Stellar structure follows from mass conservation, hydrostatic equilibrium, energy generation, and energy transport together with an equation of state and opacity law.
The temperature at a star's centre. In gas-pressure-supported stellar homology, the stellar hydrostatic equation and ideal gas law give , with a coefficient set by the dimensionless density and pressure profiles. It controls the strongly temperature-dependent stellar energy-generation rate.
A stellar core is the central region distinguished from the surrounding envelope by its composition, energy generation or thermodynamic state. A core boundary at radius encloses mass . In a hydrogen-shell-burning red giant, a helium-rich core can be inert while a narrow surrounding layer supplies the luminosity. Core mass and core radius are separate variables: the relation between them must come from a structural model, such as a polytropic mass-radius relation, rather than from the word core alone.
Uniform solid-body rotation adds the centrifugal potential to the gravitational potential. In the corotating frame, hydrostatic equilibrium becomes . The Poisson equation gives . On regular connected equipotential surfaces, is constant; taking the curl shows that is constant too. Uniform composition and an invertible equation of state then make constant on each such surface. These statements do not require to be constant there.
This approximation represents the gravitational potential by a central point mass while retaining the centrifugal potential. A surface through polar radius satisfies , where . The inner closed surface is regular below ; at the limiting value its equatorial radius is and equatorial effective gravity vanishes. The approximation is useful for illustrating oblateness and gravity darkening, rather than modeling the density distribution of every rotating star.
The divergence theorem and Poisson equation give on a bounding equipotential surface. Equipotential luminosity conservation with stellar circulation then fixes . Combining , and radiative conductivity gives the displayed logarithmic temperature-pressure gradient. Both appearances of mass mean the enclosed mass ; only on the outer boundary can both be replaced by the total mass.
Slow circulation in planes containing the rotation axis can transport entropy through a rotating star while the leading mechanical balance remains nearly hydrostatic equilibrium. Its steady mass flux satisfies the continuity equation. It is distinct from assuming an exactly motionless radiative interior, and from turbulent convection.
The thermal imbalance of a slowly rotating radiative star can drive stellar meridional circulation. Its fractional centrifugal distortion is , so balancing an order- fraction of the luminosity by thermal advection estimates , where . Stable composition gradients can further impede the circulation. This radiative thermal estimate is different from rapid torque-driven circulation in a convective envelope.
For steady stellar meridional circulation, and . Thus . In the leading uniformly rotating stellar hydrostatic equilibrium, is constant on an equipotential surface; its total advected flux vanishes because the net mass flux vanishes. Integrating the energy equation then identifies the outward luminosity with enclosed nuclear energy generation, even though local heat advection is nonzero.
On a regular equipotential surface, and are constant, but generally varies. Consequently a flux cannot ordinarily satisfy local radiative equilibrium at all latitudes. Special cases such as or spherical symmetry evade this obstruction. Stellar meridional circulation supplies heat advection in the leading hydrostatic treatment.
Gravity darkening is the variation of surface brightness and effective temperature with effective gravity over a rotating or tidally distorted star. Lower equatorial gravity generally corresponds to cooler equatorial regions. The radiative gravity-darkening law applies to the idealized uniformly rotating, radiatively transporting, composition-uniform case; its exponent is not universal for every stellar envelope.
In uniformly rotating stellar hydrostatic equilibrium, composition-uniform thermodynamic quantities are functions of the total potential. Radiative conductivity gives , with . On one surface, is constant, so the outward flux is . The Stefan–Boltzmann law therefore gives . This is a surface-flux law: the material temperature constant on an interior equipotential is not the latitude-dependent emergent effective temperature.
A uniform-density spherical hydrostatic equilibrium model with zero surface pressure has , and gravitational energy . A perfect gas can have this mechanical structure with varying temperature and entropy; the imposed equilibrium density does not require incompressible perturbations.
An imposed spherical profile gives in hydrostatic equilibrium. For an ideal gas with zero surface pressure, and , where , and . The density has a central cusp and temperature initially rises outward, so positive outward radiative diffusion with regular positive nuclear heating cannot satisfy this imposed profile near the centre.
For a slowly evolving spherical star, the Lagrangian energy equation separates nuclear rest-mass release, stellar neutrino energy loss, thermal storage and pressure-volume work. Specific internal energy and nuclear energy conventions must avoid counting nuclear mass changes or escaping reaction-neutrino energy twice. At fixed composition the gravothermal stellar energy generation is . Energy transport processes redistribute heat rather than creating it.
Escaping neutrinos remove energy produced by nuclear reactions or drawn from thermal reservoirs. Pair annihilation, plasma excitations, photoneutrino emission and electron-ion bremsstrahlung provide thermal losses. This reduces photon luminosity or increases the required nuclear and gravothermal supply. At sufficiently extreme collapse densities, neutrino transport must replace a free-escape loss approximation.
This term accounts for thermal storage and compression or expansion in the stellar energy balance equation. At fixed composition the first law of thermodynamics makes it . Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction can supply positive luminosity, while thermal adjustment may locally absorb energy. It is not simply the full change in gravitational potential energy: the stellar virial theorem also requires changes in internal energy.
The gas-pressure fraction describes the relative support by an ideal gas and radiation pressure. For monatomic gas plus equilibrium radiation, it determines the adiabatic exponents of a monatomic gas-radiation mixture. Its value at the unperturbed state may be specified, but it generally changes during an isentropic parcel displacement.
For a radiative envelope, . Exactly uniform stellar gas-pressure fraction instead requires this derivative to be . Constant opacity therefore requires to increase in proportion to enclosed mass. A positive-density finite-mass envelope with no local energy generation has constant and cannot satisfy all these conditions pointwise. The Eddington-model convective-core mass fraction uses constant as a global approximation, rather than an exact detailed envelope constraint.
In stellar structure, stellar thermal equilibrium means that internal heating balances the surface luminosity and any energy loss through neutrinos, with negligible secular storage of thermal energy on the timescale considered. A star can satisfy this balance while its interior is hotter than its surface and heat flows outward. It is therefore different from equal-temperature thermal equilibrium between systems. Neglecting neutrino losses, the balance is . In a slowly mass-losing donor star, a stellar thermal equilibrium radius sequence applies only when thermal adjustment is fast compared with the mass-loss timescale; rapid loss instead requires the adiabatic stellar radius response exponent.
A temperature versus density diagram separates classical, degenerate, nonrelativistic and relativistic stellar-matter limits. The Electron degeneracy boundary is , with slope at low density and at high density. Thermal relativity is controlled by , while relativity of degenerate Electrons is controlled by . Photon pressure and thermal electron-positron pairs add further crossovers; all depend on composition and are gradual, not thermodynamic phase boundaries.
For one ionic species of number density , the ion-sphere radius is . The ionic Coulomb coupling parameter compares the interaction energy from Coulomb's law at that separation with thermal energy . At fixed composition, . Values near one mark significant corrections to the ideal ion gas; strong coupling can lead to an ordered solid. Screening, mixtures and quantum motion modify detailed transitions, so this estimate is not a universal crystallization boundary. It is separate from the electron degeneracy criterion based on the electron Fermi temperature.
Equating radiation pressure to cold electron degeneracy pressure gives . Because the two Electron pressure limits scale as and , this boundary has logarithmic slopes and , respectively. Above it, photon pressure can dominate even when the net Electrons remain degenerate; degeneracy of one component and dominance of the total pressure are different criteria. Thermal pairs modify the high-temperature pressure comparison.
For a nondegenerate fully ionized gas, equating with gives . Radiation dominates at higher temperature for fixed density. A degenerate Electron gas requires its degeneracy pressure instead of extrapolating this ideal-gas formula.
In a dilute Electron gas, thermal kinetic energies become relativistic near , corresponding to . This is a crossover in the momentum distribution, not an abrupt temperature transition. Degenerate Electrons can instead be relativistic at much lower temperature if their Fermi momentum exceeds .
A stellar composition profile gives chemical mass fractions against radius or enclosed mass. Flat portions can indicate mixing in a convective core or convective envelope, while burning shells and moving convective boundaries leave gradients and discontinuities.
The stellar structure equations describe spherical hydrostatic stars through radial conservation of mass, force balance, energy generation, and energy transport. An equation of state, opacity, energy-generation law, and boundary conditions close the system.
In spherical stellar structure, a shell of radius , thickness and mass density has mass . Integrating outward gives the enclosed mass, .
The stellar adiabatic exponents describe pressure and temperature responses to an isentropic density change:
For fixed-composition monatomic ideal gas plus equilibrium radiation pressure, specific internal energy is . An isentropic process satisfies , giving andThe stellar gas-pressure fraction must be allowed to change along the adiabat. The pure-radiation and pure-gas limits give and , respectively. Partial ionization or different gas heat capacities change these formulas.
For fixed-composition monatomic ideal gas plus equilibrium blackbody radiation, let and . The mass-specific heats are and . The specific-heat ratio is , not generally any one of the stellar adiabatic exponents. Differentiate at constant total pressure rather than at constant .
For a static spherically symmetric Newtonian star, balancing the inward gravitational force against the pressure gradient gives
A stellar polytrope obeys for constant and polytropic index . Its dimensionless density profile satisfies the Lane-Emden equation.
The regular Lane-Emden equation solution has no finite first zero. Its Lane-Emden mass formula gives , so its infinite-radius total mass is . Its enclosed mean mass density is and tends to zero. A finite externally confined core instead requires a specified truncation pressure.
For a gas-pressure-supported polytrope of index five with uniform mean molecular weight, . A specific stellar energy-generation rate therefore integrates to . Substituting gives the displayed formula, convergent for . At its dimensionless coefficient is approximately . The scale factor is a volume, , rather than an area.
For a spherical stellar polytrope, the axial moment of inertia is . With Lane-Emden variables for a stellar polytrope, first zero and Lane-Emden surface mass constant , its dimensionless form isA polytrope of index zero gives , while a polytrope of index one gives . The latter is smaller because more of the mass lies near the center. The scalar second mass moment is , not the axial moment of inertia.
The regular solution of the Lane-Emden equation is , with first zero . Its interior density is constant and its pressure varies as . This is the structural incompressible limit; itself is singular at , and does not assign the perturbative stellar adiabatic exponent of a thermally stratified ideal-gas model.
For , the Lane-Emden mass formula gives at fixed , while . For , the Lane-Emden equation has a finite-radius solution, yet as . The relativistic Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation approaches this limit since . Monotone pressure and density alone therefore do not impose a finite stellar maximum mass.
For a spherical stellar polytrope of finite radius and zero surface pressure, the specific enthalpy is . Hydrostatic equilibrium gives , hence . Eliminating the pressure integral with the stellar virial theorem proves the displayed formula. For a gas adiabatic stellar polytrope, and ; a general polytropic index need not have this relation to the specific-heat ratio.
A stellar polytrope with polytropic index one has in hydrostatic equilibrium. Combining this with the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity gives the Helmholtz equationThe spherical solution regular at the origin is . Its first zero gives , independent of central mass density, and .
The interior Helmholtz equation for a polytrope of index one also admits a positive solution vanishing on the faces of a cube:Its central value is and its average is . Together with , it solves the interior hydrostatic equilibrium and Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. A local interior solution need not match the external field of its own mass.
For the cubic polytropic interior, vanishes at each vertex, so the locally defined potential predicts zero gravitational acceleration there. But at the vertex , the actual self-gravitational acceleration of the positive mass distribution iswhose three components are strictly positive. The fields cannot match continuously. Thus the interior Helmholtz equation and zero density on the faces do not construct an isolated static cubic star. External stresses or an external gravitational field would be needed to realize such a boundary-value construction.
The sine-product cubic polytropic interior has zero mass density gradient at every corner. Its hydrostatic potential therefore has zero gradient there. In contrast, at a corner of a cube containing a positive mass density, every interior mass element contributes a gravitational-potential gradient pointing into the same coordinate octant. Each component of the gradient is strictly nonzero. This directly proves failure of global isolated gravitational matching, even though the interior hydrostatic and Poisson equations hold.
The Eddington standard model is a chemically homogeneous stellar polytrope with constant gas-pressure fraction . It approximates massive radiative stars in which gas and radiation both contribute appreciably to pressure.
The polytropic index is defined by . A monatomic convective ideal gas has , while a radiation-supported Eddington model has .
An adiabatic stellar polytrope has with constant specific entropy, so . For a monatomic perfect gas, and .
With , the exact rearranged relation iswhereFor , the radius dependence disappears and the mass is proportional to .
For a finite regular polytrope with fixed index, the scale implies . Thus, for , . For , . Fixed composition makes the cold electron degeneracy pressure coefficient approximately fixed, but a convective ideal gas has controlled by entropy. A stellar sequence with changing entropy therefore need not follow the fixed- negative slope.
For a chemically uniform gas-plus-radiation polytrope with constant gas-pressure fraction , the mass obeysIt follows from the mass scaling and the equation of state.
Homologous stellar models have the same dimensionless radial profiles after mass, radius, density, pressure, and temperature are scaled by characteristic values.
For a monatomic ideal gas fully convective star, and . Matching its adiabat to a photosphere with and gives , and hence surface luminosity . Specific heating gives . Equality yields the displayed laws and , so the theoretical HR slope is . Fixed composition, efficient convection and the surface matching approximation are essential.
A mass-preserving stellar homology with scale has mass density proportional to . For an adiabatic process with constant adiabatic index , its internal energy scales as and its Newtonian gravitational potential energy as . Writing , stationarity at requires , and the second scale derivative is . Thus this particular displacement is restoring for , destabilizing for , and marginal at . This is a test of homologous radial stability; it does not by itself test every stellar displacement.
For radiative, gas-pressure-supported homologous stars with constant opacity, write , and . The radiative diffusion in a star equation contains the dimensionless coefficient . A common fixed profile fixes , so and the luminosity of a fixed-mass member is constant. Gravitational energy generation in a homologously contracting ideal-gas star gives for a positive profile constant . Thus . For CNO cycle heating , the stellar nuclear fusion luminosity scales as . Equating this with gives . Neglecting , the arrival time is , hence a coeval cluster's newly arriving mass scales as . All comparisons hold stellar composition, opacity normalization and dimensionless profiles fixed.
In stellar homology, a fixed dimensionless density profile gives through the mass integral. Integrating the stellar hydrostatic equation through the same profile gives when surface pressure is negligible. The constants depend on the shape, rather than the mass and radius. For an ideal gas, .
During a spherical stellar homology contraction at fixed mass and angular momentum, a constant inertia coefficient gives and solid-body rotation gives . A fixed fluid label retains its enclosed mass and polar angle, so centrifugal acceleration scales as and gravity as . Their ratio increases as . This assumes spin conservation, not continuous synchronization to an external orbit.
In the spherical approximation, equatorial centrifugal acceleration balances surface gravity when . For and conserved angular momentum , this gives the displayed critical radius. Real rotating gas can deform, lose matter and exchange torques before a spherical model remains accurate at this limit.
For chemically uniform, gas-pressure-supported stars with homologous dimensionless profiles, mass conservation and hydrostatic pressure support equation give and . Suppose opacity scales as and specific nuclear energy generation as . ThenThe second scaling follows from radiative diffusion in a star, . Equating the two giveswhen the denominator is nonzero. Fixed composition and self-similar profiles are essential; these are relations between idealized models rather than universal stellar laws.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with and specific nuclear heating , the central scalings give and radiative diffusion in a star gives . Equating them yields the displayed laws. The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives , hence . Composition and dimensionless profiles are held fixed.
For a chemically uniform, gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with Kramers' opacity law and specific heating , radiative diffusion in a star gives . Nuclear heating gives . Equating them yields . Thus gives a mass-independent radius, whereas gives and . The coefficients and dimensionless profiles must be fixed; this is an idealized radiative model rather than a universal stellar law.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with opacity and stellar energy-generation rate , radiative diffusion in a star gives . Integrating the heating rate instead gives . Equality in stellar thermal equilibrium yields the displayed radius law and . This fixes the dimensionless profiles and coefficients, and neglects radiation pressure; it is a model comparison rather than a universal law for all main sequence stars. At fixed mass and metal mass fraction, homogeneous hydrogen burning gives the homogeneous fuel-depletion luminosity feedback through .
For a chemically uniform, ideal-gas-supported stellar homology sequence with nuclear energy generation and opacity , radiative diffusion in a star fixes and nuclear heating fixes . Eliminating gives , henceThe absence of in the radius law is a consequence of these particular power laws; it is not a universal relation for real stars. At fixed initial and , the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives at fixed luminosity.
Let a fixed-mass, fully mixed stellar model evolve by hydrogen burning, with and . Energy conservation gives . The time to reach is therefore . If and the function are common to the population, the integral is constant and . This includes the change of luminosity during fuel depletion rather than replacing the luminosity by its initial value.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with specific nuclear heating and opacity , the dimensionless radiative coefficient is proportional to . The nuclear coefficient is proportional to . Holding both and the dimensionless profiles fixed gives the displayed scalings. The Stefan–Boltzmann law then gives and . The coefficients, pressure regime and composition assumptions must be held as specified; these relations are not universal laws for massive stars.
For a fixed-mass fully mixed hydrogen burning star with whose radiative stellar homology gives , put . The luminosity is and fuel conservation gives . Hence , producing the displayed feedback law. This applies both to CNO homology with density-dependent inverse-cubic opacity and to radiative homology with fifth-power hydrogen burning and inverse-cubic opacity, at fixed metal mass fraction in the latter. Its physical domain ends at , before the formal denominator vanishes. The idealization holds the coefficient normalizations fixed while stellar composition changes through the mean molecular weight and fuel abundance.
For homologous, chemically uniform, gas-pressure-supported radiative stars with specific energy generation and composition-dependent constant opacity, stellar homology gives and . Equating them gives the displayed scalings. Hydrogen depletion changes both mean molecular weight and electron-scattering opacity; holding composition fixed gives and . The power-law burning approximation applies only while hydrogen fuel remains.
With negligible heavy-element contribution to the mean molecular weight, and . At fixed mass, composition-dependent CNO homology gives and . The Stefan–Boltzmann law then gives . From the formal reference, declining initially increases luminosity and effective temperature, unlike the usual redward main-sequence turn-off. A trace CNO catalyst abundance is implicit in the burning coefficient; an exactly metal-free pure-hydrogen star cannot burn through that cycle.
For a stellar homology sequence with and , the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives . Eliminating mass gives the displayed Hertzsprung-Russell diagram slope when . The usual horizontal axis decreases in temperature toward the right, reversing the visual left-to-right sign. The relation is between logarithmic variables and depends on the specified structural assumptions.
With proton–proton chain energy generation and Kramers' opacity law , homology relations for radiative stars giveThe Hertzsprung-Russell diagram relation has , with effective temperature increasing toward the left in the usual plotting convention.
Using the idealized CNO cycle law and constant electron-scattering opacity, homology relations for radiative stars giveThese retain ideal-gas pressure support; significant radiation pressure or convection changes the model.
A stellar surface boundary condition matches the interior pressure and temperature to an atmospheric solution, commonly near optical depth where a grey atmosphere has .
The photosphere is the layer from which most observed stellar radiation escapes; in a grey atmosphere it is represented approximately by optical depth .
In a plane-parallel atmosphere with and , one has . If gravity and opacity vary slowly, the pressure at optical depth is approximately .
Take an ideal gas grey atmosphere with , constant surface gravity of a star , vanishing external pressure and . Integrating hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . Its logarithmic temperature-pressure gradient is , so the Schwarzschild criterion for a monatomic gas is crossed at . The radiative continuation beyond that depth is unstable and must be replaced by convective transport.
In a grey atmosphere with and , hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth gives . With and , integration gives the displayed pressure-temperature relation. At the matching surface , the Eddington surface boundary condition gives , hence .
For a plane-parallel atmosphere in radiative equilibrium, constant surface gravity of a star and opacity , match the stellar structure interior where the radiative flux satisfies . The grey atmosphere law then puts the surface at optical depth with . Integrating hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth from gives . Multiplication by proves the displayed boundary condition for , . At the integral is logarithmic and the continuous limit is . The relation assumes negligible radiation pressure and describes the Eddington closure approximation, rather than exact angular transfer.
Assume an ideal-gas grey atmosphere with , constant surface gravity of a star , and for . Using in and integrating givesDifferentiation yields . Applying the Schwarzschild criterion with monatomic adiabatic gradient gives . Since depends only on , matching to fixes .
For a grey atmosphere with , an ideal gas and , hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth integrates to , taking . The logarithmic radiative gradient is . Equating it to the monatomic adiabatic temperature gradient gives and the displayed onset temperature. Beyond this point the radiative profile must be replaced by convective transport.
For a self-gravitating fluid star with surface pressure , volume , kinetic energy , gravitational energy , and ,
Stellar convective stability compares the density of an adiabatically displaced fluid element with its new surroundings. Temperature and composition gradients determine whether buoyancy restores the element or amplifies its displacement.
In a thin ideal-gas grey atmosphere with , constant enclosed mass and luminosity , and , divide the stellar hydrostatic equation by radiative diffusion in a star. This gives . Integrating from , , yieldsLogarithmic derivative gives . For a monatomic gas gas, the Schwarzschild criterion reaches equality at , hence . The purely radiative profile cannot be continued past this point as a convectively stable model.
Stellar convective instability occurs when an adiabatic process displaces a fluid element and buoyancy amplifies the displacement. For uniform composition the Schwarzschild criterion gives instability when the actual temperature gradient exceeds the adiabatic temperature gradient; composition gradients instead require the Ledoux criterion.
A uniform-density perfect-gas sphere supported by decreasing pressure has buoyancy frequency squared in the interior. Its specific entropy decreases outward and adiabatic displacements are buoyantly unstable. For the nonradial polynomial family, the product of the two normalized squared mode frequencies is , displaying one growing branch even when radial compression modes are stable.
With a composition gradient, stability requiresA mean molecular weight increasing inward normally provides an additional stabilizing term.
For a grey atmosphere with and , logarithmic differentiation givesA monatomic perfect gas of uniform composition has adiabatic temperature gradient . The Schwarzschild criterion therefore predicts the first marginally unstable layer at , and convection for larger optical depth. Beyond that onset, the assumed purely radiative profile is no longer a self-consistent transport solution.
A convective core is a central stellar region in which the radiative temperature gradient exceeds the adiabatic threshold. Efficient convection makes its entropy nearly uniform and mixes its composition.
The global Eddington closure , combined with a representative stellar gas-pressure fraction, makes the exterior stellar radiative temperature gradient approximately when the luminosity is constant outside the core. Matching it to the adiabatic temperature gradient estimates the displayed boundary mass. This is a closure estimate: imposing exactly uniform throughout a finite-mass radiative envelope also conflicts with constant luminosity, as described by the constant-beta radiative-envelope obstruction.
A convective envelope is an outer stellar region in which convection carries a substantial fraction of the energy and mixes material. Its nearly adiabatic response to rapid mass loss is important for the dynamical stability of binary mass transfer.
A radiative envelope transports most of its energy by radiative diffusion. Its stratified entropy profile gives a different rapid mass-loss response from a convective envelope.
For a negligible-mass ideal-gas envelope above a core of mass , with constant luminosity and Kramers' opacity law, division of hydrostatic equilibrium by radiative diffusion gives . Taking the outer pressure constant to be negligible yields , where , and . Hydrostatic equilibrium then gives , so with . The radiative-zero choice is exact for a vanishing-temperature boundary at infinity and a deep-envelope approximation for a very extended finite star. It is not implied by small surface temperature alone at a specified finite radius.
For a constant-luminosity radiative envelope with ideal-gas pressure and Kramers' opacity law, impose power laws on enclosed mass, density, pressure and temperature while retaining . If their exponents are , respectively, mass conservation gives , hydrostatic balance gives , the gas law gives , and diffusion gives . Solving gives . In particular . Neglecting envelope self-gravity instead sets approximately constant and changes the exponents to ; that approximation is not an exact solution of mass conservation with nonzero density.
A thin radiative envelope with constant enclosed mass, luminosity and mean molecular weight, ideal gas pressure and opacity has , , and . Combining radiative diffusion in a star with hydrostatic equilibrium gives , so for nonzero exponents. Zero exponents give logarithmic limits. The model must be stopped or modified if the Schwarzschild criterion predicts convection.
For with and , the logarithmic radiative temperature gradient is . At a marginal boundary with an efficient ideal-gas convective envelope, the Schwarzschild criterion equates it to . Hence . The notation with real positive requires a nonnegative bracket. Vanishing or needs the corresponding logarithmic integration instead of this power form.
In a negligible-mass, non-burning stellar envelope with and Kramers' opacity law , the stellar radiative temperature gradient is . It decreases inward as the temperature rises, so the inner edge of efficient convection is where it equals . If outer matching gives , then , since and . Hence .
A fully convective star has convection throughout nearly its entire interior. Very low-mass red dwarfs are fully convective; the transition to this structure is used in the disrupted magnetic braking model.
In a radiative stellar region, photons carry luminosity down the temperature gradient. Dimensional scaling of the radiative-diffusion equation gives .
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 116 total.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.