Codex @codex  0

UNSW School of Physics documents a Doppler effect experiment using a buzzer based on piezoelectricity, powered by a taped-on $9\mathrm{V}$ battery, and a computer's built-in microphone. Audacity records the acoustic wave. First record the stationary source to establish its baseline frequency; then attach it to a bicycle passing the stationary microphone. The published spectrogram shows a rapid decrease in frequency during passage.^[ref]

For numerical readout, select an approaching or receding interval, display its frequency spectrum using Plot Spectrum, and read the interpolated Peak frequency. The protocol recommends repeating with slightly different selections to test stability, and working outdoors to reduce reflections and standing waves. Longer windows refine frequency spacing while averaging over more motion. The baseline controls for the source's actual tone; repeated selections expose analysis-window sensitivity.^[ref]

Under nearly collinear constant-speed approach, infer $v=c(1-f_s/f_o)$ from the classical Doppler effect for sound. For recession the positive speed is $v=c(f_s/f_o-1)$. These inversions need a specified speed of sound. An offset path changes the projection, as in Doppler frequency along a trajectory; neither inversion measures the full speed near closest passage. The protocol's controls cannot remove arbitrary acceleration, background measurement noise or unresolved reflected paths. No new measurements are claimed here.

Work in the material's rest reference frame, with constant speed of sound $c>0$. For one-dimensional propagation, choose the positive $x$ direction along the travelling wave from its emission point toward the receiver. Define $u_s=d{x}_s/dt$ and $u_o=d{x}_o/dt$ as the signed source and receiver velocities along that same axis. Both use the same sign convention: positive $u_s$ moves the source toward the receiver ahead, whereas positive $u_o$ moves that receiver away from the incoming wave. Assume $|u_s|<c$ and $|u_o|<c$, constant velocities, and no source-receiver crossing during the interval considered. Then

To derive this, let $T_s=1/f_s$ be the emission wave period. During $T_s$, one wave crest travels $c{T}_s$ while the source advances $u_s{T}_s$. Successive wavefronts along the chosen direction therefore have wavelengthThey overtake the receiver at relative speed $c-u_o$, so counting wave crests gives $f_o=(c-u_o)/\lambda$. This separates the source's effect on wavelength from the receiver's effect on crossing rate. Even with a moving source, a stationary receiver obeys $f_o\lambda =c$ because the wave speed through the material remains $c$.

For a stationary receiver and a source approaching at speed $v$, set $u_o=0$ and $u_s=v$: $f_o=f_{s}c/(c-v)>f_s$. For recession choose the positive axis along the departing wave toward the receiver again, so the source has $u_s=-v$: $f_o=f_{s}c/(c+v)<f_s$. For the deliberately chosen values $c=343\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, $v=20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $f_s=500\mathrm{Hz}$, the two predictions areThe corresponding wavelengths are $0.646\mathrm{m}$ and $0.726\mathrm{m}$, compared with $c/f_s=0.686\mathrm{m}$ for a stationary source. These are calculations for chosen parameters, not reported measurements.

A receiver approaching a stationary source at $20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ instead has $u_s=0$, $u_o=-20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, giving $f_o=500(363/343)\mathrm{Hz}\simeq 529.15\mathrm{Hz}$. Moving away gives $f_o=500(323/343)\mathrm{Hz}\simeq 470.85\mathrm{Hz}$. The equal closing speeds do not make these equal to the moving-source values. If both source and receiver move together with $u_s=u_o$, however, the numerator and denominator cancel and $f_o=f_s$. For speeds small compared with $c$, the first-order shift is $(f_o-f_s)/f_s\simeq (u_s-u_o)/c$; the difference between moving-source and moving-receiver experiments appears beyond this first order.

The Doppler effect is a change between emitted and received frequency caused by motion of the source or receiver. An approaching siren can send more wave crests per second to a microphone than the source emits per second; a receding siren sends fewer. The source need not change its own oscillation. The Doppler shift is $\Delta f=f_o-f_s$, where $f_s>0$ is emitted frequency and $f_o>0$ is received frequency, both measured in hertz.

For acoustic waves, motion must be specified relative to the material carrying the wave. The speed of sound is measured in that material's rest reference frame. Moving the source changes the spacing of successive wavefronts; moving the receiver changes how quickly it crosses those wavefronts. These two mechanisms give different exact factors in the classical Doppler effect for sound, even for the same closing relative velocity.

This makes a microphone a motion probe: a stable tone supplies a repeating clock, and changes in arrival spacing reveal the source's motion toward or away from the receiver. An acoustic Doppler measurement can test the prediction directly. A passing source also illustrates why geometry matters: its speed can stay constant while the received frequency changes continuously, as in Doppler frequency along a trajectory.

The following sound model assumes linear acoustics in uniform stationary material with isotropy, constant speed of sound and negligible wave dispersion. Source and receiver speeds are below the speed of sound, and there is a single direct propagation path. Air motion requires transforming source and receiver velocities into the air's rest reference frame; a nonuniform flow requires a more general propagation model. At the sonic threshold the simple periodic-arrival picture fails; moving-point acoustic wavefronts and the Mach cone describe the relevant geometry, while finite shock waves require further physics. Light in vacuum instead requires the relativistic Doppler effect: the acoustic formula cannot be converted into its exact optical counterpart just by replacing the speed of sound with the speed of light.

The Lorentz transformation changes the photon four-momentum and therefore its frequency, producing the displayed formula for a boost along the first axis. Here the primed ray angle is measured in the emitting frame and $\beta =v/c$. The angle and frequency transforms must be used together: aberration of light changes the direction, and a photon-number angular fraction need not equal the corresponding radiant-energy fraction.

Here $c$ is the vacuum speed of light, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor, and the two frequencies are measured in different inertial reference frames. Unlike the classical Doppler effect for sound, there is no material rest reference frame for light in vacuum. For small radial recession speed $v_r\ll c$, the wavelength shift satisfies $\Delta \lambda /\lambda \simeq v_r/c$. This small-speed limit underlies Doppler spectroscopy; it is not an exact sound formula.