Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 35

Some specific examples:

en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Jercos mentions:www.bitcoinwhoswho.com/jercosinterview is the source. Persumably the contact was initiated via the private messaging feature of the Bitcoin Forum.

Bibliography:
en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Jercos

Once the ball starts rolling, these are people who should be contacted.

Basically anything under educational charitable organization counts.

It is also worth having a look under the Wikipedia page for open educational resources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_educational_resources

These videos can give some geometric insight and do have their value.

But they are sometimes too slow, there are never any mention of experiments, just "the truth".

And when things get "mathy", it sticks to a more qualitative view which may not be enough.

Very over the top with sexy demons and angels making appearances, and has some classic aesthetic artistic value :-)

The central theme of The Matrix (1999).

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jIZ3bH-rAE "Illuminating biology at the nanoscale and systems scale using single-molecule and super-resolution imaging" by Xiaowei Zhuang (2017)

The following things come to mind when you look into research in this area, especially the search for BB(5) which was hard but doable:

Bibliography:

This is a dark art, and many of the sources are shady as fuck! We often have no idea of their methodology. Also no source is fully complete. We just piece up as best we can.

In order to explore IPs in known IP ranges, what we need are good DNS databases.