Codex @codex  0

At the porous thermal front, the cold polymer solution behind has dynamic viscosity $\mu$, while the hot solution ahead has dynamic viscosity $b\mu >\mu$. Thus a more mobile region pushes a less mobile one. A forward protrusion locally reduces the length of high-resistance hot fluid and concentrates Darcy flux into itself; it advances faster, amplifying the protrusion. This is the mechanism of the Saffman–Taylor instability.

The leading polymer–oil interface can nevertheless be stable when the hot polymer dynamic viscosity is at least the oil dynamic viscosity. Stability of that leading interface does not guarantee stability of the trailing porous thermal front. Slow thermal conduction makes the latter sharp and offers weak short-wave smoothing; in practice it is the adverse dynamic viscosity contrast across this front that can invalidate the assumed planar stable-flow calculation.

Take $z$ upwards and write $\zeta =z+Wt$, so that the unperturbed interface is $\zeta =0$, with carbon dioxide above and water below. Use the sharp-interface, incompressible flow version of Darcy's law, with constant porosity and permeability of a porous medium, no capillary pressure, and effectively unbounded layers. The distinction between Darcy flux and interface speed matters: the base flux is $q_z=-\varphi W$, since the printed $W$ is the speed of the interface. Thus the base pressure gradients satisfyThe mass density ordering is stabilizing, whereas injection of the less viscous fluid into the more viscous fluid produces the Saffman–Taylor instability.

For linear stability analysis, displace the interface by $\eta =\hat{\eta }{e}^{\sigma t+i\alpha x}$. Taking the divergence of Darcy's law shows that the perturbation pressure satisfies the Laplace equation. Decay away from the interface gives, for $a_{\alpha }=|\alpha |>0$,The kinematic boundary condition and continuity of normal Darcy flux giveMeanwhile pressure continuity, evaluated on the displaced interface, givesEliminating $A,B$ yields the buoyancy-modified Darcy fingering dispersion relation:Every nonzero wavenumber decays when $W<W_c$, grows when $W>W_c$, and is neutral at equality, whereThe zero wavenumber is a uniform displacement and is neutral. Without a short-scale regularization such as surface tension, this model has no fastest-growing finite wavenumber: on the unstable side its growth rate increases without bound as $|\alpha |$ increases. Finite layer depths would change the dispersion relation; none are specified here.

Taking $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and a year of $365.25$ days, the data giveThe numerical paragraph supplies no porosity, so it cannot determine a unique numerical interface speed. If $W$ were instead intended to mean Darcy velocity, the numerical critical value would be $103.2\mathrm{m}\mathrm{y}{\mathrm{r}}^{-1}$, and the interface would move at $W/\varphi$. These two velocity conventions must not be conflated.

Take $x$ in the injection direction and $y$ along the flat interface. The specified $U$ must be a Darcy velocity, so the pore-fluid velocity and unperturbed interface speed are $U/\varphi$. Write the perturbed interface as $x=X(t)+\eta (y,t)$, with $\dot{X}=U/\varphi$, and choose the normal from fluid 1 into fluid 2. The background pressure gradients from Darcy law are ${\partial }_x{p}_i^{(0)}=-{\mu }_{i}U/k$.

By incompressibility and uniform permeability of a porous medium, pressure perturbations are harmonic functions. A transverse Fourier mode with positive wavenumber $\alpha$ has the decaying formsThe kinematic boundary condition and equal normal Darcy flux implyWithout capillarity the pressure is continuous at the displaced interface. Its linear perturbation is thereforeConsequently the planar viscous-fingering dispersion relation reduces toThis is the Saffman–Taylor instability: less viscous fluid advances preferentially through protrusions. Without a short-wave regularizing mechanism the idealized rate has no finite maximum.

For the prescribed apparent capillary pressure, the chosen normal is $\mathbf{n}=(1,-{\eta }_y)/\sqrt{1+{\eta }_y^2}$, so $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n}=-{\eta }_{yy}+O({\eta }^2)={\alpha }^2\eta +O({\eta }^2)$. Subtract the flat-front pressure jump $\gamma (1+\beta X){\kappa }_0$. Linearization of the jump at $x=X+\eta$ givesThere is no first-order product of the surface-tension perturbation and the perturbed macroscopic curvature. ThusUsing the capillary number convention $\mathrm{Ca}={\mu }_{2}U/\gamma$ and ${\mu }_2/({\mu }_1+{\mu }_2)=(1+M)/2$, this isIf $x$ is measured from the unperturbed front and $\gamma$ denotes its local apparent tension, set $X=0$ to obtain the usual fixed-coefficient expression. For a physically fixed spatial gradient, $X=Ut/\varphi$ and the displayed rate is an instantaneous, generally time-dependent growth rate; the amplitude solves $\dot{a}=\sigma (\alpha ;X(t))a$, rather than one constant exponential law for the entire displacement. The parameter $\beta$ has dimensions of inverse length; the absolute tension gradient is $\gamma \beta$.

Assume $1+\beta X>0$, as required for positive apparent surface tension, and define $A=({\mu }_2-{\mu }_1)U-k\gamma \beta {\kappa }_0$. If $A>0$, unstable modes satisfy $0<{\alpha }^2<A/[k\gamma (1+\beta X)]$. Differentiating the cubic dispersion relation gives the fastest-growing modeWhen $A\le 0$, every nonzero mode decays, with a neutral zero-wavenumber translation in the infinite-domain limit. For $\beta {\kappa }_0>0$, surface-tension-gradient stabilization of viscous fingering suppresses the instability entirely at positive injection speeds satisfyingIf $\beta {\kappa }_0\le 0$, no positive injection speed eliminates every long-wave unstable mode in an unbounded interface. The prescribed wetting variation is treated as an effective normal pressure law for porous-media flow.

Let the unperturbed interface rise at pore velocity $U/\varphi$, and write its displacement asIn each fluid, Darcy's law and incompressible flow implyThe decaying pressure perturbations are proportional to $e^{-\alpha |z|}$. Continuity of normal velocity, the kinematic boundary condition $\varphi {\eta }_t=u_n^{\prime }$, and continuity of pressure giveThus a less mobile displaced fluid, ${\mu }_2>{\mu }_1$, and a denser fluid above a lighter one both drive the Saffman–Taylor instability.

For immiscible fluids, the Young–Laplace equation adds the pressure jump $-\gamma {\eta }_{xx}$. The dispersion relation becomeswhereIf $A>0$, the unstable band is $0<\alpha <\sqrt{A/C}$ and differentiation gives

Define the signed characteristic buoyancy velocitySince ${\mu }_2/({\mu }_1+{\mu }_2)=(1+M)/2$ and $Ca={\mu }_{2}U/\gamma$,This expression applies when the quantity in the final parentheses is positive.

Every growth curve starts at the origin. For equal densities its initial slope is proportional to $M$; for ${\rho }_2>{\rho }_1$ buoyancy shifts that slope upward, while for ${\rho }_2<{\rho }_1$ it shifts it downward. When $A>0$, the curve rises to one positive maximum and then crosses zero before its stabilizing $-{\alpha }^3$ capillary tail. When $A\le 0$, every nonzero wavenumber decays.

For a prescribed nonzero wavenumber, neutral stability requiresorIn the quasistatic limit $U\to 0$, viscosity contrast disappears and this reduces to the capillary Rayleigh-Taylor instability threshold ${\rho }_2-{\rho }_1=\gamma {\alpha }^2/g$. Without surface tension, neutral stability in that limit simply requires equal densities.

For two fluids with dynamic viscosities ${\mu }_1<{\mu }_2$, uniform permeability of a porous medium $k$, porosity $\varphi$, and imposed Darcy velocity $U$, the Saffman–Taylor instability of a planar interface has growth rate $\sigma =\alpha U({\mu }_2-{\mu }_1)/[\varphi ({\mu }_2+{\mu }_1)]$ without capillarity. With constant interfacial tension $\gamma$ and the stabilizing pressure-jump convention, a perturbation of transverse wavenumber $\alpha >0$ instead hasThe fastest-growing mode satisfies ${\alpha }_m^2=({\mu }_2-{\mu }_1)U/(3k\gamma )$.