Greatest common divisor Updated 2025-07-16
The "greatest common divisor" of two integers and , denoted is the largest natural number that divides both of the integers.
Least common multiple Updated 2025-07-16
Electricity generation Updated 2025-07-16
Pirates (2005) Updated 2025-07-16
One of the first 1 million USD (zero artistic value) porn movie. And also a piece of shit! Hotter porn has been shot in kitchens around the world using iPhones.
IMDb entry: www.imdb.com/title/tt0477457/.
Quanta Magazine Updated 2025-07-16
This is actually pretty good! Makes a small first step into The missing link between basic and advanced.
By the Simons Foundation.
Unfortunately does not use a free license for content.
Scientific American Updated 2025-07-16
Convex polytope Updated 2025-07-16
Regular polytope Updated 2025-07-16
TODO understand and explain definition.
Polygon Updated 2025-07-16
Polyhedron Updated 2025-07-16
Regular polyhedron Updated 2025-07-16
4-polytope Updated 2025-07-16
Polynomial over a ring Updated 2025-07-16
However, there is nothing in the immediate definition that prevents us from having a ring instead, i.e. a field but without the commutative property and inverse elements.
The only thing is that then we would need to differentiate between different orderings of the terms of multivariate polynomial, e.g. the following would all be potentially different terms:while for a field they would all go into a single term:so when considering a polynomial over a ring we end up with a lot more more possible terms.
If the ring is a commutative ring however, polynomials do look like proper polynomials: Section "Polynomial over a commutative ring".
Line (geometry) Updated 2025-07-16
Hyperplane Updated 2025-07-16
Shadow library Updated 2025-07-16
American physics research institute Updated 2025-07-16
British physics research institute Updated 2025-07-16
How to teach and learn physics Updated 2025-07-16
The approach many courses take to physics, specially "modern Physics" is really bad, this is how it should be taught:
- start by describing experiments that the previous best theory did not explain, see also: Section "Physics education needs more focus on understanding experiments and their history"
- then, give the final formula for the next best theory
- then, give all the important final implications of that formula, and how it amazingly describes the experiments. In particular this means: doing physics means calculating a number
- then, give some mathematical intuition on the formulas, and how the main equation could have been derived
- finally, then and only then, start deriving the outcomes of the main formula in detail
This is likely because at some point, experiments get more and more complicated, and so people are tempted to say "this is the truth" instead of "this is why we think this is the truth", which is much harder.
Related:
- settheory.net/learnphysics and www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MKjPYuD60I&list=PLJcTRymdlUQPwx8qU4ln83huPx-6Y3XxH from settheory.net
- math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html by John Baez. Mentions:Ciro Santilli is trying to change that: OurBigBook.com.
This webpage doesn't have lots of links to websites. Websites just don't have the sort of in-depth material you need to learn technical subjects like advanced math and physics — at least, not yet. To learn this stuff, you need to read lots of books
- web.archive.org/web/20210324182549/http://jakobschwichtenberg.com/one-thing/ by Jakob Schwichtenberg
The most important physics experiments Updated 2025-07-16
Videos should be found/made for all of those: videos of all key physics experiments
- speed of light experiment
- basically all experiments listed under Section "Quantum mechanics experiment" such as:
- Davisson-Germer experiment
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.
/_derived_jpg_q90_310x470_m0/Pirates2005-PosterArt.jpg)