Topics (274k) Articles (282k) Users (352) Discussions (237) Comments (383) Files (8k) New article
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 6C Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Divide the differential equation by . Its Sturm-Liouville form isHere and weight . Multiply the equations for by the other polynomial and subtract. Integration by parts gives a boundary term , which vanishes at both endpoints because polynomial derivatives are finite and . HenceWith the standard nonnegative degree indices , this proves orthogonality for . If signed integer indices are used literally, the condition is : , so merely would not suffice.
Set and . The chain rule gives , so . For , . A polynomial has , forcing . At , and the same endpoint condition gives . Therefore every polynomial solution is proportional toThe cosine recurrence yields , , confirming that these functions are polynomials. In this normalization the Chebyshev polynomial weight identity isIt is simply cosine orthogonality after .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 5A Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the Fourier transform conventionThis convention also gives the sign of the inverse transform in 15A. The Parseval identity, in its bilinear form, isIn particular . Initially take to be Schwartz functions; the formula then extends to with Fourier transforms interpreted by completion.
Here is a proof which also justifies the needed limit operations. For , formAbsolute integrability allows Fubini's theorem to replace the transformed factors by their defining integrals. The elementary Gaussian integral givesso , with convolution . The kernel is nonnegative, has integral one, and its mass outside any fixed neighborhood of zero tends to zero. Since a Schwartz function is bounded and uniformly continuous, splitting the convolution difference into small and large proves uniformly. As , the last integral consequently tends to .
On the spectral side, repeated integration by parts makes the transforms rapidly decreasing; their product is integrable. The dominated convergence theorem therefore gives . Equating the two limits proves the displayed identity. For general functions, approximate by Schwartz functions. The norm identity makes their transforms Cauchy in with the prescribed factor; the limit defines the Fourier transform independently of the approximation. Taking limits in the bilinear identity proves it for all pairs. Thus the proof includes the hypotheses and avoids unjustified exchanges of nonabsolutely convergent integrals.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 4E iii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 4E ii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 4E i by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 3F Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The map is differentiable at when there exists a linear map such thatThe increments are taken sufficiently small to stay in the open domain; is the derivative. This is a joint approximation in all directions, not just the existence of coordinate partial derivatives.
At with , choose . If , neither coordinate changes sign, andThus the remainder in the differentiability definition is identically zero throughout that neighborhood. Consequentlywhich proves the requested differentiability directly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 2F iii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 2F ii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 2F i by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 20G Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Each coordinate lies in . Since , , with equality exactly when or . Summing gives . Equality under the simplex constraint forces exactly one coordinate to be one. Thus the minimum is , attained exactly at the vertices of the probability simplex.
For the maximum, is strictly concave on . The Jensen inequality givesStrict concavity makes equality possible exactly when all coordinates agree. Hence the extrema of a concave power sum on a simplex areFor the simplex is a single point, and both descriptions coincide.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 1E Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For the given orthonormal basis, the orthogonal projection isIt belongs to , and for every basis vector. Thus . For any , decompose . The summands are orthogonal, so the Pythagorean theorem in an inner-product space for the inner product givesEquality holds exactly when . Hence is the unique closest point of to . This proves the minimizing property as well as the formula, including and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 19H ii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 19H i by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 18C Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For steady incompressible flow of constant density without a body force, the Euler equation and mass conservation giveApply the divergence theorem componentwise to a fluid volume. With its outward normal, the integral momentum flux balance isIf a solid bounds part of the volume, retain its pressure contribution; that contribution supplies the force on the fluid. This derivation includes pressure as well as transported momentum.
Choose the axis in the incoming jet direction. The printed diagram measures between that axis and the downstream sheet: it is the cone's half-angle. Along a streamline, the steady Euler equation integrates to the Bernoulli equation . At the incoming free jet and the outgoing free sheet the pressure is atmospheric. With gravity neglected, the outgoing speed is therefore . This argument uses far free surfaces; it does not assert atmospheric pressure on the wetted sphere.
At radial distance , the sheet's circumference is . Its cross-section normal to its velocity is this circumference times its small thickness . Conservation of mass gives , henceFor the axial momentum balance, transverse contributions cancel by axial symmetry. The outgoing axial momentum rate is and the incoming rate is . Uniform atmospheric pressure cancels on the closed control surface when expressed as gauge pressure. The sphere's force on the fluid is therefore in the axis direction. By action and reaction, the fluid force on the sphere is downstream, with magnitudeThe downstream direction in the original diagram fixes this sign and the factor . If one calls the full cone opening its vertex angle, that full opening is ; using as the full opening would conflict with the printed thickness formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 17D Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
With metric signature , four-momentum is ; for a particle of rest mass it satisfies . For a massive particle , where is its four-velocity. The total four-momentum is the sum of the individual four-momenta. If that sum is timelike, its center-of-momentum frame exists and the total energy in that frame isThis follows because the spatial momentum is zero in that frame and the Minkowski norm is invariant under a Lorentz boost. A null total momentum, such as parallel photons, would not have such a rest frame.
For the photon striking an electron initially at rest, the initial invariant gives . The three final particles have total rest energy . Their center-of-momentum energy is at least this value, with equality when all have zero relative momentum. Energy-momentum conservation therefore requiresThe photon-induced triplet pair-production threshold is consequently four electron rest-energy units. This is attainable as a kinematic threshold: at equality the center-of-momentum speed in the laboratory is , and boosting the three resting final particles gives each energy and momentum . Their totals are the initial and . Recoil of the original electron is why twice the rest energy is insufficient.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 16C Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For the radial Helmholtz Dirichlet Green function, set . Multiplication of the radial equation by givesThe first endpoint follows from the required boundedness of at zero. For and , use the left solution and right solution . Their Wronskian is . Matching continuity and the derivative jump therefore gives, with and ,This is finite at zero, vanishes at one, is continuous at , and has . Thus it has exactly the prescribed delta source, not its negative. Its weighted reciprocity is , as expected for the radial weight.
Integrating the Green function against the constant forcing givesThe integrals are respectively and . After cancellation their weighted sum is . HenceThe values at zero are interpreted by continuity. At the limit exists: and .
The exceptional nonzero values need a genuine qualification. There is then a nonzero bounded homogeneous solution satisfying both endpoint conditions, so an inverse Green function does not exist. Moreover the stated forcing is incompatible, not merely nonunique. If solved the problem, multiply by and integrate by parts using . The left side is zero, whereasThus there is no solution for nonzero . This explains exactly when the generic formula is applicable.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 15A ii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 15A i by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 14E iii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 ib Paper 4 14E ii by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





