Post-nominal letters Updated 2025-07-16
Rust (video game) Updated 2025-07-16
Crime Updated 2025-09-11
FBI vs Un-Defuseable Bomb by Qxir (2021)
Source. Tells the story of Harvey's Resort Hotel bombing (1980) tig (git UI) Updated 2025-07-16
This is good. But it misses some key operations, so much so that makes Ciro not want to learn/use it daily.
Topological quantum computer Updated 2025-07-16
Topological Quantum Computer by Professor John Preskill
. Source. Topological Quantum Computation by Jason Alicea (2021)
Source. Cobalt bomb Updated 2025-07-16
Generating set of a group Updated 2025-07-16
Mahayana Updated 2025-07-16
Mahayana adds a bunch of stuff on top of the Pali Canon. Most of it appears to be random mysticism. Maybe there is something good in it... maybe.
Molecular biology Updated 2025-07-16
Ciro Santilli believes that molecular biology technologies will be a large part of the next big things as shown at: Section "Molecular biology technologies".
Bibliography:
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS563_Teges&list=PLQbPquAyEw4dQ3zOLrdS1eF_KJJbUUyBx Biophysical Techniques Course 2022 by the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Holy crap that playlist is a tour de force of molecular biology techniques in 2022!
Porn meme Updated 2025-07-16
Ciro's Edict #5 Completely rebrand Cirodown to OurBigBook Updated 2025-07-16
The name cirodown should not appear anywhere now, except with very few exceptions, e.g.:
- github.com/cirosantilli/cirodown to github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
- file extension from
.ciro
to.bigb
- the Node.js NPM package was renamed from
cirodown
toourbibook
. - all in-code instances
I have also squatted
OurBigBook
on all major social media handles for near future usage, e.g.: twitter.com/ourbigbook and so on.I was going to do this sooner or later, it was inevitable, but the timing was partly triggered due to noticing that English speakers (and likely many other nationalities) are not able to easily read/hear/pronounce "Ciro".
Ciro's Edict #5
\x
on title from another file Link to an image or video in another file that has an Updated 2025-07-16Issue report at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook/issues/198 Suppose you had:
programming-language.ciro
= Programming language
\Image[https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/media/master/python-logo.jpg]
{title=The \x[python-programming-language] logo}
== Python
{c}
{disambiguate=programming-language}
= Logos I like
\x[image-the-python-logo]
Now, when rendering
\x[image-the-python-logo]
, we would need to fetch two IDs:image-the-python-logo
for theThe
andlogo
partpython-programming-language
itself, to know that\x[python-programming-language]
should render asPython
But after group all SQL queries together was done, there was no way to know that rendering
image-the-python-logo
would imply also fetching python-programming-language
.This was solved by adding a new database entry type,
REFS_TABLE_X_TITLE_TITLE
to the existing References table, which tracks dependencies between IDs. Chinese poem Updated 2025-07-16
Chromosomal crossover Updated 2025-07-16
Force Updated 2025-07-16
GDB reverse debugging Updated 2025-07-16
The best open source implementation as of 2020 seems to be: Mozilla rr.
Genius Updated 2025-07-16
This is not a label that Ciro Santilli likes to give lightly. But maybe sometimes, it is inevitable.
Bibliography:
Get nucleotide at a given position of a FASTA file Updated 2025-07-16
Glueball Updated 2025-07-16
Lagrangian mechanics Updated 2025-07-16
Originally it was likely created to study constrained mechanical systems where you want to use some "custom convenient" variables to parametrize things instead of global x, y, z. Classical examples that you must have in mind include:lagrangian mechanics lectures by Michel van Biezen (2017) is a good starting point.
- compound Atwood machine. Here, we can use the coordinates as the heights of masses relative to the axles rather than absolute heights relative to the ground
- double pendulum, using two angles. The Lagrangian approach is simpler than using Newton's laws
- two-body problem, use the distance between the bodies
When doing lagrangian mechanics, we just lump together all generalized coordinates into a single vector that maps time to the full state:where each component can be anything, either the x/y/z coordinates relative to the ground of different particles, or angles, or nay other crazy thing we want.
Then, the stationary action principle says that the actual path taken obeys the Euler-Lagrange equation:This produces a system of partial differential equations with:
- equations
- unknown functions
- at most second order derivatives of . Those appear because of the chain rule on the second term.
The mixture of so many derivatives is a bit mind mending, so we can clarify them a bit further. At:the is just identifying which argument of the Lagrangian we are differentiating by: the i-th according to the order of our definition of the Lagrangian. It is not the actual function, just a mnemonic.
Then at:
- the part is just like the previous term, just identifies the argument with index ( because we have the non derivative arguments)
- after the partial derivative is taken and returns a new function , then the multivariable chain rule comes in and expands everything into terms
However, people later noticed that the Lagrangian had some nice properties related to Lie group continuous symmetries.
Basically it seems that the easiest way to come up with new quantum field theory models is to first find the Lagrangian, and then derive the equations of motion from them.
For every continuous symmetry in the system (modelled by a Lie group), there is a corresponding conservation law: local symmetries of the Lagrangian imply conserved currents.
Genius: Richard Feynman and Modern Physics by James Gleick (1994) chapter "The Best Path" mentions that Richard Feynman didn't like the Lagrangian mechanics approach when he started university at MIT, because he felt it was too magical. The reason is that the Lagrangian approach basically starts from the principle that "nature minimizes the action across time globally". This implies that things that will happen in the future are also taken into consideration when deciding what has to happen before them! Much like the lifeguard in the lifegard problem making global decisions about the future. However, chapter "Least Action in Quantum Mechanics" comments that Feynman later notice that this was indeed necessary while developping Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory into quantum electrodynamics, because they felt that it would make more sense to consider things that way while playing with ideas such as positrons are electrons travelling back in time. This is in contrast with Hamiltonian mechanics, where the idea of time moving foward is more directly present, e.g. as in the Schrödinger equation.
Genius: Richard Feynman and Modern Physics by James Gleick (1994) chapter "The Best Path" mentions that Richard Feynman didn't like the Lagrangian mechanics approach when he started university at MIT, because he felt it was too magical. The reason is that the Lagrangian approach basically starts from the principle that "nature minimizes the action across time globally". This implies that things that will happen in the future are also taken into consideration when deciding what has to happen before them! Much like the lifeguard in the lifegard problem making global decisions about the future. However, chapter "Least Action in Quantum Mechanics" comments that Feynman later notice that this was indeed necessary while developping Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory into quantum electrodynamics, because they felt that it would make more sense to consider things that way while playing with ideas such as positrons are electrons travelling back in time. This is in contrast with Hamiltonian mechanics, where the idea of time moving foward is more directly present, e.g. as in the Schrödinger equation.
And partly due to the above observations, it was noticed that the easiest way to describe the fundamental laws of particle physics and make calculations with them is to first formulate their Lagrangian somehow: S.
TODO advantages:
- physics.stackexchange.com/questions/254266/advantages-of-lagrangian-mechanics-over-newtonian-mechanics on Physics Stack Exchange, fucking closed question...
- www.quora.com/Why-was-Lagrangian-formalism-needed-in-the-presence-of-Newtonian-formalism
- www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_advantage_of_Lagrangian_formalism_over_Hamiltonian_formalism_in_QFT
Bibliography:
- www.physics.usu.edu/torre/6010_Fall_2010/Lectures.html Physics 6010 Classical Mechanics lecture notes by Charles Torre from Utah State University published on 2010,
- Classical physics only. The last lecture: www.physics.usu.edu/torre/6010_Fall_2010/Lectures/12.pdf mentions Lie algebra more or less briefly.
- www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/dynamics/two.pdf by David Tong
Euler-Lagrange equation explained intuitively - Lagrangian Mechanics by Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky (2018)
Source. Well, unsurprisingly, it is exactly what you can expect from an Eugene Khutoryansky video. There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.