The flow of a Killing vector field consists of local isometries. Isometries preserve both the metric and its unique torsion-free metric-compatible Levi-Civita connection, hence . Set and in part (b). Since ,
and antisymmetry of the first two curvature arguments gives
This is the geodesic deviation equation with connecting field : applying the isometry to the original geodesic produces a neighboring geodesic, and curvature determines their relative acceleration.
Write . Expanding the definition on gives terms proportional to derivatives of with coefficient
All remaining terms carry an overall factor , so
The same argument gives linearity in , confirming that the Lie derivative of an affine connection is tensorial.
Using the torsion-free identities and , expand
This is the required formula.
A Killing vector field obeys , or equivalently . Along an affinely parametrized geodesic with tangent ,
The second term vanishes by the geodesic equation, while the first contracts the symmetric tensor with the antisymmetric part selected by the Killing equation. Thus is a geodesic conserved quantity from a Killing vector. In Minkowski spacetime, translational Killing fields give conserved energy-momentum and rotational or boost Killing fields give the corresponding angular-momentum and boost charges; the same construction works for any spacetime isometry.
The component interactions include the Yukawa vertex
and the quartic scalar vertex , with cubic scalar interactions fixed by the same and . At one loop, the scalar propagator has a bosonic tadpole from the quartic vertex and a closed fermion loop with two Yukawa vertices. The loop's fermionic minus sign makes their quadratic cutoff dependence equal and opposite; diagrams involving the dimensionful cubic scalar vertex are at most logarithmically divergent. This is the supersymmetric cancellation of quadratic divergences, and it relies on the coupling relations imposed by supersymmetry.
Eliminating the auxiliary field gives
Explicitly,
The two supersymmetric vacua for are and .
Weak-coupling matching gives
because
Thus . The holomorphic superpotential receives neither perturbative nor nonperturbative corrections compatible with the limits and symmetries. The Kähler potential and wavefunction normalization can still be renormalized, so canonically normalized couplings can run through anomalous dimensions.
The ratio
is neutral under both symmetries. The unique monomial with mass dimension three and charges is
Holomorphy and the spurion symmetries therefore require
Expanding a term gives
Regularity as requires , while regularity as requires . Hence only can occur.
Take an ordinary and an -symmetry, assigning . The superpotential has charges
because is neutral under the first symmetry and has -charge . Formal invariance of each term then assigns
At and ,
The stationary point is therefore a local minimum along the real direction. In fact is positive away from this point on the real axis, tends to as , decreases to the zero-valued minimum at , and then rises again. Its sketch is a single well tangent to the axis at .
At a real Minkowski vacuum, gives
where the branch relevant to the sub-Planckian solution has been chosen. Since the bracket multiplying vanishes, stationarity gives
Combining the equations yields . Solving gives
Thus , , , and .
For ,
and the supergravity F-term potential is
The potential is invariant under complex conjugation. Writing , its derivative with respect to vanishes at , so the extremisation equations consistently admit a real solution. On that slice,
A vacuum preserves supersymmetry exactly when
A nonzero expectation value alone therefore does not decide the issue. On the real slice this condition is , which has real solutions only when . The sub-Planckian Minkowski solution found below has , so there and supersymmetry is spontaneously broken.
The three Weyl components form one fundamental representation of the global , so coupling to background gauge fields reveals a nonzero 't Hooft anomaly. This does not destroy the global symmetry in flat space or make the theory inconsistent; it constrains any infrared description through 't Hooft anomaly matching. If were instead intended as a dynamical gauge symmetry, the same uncancelled gauge anomaly would make the model inconsistent and additional chiral matter would be required. Ordinary quantum corrections cannot generate the forbidden superpotential, and the non-renormalization theorem protects its absence.
For one triplet and no gauge multiplet, the only nonzero -invariant soft term is the universal scalar mass,
An invariant bilinear does not exist, and the formal trilinear vanishes because the scalar fields commute. Thus the phrase “general soft terms” does not generate further interactions for the field content stated in the question.
Soft supersymmetry breaking means adding supersymmetry-breaking operators with positive-mass-dimension coefficients that do not create new ultraviolet quadratic divergences. Standard examples are scalar masses, holomorphic bilinear and trilinear scalar couplings, gaugino masses, and singlet tadpoles when the field content and symmetries allow them.
The F-term scalar potential is
Since the invariant superpotential is constant, all derivatives vanish and
There are no gauge fields in the stated model, so there is no D-term potential.
The canonical Kähler potential is
Under with , it becomes , so it respects .
The eight Gell-Mann matrices generate , and the three superfields form one fundamental triplet. A renormalizable superpotential may have degree at most three. There is no invariant vector or symmetric rank-two tensor in the fundamental. The only apparent cubic singlet is
but chiral superfields are Grassmann-even and commute, so this contraction of a symmetric product with vanishes identically. Consequently the most general invariant superpotential as the question is written is only a constant,
which has no effect in global supersymmetry. In particular, is not invariant under a general rotation.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact