Divide the differential equation by . Its Sturm-Liouville form is
Here and weight . Multiply the equations for by the other polynomial and subtract. Integration by parts gives a boundary term , which vanishes at both endpoints because polynomial derivatives are finite and . Hence
With the standard nonnegative degree indices , this proves orthogonality for . If signed integer indices are used literally, the condition is : , so merely would not suffice.
Set and . The chain rule gives , so . For , . A polynomial has , forcing . At , and the same endpoint condition gives . Therefore every polynomial solution is proportional to
The cosine recurrence yields , , confirming that these functions are polynomials. In this normalization the Chebyshev polynomial weight identity is
It is simply cosine orthogonality after .
Use the Fourier transform convention
This convention also gives the sign of the inverse transform in 15A. The Parseval identity, in its bilinear form, is
In particular . Initially take to be Schwartz functions; the formula then extends to with Fourier transforms interpreted by completion.
Here is a proof which also justifies the needed limit operations. For , form
Absolute integrability allows Fubini's theorem to replace the transformed factors by their defining integrals. The elementary Gaussian integral gives
so , with convolution . The kernel is nonnegative, has integral one, and its mass outside any fixed neighborhood of zero tends to zero. Since a Schwartz function is bounded and uniformly continuous, splitting the convolution difference into small and large proves uniformly. As , the last integral consequently tends to .
On the spectral side, repeated integration by parts makes the transforms rapidly decreasing; their product is integrable. The dominated convergence theorem therefore gives . Equating the two limits proves the displayed identity. For general functions, approximate by Schwartz functions. The norm identity makes their transforms Cauchy in with the prescribed factor; the limit defines the Fourier transform independently of the approximation. Taking limits in the bilinear identity proves it for all pairs. Thus the proof includes the hypotheses and avoids unjustified exchanges of nonabsolutely convergent integrals.
The map is differentiable at when there exists a linear map such that
The increments are taken sufficiently small to stay in the open domain; is the derivative. This is a joint approximation in all directions, not just the existence of coordinate partial derivatives.
At with , choose . If , neither coordinate changes sign, and
Thus the remainder in the differentiability definition is identically zero throughout that neighborhood. Consequently
which proves the requested differentiability directly.
Each coordinate lies in . Since , , with equality exactly when or . Summing gives . Equality under the simplex constraint forces exactly one coordinate to be one. Thus the minimum is , attained exactly at the vertices of the probability simplex.
For the maximum, is strictly concave on . The Jensen inequality gives
Strict concavity makes equality possible exactly when all coordinates agree. Hence the extrema of a concave power sum on a simplex are
For the simplex is a single point, and both descriptions coincide.
For the given orthonormal basis, the orthogonal projection is
It belongs to , and for every basis vector. Thus . For any , decompose . The summands are orthogonal, so the Pythagorean theorem in an inner-product space for the inner product gives
Equality holds exactly when . Hence is the unique closest point of to . This proves the minimizing property as well as the formula, including and .
For steady incompressible flow of constant density without a body force, the Euler equation and mass conservation give
Apply the divergence theorem componentwise to a fluid volume. With its outward normal, the integral momentum flux balance is
If a solid bounds part of the volume, retain its pressure contribution; that contribution supplies the force on the fluid. This derivation includes pressure as well as transported momentum.
Choose the axis in the incoming jet direction. The printed diagram measures between that axis and the downstream sheet: it is the cone's half-angle. Along a streamline, the steady Euler equation integrates to the Bernoulli equation . At the incoming free jet and the outgoing free sheet the pressure is atmospheric. With gravity neglected, the outgoing speed is therefore . This argument uses far free surfaces; it does not assert atmospheric pressure on the wetted sphere.
At radial distance , the sheet's circumference is . Its cross-section normal to its velocity is this circumference times its small thickness . Conservation of mass gives , hence
For the axial momentum balance, transverse contributions cancel by axial symmetry. The outgoing axial momentum rate is and the incoming rate is . Uniform atmospheric pressure cancels on the closed control surface when expressed as gauge pressure. The sphere's force on the fluid is therefore in the axis direction. By action and reaction, the fluid force on the sphere is downstream, with magnitude
The downstream direction in the original diagram fixes this sign and the factor . If one calls the full cone opening its vertex angle, that full opening is ; using as the full opening would conflict with the printed thickness formula.
With metric signature , four-momentum is ; for a particle of rest mass it satisfies . For a massive particle , where is its four-velocity. The total four-momentum is the sum of the individual four-momenta. If that sum is timelike, its center-of-momentum frame exists and the total energy in that frame is
This follows because the spatial momentum is zero in that frame and the Minkowski norm is invariant under a Lorentz boost. A null total momentum, such as parallel photons, would not have such a rest frame.
For the photon striking an electron initially at rest, the initial invariant gives . The three final particles have total rest energy . Their center-of-momentum energy is at least this value, with equality when all have zero relative momentum. Energy-momentum conservation therefore requires
The photon-induced triplet pair-production threshold is consequently four electron rest-energy units. This is attainable as a kinematic threshold: at equality the center-of-momentum speed in the laboratory is , and boosting the three resting final particles gives each energy and momentum . Their totals are the initial and . Recoil of the original electron is why twice the rest energy is insufficient.
For the radial Helmholtz Dirichlet Green function, set . Multiplication of the radial equation by gives
The first endpoint follows from the required boundedness of at zero. For and , use the left solution and right solution . Their Wronskian is . Matching continuity and the derivative jump therefore gives, with and ,
This is finite at zero, vanishes at one, is continuous at , and has . Thus it has exactly the prescribed delta source, not its negative. Its weighted reciprocity is , as expected for the radial weight.
Integrating the Green function against the constant forcing gives
The integrals are respectively and . After cancellation their weighted sum is . Hence
The values at zero are interpreted by continuity. At the limit exists: and .
The exceptional nonzero values need a genuine qualification. There is then a nonzero bounded homogeneous solution satisfying both endpoint conditions, so an inverse Green function does not exist. Moreover the stated forcing is incompatible, not merely nonunique. If solved the problem, multiply by and integrate by parts using . The left side is zero, whereas
Thus there is no solution for nonzero . This explains exactly when the generic formula is applicable.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact