^{-s}$, since that sum is $\log (1/(s-1))+O(1)$. Adding or removing finitely many prime numbers leaves the Dirichlet density unchanged.

Put $\alpha =\sqrt[4]{2}>0$ and $L=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ,i)$. This is the splitting field of $X^4-2$, whose four roots of a polynomial are $\alpha ,i\alpha ,-\alpha ,-i\alpha$. The polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at $2$, so $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ):\mathbb{Q}]=4$. Since $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha )$ is contained in the real numbers, it does not contain $i$, giving $[L:\mathbb{Q}]=8$. Thus $L/\mathbb{Q}$ is a Galois extension of degree $8$. Its Galois group is the dihedral group of order $8$: the field automorphisms $r(\alpha )=i\alpha$, $r(i)=i$ and $s(\alpha )=\alpha$, $s(i)=-i$ satisfy $r^4=s^2=1$ and $srs=r^{-1}$.

For an odd prime number $p$, the condition $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$ means that the finite field ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ contains all fourth roots of unity. Under this condition, $2$ is a quartic residue exactly when $X^4-2$ has a root in ${\mathbb{F}}_p$; multiplying that root by $1,i,-1,-i$ gives all four distinct roots. Conversely, complete splitting of $X^4-2$ over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ gives both a fourth root of $2$ and a primitive fourth root of unity, so it also forces $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$.

The polynomial discriminant of $X^4-2$ is $-2^{11}$. Hence every odd prime number is unramified in $L$, and the root-splitting criterion is equivalent to its Frobenius automorphism acting trivially on all the roots. Since the roots generate $L$, this is equivalent to the Frobenius automorphism being the identity, or to $p$ being a completely split prime of $L/\mathbb{Q}$. The Chebotarev density theorem says that the unramified prime numbers with Frobenius conjugacy class $C$ have Dirichlet density $|C|/|\mathrm{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})|$. Here $C=\{1\}$, so

For a finite extension $E/K$ of number fields, the inverse different is the fractional idealThe different ideal is its inverse. The trace pairing is nondegenerate because extensions of number fields are separable, so this definition gives a full fractional ideal. The inclusion ${\mathcal{O}}_E\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}^{-1}$ shows that ${\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}$ is integral.

Write its prime ideal factorization as ${\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}={\prod }_{\mathfrak{P}}{\mathfrak{P}}^{d_{\mathfrak{P}}}$. For $\mathfrak{P}$ above $\mathfrak{p}$, with ramification index $e_{\mathfrak{P}}$ and residue characteristic $\ell$, the different exponent and tame ramification theorem saysThe equivalence uses the separability of finite residue-field extensions. In particular, $d_{\mathfrak{P}}=0$ precisely at unramified prime ideals; in the wild case $d_{\mathfrak{P}}\ge e_{\mathfrak{P}}$. This theorem does not require a Galois extension. The relative discriminant is the norm of the different ideal:For $K=\mathbb{Q}$, this gives $|D_E|=N({\mathfrak{D}}_{E/\mathbb{Q}})$.

Now take ${\alpha }^3=m$ and $K=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha )$. For any prime number $q\mid m$, the square-free integer hypothesis makes $X^3-m$ an Eisenstein polynomial at $q$. It is therefore irreducible, and $K$ is a pure cubic number field of degree $3$. Since $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer, $A=\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is an order in a number field. The discriminant of elements of a number field for its basis $1,\alpha ,{\alpha }^2$ isFor example, the resultant of $X^3-m$ and $3X^2$ is $27m^2$, and the degree-three sign in the polynomial discriminant is negative. If $I=[{\mathcal{O}}_K:A]$, the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice givesOnly prime numbers dividing $3m$ can therefore divide $I$.

For $q\mid m$, the Eisenstein polynomial gives a totally ramified extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_q$ of degree $3$. Thus $K$ has a unique prime ideal $\mathfrak{P}$ above $q$, with ramification index $3$ and residue-field degree $1$. Since $q\ne 3$, this is tame ramification, and the different exponent and tame ramification theorem gives $d_{\mathfrak{P}}=2$. Hence $v_q(D_K)=2$. Comparing with $v_q(-27m^2)=2$ in the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice yields $v_q(I)=0$.

At $3$, use the shifted Eisenstein polynomial of $\beta =\alpha -m$:Because $3\nmid m$, the constant term is divisible by $3$. Moreover,when $3\nmid m$: the factors $m-1$ and $m+1$ cannot both be divisible by $3$. The hypotheses therefore give $v_3(m^3-m)=1$, so the translated polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at $3$. The resulting completion is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$, with residue-field degree $1$, and its ramification index is divisible by the residue characteristic. Thus its different exponent is at least $3$.

It follows that $v_3(D_K)\ge 3$. But $v_3(-27m^2)=3$, soforces $v_3(I)=0$ and $v_3(D_K)=3$. No prime number divides $I$. We have proved the integral basis of a nonexceptional pure cubic field:Using local Eisenstein polynomials here only establishes the local ramification indices; it does not assume that $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is already the full ring of integers of a number field.

Let $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-31})$. Its ring of integers of a quadratic field is $\mathbb{Z}[(1+\sqrt{-31})/2]$, and its fundamental field discriminant is $-31$.

First compute the class number. The ideal-form correspondence for imaginary quadratic fields identifies the ideal classes with proper equivalence classes of primitive positive definite binary quadratic forms of discriminant $-31$. Each has a unique reduced positive definite binary quadratic form representative under the convention $|b|\le a\le c$, with $b\ge 0$ when $|b|=a$ or $a=c$. From $31=4ac-b^2\ge 3a^2$ we get $1\le a\le \sqrt{31/3}<4$. Checking these three possible leading coefficients gives exactlyFor $a=3$, neither odd residue choice $b=\pm 1,\pm 3$ makes $(b^2+31)/12$ integral. The listed forms are primitive and satisfy the reduction convention, soThis computes the ideal class group of Q of square root minus thirty-one.

Now take a root $\theta$ of $F(T)=T^3+T-1$, and let $H$ be its splitting field over $\mathbb{Q}$. There is no rational root: the only candidates are $\pm 1$, and neither vanishes. Thus the cubic is irreducible. Its polynomial discriminant isSince this is nonsquare, the Galois group of an irreducible cubic is $S_3$. Its quadratic subfield is $K$: the product of pairwise root differences squares to $-31$ and changes sign under odd permutations. Thus $H/K$ is cyclic of degree three, and $H=K(\theta )$. Indeed the cubic field and $K$ have coprime degrees, so their compositum already has the full splitting-field degree six. The squarefree polynomial discriminant also shows, by the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice, that $\mathbb{Z}[\theta ]$ is the full integer ring of the cubic field.

It remains to prove that $H/K$ is unramified everywhere. At any rational prime $\ell \ne 31$, the reduction of $F$ is separable. Over a finite residue extension in which it splits, all residue roots are simple and lift by Hensel lemma to the corresponding unramified extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell }$. Therefore the local splitting field is unramified over ${\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell }$, and its extension over a completion of $K$ is unramified as well.

At the only possible ramified prime, direct reduction givesThe simple root lifts to $r\in {\mathbb{Q}}_{31}$. Write $F(T)=(T-r)Q(T)$, with $Q$ monic quadratic over ${\mathbb{Q}}_{31}$. The discriminant product formula givesHere $Q(r)=F^{\prime }(r)$ is a unit, so the quadratic discriminant has square class $-31$. Hence the entire local splitting field isIt is quadratic over ${\mathbb{Q}}_{31}$, but its extension over the completion of $K$ is trivial. Thus the prime over $31$ splits completely in $H/K$; in particular it is not ramified there. This is the local splitting-field argument behind an unramified cyclic cubic extension from a prime-discriminant cubic. There are no real places of the imaginary quadratic field $K$, so no infinite-place ramification remains to check.

The Hilbert class field theorem identifies the maximal everywhere unramified abelian extension with an extension of degree $h_K$. Our cyclic unramified extension already has that degree, so it must be the whole Hilbert class field. ThereforeEquivalently, it is the splitting field of $T^3+T-1$, of degree six over $\mathbb{Q}$ and degree three over $K$. Replacing $\theta$ by ${\theta }^{-1}$ gives the alternative defining cubic $T^3-T^2-1$. This is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus thirty-one.

The conjugates of $\omega$ are $\omega ,ldots,{\omega }^{p-1}$. Fromwe obtain, at every nontrivial $p$th root $\alpha$,The product of the roots is one and ${\prod }_{a=1}^{p-1}(1-{\omega }^a)={\Phi }_p(1)=p$. The derivative formula for a polynomial discriminant therefore yields the discriminant of a prime cyclotomic power basis:

Since $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$, the sign is positive. The Vandermonde determinantbelongs to $L$ and satisfies ${\Delta }^2=p^{p-2}$. Hence