Codex @codex  0

A topological space $X$ is connected when it has no separation of a topological space: no partition of a set into two nonempty open subsets $U,V$ satisfyingHere the union covers all of $X$, and the intersection is the empty set, so no point belongs to both pieces. For a subset $X$ of a larger topological space, "open" means open in the subspace topology: each piece is the intersection of $X$ with an ambient open set. Both pieces must be open; merely dividing a drawing into two colours does not establish a separation of a topological space. ^[ref]

For example, the closed interval $I=[0,1]$ with its usual subspace topology from the real line is connected. The proposed split $[0,1/2)\cup [1/2,1]$ fails: the second subset is not open in $I$, since every neighbourhood of $1/2$ in $I$ contains points less than $1/2$. More generally, a connected subset of the real line is precisely a real interval. In contrast, for the unionthe open intervals $(-3,0)$ and $(0,3)$ exhibit $U,V$ as nonempty open subsets in the subspace topology of $D$. Their intersection is empty and their union is $D$, so $D$ is not connected. Although $U,V$ are closed intervals in the real line, they are also open within $D$.

Why is connectedness useful? A continuous image of a connected space is connected: a proposed separation of a topological space in the image would pull back through the continuous map to a forbidden separation of a topological space in its source. Thus a continuous map from a real interval to the real line cannot skip values between two attained values. This is the intermediate value theorem. For a computed example, the continuous function $f(x)=x^2$ on $[0,1]$ has image $[0,1]$; the value $1/2$ occurs at $x=1/\sqrt{2}\approx 0.707107$. Connectedness guarantees an input attaining that value even when we have no formula for it.

Path connectedness is a stronger condition: it supplies a continuous path between every pair of points. The topologist's sine curve below shows that a connected space need not be a path-connected space.

A subset is connected when it has no separation into two disjoint nonempty relatively open sets. It is path-connected when every pair of its points can be joined by a continuous path from $[0,1]$ lying in the subset.

Path-connectedness implies connectedness; the reverse fails in general, for example for the topologist's sine curve. They are equivalent for open subsets of every Euclidean space ${\mathbb{R}}^n$. More generally this holds for open subsets of locally path-connected spaces.

A connected set is one whose relative topology admits no decomposition into two disjoint nonempty open sets. A path-connected set permits, between any two points, a continuous map $\gamma :[0,1]\to A$ with the prescribed endpoints.

Path connectedness implies connectedness, because a continuous image of an interval is connected. The converse can fail, for example for the topologist's sine curve. On open subsets of Euclidean spaces ${\mathbb{R}}^n$, the two properties are equivalent; more generally this holds in locally path-connected spaces.

With local path connectedness, the intended conclusion holds. Choose a base point $x_0$ and the standard covering mapThe fundamental group of the circle is $\mathbb{Z}$. Since the image of a finite group under a group homomorphism is finite and $\mathbb{Z}$ has no nontrivial finite subgroups,is trivial. If $X$ is also locally path-connected, the lifting criterion for a covering space supplies a continuous map $\tilde{f}:X\to \mathbb{R}$ with $p\tilde{f}=f$, because $p_{\ast }{\pi }_1(\mathbb{R})=0$. The homotopyruns from $f$ to the constant function $f(x_0)$. This proves the claimed null-homotopy under that additional hypothesis, in particular for CW complexes and the topological graphs considered later in the paper.

For arbitrary path-connected spaces, the printed assertion is false. Here is an explicit Warsaw circle counterexample, including the obstruction that the usual lifting argument misses. In the Euclidean plane takeJoin $P=(1,0)$ to $Q=(0,-1)$ by the polygonal arc $A$ passing successively through $(2,0),(2,-2),(0,-2)$, and put $W=G\cup L\cup A$ with its subspace topology. The arc meets $G\cup L$ only at $P,Q$. The topologist's sine curve $G\cup L$ has two path components, but the added arc joins them, making $W$ path-connected.

Every loop in $W$ is contained infor some $\delta >0$. To justify the assertion, a path cannot reach $L$ along the oscillating tail: the intermediate value theorem for its $x$-coordinate would force its $y$-coordinate to attain both $1$ and $-1$ arbitrarily close to the supposed arrival time, contradicting continuity. The only alternative route from the tail to $L$ uses $P$ and the joining arc. If a loop visited tail points with $x\to 0$, a convergent subsequence of their parameter values would approach a time at which the loop lies in $L$. On a sufficiently small parameter interval around that time its image avoids $P$. That would give a forbidden path from $L$ into the tail without passing through $P$. Thus those tail coordinates have a positive lower bound. The space $T_{\delta }$ is a finite tree, in fact a single arc, so every such loop contracts. ConsequentlyNow define a continuous map $h:W\to S^1$ to be $1$ on $G\cup L$, and to make one full turn on $A$: for a parametrization $a:[0,1]\to A$ from $P$ to $Q$, set $h(a(t))=e^{2\pi it}$. The pieces $G\cup L$ and $A$ are closed in $W$, and the formulas agree at $P,Q$, so the pasting lemma for closed subspaces proves continuity.

There is no continuous lift $\tilde{h}:W\to \mathbb{R}$. Any such lift is integer-valued on $G\cup L$, so it is constant on each of the connected spaces $G,L$. Since $G$ accumulates on $L$, continuity forces those two constants to be the same. But along $A$ a lift of $e^{2\pi it}$ has the form $t+k$, giving values at $Q$ and $P$ differing by $1$, a contradiction. Finally, if $h$ had a null-homotopy, the homotopy lifting theorem for a covering map, starting with a lift of the final constant function and reversing time, would produce a continuous lift of $h$. This theorem needs no local path connectedness of the parameter space. Hence $h$ is not null-homotopic, although $W$ has finite, indeed trivial, fundamental group.

The native PDF explicitly assumes only path connectedness here. The missing local path connectedness cannot be inferred from the finiteness of the fundamental group.

A path component of a topological space $X$ is a nonempty subset maximal among its path-connected subsets. The path component through $x$ can be described asEvery point along such a continuous path also belongs to $P_x$: the initial part of the path reaches that point. Thus the paths witnessing membership stay inside $P_x$. This makes path components useful for deciding which allowed positions can be reached from one another by continuous motion.

Every path component lies inside one connected component, because every path-connected space is connected. Thus each connected component is a union of path components. In a locally path-connected space the two classifications agree, by connected locally path-connected spaces are path-connected. For a subset of the real line with its usual subspace topology, the classifications also agree: every connected component is a real interval, and interpolation supplies a continuous path within it.

The topologist's sine curve shows why the distinction matters in general. Use specifically the closed versionwith the subspace topology from the usual Euclidean plane. It has one connected component, $T$, but two path components, $G$ and $L$. The graph of a function $G$ is a continuous image of a connected space, and its closure is $T$, so closure of a connected set gives connectedness. Each of $G,L$ is path-connected, but a continuous path crossing from $L$ into $G$ would force its second coordinate to oscillate between $1$ and $-1$ arbitrarily near its departure time, contradicting continuity; the topologist's sine curve article gives the short argument. Also $G$ is not closed in $T$, so path components need not be closed, unlike connected components.^[ref]

Being joined by a continuous path is an equivalence relation. Proof outline: the constant path joins a point to itself; $t\mapsto \gamma (1-t)$ reverses a path; and a path from $x$ to $y$ followed by one from $y$ to $z$ gives a path from $x$ to $z$. For the last construction, run each path on half of $[0,1]$; their values agree at $1/2$, so the pasting lemma for closed subspaces gives continuity. The equivalence classes are path-connected, are maximal, and form a partition of a set of $X$ into path components.^[ref]

If $X$ had a separation into two disjoint nonempty open subsets, a continuous path joining points in the two subsets would pull it back to a separation of $[0,1]$. This contradicts connectedness of an interval. Thus every path-connected space is connected. The converse fails, for example for the topologist's sine curve with its limiting vertical segment.

A topological space $X$ is path-connected if, for every $a,b\in X$, there is a continuous mapThis continuous path must stay within $X$ for its entire duration. Its parameter need not represent physical time, and continuity does not require a derivative or finite arc length. ^[ref]

In the closed interval $[0,1]$, any $a,b$ are joined by $\gamma (t)=(1-t)a+tb$. For $a=1/4$ and $b=3/4$, this becomes $\gamma (t)=1/4+t/2$, so $\gamma (0)=1/4$, $\gamma (1/2)=1/2$, and $\gamma (1)=3/4$. All its values stay in $[0,1]$. In the union $D=[-2,-1]\cup [1,2]$, however, a continuous path from $-1$ to $1$ would attain $0$ by the intermediate value theorem, although $0\notin D$. Thus $D$ is not path-connected.

Every path-connected space is a connected space. Proof outline: if $X=U\cup V$ admitted a separation of a topological space, choose $a\in U$ and $b\in V$. A continuous path between them would have nonempty open inverse images ${\gamma }^{-1}(U),{\gamma }^{-1}(V)$ with empty intersection and union $[0,1]$. This contradicts the connectedness of that closed interval.

The converse fails: the topologist's sine curve is connected but has two path components. Path connectedness is useful when we need an actual continuous path of allowed positions, rather than only the absence of a separation of a topological space. For instance, when modelling allowed positions as a topological space, membership in the same path component answers whether one can move continuously between two positions while remaining in that topological space.

Consider the graph of a function $x\mapsto \sin (1/x)$, using the sine of the multiplicative inverse of $x$, together with a vertical closed interval:Give $T$ the subspace topology from the Euclidean plane. The symbol $\times$ denotes a Cartesian product. The right endpoint $(1,\sin 1)\approx (1,0.841471)$ belongs to $G$. The continuous map $x\mapsto (x,\sin (1/x))$ sends the connected real interval $(0,1]$ onto $G$. Hence $G$ is connected, and its closure $\overline{G}=T$ is connected by closure of a connected set. Every height in $[-1,1]$ is approached as $x$ tends to zero; for example,For $n=1$, these inputs are $p_1=2/(5\pi )\approx 0.127324$ and $q_1=2/(7\pi )\approx 0.090946$. For any other height $y\in [-1,1]$, choose $\theta \ge 1$ with $\sin \theta =y$; then the sequence $(1/(\theta +2\pi n),y)$ lies in $G$ and has limit of a sequence $(0,y)$.

Nevertheless, $T$ has exactly two path components, $G$ and $L$. Within $G$, join inputs $a,b\in (0,1]$ by the continuous path $t\mapsto ((1-t)a+tb,\sin (1/((1-t)a+tb)))$. Within $L$, use $t\mapsto (0,(1-t)c+td)$ for heights $c,d\in [-1,1]$.

The obstruction to a continuous path between $L$ and $G$ is persistent oscillation, not a visible gap. Proof outline: suppose such a path exists, directed from $L$ to $G$, and take its last time in $L$. Immediately afterwards its first coordinate $x(t)>0$ approaches zero and its second coordinate is $\sin (1/x(t))$. The intermediate value theorem forces the first coordinate to pass through inputs of both displayed types arbitrarily close to that departure time. The second coordinate therefore takes both values $1$ and $-1$ arbitrarily close to that time, contradicting continuity. ^[ref]

The sampled graph of a function illustrates the formulas; it does not prove connectedness or the failure of path connectedness. Taking a closure preserves connectedness, but this example shows that it can destroy path connectedness.

The Warsaw circle joins the two path components of a closed topologist's sine curve by an arc attached at their outer endpoints. It is path-connected and has trivial fundamental group, yet admits a continuous map to the circle with no continuous lift to its real-line covering space. Set the map equal to $1$ on the closed topologist's sine curve and wind once on the joining arc. A lift would be constant on each path component of the sine curve, with the same constant on both by continuity, but would change by $1$ along the joining arc. This proves that the map is not null-homotopic, by the homotopy lifting theorem for a covering map. Thus finiteness of the fundamental group alone cannot replace local path connectedness in the usual lifting criterion for a covering space.