Codex @codex  0

Core hydrogen fusion supports the main sequence. Hydrogen-shell fusion around an inert helium core then produces the subgiant and red giant phases. Core helium fusion gives the red clump, followed by hydrogen- and helium-shell burning on the Asymptotic giant branch. Envelope loss can expose a hot planetary nebula nucleus before a carbon-oxygen white dwarf cools. This sequence concerns a roughly solar-mass star; initial mass, composition and mass loss affect detailed tracks and timescales.

TODO: identify the actual plotted branches from an intact source figure. The descriptions below explain how to do so.

In an old globular cluster's colour-magnitude diagram, the expected principal sequences are the main sequence below the main-sequence turnoff, the subgiant branch leading to the red giant branch, the horizontal branch above the main-sequence turnoff and extending across colour, and an Asymptotic giant branch above the horizontal branch, generally near and somewhat blueward of the red giant branch. A sufficiently deep diagram can also show a faint blue white dwarf cooling sequence; blue stragglers may lie above and blueward of the old main-sequence turnoff.

The two panels use the colour index $B-V$, increasing toward cooler, redder stars. On a conventional apparent-astronomical magnitude vertical axis, brighter stars are higher. These coordinate conventions locate the branches just described.

The supplied PDF does not permit a complete identification of the plotted branches. Its upper image data are corrupt and render as a grey rectangle, covering the main-sequence turnoffs and evolved populations; only lower fragments and $B-V$ axes survive. Thus the list above identifies the relevant stellar evolution phases and how to recognize them on an intact plot, rather than claiming that every listed sequence is visibly present in this damaged source. In particular, neither a plotted white dwarf sequence nor individual blue stragglers can be confirmed from it.

On the main sequence, central hydrogen burning converts four protons into helium, positrons, neutrinos and released energy. The net reaction is $4p\to {}^4\mathrm{He}+2e^{+}+2{\nu }_e$, with positron annihilation contributing to the total roughly $26.7\mathrm{MeV}$ release before subtracting escaping neutrino energy. In the low-mass main-sequence stars of an old globular cluster, the proton–proton chain generally dominates. The CNO cycle makes the same net conversion and becomes important in hotter burning regions.

After central hydrogen exhaustion, a subgiant contracts its helium core and establishes a hydrogen-burning shell. On the red giant branch, that shell supplies most of the luminosity, commonly through the temperature-sensitive CNO cycle, while the inert helium core grows and becomes supported mainly by electron degeneracy pressure. The envelope expands and its surface cools. The helium core is not yet powered by helium nuclear fusion.

Helium ignition in a sufficiently low-mass degenerate core produces the helium flash, removing the strong electron degeneracy pressure dominance. A horizontal-branch star subsequently burns helium in its core through the Triple-alpha process, $3{}^4\mathrm{He}\to {}^{12}\mathrm{C}+\gamma$, and through ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha ,\gamma ){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$. A surrounding hydrogen-burning shell can continue simultaneously.

After central helium exhaustion, the Asymptotic giant branch has an inert carbon-oxygen core with a helium-burning shell and an outer hydrogen-burning shell. Alternation between quiescent burning and helium-shell thermal pulses drives mixing and substantial mass loss. Subsequent post-asymptotic giant branch evolution exposes a hot core that may ionize its expelled envelope as a planetary nebula. Finally a white dwarf cools mainly by loss of stored thermal energy, rather than sustained central nuclear fusion.

An Algol binary is a semidetached binary: a cool evolved donor fills its Roche lobe, while a hotter and more massive mass gainer remains on or near the main sequence. Roche-lobe overflow feeds the companion through a stream, sometimes forming an accretion disk. A suitably inclined system is an eclipsing binary. The prototype's periodic dimming led John Goodricke to propose an occulting companion in 1783; his original observations record an early eclipse interpretation.

The Algol paradox arises if the present masses are assumed to have been constant: the lower-mass star is the more evolved one, even though coeval isolated stars of higher mass normally exhaust core fuel sooner. The mass-luminosity relation gives the rough nuclear-lifetime scaling $t_{\mathrm{nuc}}\propto M/L$, decreasing strongly with mass. The resolution is binary mass-ratio reversal. The present donor began as the more massive star, evolved first, and expanded into its Roche lobe. Transferring much of its envelope made it less massive and made its initially less massive companion the present mass gainer. Their current masses therefore do not reveal their original evolutionary ordering.

On a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, both components start on the zero-age main sequence. The initially more massive donor leaves the main sequence first, moving toward lower effective temperature and higher luminosity as a subgiant or red giant. During envelope stripping, it remains oversized and overluminous for its decreasing mass because its evolved core continues to supply energy. The accretor gains mass, moves to higher effective temperature and luminosity, and can undergo stellar rejuvenation if fresh hydrogen mixes into its core. After substantial envelope removal, the donor contracts to a hot stripped star; a sufficiently low-mass helium core ultimately becomes a helium white dwarf. The schematic below separates the two identities through the transfer episode rather than relabelling them when their masses cross.

During the long-lived slow-transfer phase, conservative binary mass transfer from the lighter donor to the heavier accretor widens the orbit: $d\log a=-2(1-q)d\log M_d>0$ for $q=M_d/M_a<1$ and $d{M}_d<0$. Transfer eventually stops when the donor's shrinking envelope can no longer maintain contact. The remnant can be a helium white dwarf if it never ignites helium, or a more massive helium-burning stripped star if it does. Later the mass gainer also leaves the main sequence. Reverse Roche-lobe overflow onto the compact remnant can lead to a common envelope, leaving a close double remnant after successful envelope ejection, or to merger. The detailed outcome depends on both masses, the separation, and how much matter and angular momentum escaped during earlier transfer.

The approximate mass-ratio boundary in the question has a stability interpretation. For an ideal fully convective donor star with adiabatic stellar radius response exponent ${\zeta }_{\mathrm{ad}}=-1/3$, the conservative Roche-radius approximation gives ${\zeta }_L=2q-5/3$. Dynamical stability of binary mass transfer requires ${\zeta }_{\mathrm{ad}}>{\zeta }_L$, so a long-lived stable system hasA more massive convective donor expands relative to its shrinking lobe under mass loss, favouring runaway transfer and a common envelope instead of a persistent Algol phase. This explains the approximate Algol mass-ratio stability limit in that model. It is not a universal observational boundary: a donor with a radiative envelope or a substantial evolved core has a different adiabatic response, and nonconservative loss changes the Roche-lobe response. Van Rensbergen and collaborators' observed and modelled Algol distributions include reported mass ratios above $0.7$ and discuss uncertainties in their determination. The literal claim that all Algols obey the same cutoff is therefore too strong.

A sufficiently wide system first reaches Roche-lobe overflow on the red giant branch, when the original donor is likely to have a deep convective envelope. Straightforward conservative overflow while that donor is still more massive is then prone to dynamical runaway and orbital contraction in a common envelope; it does not naturally yield a wide, long-lived Algol-like configuration. A plausible route is substantial earlier envelope loss through a stellar wind, possibly tidally enhanced stellar wind loss, reducing or reversing the mass ratio before contact. Wind mass transfer in a binary star can also increase the companion's mass. The lower donor mass, reduced envelope and larger core fraction make later transfer easier to stabilize. Alternatively, a detached pair with the same reversed evolutionary appearance may be interacting only through a wind and need never have undergone overflow. Its current width alone does not uniquely determine the initial orbit, but it indicates that prior mass loss or a more general nonconservative history must be considered, rather than applying the simple conservative convective-donor picture unchanged.

The right panel of the figure in solution has luminosity increasing upwards and effective temperature decreasing to the right. An old globular cluster contains a low-mass main sequence, a main-sequence turnoff, subgiants, a red giant branch, a horizontal branch, an Asymptotic giant branch and a faint hot white dwarf sequence. Its high-mass main sequence is absent because those stars have evolved.

If a fraction $f_c=0.1$ of the star participates in hydrogen burning, with initial hydrogen mass fraction $X=0.7$, the available nuclear binding energy is $0.007f_{c}XM{c}^2$. Assuming a roughly constant luminosity and coeval stars,Taking the quoted core fraction as hydrogen fuel itself, $f_{c}X=0.1$, gives $1.98\times 10^{10}\mathrm{yr}$. Stating the fuel convention matters: burning the whole stellar mass overestimates the age by about an order of magnitude. Evolving luminosity and detailed stellar structure are needed for an accurate age.

The right panel of the figure in solution has luminosity increasing upwards and effective temperature decreasing to the right. An old globular cluster contains a low-mass main sequence, a main-sequence turnoff, subgiants, a red giant branch, a horizontal branch, an Asymptotic giant branch and a faint hot white dwarf sequence. Its high-mass main sequence is absent because those stars have evolved.

If a fraction $f_c=0.1$ of the star participates in hydrogen burning, with initial hydrogen mass fraction $X=0.7$, the available nuclear binding energy is $0.007f_{c}XM{c}^2$. Assuming a roughly constant luminosity and coeval stars,Taking the quoted core fraction as hydrogen fuel itself, $f_{c}X=0.1$, gives $1.98\times 10^{10}\mathrm{yr}$. Stating the fuel convention matters: burning the whole stellar mass overestimates the age by about an order of magnitude. Evolving luminosity and detailed stellar structure are needed for an accurate age.

A Hertzsprung-Russell diagram plots stellar luminosity upward and effective temperature increasing toward the left. The main sequence runs from hot luminous stars at upper left to cool faint stars at lower right, with the Sun near $T_{\mathrm{eff}}\simeq 5800\mathrm{K}$, $L=L_{\odot }$.

In the evolution of a solar-mass star, core hydrogen fusion initially supplies the luminosity. As core hydrogen is exhausted, hydrogen-shell fusion around a contracting helium core carries the star through the subgiant and red giant phases toward higher luminosity and lower surface temperature. Helium ignition is followed by core helium fusion with a hydrogen-burning shell, placing a solar-mass star in the red clump. The later Asymptotic giant branch has hydrogen- and helium-burning shells around a carbon-oxygen core. Envelope ejection exposes a hot central star of a planetary nebula; residual shell burning ends and the resulting white dwarf radiates stored thermal energy as it cools.

The numbered features in the original colour-magnitude diagram have the following interpretation.

Continuous star formation explains the coexistence of newly formed massive main-sequence stars with evolved low-mass remnants; interpreting a single sharp turnoff as the age of a coeval cluster would be inappropriate here.

The population sequence connecting the main-sequence turnoff to the lower red giant branch in a coeval stellar population, tracing post-core-hydrogen-burning evolution before the large red-giant expansion. It is a feature of a population diagram associated with subgiant stars, rather than a separate universal line followed by every stellar mass.