Finite morphisms are proper 2026-10-14
A finite morphism is of finite type and separated: on affine charts the multiplication map is surjective and represents its closed diagonal. Each element of a finite algebra satisfies a monic equation by the determinant trick. In a valuative lifting problem, its image in the fraction field is therefore integral over the valuation ring and belongs to that ring, since valuation rings are integrally closed. This gives a lift, unique because the valuation ring embeds in its fraction field. The valuative criterion for properness proves properness.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 18 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Throughout the algebraic questions, is a smooth projective connected algebraic curve over the algebraically closed field . This is the curve convention needed for the Jacobian variety; for an arbitrary singular or nonproper curve the assertions need not hold. Choose and write .
The degree- Picard functor of a curve iswith pullback as its action on morphisms. Equivalently, normalize by tensoring with and remember the resulting trivialization along . Since , an automorphism of a line bundle is multiplication by a base unit; preservation of this trivialization forces that unit to be . Thus normalized line bundles have effective descent and the displayed functor is already the appropriate sheaf, rather than just a list of classes over fields.
Here is a construction of its representing scheme. The symmetric product of a curve represents relative effective degree- Cartier divisors. It is projective, and its completed local ring at is a power-series ring in the elementary symmetric coefficients of local parameters at each . Thus it is smooth of dimension , in every characteristic. PutThis is open by the semicontinuity theorem for coherent cohomology. It is nonempty: choose points successively imposing independent vanishing conditions on , so that , and use Serre duality. The Riemann-Roch theorem gives on .
For any fixed line bundle of degree , use a copy of with the universal normalized line bundle . This represents exactly the open subfunctor on which . Indeed, cohomology and base change for line bundles on a curve makes a rank-one vector bundle. The evaluation morphismhas a unique relative zero Cartier divisor of degree and recovers the point of . No choice of a global generator on is needed. Conversely that zero Cartier divisor recovers modulo a bundle from .
These charts cover: given any degree- line bundle , choose a nonspecial effective degree- Cartier divisor and take . On the overlap of and , the unique effective representative of is constructed by the same rank-one evaluation map. It therefore gives a regular transition morphism; uniqueness gives both the inverse and the cocycle identity. Gluing gives a scheme representing , with a universal normalized line bundle.
The construction is of finite type, not an infinite union of indispensable charts. Choose and a fixed line bundle of degree . Every has a nonzero section by the Riemann-Roch theorem, so the universal effective Cartier divisor gives a surjection . The inverse images of the charts cover the projective, hence quasi-compact, symmetric product of a curve . A finite subcover gives finitely many charts for . This surjection also makes irreducible. The charts show that it is smooth of dimension .
For properness, apply the valuative criterion for properness. Let be a discrete valuation -algebra with fraction field , and let be a degree- line bundle on . A rational section represents it by a Cartier divisor. Its closure in the regular surface is again a Cartier divisor, since regular local rings are factorial. Thus extends to a line bundle on , whose fibre degree remains by constancy of line bundle degree in a family. Two extensions with the same generic class differ by a vertical Cartier divisor. The special fibre is irreducible, so that Cartier divisor is an integer multiple of the entire fibre, the principal Cartier divisor of a power of a uniformizer. The extensions therefore give the same normalized Picard class. This proves existence and uniqueness in the valuative criterion, hence separatedness and properness of the finite-type scheme .
Consequently is a smooth proper -variety of dimension . Tensoring by identifies it with . On the tensor product and inverse of line bundles induce the algebraic group operations; it is the Jacobian variety, an abelian variety.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 16 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A finite morphism is a finite type morphism. It is also a separated morphism: on an affine scheme chart , its diagonal morphism is represented by the surjective multiplication ring homomorphism , and is therefore a closed immersion by Question 1.
We prove the lifting condition in the valuative criterion for properness. Choose an affine open subset of containing the image of the closed point of . Every point of is a generalization of its closed point, so the whole map factors through this affine open subset. Its inverse image under the finite morphism is , with a finitely generated -module. Every is integral over : apply the determinant trick to multiplication by on a finite set of module generators to obtain a monic polynomial which annihilates all generators and hence annihilates .
In the given valuative square, we have compatible ring homomorphisms and . The image in of each satisfies a monic polynomial over . To see directly why it belongs to , suppose . The defining property of a valuation ring gives , and it lies in the maximal ideal since it cannot be a unit. A monic equation for , multiplied by , would then express as a sum of elements in that maximal ideal, a contradiction. This proves that valuation rings are integrally closed and that factors through . The factorization is unique because is injective. Thus the lift exists uniquely, proving
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 16 2 Solution 2026-10-14
A proper morphism of schemes is a separated morphism of finite type which is a universally closed morphism: after every base change, the resulting map of underlying topological spaces takes closed subsets to closed subsets.
The valuative criterion for properness, in the Noetherian setting used here, says that a finite type morphism is a proper morphism if and only if the following existence and uniqueness condition holds. For every valuation ring , its fraction field , and compatible morphisms of schemes and with , there is exactly one morphism of schemes such that and . All valuation rings are allowed; no discreteness assumption is needed in this formulation. The following arguments also use that each of the three defining conditions for a proper morphism is preserved by base change.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 16 2 v Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write as the ring homomorphism . By the permitted assumption, is a finitely generated -algebra. We will prove that every element of is integral over , including any nilpotent contribution. If , there is nothing to prove.
We use the integral closure as an intersection of valuation rings in its general form: if an integral domain lies in a field , then its integral closure inside is the intersection of all valuation rings of containing . Here need not be the fraction field of . One direction follows from valuation rings are integrally closed. For the other, if is not integral, the ideal is proper: an expression for in that ideal, multiplied by a sufficiently large power of , would be a monic equation for . Choose a maximal ideal containing this ideal, and apply the valuation domination lemma to the corresponding local ring inside . The resulting valuation ring contains and has in its maximal ideal, so . This proves the claimed intersection criterion. The valuation domination lemma is obtained by choosing, using Zorn's lemma, a maximal local overring dominating the given local ring; the usual alternative between adjoining and adjoining forces this maximal overring to be a valuation ring.
The Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals . SetTake any valuation ring of containing . The maps and form a square for the valuative criterion for properness. Its lift gives , whose composite with is the original map. Consequently the image is contained in . The intersection criterion proves that every element of is integral over .
Fix . For each , choose a monic polynomial whose value at the image of in is zero; coefficients over can be lifted to . The product is monic and satisfiesThe nilradical of a Noetherian ring is nilpotent. Explicitly, choose finitely many generators with ; every product of generators then contains a vanishing power. Thus for some , and is a monic polynomial annihilating . Hence is integral over .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 113 1 a Solution 2026-09-28
A morphism of schemes is proper when it is a finite type morphism, a separated morphism, and a universally closed morphism. The valuative criterion for properness says, under the usual finite-type and Noetherian hypotheses, that is proper exactly when every commutative squarewith a discrete valuation ring and has a unique diagonal lift .
For , a -point is with not all zero. If is a uniformizer, multiply all coordinates by one power of so that . The resulting coordinates lie in and at least one is a unit, so they define an -point extending the given -point. If two extensions exist, on a chart where one coordinate is a unit their affine coordinate ratios agree in and therefore in the integral domain ; hence the extensions agree. This verifies existence and uniqueness directly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 113 2 b Solution 2026-09-28
Write for . For any closed point , the fiber is the zero-dimensional closed subscheme of cut out by . It is finite over , and every finite morphism is proper. This includes , whose fiber in consists only of .
The morphism itself fails the valuative criterion for properness. Take the discrete valuation ring with fraction field . The -point lies in and lies over the -point of the target defined byAny extension of that -point must still be given by , whose closed point maps to the deleted point . It therefore cannot factor through . The required lift does not exist, so is not proper. This is an instance of the fact that proper closed-point fibers do not imply properness.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 125 3 a Solution 2026-09-28
The curve has good reduction when it admits a Minimal Weierstrass equation over whose discriminant is a unit, so reduction modulo is a nonsingular elliptic curve . Write a point of in primitive projective coordinates over . Reducing all three coordinates definesPrimitivity ensures that the reduced triple is not zero. The addition morphism on the smooth Weierstrass model reduces to the addition morphism on ; equivalently, this follows from the valuative criterion for properness for the smooth proper group scheme. Therefore .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 113 1 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be a valuation ring with fraction field . For every commutative squarethe valuative criterion for separatedness says that a finite type morphism between Noetherian schemes is separated exactly when there is at most one dotted lift completing the diagram.
Under the same finiteness hypotheses, the valuative criterion for properness says that is proper exactly when every such square has a unique lift. Thus separatedness supplies uniqueness, while properness supplies existence as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 113 1 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The composite is proper, hence separated. If two lifts solve a valuation-ring lifting problem for , they also solve the corresponding problem for . The valuative criterion for separatedness for makes them equal, so is separated.
It remains to prove existence. Start with a squareAfter composing the lower map with , properness of gives a lift over whose generic restriction is . The two maps and from to agree on and have the same composite with . Since is separated, its valuative uniqueness criterion gives . Hence is the required lift for .
The morphism is of finite type by hypothesis, and it is separated and satisfies valuative existence. The valuative criterion for properness therefore proves that is proper.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 113 1 c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be a discrete valuation ring with uniformizer , fraction field , and normalized discrete valuation . A map is a projective pointwith at least one nonzero coordinate. Put and set . Then every lies in , and at least one is a unit.
On the standard affine chart of projective space, the ratios all lie in . They therefore define a map whose generic restriction is the original point. This proves existence in the DVR case. The assumed separatedness of , through the valuative criterion for separatedness, gives uniqueness. Thus the morphism satisfies the requested DVR form of the valuative criterion for properness.
A finite-type morphism can have a proper fiber over every closed point without being proper. Properness controls compatible specialization in families, as expressed by the valuative criterion for properness, rather than only the individual closed fibers.
Valuative criterion 2026-10-14
Valuative criteria test properties of scheme morphisms by extending a lift from the generic point of the spectrum of a valuation ring to the whole spectrum. Under the usual finiteness hypotheses, uniqueness characterizes separatedness, existence characterizes universal closedness, and existence with uniqueness characterizes properness. The valuative criterion for separatedness and valuative criterion for properness are the respective specific statements.