Turkish bioinformaticians are professionals from Turkey who specialize in bioinformatics, which is an interdisciplinary field that combines biology, computer science, mathematics, and statistics to analyze and interpret biological data. They may work on a variety of projects, including genomic sequencing, protein structure prediction, data analysis for clinical research, and the development of algorithms and software for biological data analysis. Bioinformatics in Turkey has been growing, with increasing research initiatives and collaborations between universities, research institutes, and the biotechnology industry.

As of my last update in October 2021, there is no widely recognized term or concept known as "Ordal Demokan." It could be a fictional name, a term from a niche topic, or a name that has emerged after my last update.

Erdal Arıkan is a prominent Turkish electrical engineer, known primarily for his contributions to the fields of information theory and communications. He is notably recognized for his work on polar codes, a type of error-correcting code that has gained significant attention in the context of achieving the capacity of communication channels. Polar codes were first introduced by Arıkan in a seminal paper published in 2009.

Ciro Santilli can accept closed source on server products more easily than offline, because the servers have to be paid for somehow (by stealing your private data).

Closed source on offline products used by millions of people is evil, when you could just have those for free with open source software! Thus Ciro's hatred for Microsoft Windows and MacOS (at least userland, maybe).

The opposite of open source software.

ISO is the main culprit of this bullshit, some notable examples related to open source software:

The only low level thing that escaped this was OpenGL via Khronos, what heroes those people are.

How the hell are you supposed to develop an open source implementation of something that has a closed standard?

Not to mention open source test suites, that would be way too much to ask for, those always end up being made by some shady small companies that go bankrupt from time to time, see e.g. .

If you are going to do closed source, at least do it like this.

Basically the opposite of need to know for software.

These people are heroes. There's nothing else to say.

A language that allows you to talk to and command a computer.

There is only space for two languages at most in the world: the compiled one, and the interpreted one.

For 2020 now, when you have a choice, you must go for:

Those two are languages not by any means perfect from a language design point of view, and there are likely already better alternatives, they are only chosen due to a pragmatic tradeoff between ecosystem and familiarity.

Ciro predicts that Python will become like Fortran in the future: a legacy hated by most who have moved to JavaScript long ago (which is slightly inferior, but too similar, and with too much web dominance to be replaced), but with too much dominance in certain applications like machine learning to be worth replacing, like Fortran dominates certain HPC applications. We'll see. Maybe non performance critical scripting languages are easier to replace.

C++ however is decent, and is evolving in very good directions in the 2010's, and will remain relevant in the foreseeable future.

Bash can also be used when you're lazy. But if the project goes on, you will sooner or later regret that choice.

The language syntax in itself does not matter. All that matters is how many useful libraries and tooling it has.

This is how other languages compare: