Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Four mechanisms that can produce disequilibrium chemistry in an exoplanet atmosphere are:
- Atmospheric photochemistry. Stellar ultraviolet photons initiate reactions whose products need not follow local thermochemical equilibrium. The ozone layer on Earth is a solar-system example. Calculations for HD 189733 b predict enhanced hydrogen cyanide and acetylene from the processing of methane and ammonia; these are model examples rather than assertions of an unambiguous detection.
- Vertical transport and chemical quenching. When the eddy mixing time is shorter than the chemical relaxation time, gas retains a deeper abundance above its chemical quench level. The excess carbon monoxide in Jupiter's cool atmosphere exemplifies carbon monoxide–methane quenching. Models of HD 189733 b predict quenched methane and ammonia abundances differing from their local chemical equilibrium values. The enhancement or depletion depends on the underlying atmospheric pressure-temperature profile.
- Horizontal chemical quenching. If the atmospheric advection time is short, winds move chemically processed gas into regions with different irradiation or temperature faster than it can re-equilibrate. Transport of gas within Earth's ozone layer moves material away from its local photochemical production regions. Models of HD 209458 b show that dayside carbon monoxide-rich composition can persist into the cooler nightside instead of forming the local chemical equilibrium amount of methane.
- Condensation with sedimentation or rainout. Finite-rate cloud formation can depart from phase equilibrium, while atmospheric condensate rainout removes elements from a layer and changes its gas composition. Earth's water atmospheric cold trap limits the supply of water to the stratosphere. In HD 209458 b models, titanium-bearing condensates can settle and suppress upper-atmospheric titanium monoxide. The remaining gas can still be in local chemical equilibrium with its depleted inventory: rainout is an open-column effect, not necessarily a failure of equilibrium among all gas reactions.
The exoplanet transport and photochemical examples follow kinetic atmosphere calculations and models including horizontal transport; the condensate example is examined in cold-trap calculations.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 3 b i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Take the logarithm to base ten and write pressure in units of , so its argument is dimensionless. Continuity of the atmospheric pressure-temperature profile givesThusIf the logarithm means , the equivalent constant is . A plot of temperature against logarithmic pressure is vertical in each isothermal region and straight between the two endpoints.
The processes can be organized by the supplied pressure ranges, although the exact boundaries require reaction rates, irradiation and mixing information:
- At , the dense gas can approach thermochemical equilibrium because collisions and reactions are relatively rapid. Deep carbon monoxide and molecular nitrogen can provide reservoirs for transported material.
- At , the falling temperature slows chemical conversion. Vertical transport can produce a chemical quench level when the chemical relaxation time crosses the eddy mixing time. Horizontal chemical quenching is also possible if dayside and nightside conditions differ. Suitable species can condense and undergo atmospheric condensate rainout where a saturation curve is crossed.
- At , slow thermal chemistry permits a quenched atmospheric mixing ratio to survive. Atmospheric photochemistry can dominate where stellar ultraviolet photons penetrate, often at still lower pressures; atmospheric haze may form from its products. Extremely high layers can also experience atmospheric escape.
The profile identifies plausible chemical regimes, but does not fix their transition pressures by itself. In particular, cloud formation depends on the species-specific condensation curve, and ultraviolet processing depends on shielding.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 3 b iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
At fixed temperature and pressure, the atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio controls the division of the elemental inventory among carbon monoxide, methane, water and other molecules. For an oxygen-rich mixture, water can remain after carbon monoxide consumes its share of oxygen. Increasing the atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio reduces the oxygen available for water, particularly in the hotter layers where carbon monoxide is stable. Near or above unity there, water can become strongly depleted while excess carbon feeds methane, hydrogen cyanide and acetylene. This familiar hot carbon-rich behavior should not be applied unchanged to every cool layer: at , methane formation can leave substantial water even at high atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio.
Increasing the atmospheric metallicity of a giant planet at fixed elemental ratios increases the heavy-element inventory relative to molecular hydrogen and helium. Abundances of water and the major carbon-bearing molecules generally rise while molecular hydrogen remains dominant. In that regime, the law of mass action for givesWhere carbon monoxide and water each scale roughly linearly with enrichment , carbon dioxide consequently scales approximately as . This scaling changes when molecular hydrogen ceases to dominate or chemical partitioning changes. Higher enrichment can also favor carbon monoxide over methane at fixed conditions, increase mean molecular weight, and reduce the atmospheric scale height and transmission-feature amplitudes. Cloud formation and atmospheric condensate rainout alter the observable elemental ratios relative to the bulk ones.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 4 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Three major research directions, appropriate to the scientific questions posed in 2018, are:
- Characterizing small-planet atmospheres and habitability. Measure an exoplanet transmission spectrum and an exoplanet emission spectrum to establish whether rocky planets retain atmospheres, determine their composition and climate, and test exoplanet habitability. Interpreting an exoplanet biosignature requires a planetary and stellar context: photochemical false positives, exoplanet cloud obscuration and atmospheric escape can all affect apparently promising molecules.
- Connecting atmospheres and interiors to planet formation. Combine planetary mass-radius relations with ages, host-star abundances, atmospheric metallicity of a giant planet and atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio to test growth and migration histories. Exoplanet interior-composition degeneracy, chemical processing and atmospheric condensate rainout prevent a molecular abundance or bulk radius from being a unique record of birth conditions.
- Understanding atmospheric circulation and thermal evolution across populations. Combine exoplanet thermal phase curves, Doppler spectroscopy and pressure-dependent spectra to test day-night heat redistribution, exoplanet cloud formation and disequilibrium chemistry in an exoplanet atmosphere. Relate these measurements to hot-Jupiter radius inflation, internal cooling and atmospheric escape, using comparative observations to distinguish mechanisms instead of fitting each planet in isolation.
These are research goals rather than claims that the relevant mechanisms or habitable atmospheres have already been established.
