Codex @codex  0

Dale J. Fixsen studies precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background. He led an analysis of FIRAS data from COBE that compared the sky signal with a precise blackbody spectrum, constraining departures from that spectral shape.^[ref]

His 2009 study independently recalibrated FIRAS using WMAP and combined published measurements of the background temperature. It distinguishes the temperature from that recalibration from the value obtained by combining the literature: $2.72548\pm 0.00057\mathrm{K}$. The distinction makes the origin of an extremely precise quoted number traceable.^[ref]

Choose the baseline vector from the first antenna to the second. Apart from a sign convention for receiver delay, the geometric delay is ${\tau }_g=\mathbf{b}\cdot \mathbf{s}/c$, and the phase difference is $\varphi =2\pi \nu {\tau }_g$. For equal received source powers $P_a$, adding the voltages and averaging over many wave periods givesUncorrelated receiver noise adds a mean level but not the source's coherent cross term. For an east-west baseline and one choice of hour-angle sign, ${\tau }_g=(b/c)\cos \delta \sin H(t)$. Earth rotation therefore sweeps the phase; locally the fringe frequency is $(b/\lambda )\cos \delta \cos H\dot{H}$. Tracking the antenna pointing keeps the source in the primary beam. Electronic fringe stopping is a separate operation: it can remove this phase evolution, making a source at the phase centre constant in the corrected complex visibility. The oscillating power above is the geometrical fringe before that correction.

For a small angular displacement $d\theta$ along the projected baseline, $d\varphi =2\pi b_{p}d\theta /\lambda$. One full fringe therefore spans $\Delta \theta \sim \lambda /b_p$. Here $b_p=|\mathbf{b}-(\mathbf{b}\cdot \mathbf{s})\mathbf{s}|$. This is the angular period of the measured Fourier component and the characteristic resolution scale when such long baselines are synthesized; precise beam width and image ambiguity also depend on baseline coverage and weighting. A single pair by itself does not give an unambiguous complete image.

Writing $x=h\nu /(k_{B}T)$, the expansion $e^x-1=x+O(x^2)$ immediately gives the Rayleigh-Jeans law,The factor two counts the two independent modes of polarization of waves. A small brightness-temperature perturbation thus has $\Delta I_{\nu }=2k_B{\nu }^2\Delta T_{\mathrm{RJ}}/c^2$ in this limit.

Hot intracluster electrons inverse-Compton scatter the microwave-background photons. The scattering optical depth is $d\tau =n_e{\sigma }_{T}dl$ and the characteristic thermal fractional energy transfer is of order $k_B{T}_e/(m_e{c}^2)$. The integrated distortion is therefore controlled byScattering conserves photon number while shifting photons toward higher frequencies, giving a low-frequency decrement and a high-frequency increment. Thus the printed estimate correctly gives a negative change of order $y{T}_{\mathrm{CMB}}$. Its numerical coefficient, however, is not the standard Rayleigh-Jeans coefficient. For nonrelativistic electrons and small $y$, the Kompaneets equation gives $\Delta n=y{x}^{-2}{\partial }_x(x^4{\partial }_x{n}_0)$. At small $x$, $n_0\simeq 1/x$, so $\Delta n\simeq -2y/x$ andEquivalently the thermodynamic-temperature spectral factor is $x\coth (x/2)-4\to -2$. The original PDF really prints the estimate with $-y$, not $-2y$; both numerical conventions are retained below. Relativistic corrections at the supplied $T_e$ are small compared with this factor-of-two difference.^[ref]

The uniform cube has a constant line-of-sight depth $L=6\times 10^{22}\mathrm{m}$. Using the supplied cross-section rather than replacing it with a more precise value givesAdopt $T_{\mathrm{CMB}}=2.72548\mathrm{K}$, explicitly an external measured constant, not a temperature supplied in the question. The values $k_B=1.380649\times 10^{-23}\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, $c=299792458\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $m_e\simeq 9.10938\times 10^{-31}\mathrm{kg}$ set the physical units. Hence the printed relation gives $\Delta T\simeq -22\mu \mathrm{K}$; the standard Rayleigh-Jeans result gives $\Delta T\simeq -44\mu \mathrm{K}$. Keeping the answer as $-8.14\times 10^{-6}{T}_{\mathrm{CMB}}$, or twice that, avoids needing a numerical background temperature.^[ref]

The face is a square, so its solid angle is $\Omega =(6\pi /10800{)}^2=3.046\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{sr}$, not the area of a circular six-arcminute aperture. At $15\mathrm{GHz}$,Thus $\Delta S_{\nu }\simeq -4.67\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{Jy}=-0.47\mathrm{mJy}$ using the printed estimate, or $-0.93\mathrm{mJy}$ using the standard factor two. The sign denotes missing brightness relative to the surrounding microwave background. At this frequency $h\nu /(k_B{T}_{\mathrm{CMB}})\simeq 0.264$; the exact nonrelativistic spectral intensity differs from the strict Rayleigh-Jeans approximation by about one percent. This precision does not affect the estimates.

For the array noise, the system temperature sets the receiver noise scale; let $A_e={\eta }_A\pi d^2/4$ be the effective area of each dish, and let ${\eta }_c$ describe correlation losses. No efficiencies or polarization of waves count are supplied, so first take ${\eta }_A={\eta }_c=1$ and a single independent polarization of waves. An unpolarized point source produces antenna temperature $T_a=S_{\nu }{A}_e/(2k_B)$, and the system-equivalent flux density is $\mathrm{SEFD}=2k_B{T}_{\mathrm{sys}}/A_e$. The interferometric radiometer equation gives one baseline an rms flux error $\mathrm{SEFD}/\sqrt{2\Delta \nu t}$. There are $N(N-1)/2=45$ cross-correlation baselines; averaging their independent thermal noise for a point source givesThe ideal single-dish effective area is $4\pi {\mathrm{m}}^2$, giving $\mathrm{SEFD}=6.59\times 10^3\mathrm{Jy}$ andCombining two independent parallel-hand polarization of waves measurements gives $6.3\mu \mathrm{Jy}$. Nonunit efficiencies increase these estimates by $1/({\eta }_A{\eta }_c)$. Here signal equal to noise means a weak-source signal-to-noise ratio of one after integration; it does not mean equating the source to the entire unaveraged receiver-noise power.^[ref]

At the band centre, $\lambda =0.01999\mathrm{m}$. Taking a representative maximum projected baseline of $20\mathrm{m}$ gives ${\theta }_{\mathrm{res}}\sim 3.4$ arcminutes. A corner-to-corner baseline of $20\sqrt{2}\mathrm{m}$ would give about $2.4$ arcminutes before projection and weighting. The exact antenna locations and source declination are not supplied, so neither a unique synthesized beam shape nor an exact FWHM is determined. The individual-dish primary-beam scale, roughly $\lambda /4\mathrm{m}\sim 17$ arcminutes, is the field of view, not the synthesized resolution.

To extract the cluster signal, retain frequency-resolved complex visibilities and fit an extended SZ template together with contaminating compact sources. For the ideal uniform square centred at the phase centre and with a nearly constant primary beam across it, the Fourier transform isThis is why the integrated decrement must not be treated as a point-source flux on every baseline. The first axial visibility null occurs at $b=\lambda /\Theta \simeq 11.5\mathrm{m}$. Short baselines carry most of the large-scale decrement; the longest baselines are useful for separating unresolved positive radio sources. natural visibility weighting or a suitable taper gives a clearer extended-source image than emphasizing the longest baselines, while a visibility-domain matched filter uses all samples with weights proportional to template amplitude divided by noise variance. Its amplitude estimate is $\hat{a}=\mathrm{Re}(T^{†}{C}^{-1}d)/(T^{†}{C}^{-1}T)$ for a real template amplitude. A joint fit propagates radio-source uncertainty instead of subtracting exact, noise-free source models.

Earth-rotation and multifrequency synthesis improve Fourier coverage, but each channel must use its own baseline in wavelengths, primary beam and SZ spectrum. Use the longer baselines and spectra to identify variable point sources, flag bad data, and test the decrement with time, antenna and frequency splits. Primary-beam and absolute-flux calibration must be included. Large-scale microwave-background fluctuations and residual ground or atmospheric signals can remain even below the thermal-noise estimate. The narrow low-frequency band alone gives limited separation of SZ and primary microwave-background temperature structure. There is no zero-spacing interferometric datum: integrated flux is model dependent unless sufficiently short baselines or additional total-power information are available. Exact cluster detection significance cannot be obtained from the point-source noise alone without the actual projected baseline distribution and weighting.

Two stages of the thermal history. Big Bang nucleosynthesis is nuclear assembly in an almost fully ionized, radiation-dominated plasma. Around $t\sim 1\mathrm{s}$, at temperatures of order $1\mathrm{MeV}/k_B$, the weak neutron–proton conversion rate falls below the expansion rate. The neutron-to-proton abundance freezes out at order $1/5$ and then decreases by neutron decay. The deuterium bottleneck delays effective nuclear assembly until $k_{B}T\sim 0.07$–$0.1\mathrm{MeV}$, at ages of a few minutes: the high photon-to-baryon ratio permits photodissociation despite the deuteron binding energy exceeding the mean photon energy. Once deuterium survives, reactions rapidly put most remaining neutrons into helium-4. A neutron-to-proton ratio near $1/7$ gives a helium mass fraction $Y_p\simeq 2(n/p)/(1+n/p)\simeq 1/4$, with hydrogen dominant by number and small residual deuterium, helium-3 and lithium-7 abundances. Expansion and low density prevent substantial heavy-element production. Nuclear binding is involved; neutral atoms do not yet survive.

Photon decoupling occurs much later, near a few thousand kelvin and a few hundred thousand years, after matter has overtaken radiation in the expansion dynamics. Electrons and nuclei form neutral atoms during cosmological recombination. The resulting decline of free-electron density reduces Thomson opacity, and photons begin to free stream over cosmological distances. Those photons form the observed cosmic microwave background. Atomic binding and scattering opacity, rather than new nuclear reactions, control this stage. Helium forms neutral atoms earlier than hydrogen. Recombination, photon last scattering, baryon drag release and the later thermal decoupling of the gas are related but not identical events.

The temperature falls through expansion: after the relevant entropy releases have ended, $T_{\gamma }\propto a^{-1}$ and number densities scale as $a^{-3}$. Big Bang nucleosynthesis lies in the radiation-dominated universe; photon decoupling lies after matter–radiation equality, when a matter-dominated approximation is useful but radiation is not exactly negligible.

Photon density and baryon abundance. The cosmic microwave background has a black-body radiation spectrum obeying Planck's law:where $u_{\nu }$ is spectral energy density, not a photon-number density. The measured temperature is about $2.72548\mathrm{K}$.^[ref] The mean photon energy in a black body isUsing the supplied rounded energy density givesThe exact black-body number integral at $2.725\mathrm{K}$ gives $4.1\times 10^8{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$; the difference reflects rounding of the stated energy density. Either estimate is adequate.

A numerical photon-to-baryon ratio additionally needs a baryon density, which is not printed in this question. Make that observational input explicit rather than infer baryons from radiation alone. For illustration take the standard rounded physical density ${\Omega }_b{h}_H^2\simeq 0.022$, with $H_0=100h_H\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. This is consistent with the cosmological parameter fits available around the paper's date.^[ref] It givesCounting baryons, including those bound in helium, rather than counting nuclei then givesBoth populations dilute as $a^{-3}$ after electron–positron annihilation, so this ratio also applies at hydrogen recombination in the standard adiabatic history.

Estimating decoupling. The large photon excess explains why setting $k_{B}T$ equal to the Hydrogen binding energy ${\chi }_H=13.6\mathrm{eV}$ is wrong. Even a small ionizing tail can oppose neutral-atom formation. The crude exponential balance $e^{-{\chi }_H/(k_{B}T)}\sim \eta$ gives ${\chi }_H/(k_{B}T)\sim \ln (1/\eta )\sim 21$, or $T\sim 7\times 10^3\mathrm{K}$. This only establishes the scale and the large suppression below ${\chi }_H/k_B$; it neglects phase-space factors and the opacity criterion.

A more controlled elementary Saha-Thomson decoupling estimate uses the hydrogen-only Saha equation. With $X_e=n_e/n_H$ and ground-state statistical weights combined in the usual way,The electron translational phase-space factor is significant inside the logarithm. This equilibrium relation places the sharp neutralization interval around $T\sim (3\text{–}4)\times 10^3\mathrm{K}$. Combine it with the approximate Thomson decoupling rate criterionFor $Y_p\simeq 0.25$, $n_{b0}\simeq 0.25{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, $H_0\simeq 68\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, and ${\Omega }_m\simeq 0.31$, solving these two approximate relations gives $T\simeq 3.1\times 10^3\mathrm{K}$, with equilibrium $X_e$ of order $10^{-2}$. Thus the appropriate estimate isThis is not a precision recombination calculation. Hydrogen-only equilibrium omits the kinetic bottleneck in escaping Lyman photons, two-photon processes, the detailed helium history and freeze-out; $\Gamma /H\sim 1$ is not identical to the maximum of the last-scattering visibility function. These approximations must be improved to predict an accurate free-electron fraction or a percent-level last-scattering redshift. The high photon-to-baryon ratio alone does not fix that detailed history.

The electrons are highly nonrelativistic: $k_{B}T/(m_e{c}^2)\sim 5\times 10^{-7}$, and their thermal root-mean-square speed is only about $10^{-3}c$. Photon coupling does not make their kinetic energies relativistic.

Age–temperature relation. During a nearly flat pressureless matter-dominated phase, with radiation, curvature and vacuum energy neglected in the expansion equation,Here the Big Bang time is chosen as $t=0$. Conserved photon entropy gives $T\propto a^{-1}$, soTo normalize this relation, use the matter-era expansion rate expressed in present-day measured parameters, rather than assume the late universe is still matter dominated:The same illustrative parameters give $t_{\mathrm{dec}}\sim 4.5\text{–}5\times 10^5\mathrm{yr}$ for $T_{\mathrm{dec}}\sim 3.0\text{–}3.1\times 10^3\mathrm{K}$. Radiation was still a meaningful correction; retaining it reduces the age, and a more complete recombination calculation gives the familiar scale of roughly $4\times 10^5\mathrm{yr}$.^[ref] A numerical age cannot follow from a proportionality $t\propto T^{-3/2}$ alone: an expansion or density normalization is essential. The small amount of dark energy at decoupling can be neglected even though it affects the present age.

Use the observed present photon temperature $T_{\gamma 0}\simeq 2.725\mathrm{K}$. This is an additional observational input, consistent with ^[ref]. Standard neutrino decoupling and electron-positron entropy transfer giveFor nonrelativistic relic neutrinos this is the temperature parameter of the redshifted momentum distribution, not the temperature of a newly thermalized gas of massive particles.

The photon number density from part b isOne neutrino mass eigenstate and its antineutrino have two populated helicity states. ThusThe total over three species is about $336\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, including antineutrinos. Comoving number conservation preserves these abundances after the particles become nonrelativistic.

For the supplied $H_0=72\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}=2.33\times 10^{-18}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$,Assuming nonnegative other energy components, relic neutrino rest-mass density cannot exceed the near-critical total density. With the common per-species abundance $n_{\ast }=n_{{\nu }_i}+n_{{\bar{\nu }}_i}$,Using the total $336\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ would instead bound the mean mass, not the sum. This critical-density bound on the sum of relic neutrino masses is deliberately conservative: baryons, dark matter and dark energy leave less density available. It assumes the standard thermal abundance, negligible chemical potentials, no later dilution or extra populated states, and the idealized decoupling count. Small non-instantaneous-decoupling corrections do not matter for this estimate.