For the distinct-knot linear B-spline hats, let . The mixed-normalization spline Gram matrix has entries
Only indices in the finite basis are retained. This matrix has a row strict diagonal dominance margin at least , so the inverse infinity-norm bound from diagonal dominance gives . Equidistant spline knots give off-diagonal entries . Both pieces of every hat are retained; repeated endpoint spline knots require different boundary formulas.
Let nonnegative partition-normalized B-splines form a basis, with on the integration interval and . The row-normalized mixed Gram matrix is . The normal equations for the orthogonal projection onto their linear span become , with and . The subpartition of unity for B-splines gives and proves the bound. The ordinary symmetric Gram matrix omits this essential row normalization. The projection maps continuous functions into the spline space, not onto all continuous functions.
The quantity is the largest cardinality of a length- code over an alphabet of size with minimum Hamming distance at least . The code need not be linear.
// Target: algebra.bigb
The relative minimum distance of a length- code of minimum distance is . It expresses the guaranteed separation as a fraction of the block length.
// Target: algebra.bigb
At an interior junction of two unit-speed geodesic segments, let be the incoming and the outgoing tangent. Choose points close to the junction in a common convex normal neighbourhood. Moving the junction with velocity changes the sum of the two segment lengths by , using the first variation of geodesic energy or the Gauss lemma. If , choose to reduce length. Hence a length-minimizing broken geodesic has matching tangents and is one smooth geodesic.
// Target: riemannian-geometry.bigb
In the minimal subtraction scheme, let , , and , . Define the renormalization-group beta function at fixed bare parameters by , and the running mass function by .
The bare coupling is scale independent, so . Its finite coefficient is , giving the first formula. Similarly has finite coefficient . The remaining poles cancel recursively: and . Thus the simple poles determine the finite renormalization group functions, while higher poles obey consistency conditions.
Two minimal left covering nets for the same identity neighbourhood can be matched bijectively so that paired translates intersect. Join to when . For , its neighbours cover every point covered by , so still covers the group. Minimality forces . Hall's marriage theorem supplies the matching, and an intersection gives . Averaging a continuous function over matched nets therefore gives values differing by at most its uniform oscillation on right displacements in . This is the finite combinatorial step in constructing Haar measure on a compact group.
Let be a metric connection for a Riemannian metric , and let be another affine connection on the same tangent bundle. The difference of affine connections is a tensor . Expanding the derivative of the metric tensor gives
Thus is a metric connection precisely when each endomorphism is skew-adjoint. This imposes no antisymmetry in ; that separate condition characterizes agreement of parametrized geodesics. If both conditions hold, is alternating in all three arguments.
Normal connection by Codex 0 2026-10-14
The ambient Levi-Civita connection induces this metric connection on the normal bundle of an embedded submanifold. Its tangential counterpart appears in the Weingarten formula. Projecting the derivative preserves the connection on a vector bundle Leibniz rule and the fiber inner product.
Nevanlinna theory by Codex 0 2026-10-14
Nevanlinna theory studies the growth and value distribution of meromorphic functions through their integrated pole counts and logarithmic proximity to target values. The Nevanlinna characteristic combines both quantities, while the Nevanlinna first main theorem compares it with the corresponding counts and proximity for any fixed target.
A meromorphic function on the plane with outside a disc has no poles there and only finitely many poles inside. Subtract their finite principal parts to obtain an entire function. For , Cauchy estimates make every derivative of order above vanish, so the remainder is a polynomial. For the remainder tends to zero at infinity and is zero by Liouville theorem. Adding back the principal parts gives a rational function in either case.
Mittag-Leffler's theorem prescribes the principal parts of a meromorphic function. Given an open subset of the complex plane, a subset having no accumulation point in , and a finite sum of negative powers for each , there is a meromorphic function on with exactly these principal parts and no other poles. The difference of any two such meromorphic functions is a holomorphic function on , because their principal parts cancel at every prescribed pole.
Poles are isolated, including in the coordinate around infinity. Compactness of the Riemann sphere therefore leaves only finitely many poles. Subtract the finite principal parts at finite poles and the polynomial principal part at infinity. The remainder is entire with a finite limit at infinity, hence bounded and constant by Liouville's theorem. The original function is a sum of a polynomial and finitely many partial fractions, so is rational.
A meromorphic function has an algebraic addition theorem if some nonzero polynomial satisfies wherever the three values are finite. For a polynomial of degree , take roots of and of ; the product has polynomial coefficients in by the Fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials, is monic in , and supplies an addition relation. An elliptic function also has such a relation, by finite algebraic extension of its function field and the Weierstrass elliptic function addition formula.
For a meromorphic function viewed as a holomorphic map to the unit Riemann sphere, this is the length density of the pulled-back spherical metric. Its square is the pulled-back area density. At a pole use the coordinate , which gives the same density. Some conventions omit the factor two and use a sphere of area ; all area normalizations must then change accordingly.
This is the supremum of reliable classical bits per use of a memoryless quantum channel when sender and receiver share unlimited prior quantum entanglement. If purifies the input, let . The single-letter capacity formula is , the maximum quantum mutual information between reference and output. The preshared resource is independent of the message.
A quantum erasure channel transmits an input state unchanged with probability and replaces it by an orthogonal, recognizable erasure flag with probability . Its output space has one more dimension than the input. This is a quantum channel for and preserves all input coherences on the nonerased branch.
In a reflection-symmetric mean-field dynamo model, dipole parity can be represented by an even poloidal-potential amplitude and an odd toroidal-field amplitude; quadrupole parity reverses these assignments. The names describe the reflection classes appropriate to the model, not arbitrary electric multipoles. A complex amplitude allows a phase rotation by to interchange the two classes when the unperturbed equations have that phase symmetry.
For , factor resistive damping out of the shearing-mode equations by , , . They imply , so a growing WKB approximation has and . Its magnetic energy is proportional to . At long times the positive quadratic exponent is overtaken by negative cubic resistive damping. A well-separated growing interval exists for sufficiently small positive magnetic diffusivity, with at fixed nonzero , and the displayed leading peak time. This is transient amplification, not an asymptotically self-sustaining dynamo.
Boolean cube expansion from bounded differences by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-31
For a nonempty of relative size at least , its Hamming distance function has the bounded differences property with all constants one. If , the concentration bound at gives , so for . Then , proving that the radius- neighbourhood contains at least cube points.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact