Write in . The photon count ratio in d eliminates radius, electron number density and the common normalization:
The extra is essential for a photon number spectrum. Hence
The measured central Compton y parameter and the supplied conversion coefficient then determine a column combination:
To determine the two remaining quantities separately, define and . Use , , , , and in d. With the spectral unit conversion explained there, the count luminosity is
Explicitly the numerical coefficient is
Since , substitution gives , so
Rounding consistently with the supplied coefficient , the cluster has , and . Substituting the unrounded values into both X-ray count luminosities gives and , and the central Compton y parameter returns . If the observed were a projected-disk average, its central value would be times larger and this same inversion would give smaller by and larger by ; specifying the sightline is therefore part of the inference.
In the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, hot intracluster electrons transfer energy to cosmic microwave background photons by inverse Compton scattering. Their thermal energy is much larger than the CMB photon energy; in the nonrelativistic limit the mean fractional photon energy gain per scattering is about . Multiplication by the incremental Thomson scattering optical depth explains why measures the electron pressure integrated along the line of sight. The result is a spectral distortion, with a low-frequency decrement and a high-frequency increment, rather than a positive additional emission component at every frequency.
For a uniform sphere, a line of sight at impact parameter has path length . Therefore
On the central line of sight this reduces to the requested expression
The central-ray qualification matters: the average over the projected disk is , while the tangent ray has . Thus the printed formula does not hold for an arbitrary sightline. Part f uses the specified as this central value, as required by the preceding formula.
The coefficient is power per unit volume, frequency and solid angle. For uniform, optically thin, isotropic emission from , the spectral luminosity is . With photon energy , conservation of energy and the change of spectral variable give
Thus
The outside integrates over emitted solid angle; changes radiated energy to a photon count, and is the Jacobian determinant from frequency to energy.
With in and in joules, this formula produces . To compare with counts per , multiply by . Equivalently, the conversion cancels the same joule-per- factor in : one can use the numerical in in the factor, retain in , and express in in the exponential. The radius in the volume must still be converted to metres because is per .
Neglect electron mass and nuclear binding corrections when converting mass density into hydrogen and helium number densities. With ,
The thermal free-free emissivity adds over ion species with weights . Consequently
With each Gaunt factor set to one, the mixture has
At fixed , pure hydrogen gives the composition factor , and pure helium gives . The latter check follows independently from and ; simply replacing by an average charge would lose this weighting.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact