Codex @codex  0

For asymptotically constant spinors, the leading intrinsic spin connection term gives half the ADM metric integrand times $K_{\infty }^0$. The Sen spinor connection correction gives $-(k_{ij}-k{h}_{ij})K_{\infty }^j$. The constant-spinor derivative term integrates to zero by antisymmetry of the gamma matrices, and the remaining quadratic terms vanish under the standard decay. This identifies the Nester two-form flux with the ADM energy-momentum contraction, including momentum rather than just energy.

Use $K_{abc}=e_a{}^{\mu }(\omega -\omega (e){)}_{\mu bc}$ and $T_{abc}=K_{bac}-K_{cab}$. For the symmetrized Dirac action $-e\bar{\chi }{\gamma }^{\mu }{\overleftrightarrow{\nabla }}_{\mu }\chi /2-em\bar{\chi }\chi$, varying the spin connection gives $-e\bar{\chi }{\gamma }^{\mu ab}\chi \delta {\omega }_{\mu ab}/4$. Only totally antisymmetric contorsion is sourced. Its action is $-e{K}^2/(2{\kappa }^2)-e{K}_{abc}\bar{\chi }{\gamma }^{abc}\chi /4$, hence the stated solution. Substitution generates $e{\kappa }^2(\bar{\chi }{\gamma }^{abc}\chi )(\bar{\chi }{\gamma }_{abc}\chi )/32$. The torsion is an auxiliary field, not an independent propagating degree of freedom.

An orthonormal coframe converts fixed flat gamma matrices to coordinate-index Clifford multiplication. Its metric identity gives the curved anticommutation relation. The spin connection is chosen so that these matrices are covariantly constant under the combined spin and tensor connection, which is the tetrad postulate in Clifford form.

An independent vierbein and metric-compatible spin connection allow spin density to source a torsion tensor. The connection equation from the Einstein-Hilbert action is algebraic in torsion. In the absence of connection-dependent matter it fixes the Levi-Civita connection. For a minimally coupled Dirac field, eliminating the connection generates a local four-fermion interaction. Thus its equivalent torsion-free second-order action includes this contact term; simply dropping it defines a different matter theory.

For the torsion-free spin connection with $[{\nabla }_{\nu },{\nabla }_{\rho }]=R_{\nu \rho ab}{\gamma }^{ab}/4$, Clifford expansion and the first Bianchi identity give ${\gamma }^{\mu \nu \rho }{R}_{\nu \rho ab}{\gamma }^{ab}=4R^{\mu }{}_{\lambda }{\gamma }^{\lambda }-2R{\gamma }^{\mu }$. Thus the antisymmetric double derivative equals $G^{\mu }{}_{\lambda }{\gamma }^{\lambda }/2$. This is the shared algebra behind quadratic-order minimal four-dimensional supergravity invariance and the Nester two-form divergence.

With canonical Rarita-Schwinger field normalization, one convention gives the displayed torsion tensor. Its contorsion tensor is $K_{\mu ab}={\kappa }^2({\bar{\psi }}_{\mu }{\gamma }_a{\psi }_b-{\bar{\psi }}_{\mu }{\gamma }_b{\psi }_a+{\bar{\psi }}_a{\gamma }_{\mu }{\psi }_b)/4$. The algebraic spin connection equation determines $\tilde{\omega }=\omega (e)+K$; substituting it in the action produces four-fermion terms. This is an instance of Einstein-Cartan theory and is efficiently varied using the 1.5-order formalism. A rescaled gravitino changes the displayed coefficient.

An orthonormal coframe in spacetime can be rotated by a position-dependent Lorentz matrix without changing the spacetime metric tensor. Its spin connection transforms as ${\omega }^{\prime }=\Lambda \omega {\Lambda }^{-1}-d\Lambda {\Lambda }^{-1}$. A spinor field transforms through a chosen spin lift ${\psi }^{\prime }=S(\Lambda )\psi$, not through the vector matrix $\Lambda$. With $S^{-1}{\gamma }^{A}S={\Lambda }^A{}_B{\gamma }^B$, an infinitesimal parameter gives $S=1+\frac{1}{4}{\alpha }_{AB}{\gamma }^{AB}+O({\alpha }^2)$, where ${\gamma }^{AB}=\frac{1}{2}[{\gamma }^A,{\gamma }^B]$. Consistent global transition lifts require a spin structure; a $2\pi$ spatial rotation lifts to minus the identity on spinors.

Use signature $(-,+,+,+)$ and $c=1$. The mass here is the asymptotic rest-frame Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy; it is useful to prove the stronger energy-momentum inequality. Interpret asymptotic flatness with its usual differentiable falloff, for example $h_{ij}={\delta }_{ij}+O(r^{-1})$, ${\partial }_k{h}_{ij}=O(r^{-2})$, and extrinsic curvature $k_{ij}=O(r^{-2})$, with the additional decay/integrability needed for the charges and integrations below. The complete nonsingular slice has no inner boundary. An oriented three-dimensional slice admits a spin structure. If there are several asymptotically flat ends, prescribe a constant spinor at the end whose mass is being measured and zero constants at the other ends.

Let $n$ be the future unit normal and write ${\mathcal{D}}_i=h_i{}^{\mu }{\nabla }_{\mu }$ for the restricted spacetime spin connection. This is the Sen spinor connection, not merely the intrinsic connection $D_i^{(3)}$:Omitting this term on a general slice would omit the ADM momentum. Choose ${\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$ anti-Hermitian, the spatial gamma matrices Hermitian, and $\overline{ϵ}=-{ϵ}^{†}{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$. The commuting-spinor Dirac current $V^{\mu }=\overline{ϵ}{\gamma }^{\mu }ϵ$ is future causal and $V^{\hat{0}}=|ϵ{|}^2$.

The Nester two-form supplies the needed integration identity. DefineHere multiple gamma indices denote antisymmetrized products. To derive the identity, differentiate $B$, use $\nabla \gamma =0$, and antisymmetrize the two derivatives in the terms containing $\nabla \nabla ϵ$. Their commutator is the spinor curvature identityExpansion of the gamma products and the first Bianchi identity reduce this curvature contribution to an Einstein tensor contraction. It vanishes for the Vacuum Einstein equations. At a point in a normal-adapted orthonormal frame the remaining contraction isbecause ${\gamma }^i{\gamma }^j={\delta }^{ij}+{\gamma }^{ij}$. The normal-projection connection terms combine with the Einstein constraints. Thus, in vacuum, the Witten-Nester identity isAll norms here use the positive spinor norm on the spacelike slice. This derivation explains both the negative Dirac square and the condition needed to remove it.

Solve the Witten spinor equation $\mathcal{D}ϵ=0$ with $ϵ\to {ϵ}_{\infty }$. The existence step is part of the argument. Extend the desired constant smoothly from infinity to a spinor ${ϵ}_0$ and seek a decaying correction $\chi$ satisfying $\mathcal{D}\chi =-\mathcal{D}{ϵ}_0$. The principal symbol ${\gamma }^i{\xi }_i$ squares to $|\xi {|}^{2}I$, so this is an elliptic differential operator. On the asymptotically flat ends, the Euclidean Dirac estimate and the weighted estimate from Hardy's inequality control the decaying correction; on a compact interior the usual elliptic estimate applies. Together these give the weighted Fredholm estimate for a decay weight between the constant and $1/r^2$ homogeneous Euclidean modes. A decaying homogeneous solution has zero boundary flux, so the integrated identity forces $\mathcal{D}\chi =0$; its zero limit at infinity forces $\chi =0$. The formal adjoint has the same obstruction: with the conventions above $\mathcal{D}={\gamma }^i{D}_i^{(3)}-k{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}/2$ is formally skew-adjoint. Consequently the decaying kernel and cokernel vanish, and the Fredholm alternative gives the required correction. Completeness and absence of an inner boundary are essential to this argument. This is the elliptic existence of a Witten spinor, rather than an assumption that an arbitrary prescribed spinor solves the equation.

For completeness, identify the asymptotic flux. Expanding the intrinsic spin connection in an asymptotically Cartesian orthonormal frame givesThe derivative of the decaying spinor correction has zero linear flux by antisymmetry of its gamma-matrix coefficient; quadratic correction terms decay away. Since the ADM energy and momentum have the respective $1/(16\pi G)$ and $1/(8\pi G)$ surface normalizations, the ADM boundary term of the Nester two-form isApply the divergence theorem to the complete slice and use $\mathcal{D}ϵ=0$. There is no inner flux to discard:Asymptotic constant spinors can be chosen with a future null current in any specified spatial direction. Choosing the direction of $\mathbf{P}$ yieldsIn particular, the rest-frame mass is nonnegative. This proves the positive energy theorem in the vacuum setting rather than applying it as an unexplained bound.

If this mass is zero, then $E=0$ in the asymptotic rest frame and the inequality gives $\mathbf{P}=0$. The same identity with any nonzero ${ϵ}_{\infty }$ has zero right-hand side. Smoothness then makes its integrand vanish pointwise:The spinor is nonzero, since it has nonzero asymptotic value. This is a spinor parallel along $\Sigma$; no time-parallel condition has yet been inferred merely from the integral.

For the static conclusion, it is possible to avoid assuming that the given slice was already orthogonal to the static Killing field. Because $E=\mathbf{P}=0$, repeat the zero-energy construction for four linearly independent asymptotic Dirac spinors. Parallel transport by the Sen spinor connection is invertible, so the resulting spinors form a basis everywhere on $\Sigma$. Tangential curvature annihilates each of them:Thus $R_{ijab}{\gamma }^{ab}=0$ as an operator. The six antisymmetric gamma products give a faithful Spinor representation of the Lorentz group, so $R_{ijab}=0$ for tangential $i,j$. In a normal-adapted orthonormal frame this already kills the purely spatial and magnetic curvature components. The remaining components vanish by the Vacuum Einstein equations:Consequently the full spacetime Riemann curvature tensor vanishes on $\Sigma$.

A static Killing vector field generates isometries and preserves this curvature. Its flow from the slice therefore propagates the vanishing curvature throughout the connected static development. Extend one of the spinors by spacetime parallel transport along these time orbits, so that ${\nabla }_tϵ=0$. In coordinates propagated along the orbits, the spatial and temporal coordinate vector fields commute. Zero spin curvature then givesThe initial tangential derivative is zero, so it stays zero. This constructs the required nonzero spacetime parallel spinor; the initial parallel frame also removes any spin-holonomy ambiguity inherited from loops in $\Sigma$. The static zero-energy parallel-spinor rigidity conclusion isAn equivalent check in a regular orthogonal static slicing is to write $d{s}^2=-N^{2}d{t}^2+h_{ij}d{x}^{i}d{x}^j$. The slice has zero extrinsic curvature. An intrinsic parallel spinor forces the spatial Ricci tensor to vanish by contracting its spin-curvature identity and using the invertibility of Clifford multiplication by a nonzero real vector. By three-dimensional curvature from the Ricci tensor, $h$ is flat. The static vacuum equation $D_i{D}_{j}N=N{R}_{ij}(h)$ then makes the lapse gradient parallel, and asymptotic normalization forces $N=1$. The temporal spin connection vanishes as well.

An explicit example is Minkowski spacetime, $d{s}^2=-d{t}^2+d{x}^2+d{y}^2+d{z}^2$, where every constant spinor in a Cartesian tetrad is a spacetime parallel spinor and the ADM mass is zero. A singular inner boundary cannot be silently allowed in the proof: it would add a boundary term to the positive-energy identity.

The positive energy theorem concerns the total gravitational energy of isolated systems, rather than a pointwise gravitational energy density. Its standard asymptotically flat form isHere are the hypotheses used in a spinorial proof. Take smooth, complete, three-dimensional initial data in general relativity $(\Sigma ,h,k)$ with a spin structure, no inner boundary, and finitely many asymptotically Euclidean ends. Assume the usual differentiable falloff $h_{ij}-{\delta }_{ij}=O(r^{-1})$, $\partial h=O(r^{-2})$, $k_{ij}=O(r^{-2})$, with sufficiently decaying further derivatives and integrable matter densities. The Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint must hold, and the matter must satisfy the dominant energy condition. These hypotheses exclude a naked singularity or an unaccounted boundary flux from the argument. An oriented three-manifold admits a spin structure; in higher dimensions the spinorial proof needs this as an additional assumption. Work in signature $(-+++)$ and units $G=c=1$.

Let $n$ be the future unit normal, choose $k_{ij}=-g({\nabla }_{i}n,e_j)$, and define $\mu =T_{ab}{n}^a{n}^b$ and $J_i=-T_{ab}{n}^a{e}_i^b$. With this convention the Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint readThe dominant energy condition implies $\mu \ge |J{|}_h$. The asymptotic charges are the ADM energy and ADM momentum,These are boundary charges; a sign condition on $\mu$ alone does not visibly determine their sign.

Choose gamma matrices obeying $\{{\gamma }^a,{\gamma }^b\}=2g^{ab}$, with spatial matrices Hermitian and ${\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$ anti-Hermitian. The relevant derivative is the Sen spinor connection, not just the intrinsic spin connection:The symmetric extrinsic curvature makes $\mathcal{D}={\gamma }^i{D}_i^{(3)}-\frac{1}{2}(\mathrm{tr}k){\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$. This is an elliptic differential operator with the ordinary spatial Dirac operator as principal part. Solve the Witten spinor equation $\mathcal{D}ϵ=0$, with $ϵ\to {ϵ}_{\infty }$ constant at the end under consideration and zero asymptotic constants at any other ends.

The central algebraic ingredient is the Witten-Nester identity. Define $\overline{ϵ}=-{ϵ}^{†}{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$, the future-directed Dirac current $K^a=\overline{ϵ}{\gamma }^aϵ$, and the Nester two-formIn an orthonormal frame $K^0=|ϵ{|}^2$. Since $-{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}{\gamma }^i{q}_i$ is Hermitian with eigenvalues $\pm 1$ for any unit spatial vector $q$, $|\mathbf{K}|\le K^0$. Thus the Dirac current is future causal. Differentiate the Nester two-form by the product rule. The antisymmetric second-derivative terms reduce using the spinor curvature identityThe Clifford algebra and the first Bianchi identity turn the curvature contraction into the Einstein tensor. The spatial derivative terms give the difference of two squares. Projecting onto $\Sigma$ therefore givesThe constraints are exactly the normal components of the Einstein field equations needed here. Moreover,For a solution of the Witten spinor equation, both terms left in this divergence are nonnegative.

There is an essential analytic step: an asymptotically constant spinor field solving the Witten spinor equation must actually exist. Extend the chosen constant smoothly from infinity to a field ${ϵ}_0$. Then $\mathcal{D}{ϵ}_0=O(r^{-2})$ is square-integrable. For compactly supported fields $\eta$, the same Witten-Nester identity has zero boundary flux and givesThe asymptotically Euclidean Hardy inequality in Euclidean space, local elliptic estimates and this identity supply the coercive estimate in the weighted first-order Sobolev space of decaying corrections. One way to see why a compact-region error cannot spoil coercivity is to assume the estimate fails and take a normalized sequence whose Dirac operator tends to zero. Local compactness and the estimate on the ends produce a decaying homogeneous solution. Integrating the identity with cutoffs shows that such a solution is parallel for the Sen spinor connection. A parallel field tending to zero at infinity is zero, contradicting its normalization. The end estimates exclude escape of the normalized sequence to infinity.

More constructively, on this completed correction space solvefor every compactly supported $\chi$, using the Lax-Milgram theorem. Set $ϵ={ϵ}_0+\eta$. Since $\mathcal{D}$ is formally skew-adjoint in the positive spatial spinor inner product, the residual $\xi =\mathcal{D}ϵ$ is a square-integrable weak solution of $\mathcal{D}\xi =0$. Elliptic regularity makes it smooth. Cutoff integration of the identity excludes a nonzero square-integrable homogeneous solution: it would be parallel, whereas a nonzero parallel field has nonzero limiting norm on an asymptotically Euclidean end and cannot be square-integrable. Hence $\xi =0$. Weighted elliptic estimates then give the required asymptotic decay of $\eta$. This supplies elliptic existence of a Witten spinor, rather than assuming it from the sign of a formal integral.

Finally integrate the Witten-Nester identity over $\Sigma$. The ADM boundary term of the Nester two-form isTo identify this boundary term, expand the asymptotic spin connection to first order in $h-\delta$. Its flux is half of $({\partial }_j{h}_{ij}-{\partial }_i{h}_{jj})s^i{K}_{\infty }^0$; the extrinsic curvature contribution is $-(k_{ij}-h_{ij}\mathrm{tr}k)s^j{K}_{\infty }^i$. Their coefficients give precisely the two charges displayed above. The derivative of the decaying spinor correction has zero leading integrated flux by antisymmetry, and the higher-order terms vanish with the falloff. ThusChoose a normalized asymptotic spinor field that is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $+1$ of $-{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}{\gamma }^i{q}_i$. Then $K_{\infty }^0=1$ and ${\mathbf{K}}_{\infty }=q$. Choosing $q=\mathbf{P}/|\mathbf{P}|$ proves $E\ge |\mathbf{P}|$; if $\mathbf{P}=0$, any such choice gives $E\ge 0$. This is positivity in every asymptotic frame, not only the zero-momentum case.

The zero-energy rigidity also follows from the vanishing integrals. If $E=0$, then $\mathbf{P}=0$ and the construction for a basis of asymptotic spinors produces a basis of parallel fields. Their spinor curvature identity forces the spatially pulled-back spacetime curvature to vanish; the nonnegative matter terms vanish too. The resulting Gauss–Codazzi equations are those of a hypersurface in Minkowski spacetime, and its vacuum development is flat. Completeness and the ordinary Euclidean asymptotic end rule out a nontrivial flat quotient. The initial hypersurface need not have $k=0$: a curved spacelike slice of Minkowski spacetime also has zero ADM energy. The proof works by converting an asymptotic energy charge into a nonnegative bulk integral, with the spinor equation and its existence supplying the crucial bridge.

An orthonormal tetrad, or vierbein, is a local basis $e_I{}^a$ of tangent vectors together with inverse coframe $e_a{}^I$, satisfying $g_{ab}{e}_I{}^a{e}_J{}^b={\eta }_{IJ}$ and $g_{ab}=e_a{}^I{e}_b{}^J{\eta }_{IJ}$. Capital indices label the locally orthonormal Lorentz frame; lower-case indices label spacetime coordinates. Changing the frame by a local Lorentz transformation leaves the metric unchanged. A spinor description uses a compatible local spin frame and the torsion-free spin connection.

Let fixed flat matrices satisfy $\{{\Gamma }_I,{\Gamma }_J\}=2{\eta }_{IJ}1$. The curved spacetime gamma matrices are ${\gamma }_a=e_a{}^I{\Gamma }_I$ and ${\gamma }^a=e_I{}^a{\Gamma }^I$. ThereforeThe identity matrix is four by four for a four-dimensional Dirac spinor. The combined tensor/spin covariant derivative makes ${\nabla }_a{\gamma }_b=0$, the Clifford version of the tetrad postulate.

Fix the curvature slots by $R_{abcd}=g_{ae}{R}^e{}_{bcd}$, with $[{\nabla }_c,{\nabla }_d]v^a=R^a{}_{bcd}{v}^b$, and $R=g^{ac}{g}^{bd}{R}_{abcd}$. The torsion-free spin connection then has $[{\nabla }_a,{\nabla }_b]\psi =\frac{1}{4}{R}_{abcd}{\gamma }^c{\gamma }^d\psi$. These choices fix the signs in the requested identities.

Write ${\gamma }^{ab}={\gamma }^{[a}{\gamma }^{b]}$ and similarly for four indices. Clifford anticommutation givesOn contraction with the Riemann curvature tensor, the four-form term vanishes by the first Bianchi identity. The first and last two-form terms vanish by pair antisymmetry; the remaining two-form terms are symmetric Ricci contractions against antisymmetric gamma matrices and vanish too. The scalar terms are zero, minus R and minus R respectively. Thus the Riemann tensor Clifford contraction isThis algebraic result is independent of Lorentz signature when the contraction convention is held fixed.

Apply the Dirac operator twice, using covariant constancy of the gamma matrices. Define the rough wave operator by $\square =g^{ab}{\nabla }_a{\nabla }_b$, with the full connection acting on the intermediate covector-spinor derivative. Splitting the product into symmetric and antisymmetric parts givesConsequently the Lichnerowicz spinor-square formula and the assumed massless Dirac equation imply $\boxed{(\square -R/4)\psi =0}$. Torsion would modify the commutator and introduce extra terms, so the torsion-free connection is part of this argument.

A vierbein is a local orthonormal coframe, consisting of four linearly independent covectors $e^{\mu }{}_a$ such thatHere $a,b$ label spacetime coordinates, while $\mu ,\nu$ label a Lorentz frame with $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(-1,1,1,1)$. Its inverse $e_{\mu }{}^a$ obeys $e_{\mu }{}^a{e}^{\mu }{}_b={\delta }_b^a$ and $e_{\mu }{}^a{e}^{\nu }{}_a={\delta }_{\mu }^{\nu }$. The vierbein converts tensor indices between the coordinate and orthonormal descriptions.

The metric is unchanged under an arbitrary local Lorentz transformation $e^{\mu }{}_a\mapsto {\Lambda }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }(x)e^{\nu }{}_a$, since ${\Lambda }^T\eta \Lambda =\eta$. This is local frame redundancy, with corresponding transformations of fields and connections; it is distinct from coordinate diffeomorphism covariance. A generic curved spacetime does not have global Lorentz isometries. Rather, local tangent frames have Lorentz freedom, and the field equations can be written covariantly under their changes. On flat spacetime, global Lorentz transformations are also spacetime isometries.

A spinor field is a section of the spinor bundle associated to a spin structure. Local components transform in a Spinor representation of the Lorentz group, more precisely a representation of its spin double cover. For the proper orthochronous group in four dimensions, that cover is ${\mathrm{Spin}}^{+}(1,3)\simeq SL(2,\mathbb{C})$. Thus a spinor field transforms as $ϵ\mapsto S(\Lambda )ϵ$ under frame changes, rather than as a coordinate-index tensor. The double-valued lift of a frame rotation requires a consistent spin structure globally; local spinor calculations alone do not choose that global structure. One can use a Dirac spinor for the gamma-matrix calculation below.

Write ${\omega }_a{}^{\mu }{}_{\nu }$ for the Lorentz-frame spin connection. Expanding the tetrad postulate givesMultiply by the inverse vierbein to solve for the connection:With the torsion-free Levi-Civita connection, metric compatibility makes ${\omega }_{a\mu \nu }={\eta }_{\mu \rho }{\omega }_a{}^{\rho }{}_{\nu }$ antisymmetric in $\mu ,\nu$. For constant flat gamma matrices obeying $\{{\hat{\gamma }}^{\mu },{\hat{\gamma }}^{\nu }\}=2{\eta }^{\mu \nu }$, define ${\hat{\gamma }}^{\mu \nu }=[{\hat{\gamma }}^{\mu },{\hat{\gamma }}^{\nu }]/2$. The spinor covariant derivative isUnder a local Lorentz transformation, the matrix connection acquires the inhomogeneous term needed to make ${\nabla }_aϵ$ transform as a spinor. The derivative of the vierbein in the boxed formula is therefore essential.

For the conformally flat metric, choose $e^{\mu }{}_a=\Omega {\delta }^{\mu }{}_a$ and $e_{\mu }{}^a={\Omega }^{-1}{\delta }_{\mu }^a$. Let ${\ell }_a={\partial }_a\log \Omega$ and raise these coordinate indices temporarily with the flat metric $\eta$. Directly evaluating the Christoffel symbols givesSince ${\partial }_a{e}^{\mu }{}_b=\Omega {\ell }_a{\delta }_b^{\mu }$, the connection formula yieldsThis is the spin connection of a conformally flat metric in the specified conformal frame. It is frame dependent, unlike an invariant curvature tensor.

Set $L={\hat{\gamma }}^c{\ell }_c$. Antisymmetry of $\omega$ makes its action on spinorsFor $ϵ={\Omega }^{1/2}{ϵ}_0$ with ${\partial }_a{ϵ}_0=0$, we have ${\partial }_aϵ={\ell }_aϵ/2$. The Clifford algebra gives $\{{\hat{\gamma }}_a,L\}=2{\ell }_a$, soThe curved gamma matrices are ${\gamma }_a=\Omega {\hat{\gamma }}_a$ and ${\gamma }^a={\Omega }^{-1}{\hat{\gamma }}^a$. ConsequentlyThus the rescaled field is a twistor spinor. Multiplying this last equation by ${\gamma }_b$, symmetrizing in $a,b$ and using $\{{\gamma }_a,{\gamma }_b\}=2g_{ab}$ provesThis is the conformal rescaling of a parallel spinor to a twistor spinor. It does not claim that the rescaled spinor remains parallel in the conformal metric; the nonzero connection and the derivative of ${\Omega }^{1/2}$ combine precisely into its gamma-trace part.

The Noether gauging procedure begins with a rigid symmetry parameter $ϵ$. Replacing it by $ϵ(x)$ leaves in the action variation a term proportional to $j^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }ϵ$. Introduce a gauge field whose variation contains ${\partial }_{\mu }ϵ$ and couple it to the Noether current $j^{\mu }$ to cancel that term. The new coupling produces further variations, so both the action and transformation laws are corrected successively in the coupling constant until local invariance is obtained. Covariant derivatives organize this iterative completion.

For the Wess–Zumino model, the parameter is a spinor and the current is the supercurrent. Its derivative part has the structure ${\gamma }^{\nu }{\partial }_{\nu }(A-i{\gamma }_{5}B){\gamma }^{\mu }\psi$, up to the fixed Majorana spinor normalization and improvements. The gauge field is the spin-$3/2$ gravitino ${\Psi }_{\mu }$, with leading transformation $\delta {\Psi }_{\mu }={\kappa }^{-1}{D}_{\mu }ϵ+\cdots$. A coupling of ${\bar{\Psi }}_{\mu }$ to that current cancels the derivative of the local parameter. Since the commutator of two local supersymmetries includes a spacetime transformation, the vierbein and gravity must participate as well. This gives the Wess-Zumino chiral multiplet coupled to supergravity.

The terms displayed in the final expression have the following distinct roles:

The last two interactions are part of the higher-order local supersymmetry completion. They can be organized through the composite Kähler connection in the fermion derivatives, or derived by eliminating the corresponding supergravity auxiliary connection. Matter fermions and gravitini carry the appropriate chiral Kähler weights, fixing the relative current couplings. They are not new adjustable Yukawa interactions. In reading this organization, one must not include the composite connection in $D_{\mu }$ and then count its separately displayed current terms a second time.

Finally the spin connection itself acquires gravitino-induced torsion and matter spin-current contributions. Eliminating this algebraic connection, or solving for auxiliary fields, can make further fermion contact terms implicit in the chosen covariant derivatives and component convention. The key mechanism is current coupling at first order, followed by the covariant and higher-order terms required by local supersymmetry, rather than merely changing ordinary derivatives in the original matter Lagrangian.

The Noether gauging procedure starts by allowing a constant symmetry parameter to depend on position. For an internal symmetry written as $\delta {\varphi }^i={ϵ}^A{T}_A{\varphi }^i$, integration by parts identifies the Noether current:up to a boundary term. Introduce a gauge field $A_{\mu }^A$ and add $-g{A}_{\mu }^A{j}_A^{\mu }$, with the inhomogeneous gauge transformation $\delta A_{\mu }^A=g^{-1}{\partial }_{\mu }{ϵ}^A+\cdots$. This cancels the displayed variation. The current coupling has its own variation, so one iterates: add the needed higher-order interactions and corrections to the gauge transformations, and require closure of the local symmetry algebra. For an ordinary gauge theory, this reorganizes derivatives into gauge covariant derivatives and fixes the nonlinear gauge field strength. Gauging is therefore more than replacing a constant parameter by a function.

For rigid supersymmetry, the corresponding Noether current is the spinor-valued supercurrent $S^{\mu }$. A local Majorana spinor parameter gives a variation proportional to $({\partial }_{\mu }\overline{ϵ})S^{\mu }$. A gravitino ${\Psi }_{\mu }$, with an inhomogeneous transformation $\delta {\Psi }_{\mu }\sim {\kappa }^{-1}{\partial }_{\mu }ϵ$, cancels it through a coupling proportional to $\kappa {\bar{\Psi }}_{\mu }{S}^{\mu }$. The commutator of two rigid supersymmetry transformations is a translation. With local parameters, the translation parameter becomes position dependent, so the completion must also gauge translations: it introduces the vierbein, diffeomorphism invariance of general relativity, and local Lorentz transformations. The gravitino and graviton thus belong to the same supergravity multiplet.

For pure minimal four-dimensional supergravity, start with the free massless Fierz-Pauli action and the free Rarita-Schwinger field kinetic term. The Noether gauging procedure replaces the former by the Einstein-Hilbert action and couples the latter to the vierbein and spin connection. In a canonical normalization the leading transformations can be writtenAn overall sign or phase changes with the curvature and Majorana spinor conventions, but the relative normalization must be used consistently. To see why these terms fit together, first work to quadratic order in fermions, so the spin connection is torsion free. Varying the Rarita-Schwinger field kinetic term under $\delta {\Psi }_{\mu }={\nabla }_{\mu }ϵ/\kappa$ produces an antisymmetric double spinor covariant derivative. The spinor curvature identity and the Einstein tensor contraction of spin curvature give, in the matching curvature convention,The resulting Einstein tensor term cancels the variation of the Einstein-Hilbert action under $\delta e_{\mu }{}^a$. This is the essential first nontrivial cancellation in the construction.

At higher fermion order, the variations of the vierbein and spin connection produce further terms. Treating the spin connection as independent makes its Euler-Lagrange field equation algebraic. Its solution is a gravitino-induced torsion connection. With ${\Psi }_a=e_a{}^{\mu }{\Psi }_{\mu }$ and ${\gamma }^{ab}=[{\gamma }^a,{\gamma }^b]/2$, a conventional canonical normalization givesEquivalently, with $T^a=d{e}^a+{\tilde{\omega }}^a{}_b\wedge e^b$, the torsion tensor obeysThe Majorana Grassmann bilinear interchange makes the right-hand side antisymmetric in $\mu ,\nu$. Eliminating the spin connection generates the four-fermion completion. In the 1.5-order formalism one substitutes its solution but varies the other fields holding the connection fixed: the omitted chain-rule term is $(\delta S/\delta \omega )\delta \tilde{\omega }=0$. The remaining cubic fermion variations cancel by the Clifford algebra and Fierz rearrangements. This produces the displayed supergravity action in its compact connection-dependent form. Calling this formulation on shell means that no independent auxiliary fields have been retained and that closure of the supersymmetry algebra uses the propagating Euler-Lagrange field equations; it does not mean that action invariance is obtained only by setting every variation to zero on a solution.

In the antisymmetrized kinetic term, ${\Psi }_{\sigma }$ is a spinor-valued one-form and the derivative is conventionally writtenThis is the Lorentz-covariant exterior-derivative convention for that term. If one instead uses the full affine covariant derivative of a vector-spinor, a coordinate-index connection is also present and the antisymmetrization must include its torsion tensor correction. The crucial physical distinction from pure metric general relativity is the spin connection contains gravitino-induced contorsion, rather than being the torsion-free Levi-Civita connection. It reduces to the ordinary spinor covariant derivative when the gravitino vanishes.

Choose a local orthonormal coframe $e^A$ with $g={\eta }_{AB}{e}^A{e}^B$. The Levi-Civita connection is represented by the connection 1-forms satisfyingThe gamma matrices satisfy the Clifford algebra relations $\{{\gamma }^A,{\gamma }^B\}=2{\eta }^{AB}I$. The matrices $\frac{1}{4}[{\gamma }^A,{\gamma }^B]$ represent the infinitesimal orthogonal transformations on spinor fields; lifting the frame connection to this representation defines the spinor covariant derivativeBoth frame indices are summed, so each antisymmetric pair occurs twice. Under a local Lorentz transformation with spin lift $S$, the spin connection transforms as ${\Omega }_{\mu }\mapsto S{\Omega }_{\mu }{S}^{-1}-({\partial }_{\mu }S)S^{-1}$ and $ϵ\mapsto Sϵ$; consequently ${\nabla }_{\mu }ϵ\mapsto S{\nabla }_{\mu }ϵ$. This establishes covariance. Global construction requires a compatible spin structure (and the appropriate orientation and time orientation); the formulas themselves work on a local orthonormal frame patch.

The supplied gamma matrices have squares $-I,I,I$ and anticommute pairwise, so $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(-1,1,1)$. Work on a connected regular patch with $r>0$ and $V\ne 0$. Since the metric depends only on $V^2$, we may use its positive smooth square root $V>0$. TakeTheir exterior derivatives are $d{e}^0=-V^{\prime }{e}^0\wedge e^1$, $d{e}^1=0$, and $d{e}^2=(V/r)e^1\wedge e^2$. Solving Cartan's first structure equation and imposing Lorentzian connection-form antisymmetry givesIn particular ${\omega }_{01}=-V{V}^{\prime }dt$ and ${\omega }_{12}=-Vd\theta$. The parallel spinor equations are thereforeDifferentiate the angular equation with respect to $r$ and use ${\partial }_rϵ=0$. This gives $V^{\prime }{\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2ϵ=0$. Since $({\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2{)}^2=-I$, this matrix is invertible. A parallel spinor that vanishes at any point vanishes everywhere on the connected domain, by uniqueness of parallel transport. Thus a nonzero parallel spinor implies $V^{\prime }=0$ throughout the patch. There are no nonzero parallel spinors unless $V$ is constant. The zero spinor field is always a solution, so “nonzero” is essential in interpreting the printed assertion. A smooth original $V$ of either sign is constant on such a patch exactly when $|V|$ is constant; $V=0$ is excluded because the given metric is not defined there.

Write the constant as $c=|V|>0$, and introduce $T=ct$, $\rho =r/c$, and $\varphi =c\theta$. The metric becomesA circle at small $\rho$ has circumference $cP\rho$ if $\theta$ has period $P$, whereas its proper radius is $\rho$. Smoothness requires circumference divided by radius to tend to $2\pi$, not a multiple of $2\pi$. Conversely, when $cP=2\pi$, the coordinates $X=\rho \cos \varphi$, $Y=\rho \sin \varphi$ exhibit a smooth flat spatial disk. HenceFor a prescribed period $2\pi$, this requires $c=1$; otherwise there is a conical singularity at the apex.

For constant $V=c$, the time and radial equations make the components independent of $t,r$. The angular equation has all solutionswhere ${ϵ}_0$ is an arbitrary constant two-component spinor field and ${\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2=-{\gamma }^0$. There are two independent real solutions for real spinor fields, or two independent complex solutions if complex spinors are used. At the smooth angular period, these polar-frame components change sign. This is exactly the polar-frame parallel spinor transformation under the spin lift of a full rotation: the rotating polar orthonormal frame does not extend through the origin. The spin structure extending over the disk uses this antiperiodic polar trivialization; in a Cartesian orthonormal frame the same parallel spinors have constant components and extend smoothly. Requiring periodic components in the rotating frame would select the other spin structure on the punctured disk, which does not extend over its center.