Write , , so and . Regrouping the four copies by party gives
where counts zeroes. Alice must measure only this count, preserving coherence inside each degenerate eigenspace, rather than measuring her four bits separately. Her projective measurement has projectors , and the Born rule gives
Alice sends to Bob. Up to the common phase of , their conditional pure state is
This is Schmidt projection entanglement concentration: its equal Schmidt coefficients give a maximally entangled state of Schmidt rank .
For or , , and the branch is a product state. No Bell pair can be extracted using local operations and classical communication. The respective probabilities are and .
For or , . List the four surviving strings in lexicographic order as . For this list is ; for it is . Each party applies a local unitary operation extending the basis relabelling
Such a unitary exists because these are four distinct orthonormal basis vectors mapped to four distinct basis vectors; extend the mapping to a permutation of all sixteen. Discarding the two fixed local ancillary bits leaves
Thus these branches give exactly two Bell pairs, with probabilities and , and no further measurement in quantum mechanics is needed.
For , the six strings in lexicographic order are , , , , , . A suitable local POVM gives two Bell pairs with certainty, rather than losing some of these branches to a simple subspace projection. Partition these labels into the three pairs , , . Alice uses the Kraus operators
On the six-dimensional support, each label is retained by two operators, so . Add to define a complete measurement in quantum mechanics on Alice's four qubits; that extra outcome has probability zero on this branch. Each nonzero outcome has conditional probability , and gives the normalized state
Alice sends to Bob. Both parties relabel the four surviving strings in increasing order to on two output qubits, with two fixed ancillary bits, just as above. Every therefore gives two Bell pairs. The joint probability of is for each .
For an explicit local implementation of this POVM, Alice can append an ancilla in a fixed state and apply an isometry on the six-dimensional support,
It preserves inner products, extends to a unitary on system and ancilla, and measuring the ancilla realizes precisely the operators . No nonlocal operation has been used. This is a deterministic reduction of maximally entangled Schmidt rank from six to four.
The complete output distribution for this strategy is consequently
The mean yield is pairs per four-copy block. These are the maximum possible pair counts after the stipulated count measurement: any nonzero branch has Schmidt rank at most six, whereas three independent Bell pairs require Schmidt rank eight. In any refined LOCC branch the coefficient matrix is multiplied by local matrices on the left and right, which cannot increase its rank.
The EPR criterion of reality says that if a physical quantity can be predicted with certainty without disturbing the system, then it represents an element of physical reality. For separated particles, the EPR locality assumption regards choices of measurements on the other particles as nondisturbing. The perfect correlations below therefore imply predetermined local values for both and , independent of which distant measurements are chosen.
Put and . The Pauli matrices satisfy
For three particles, each operator with one and two takes to and to , whereas interchanges the two strings without a minus sign. Thus the GHZ state in the question has the certain outcomes
Each local or value can be predicted from measurements at the other two sites in one of these contexts. If the EPR criterion of reality and locality assign values , the first three equalities require
Multiplying these ordinary numbers and using yields , contradicting the certain quantum outcome . This derives the GHZ theorem explicitly; the multiplication is of hypothetical local values, not of mutually incompatible local observables.
For general , let , with the tensor factors ordered by their site labels, and let . Directly,
For the difference of the two strings to be an eigenstate, these phases must agree, which happens exactly when is even. For odd the common phase is , and interchanging the strings negates their difference. Consequently
For even , still has eigenvalue , but every takes the difference state to a phase times the sum state, which is orthogonal to it. Thus it is not an eigenstate of any ; those operators each have outcomes with equal probabilities. Among the stated , simultaneous eigenstates therefore occur precisely at .
For odd , certainty of each again permits remote prediction of both local and . Writing , the local hidden-variable theory would require for all . Their product is
hence , since is even and is odd. Quantum theory requires the same product to be . The contradiction occurs when , giving the infinite family
For , these particular certain product constraints are consistent; for example , satisfies them. This distinguishes the GHZ contradiction for N congruent to 3 modulo 4 from the larger set of odd for which simultaneous eigenstates exist.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact