Derrick scaling of Yang-Mills-Higgs energy 2026-10-14
In three space dimensions, rescale to and to . The gauge curvature then scales with two derivatives, and the adjoint covariant derivative of the Higgs field with one. Magnetic, Higgs-gradient and potential energies give the displayed formula. Stationarity requires , which permits nonzero energies. In the Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole limit , the Bogomolny equations give .
If a four-dimensional Euclidean connection is independent of one coordinate and that connection component is renamed , the self-dual Yang-Mills equation reduces to the three-dimensional Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole equation .
Higgs norm identity for a Bogomolny monopole 2026-10-14
For the trace inner product and adjoint covariant derivative, compatibility gives . The gauge-theory Bianchi identity and imply . Therefore , equal to the energy density on a Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole. If the energy density is instead defined with an overall factor , this Laplacian is twice that density.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 70 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Bogomolny equations are first-order equations obtained by expressing a static energy as nonnegative squares plus a term fixed by the topological charge. Vanishing of the squares minimizes the energy in that topological sector. In particular, the solutions satisfy the full second-order field equations, since their first variation vanishes for compactly supported variations preserving the boundary data. Both monopole and vortex realizations illustrate this mechanism.
For a Yang-Mills theory with gauge group SU(2) and an adjoint Higgs field , take the static, purely magnetic energyHere , and is the gauge coupling. In the Bogomolny limit , retain the boundary condition ; it breaks SU(2) to U(1) at infinity even though the scalar potential has been removed. The normalized Higgs field on the sphere at infinity defines a map of topological degree . In a consistent magnetic orientation the asymptotic flux is , andFor example, this equality follows by projecting the asymptotic gauge curvature on the Higgs direction: its flux is the integral of the target-sphere area form, divided by .
The gauge-theory Bianchi identity makes the cross term a divergence:For either sign , complete the square:Choosing givesThese are the Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole equations. A nonzero scalar potential would add a positive term; a nontrivial smooth monopole with a core cannot generally saturate this same bound at . The Bogomolny monopole equations imply Yang-Mills-Higgs equations: the Bianchi identity already gives , and the square-completion argument gives stationarity with respect to the gauge field as well.
An explicit charge-one solution is furnished by the hedgehog ansatz for a monopole. To fix its signs, use component conventions and . With and , putThe radial and transverse parts of are and . The corresponding parts of are and . Therefore reduces toThe Prasad-Sommerfield radial monopole solution isDirect differentiation verifies both equations. Near , and , so the apparent angular singularities disappear and the fields are smooth. At infinity decays exponentially while , leaving an Abelian magnetic field and mass .
Translations of this magnetic monopole give three collective coordinates; a residual U(1) phase provides another in the framed description, where gauge transformations are fixed at infinity. Multimonopole solutions of a common sign also saturate the linear bound. Their widely separated constituents have position and phase parameters, with no static force: the magnetic repulsion and massless-Higgs attraction cancel in this limit. Relative motion is described at low speeds by the moduli-space approximation. An opposite-sign monopole pair does not solve one common sign of the Bogomolny equations and is not protected by that no-force argument.
For the Abelian Higgs model, a second realization occurs in the plane. Let be a complex Higgs field, , , and choose the critically coupled static energyDifferent conventions for the scalar kinetic coefficient change the numerical coefficients of both the bound and the equations. This normalization gives scalar and gauge masses , explaining the critical balance of their long-distance forces. In three spatial dimensions the planar solutions describe straight strings with this energy per unit length.
Finite energy requires and . On a large circle the Higgs phase winds by , so the magnetic flux quantization of an Abelian Higgs vortex givesWriting , expansion and integration by parts giveThe divergence integrates to zero for the usual localized vortex boundary conditions. Thus the Bogomolny square completion for an Abelian Higgs vortex isFor the Bogomolny vortex equations and bound areFor , reverse the sign in both first-order equations and obtain .
For a rotationally symmetric positive vortex number, use and the physical angular component . The Bogomolny vortex equations becomewith and . The regular core behaves as and . Linearization at infinity gives exponentially decaying massive tails. Unlike the radial monopole, these planar radial profiles have no elementary closed form in general.
The general multi-vortex solution can be encoded by the Taubes equation. Away from zeros, write . The first equation givesAt zeros of multiplicity , the phase contributes circulation . The second equation becomes, including these Dirac delta terms,For prescribed zeros the planar existence result gives a solution; the prescribed-zero construction of planar Abelian Higgs vortices reconstructs smooth fields, with near each zero. Uniqueness is visible directly: for two solutions with the same zeros, their nonsingular difference satisfies . Multiplying by and integrating giveshence . The Abelian Higgs vortex moduli space has arbitrary unordered positions of the zeros, giving real position parameters. The saturated energy is independent of their positions, so critically coupled vortices have no static interaction energy. Away from critical coupling this cancellation is lost.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 51 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the Minkowski metric convention . On the Adjoint representation, the adjoint covariant derivative is . Set and . ThenThe trace obeys , and covariant integration by parts has the ordinary boundary term because the trace of a commutator is zero. Thus compactly supported variations giveThe trace pairing on is nondegenerate, so the Euler-Lagrange field equations areIn particular the sign of the scalar mass term follows from the plus sign in the supplied trace Lagrangian density; it should not be guessed from a different metric convention. This is the adjoint Yang-Mills-Higgs trace variation.
For the static Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole, take the usual purely magnetic extension and temporal gauge . At , the equations reduce towith the equation identically zero. We now verify both spatial equations from without assuming them. The gauge-theory Bianchi identity gives , hence immediately . Also , soHere . This proves that the Bogomolny equations imply all static zero-mass Yang-Mills equations and the scalar equation. The specification of matters: the spatial Bogomolny equations by themselves do not constrain an arbitrary extra electric potential, so the implication is for their standard purely magnetic static extension.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 56 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use anti-Hermitian matrices, with invariant positive inner product . On an adjoint-valued field , define the adjoint covariant derivative and gauge curvature byEquivalently, and . Put , with . The monopole Bogomolny equations are .
For a smooth SU(2) gauge transformation , useDifferentiating a transformed adjoint field shows : the derivatives of cancel the inhomogeneous term in . Applying the commutator of these derivatives gives , and therefore . Both sides of transform identically, establishing gauge invariance of the solution condition. Individual matrix components are covariant, rather than invariant numbers.
The monopole boundary condition is a nonzero asymptotic Higgs norm,together with finite three-dimensional Yang-Mills-Higgs energy. Standard monopole asymptotics have and . The normalized Higgs field at infinity defines a map , whose topological degree is the magnetic charge. A nonzero charge gives a genuine non-Abelian magnetic monopole; the nonzero Higgs boundary value alone also allows the zero-charge vacuum. Thus the relevant nontrivial solutions are Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopoles in the zero-Higgs-potential limit.
Now form the four-dimensional connection with -independent components. Its gauge curvature hasThe self-duality sign requires an orientation. Choose the Euclidean metric and orientation . For cyclic , the Hodge star operator satisfiesUsing and , the curvature isEach term has negative star eigenvalue, soThis proves the Anti-self-dual Yang-Mills equations in the stated convention. The orientation of a monopole lift matters: with instead, the same connection is self-dual. With that opposite orientation, the anti-self-dual lift would use .
To fix the action normalization, take the Euclidean Yang-Mills actionBoth sums are over ordered index pairs. The component identity
givesHence the four-dimensional action density in terms of the three-dimensional curvature isA different overall action normalization rescales all three equal expressions together.
givesHence the four-dimensional action density in terms of the three-dimensional curvature isA different overall action normalization rescales all three equal expressions together.
A Yang-Mills instanton is a smooth finite-Euclidean-action self-dual or anti-self-dual connection in pure Yang-Mills theory, with the usual asymptotic pure-gauge behavior. Physically the term generally refers to a nontrivial field; its asymptotic gauge winding labels an instanton number. The Bianchi identity , together with , implies , so the first-order equations already imply the second-order Yang-Mills equations. Finite action is a separate requirement.
Here is independent of . If the monopole has nonzero curvature, the density is positive on an open set in , and integrating its infinite -extent givesFor a finite-energy monopole this can also be written as its positive action per unit length times . Thus a nontrivial monopole lift is not a Yang-Mills instanton on . The flat solution , constant is the zero-action exception: it is a vacuum, or a trivial charge-zero instanton if that terminology includes flat connections. It is not a counterexample to the nontrivial-monopole assertion.
More generally, finite Yang-Mills action forbids nontrivial translation symmetry, even when the translation preserves a connection only up to gauge. Such a symmetry would preserve its positive gauge-invariant action density. A nonflat field has a ball on which this density is bounded below by some positive constant. Repeated translations by a nonzero symmetry vector produce infinitely many disjoint copies of a sufficiently small such ball, all with the same positive action contribution, contradicting finiteness. Continuous translation invariance is a special case. Therefore a nonflat ASDYM instanton is localized in all four Euclidean directions and has no nonzero translational symmetry. Translating an instanton still produces another instanton with a shifted center; these position parameters belong to the instanton moduli space, rather than being invariances of one localized solution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 55 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let and . For a sufficiently regular finite-energy field configuration with vacuum asymptotics, the scaled field stays in the same boundary sector. Changing variables gives the Derrick scaling formulaA static solution must be stationary under this variation, so the Derrick virial identity isFor , both terms are nonnegative, so both vanish and the field is constant at a vacuum. Hence there are no nonconstant smooth finite-energy static solitons of this scalar type for . For the identity is , allowing kinks. For it requires : a nonzero potential contribution excludes a static soliton, but the scaling identity alone does not exclude a purely derivative energy.
There is a useful refinement specific to the unconstrained flat target . If is differentiable and nonnegative, implies and on the image. The static Euler-Lagrange field equations then give . Each first derivative is an entire harmonic function in L2 space. Its mean-value bound over a disk of radius is at most its total squared norm divided by ; letting shows that derivative is zero. Thus even the exceptional two-dimensional case has only constant smooth finite-energy solutions into this flat target. This two-dimensional flat-target Derrick obstruction uses the field equations in addition to the scale identity.
The Yang-Mills theory with a Higgs field escapes the original scaling because the gauge curvature is quadratic in spatial scaling. In three dimensions use and . Then and . Writing the magnetic, Higgs-gradient and Higgs-potential energies as , the Derrick scaling of Yang-Mills-Higgs energy givesat stationarity. These terms can balance. In particular, the zero-potential Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole has .
For a nonlinear sigma model in two dimensions, the harmonic map energy is purely quadratic in first derivatives and is scale invariant: . Its target is a curved manifold, not the unconstrained Euclidean target of the refinement above. Its equation is the nonlinear harmonic-map equation, not componentwise . The Derrick theorem therefore gives no obstruction. Nonconstant finite-energy maps into , as in the O3 nonlinear sigma model, provide examples with nonzero degree.
For the complex theory, regard and as independent variables in the variation, and write , . Variation in givesThusThe factor 2 follows from the printed normalization of the complex kinetic term; equivalently vary its two real components.
A non-topological soliton is a localized finite-energy persistent field solution with no protecting winding or other nontrivial topological sector. In this complex theory a Q-ball has a stationary spatial profile and a rotating phase,with real . It is not static as a field even though its energy density is time-independent. The global phase symmetry gives the Noether chargeThe profile equation is . Its energy is . To vary the size at fixed charge one must also vary the frequency, because scaling at fixed would change . Eliminating gives charge-constrained scalar-field scaling:The new positive-power term can balance the other terms for , including , so the static Derrick theorem does not rule out these solutions. Equivalently, at fixed frequency the profile extremizes , whose effective potential need not be nonnegative. This explains both the time dependence and the charge constraint behind the evasion; a complex field by itself is not enough.
For an explicit example take the sextic unique-vacuum Q-ball potentialIt is nonnegative, since , and its only vacuum is zero. Its small-field mass squared is , while . It supports localized Q-balls, for example radial ones in three dimensions with . In that range the profile potential is positive quadratic near zero but negative somewhere away from zero, permitting a localized nontrivial profile. This example uses a conserved phase charge and no vacuum winding.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 313 2 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The curvature of isor . The covariant exterior derivative and the Jacobi identity give the Bianchi identity
Since the Hodge star operator satisfies on Euclidean two-forms,Using the opposite choice of sign as well givesEquality holds precisely for a self-dual or anti-self-dual Yang-Mills instanton, with the sign selected by that of .
Now assume and write . ThenThe spatial Bianchi identity and the self-duality equations becomewhere the upper four-dimensional sign gives the first displayed reduced sign under the orientation used here. Consequently
Gauge invariance of the inner product givesFor ,Since at infinity, the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators excludes a negative interior minimum. Hence
With , direct decomposition givesBecause ,so the Pontryagin density reduces to the surface charge per unit . The conventional three-dimensional energyobeys the Bogomolny bound , saturated by the Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole equation. The four-dimensional action density per unit is ; signs relating and depend on the self-duality and orientation convention.
For the hedgehog ansatz for a monopole in the question, direct differentiation with givesOn a sphere of radius ,ThereforeThe boundary conditions and make the integrand equal to . Thus
Prasad-Sommerfield radial monopole solution 2026-10-14
For a Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole, the dimensionless radial Bogomolny equations are and . The displayed profiles solve both equations: differentiating gives , while differentiating gives . At the origin and , giving a regular core. At infinity decays exponentially and , giving the vacuum Higgs magnitude and a long-range Abelian magnetic field.
't Hooft-Polyakov monopole 2026-10-14
A smooth finite-energy monopole in an Yang-Mills theory with an adjoint Higgs field uses the normalized Higgs direction at infinity to define a map . Its nonzero degree supplies the magnetic topological sector. Unlike a singular Abelian Dirac monopole, the non-Abelian gauge and Higgs fields can have a regular core. In the zero-potential limit the Bogomolny-Prasad-Sommerfield monopole equations are .