The identity gives the momentum eigenstate expansion
Using the orthonormal basis from part (a), the wavefunction normalization is
Hence . The wavefunction normalization leaves a global phase free; the positive real choice used in the requested expansion gives
The two nonzero eigenvalues of the momentum operator have the same energy eigenvalue . Under unitary time evolution, their coefficients acquire the same dynamical phase. With ,
At , recovers the initial wavefunction. Its probability density, useful below, is
The unperturbed level is degenerate. The useful point is that a central perturbation is already diagonal within its usual orbital eigenbasis:
Angular orthogonality removes the possible mixing of and , and also the mixing of different magnetic sublevels. Therefore the matrix required by degenerate perturbation theory needs no further diagonalization: its diagonal entries are precisely the expectation values above. It would be incorrect to justify the calculation by claiming that the unperturbed spectrum was nondegenerate.
For the energy needs only . For a nonzero central confinement term the energy generally needs , but remains independent of . The magnetic quantum number is still needed to specify an individual orbital eigenstate, rather than just its energy.
The linear confinement correction to Coulomb bound states uses , and its first-order energy correction in a normalized Coulomb eigenstate is . Replace by in the hydrogen wavefunctions. The normalized spherical harmonics remove the angular integral, leaving
For , the integral of yields
For , put and square the full radial polynomial, including its cross term:
For , the same calculation gives
Consequently the first two Coulomb levels become, to first order,
Thus the second level splits into a singlet orbital level and a triply degenerate orbital level, with . For the confining sign , lies lower than : its smaller mean radius gives the smaller positive correction. The expansion assumes these corrections and the induced couplings to other principal shells are small compared with the relevant Coulomb energy gaps; is the governing small parameter for fixed low .
Ignoring spin and working in the fixed quarkonium internal sector, the orbital degeneracy is . Hence
No extra spin or colour multiplicity is being counted. The degeneracy between different at fixed is special to the Coulomb potential.
Separate the center-of-mass motion from the relative motion. Two equal quark masses give reduced mass . Replacing the hydrogen Coulomb strength by gives the Coulomb binding energies and length scale
The factor of two in the reduced mass matters: using directly would double the binding energy. These are relative binding energies measured from the free quark–antiquark threshold; the rest energy is excluded.
Direct integration over solid angle gives
Thus . Choosing the usual alternating sign convention,
Apply successively and divide by its ladder coefficient at each step. Explicitly,
The normalization follows because the product of the squared ladder coefficients is . This constructs every magnetic sublevel, including negative .

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact