Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 16 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the standard integral cohomology ring , . Any self-homeomorphism sends to or , and hence sends to . Its Lefschetz number is therefore , which is either or . By the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem, every such homeomorphism has a fixed point.
Now is simply connected: its CW structure has no one-cells and only two- and four-cells. If it covered a connected space with degree , it would be the universal cover. The usual covering space hypotheses hold for the base because it is locally homeomorphic to this manifold. Its deck transformation group would act transitively on every fibre and have elements. A nonidentity deck transformation has no fixed point: uniqueness of lifts makes one fixing a point the identity everywhere on the connected cover. This contradicts the preceding calculation. ThusThus the complex projective plane has no nontrivial covering quotient.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 13 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For integral singular cochains and , define the cup product on an ordered simplex byThe same construction works over any commutative coefficient ring. Expanding the coboundary as the alternating sum of faces gives the Leibniz identityIndeed faces deleting vertices before the split occur in the first sum, faces after the split occur in the second, and the two terms at the common vertex cancel with opposite signs. Thus the product of cocycles is a cocycle. Replacing by changes the product with a cocycle by ; replacing by changes the product with a cocycle by . Hence the product is independent of representatives and defines a well-defined product on cohomology classes.
With coefficients, the real-projective-space cohomology ring isFor , the pullback of the degree-one generator is either zero or . The second choice would send the zero class to the nonzero class , contradicting the naturality of the cup product. Thus the generator pulls back to zero, and so do all its positive powers. For the target's reduced cohomology is already zero. Therefore every such map induces zero on reduced mod-two cohomology.
Suppose a continuous had everywhere. Thenis a continuous odd map to and descends to . For , a path from to projects to a loop detected by the degree-one generator of the double cover. Its image lifts to a path from to , so is detected by the target's double cover as well. Thus is nonzero in degree one, contradicting the preceding calculation. For , an odd continuous map from the connected circle to is already impossible. The case is immediate. HenceThis proves the Borsuk-Ulam theorem rather than assuming it.
For a closed cover , assume no member contains an antipodal pair. Apply the just-proved theorem to , using any metric on the sphere. Empty sets can be assigned a constant positive coordinate. It gives equal distances at . If either point belongs to an with , zero distance and closedness place both points in it, a contradiction. Hence neither lies in any of the first sets, and both must lie in , another contradiction. This proves the Lusternik-Schnirelmann-Borsuk theorem for closed sets.
Four closed sets on need not contain an antipodal pair. Take the four unit vertices of a regular tetrahedron centered at zero and define . These closed sets cover the sphere by maximizing the four scalar products. If and belonged to , both inequalities would force all four scalar products to be equal. Since , they would all be zero, and because the vertices span , would be zero. This is impossible on the sphere. Thus these four sets give the antipodal-free closed cover from simplex Voronoi cells counterexample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 18 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An immersion would inject into the trivial rank-five bundle. Taking its orthogonal complement gives a normal real line bundle with . The Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes requiresThe real line bundle need not be orientable, but it has no Stiefel–Whitney classes above degree one.
Let be the pulled-back degree-one generators from the two real projective planes. Their mod-two cohomology ring, by the Künneth theorem, is . To compute the tangent classes, at a line the projective tangent space is . Adding gives , with the real line identified with its dual using a metric. Thus the stabilized tangent bundle of real projective space gives andThe tangent bundle of the product is the direct sum of the pulled-back tangent bundles. Since in this truncated ring, and similarly for ,The degree-two class is nonzero by the product-ring basis. It cannot be a class of the rank-one bundle . Equivalently , violating the codimension-one Stiefel–Whitney immersion obstruction. Hence admits no immersion in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 24 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . Its quotient cell structure has one cell in each of dimensions . In particular is five-connected. The relative cohomology sequence, or its cellular cochain complex, givesThe subscripts denote degrees. Under the quotient map back to , the three positive classes pull back to . All positive products vanish, since their degree is at least twelve. Thus the cohomology ring of a collapsed projective subspace in this case is the square-zero algebra on these three classes.
Now compute its Sullivan minimal model , using cohomological grading and the convention that even generators generate a polynomial ring and odd generators an exterior algebra. Five-connectivity gives for . Since a minimal differential is decomposable, it cannot have a nonzero value below degree twelve. Matching cohomology through degree ten therefore forceswith no other generators in degrees at most ten. The first products must then be killed by generatorsThese follow by killing respectively the unwanted degree-twelve, degree-fourteen, and two degree-sixteen classes. Subsequent generators kill and the resulting syzygies. For example is closed of degree nineteen, so it requires a further generator of degree eighteen. Thus the full minimal model is not just the algebra on the first seven generators.
There is nevertheless a simple map from the full model to : send to the three displayed classes and every other generator to zero. It is a chain map, since every generator differential is a sum of products of positive-degree elements, and all positive products in vanish. It induces an isomorphism in cohomology: the entire cohomology of is concentrated in degrees , and its indicated basis maps to the indicated basis of . This proves formality of a topological space and identifies the full minimal model as a minimal resolution of , rather than only matching the initial part of its cohomology.
An explicit description of that full resolution is useful. Take the free graded Lie algebraIts Chevalley–Eilenberg cochain algebra has one generator of degree for every homogeneous Lie basis word , and its quadratic differential is dual to the bracket, with the usual graded signs. Rescaling the bracket-word duals gives exactly the generators and differentials listed above. Positive Lie degrees make this algebra Sullivan minimal. Its cohomology is : the universal enveloping algebra is , and the augmentation module has the exact free resolutionExactness is immediate because every nonempty tensor word has a unique last letter. Applying gives just the unit and the three dual classes in total degrees ; products of positive classes land in an absent Ext degree two and are zero. Chevalley–Eilenberg cochains of a graded Lie algebra compute this Ext, so this also verifies the full model's cohomology.
The wedge sum has the same connectivity, cohomology ring, and initial closed minimal generators. The same full-model-to- argument applies to , so its minimal model is also , by uniqueness of Sullivan minimal models of quasi-isomorphic simply connected rational cochain algebras. The Sullivan minimal-model classification identifies isomorphic minimal models with the same rational homotopy type. ConsequentlyThe explicit infinite minimal resolution above is shared by both spaces.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 24 6 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use cohomological degree, and write the Sullivan minimal models asandThe subscripts indicate degrees. The even generators generate a polynomial ring and the odd generators an exterior algebra. Their cohomology rings are respectively and , since each odd differential kills exactly the indicated non-zero-divisor polynomial relation. These are the usual projective-space and even-sphere minimal models.
Orient the top classes so that the degree-one condition is . A representative model map must send to . It must send to an element of degree with differential . The element has exactly these properties. ThusThe differential check is . In these degrees there is no other available monomial: even powers of have even degree, and an odd monomial is a power of times . Hence the coefficient is forced by the differential. For the two models coincide and the map is the identity model map.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 16 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For finite-dimensional Complex projective space , use the filtration by its linear projective subspaces. The difference is , so there is one topological cell in every even dimension , and none in odd dimensions. Every cellular boundary vanishes for degree reasons. The integral cohomology is therefore in those even degrees and zero elsewhere.
For the cohomology ring, let be the Poincare dual of a projective hyperplane, using the complex orientation. Generic hyperplanes meet transversely, and a collection of of them intersects in . The geometric interpretation of the cup product identifies with the dual of that intersection. Restricting to a linear , the hyperplanes meet in one point, with positive sign because the transverse normal directions are complex lines. HenceThus is a primitive generator in degree , not merely a nonzero multiple. There are no classes beyond degree , soThe point case has ring . Taking the union of the finite projective spaces gives , since each fixed cohomological degree stabilizes. This proves the cohomology ring of complex projective space computation.
For the rank bound for a nonsingular complex bilinear map, write , , , and . Assume . Injectivity with either nonzero factor fixed implies whenever . Thereforeis well defined and continuous. Scaling either vector only scales the output, and in local projective charts the formula is given by bilinear coordinates with no simultaneous zero. Let be the target's degree-two generator and the pullbacks of the two factor generators. The Künneth theorem givesFixing or makes a projective linear embedding induced by an injective linear map. Such an embedding pulls back the hyperplane class to the factor's hyperplane class. Since the two restrictions determine of the product, , with the generator of a point factor interpreted as zero.
Put . In the source cohomology ring, every term in vanishes except the one with exponents , andThe binomial coefficient is a positive integer and the final monomial generates the top integral cohomology. If , the class in would be zero. This contradiction provesWhen , the nonzero pure-tensor image already gives . A positivity convention is genuinely necessary: if , , and , all restrictions to the zero tensor subspaces are injective, but the literal bound would read . The displayed theorem is therefore the nonzero-factor version. If a nonzero factor is infinite-dimensional, either factor restriction already bounds the image dimension below by that factor dimension; the sum of two positive cardinal dimensions, with at least one infinite, is their maximum, giving the corresponding cardinal bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 16 4 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take . It is a closed smooth manifold and is simply connected: its CW complex structure has no one-cells, and attaching cells of dimension at least two to a point cannot create a fundamental group. Its cohomology ring is with , so .
The theorem used is the Lusternik–Schnirelmann critical point theorem: every smooth real-valued function on a closed connected smooth manifold has at least its unnormalized Lusternik–Schnirelmann category many distinct critical points, without a nondegeneracy assumption. Here category is the minimum number of open subsets covering the manifold whose inclusions are null-homotopic. The cup length bound gives category at least four. To justify that bound, a cover by three categorical sets would make each positive-degree class vanish on its assigned set. The long exact sequence of each pair lifts three copies of to relative classes, and their relative cup product would lie in , contradicting . Thus every smooth function has at least four critical points, including functions with degenerate critical points. The critical-point theorem in this formulation is described in Conley pairs in geometry—Lusternik–Schnirelmann theory and more.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 16 5 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
False. Take and , with their standard product and connected-sum orientations. They are closed simply connected four-manifolds. For the connected sum, removing a four-ball leaves the fundamental group unchanged, and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem across the separating three-sphere preserves simple connectivity. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence computes integral cohomology in degrees zero, two and four, and zero in other degrees. The Künneth theorem gives the same groups for . Thus their Betti numbers agree and all their integral cohomology is torsion-free.
Their cohomology rings nevertheless differ. In , let come from the two projective summands and let generate degree four. The cohomology ring of the connected sum of two complex projective planes hasThese relations follow by using cycles in the separate summands and the degree-one pinch projections onto them. In , the sphere-factor generators satisfyConsequently every degree-two class of has squarean even multiple of the top generator, whereas in is a primitive generator. An integral graded-ring isomorphism cannot change this property, since it sends a generator of to its positive or negative. A homotopy equivalence induces a graded-ring isomorphism, so none exists. Equivalently, their intersection forms are and , an odd form and an even form respectively.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 17 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose orientations on the two sphere factors whose product is the specified orientation of . Give the four factors of the corresponding orientations in the order . The Künneth theorem has no Tor functor terms here and givesLet be the pullback of the positively normalized cohomology class from factor . The cohomology ring iswith . Its generators commute by graded commutativity of the cup product.
Fix a point in each sphere. For each pair , let be the four-dimensional submanifold in which factors vary and the remaining factors equal their fixed points. Orient by the ordered factors . The six homology classesgive a coordinate sphere intersection basis by the homology cross product description in the Künneth theorem. Moving a fixed point in one of the other two factors produces a disjoint homologous representative of each . Hence every basis element has zero self-intersection number.
More precisely, the intersection pairing isFor complementary pairs the representatives intersect transversely at one point. The sign is positive because swapping two-dimensional factors contributes . For pairs with a common index, a factor fixed in both representatives can be displaced to make them disjoint. In the paired order , the intersection form is three copies of .
For the diagonal map , write for the two sphere generators. ThenThe coefficient of in is . Pullback and the preceding cup product relations show that these coefficients are one for and zero for . ThereforeThere are exactly two complementary pairings among these four terms, each counted twice in the square. ThusThis computes both the explicit homology class and its intersection pairing, including all orientation signs.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 14 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the standard complex orientations and the product orientation. Let satisfy and , and let satisfy . These are the cohomology rings of the product of two spheres and the Complex projective plane.
For a map from the Complex projective plane, write and . Naturality of the cup product gives and . Since has infinite order, . It follows that , so every such map has degree .
In the reverse direction, write . ThenEvery even mapping degree really occurs. To construct it, identify with and use the Segre embeddingThe generator pulls back to : restricting to either factor gives a projective line and hence coefficient . By the cellular approximation theorem, is homotopic to a cellular map. Its four-dimensional domain then maps into the four-skeleton of . Denote that map by ; restriction of to is , so and .
For any integer , choose a map of mapping degree . For one may use on the Riemann sphere, for use , and for use a constant map. Then satisfies , so the possible degrees are exactly all even integers, with realizing . The cellular approximation here deforms this particular map into the skeleton; it does not require a retraction of onto .
Finally, take the connected sum of oriented manifolds with both summands carrying their standard complex orientations. Its degree-two cohomology has generators withThis follows by choosing the generators supported away from the two balls used to form the connected sum, so mixed cup products vanish while each square gives the common orientation class. WriteIf , the three cup product relations sayTaking determinants gives , which forces . Therefore the only possible degree to the connected sum is , realized by a constant map. This is a degree constraint from intersection forms: the indefinite intersection form of the sphere product cannot pull back a definite form with a nonzero degree multiplier.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 15 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Integral groups for . Put . The space is the inversion mapping torus of a torus, fibred over with fiber . The cohomology ring of a torus is the exterior algebra on degree-one generators. Inversion acts as on each such generator, hence as on .
The Wang sequence therefore givesThe right-hand term is free, so this short exact sequence splits as a sequence of groups. In even fiber degree, ; in odd fiber degree it is multiplication by . For this computes the integral cohomology of an inversion mapping torus:The top torsion group is consistent with being nonorientable: inversion of its three-dimensional fiber reverses orientation.
Mod-two groups. Over , inversion acts as the identity on the fiber cohomology. The Wang sequence givesThuswith out-of-range binomial coefficients interpreted as zero. These are exactly the dimensions of the graded groups .
The intersection pairing for . The mapping torus of reflection of the circle is the Klein bottle. Let be the section loop through a fixed point of the reflection and a fiber circle. They form a basis of . The section has a normal neighborhood homeomorphic to a Möbius band, so it is one-sided and a transverse displacement meets it once modulo two. The fiber is two-sided and can be displaced disjointly. The two loops meet once. The mod-two intersection pairing of the Klein bottle therefore has matrixTake the evaluation-dual basis , with and . By Poincare duality, the cup product matrix in this dual basis is , not :Writing for the nonzero top class gives , and . Hence the cohomology ring isThese relations already force all degrees above two to vanish.
The ring for general . For each of the fiber coordinates, projection induces . Pull back the classes above, calling the common base class and the fiber-coordinate classes . Naturality of the cup product gives and . The square-free products restrict to the exterior algebra basis of the fiber cohomology. The Leray-Hirsch theorem then says that and form an additive basis. This proves the full mod-two cohomology ring of an inversion mapping torus:For , is nonzero by this basis description. In the cohomology ring of a torus every degree-one class squares to zero: the generators square to zero and the cross terms occur twice in characteristic two. The degree-one cup-square obstruction to ring isomorphism therefore proves that the rings are not isomorphic for any , despite their isomorphic graded groups. For , both spaces are circles and the rings are isomorphic. Even if grading is forgotten, the rings differ for : every element of the torus ring has square either zero or one, whereas is nonzero and is not the unit.
Integral cup products in . To specify also as a ring, let be the pullback of the positive generator of . Let denote reduction modulo two and set using the integral Bockstein homomorphism. The degree-one Bockstein square identity gives , so the are the three independent order-two classes in degree two. Choose free classes which restrict to the corresponding two-fold fiber products and have reductions . Such choices exist: reduction in degree two is surjective because is free, and adding the removes any terms from an initial lift.
The Wang sequence identifies as a free basis of . Let generate , with . Reduction in degree four is an isomorphism. The integral cup products in the four-dimensional inversion mapping torus are consequently determined byTogether with the unit, graded commutativity and vanishing above degree four, these give every product. For example, , whereas . The products vanish because they are torsion in the free group .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 114 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For nonzero finite-dimensional and , the intended assertion is true. Write , , and replace by , of dimension . Injectivity on the stated slices implies whenever . Consequently the bilinear map defines a continuous map of Complex projective spacesThe rank is at least one, since one such nonzero tensor has nonzero image.
Let be the respective tautological bundles. Fiberwise, identifies with . For the positive hyperplane classes , and (zero when the projective space is a point), the first Chern class of a tensor product of complex line bundles givesThe Künneth theorem, together with part (a), identifies the product cohomology ring withThere are no Tor terms because the factor groups are free. In particular, its monomials with , form an integral additive basis. In top degree,If , the target relation would imply and hence contradict this nonzero top power. ThusWhen , the already-established inequality gives the same conclusion. The complex bilinear dimension bound is sharp: multiplication of complex polynomials of degrees less than and has target dimension , is injective in either nonzero fixed factor, and its image spans every monomial in that target.
Literal zero-space qualification. The printed assertion does not explicitly exclude zero vector spaces. If , and , its slice-injectivity hypothesis is vacuous, while the claimed inequality would be . Thus, with zero spaces permitted, this is a counterexample to the assertion exactly as written; the proof above supplies the usual nonzero finite-dimensional interpretation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 114 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Here is an intrinsic definition that also proves well-definedness. For a complex line bundle , define its First Chern class to be the Euler class of its canonically oriented underlying real rank-two bundle: pull its integral Thom class back along the zero section after forgetting relative support. The complex orientation fixes the sign, so this construction makes no arbitrary choice of generator.
For a rank- complex vector bundle , let be its projective bundle of lines, let be the tautological bundle, and put . On every fiber , is the positive degree-two generator. The Leray-Hirsch theorem says that if globally defined cohomology classes restrict to a free basis of the cohomology of every fiber, then multiplication by those classes identifies the cohomology of the total space with a free module over the base. Applied here, it givesThe finite trivializing cover in the question is sufficient for this application: the assertion holds on each trivializing open set by the Künneth theorem, since the fiber has finite free cohomology, and the Mayer–Vietoris sequence and the Five lemma glue it over the finite cover. The same local argument constructs the oriented Thom class used for line bundles. It does not require a choice of classifying map.
There are therefore unique classes such thatDefine and for . For rank zero the Total Chern class is . This is the projective bundle definition of Chern classes. Existence and uniqueness follow by expressing in the displayed free module basis, with degrees determining each coefficient. The projective bundle and tautological bundle are intrinsic to , and the line Thom class is uniquely fixed by orientation. Hence the resulting Chern classes do not depend on trivializations or other auxiliary choices. For a line bundle the relation is , agreeing with the original normalization. Pulling back this unique relation also proves naturality. This standard construction and the sum theorem are treated in Vector Bundles and K-Theory, Section 3.1.
The requested result is the Whitney sum formula for Chern classes:Here , and the formula holds for complex vector bundles over a common base. In particular, a trivial bundle has total Chern class .
Now take and let be its tautological bundle. The standard Hermitian inner product gives the rank- complex bundle , with . The orthogonal complex line flag manifold in the question is precisely : over a first line , the second line is any line in . Local orthonormal frames give this identification as a fiber bundle, with fiber .
Let on , also writing for its pullback to . By part 3(a), . The Whitney sum formula for Chern classes givesLet be the second tautological line on , and set . Thus are exactly the pullbacks of the positive hyperplane classes from the two projective factors. The projective bundle definition of Chern classes for givesTogether with , this gives a surjective graded ring mapThere are no additional relations. Indeed the second relation is monic of degree in , so polynomial division makes its source free over on . The projective bundle formula for complex vector bundles gives exactly the same free basis on the target. The map sends each basis element to its corresponding basis element, and is therefore an isomorphism. ConsequentlyThis is the cohomology ring of the orthogonal complex line flag manifold. Its additive basis is with , . As a symmetry check, multiplying the second relation by gives , so as expected from the second projection. For , every line has a unique orthogonal line, and the relations become , , giving the ring of . If , the space is empty and the second relation is , so the printed formula still gives the zero cohomology ring.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 114 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use coefficients throughout. Write on Complex projective space and on Real projective space. We use the standard cohomology ring of complex projective space , with , and the real projective calculation from the preceding solution. The complex projective calculation follows, for example, from its one cell in each even dimension together with the fact that transverse projective hyperplanes represent the powers of ; such hyperplanes have one intersection point.
For the standard inclusion , the restricted complex tautological line is . As a real vector bundle it is , whose total Stiefel–Whitney class is . The Stiefel–Whitney class of the underlying real bundle of a complex line identifies its degree-two class with its First Chern class reduced modulo two. Passing to the dual line defining changes only a sign, which disappears modulo two. Thus mod-two restriction from complex to real projective space gives . In particular the answer for dimension two is the ring mapIt sends to , is an isomorphism in degree two, and sends to zero.
Now assume and put , , , with inclusions and . The real dimensions are and , respectively. A tubular neighborhood and excision identify the cohomology of with that of the normal disk bundle relative to its sphere bundle. Every real normal bundle is oriented over , so the Thom isomorphism theorem givesUnder this identification the relative-to-absolute map is the cohomological Gysin map of an embedding . The exact sequence of the pair is thereforeHere denotes the ordinary connecting homomorphism followed by the inverse of the isomorphism supplied by the Thom isomorphism theorem.
To compute , use mod-two Poincare duality and its evaluation formulaFor , take and . The right side is . Since the target group is generated by and , this provesOdd-degree classes have zero image because has no odd-degree cohomology. Exactness now givesFor precision, below degree the restriction map is an isomorphism. In degree the next map is , an isomorphism, so the complement group is zero. In even degrees , , the preceding is an isomorphism and the following odd-degree is zero; consequently is an isomorphism. The intervening odd groups and the top group vanish.
It remains to establish multiplication. Put . Since , exactness gives . Choose with , which is possible by the just-computed isomorphism. Naturality of the relative cup product, and the module property of the Thom isomorphism theorem, giveThus for . Each class is nonzero and generates its upper-half group, while generate the lower-half groups. Also because . These classes account for every group, so there are no further relations:By the field-coefficient Künneth theorem this is precisely the cohomology ring of . For the relation leaves the sphere's ring. The calculation identifies rings and does not claim a homotopy equivalence of the spaces; is outside the expression involving .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 142 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Let have rank , let be its projectivization of a real vector bundle, and let be its tautological bundle. Put . The Projective bundle definition of Stiefel–Whitney classes starts from the isomorphismIn particular, is injective. Expand uniquely in this basis. The coefficients define the Stiefel–Whitney classes through the relationSet and for ; for a rank-zero vector bundle set . Uniqueness also proves naturality of the Stiefel–Whitney classes under a pullback vector bundle.
To prove the Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes, apply the splitting principle for real vector bundles simultaneously to and . Its injective pullback on mod-two cohomology follows by iterating the Projective bundle definition of Stiefel–Whitney classes. It suffices to compute for a split vector bundle . Put .
On , the coordinate projections of the tautological inclusion give sections of the real line bundles with no common zero. The mod-two Euler class of a real line bundle is its first Stiefel–Whitney class, and the First Stiefel–Whitney class of a tensor product of real line bundles gives . Multiplication of Euler classes under a direct sum, and vanishing of the Euler class of a vector bundle with a nowhere-zero section, therefore giveComparing with the unique monic relation defining the Stiefel–Whitney classes shows that is the th elementary symmetric polynomial in the . Thus . A direct sum joins the two lists, so injectivity of the splitting pullback gives
For the immersion obstruction, use the notation : the printed here means the map from one copy of Real projective space into the product. Write and let be the mod-two reduction of . The mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space and the cohomology ring of complex projective space giveNontriviality in degree two forces . Necessarily , since the degree-two cohomology of vanishes.
The standard tangent bundle identities for Real projective space and Complex projective space areFor the underlying real vector bundle of a complex line bundle, its total Stiefel–Whitney class is . HenceIf is homotopic to an immersion , its normal bundle has rank , andThe Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes and homotopy invariance of cohomology yieldThe division is legitimate in the truncated cohomology ring, since is a unit. The degree- component isIt must vanish because , while . Therefore must be odd.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 114 1 1 2 Solution 2026-10-03
The cellular chain complex for either space has one cell in dimensions , with the only nonzero differential equal to multiplication by from degree three to degree two. The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology therefore gives, for both and ,Every product of positive-degree classes vanishes for dimensional reasons, so
Their modulo- cohomology rings distinguish them. Let be the class restricting to the standard generator on . The attaching map has degree , so its cellular coboundary vanishes modulo ; the classes in degrees two and four restrict isomorphically to those of . Hence in . In , the degree-two class comes from the three-dimensional Moore space, so its square is zero; products between distinct wedge summands also vanish. The mod-p cup-square obstruction to a homotopy equivalence now proves
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 114 1 1 Solution 2026-10-03
Let be the pullbacks of the two orientation classes. The cohomology ring of a product of two spheres hasand generates . WriteThe matrix lies in because a homeomorphism induces a cohomology ring automorphism.
If is even, graded commutativity givesThus . Invertibility forces to be diagonal or anti-diagonal, and its two nonzero entries must each be . Hence there are exactly eight possible actions: the signed permutation matrices.
Evenness is necessary. For , the product is the torus, and every is induced by an integral linear automorphism of the torus. For example, the infinitely many matrices give distinct actions on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 165 3 ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Apply the rational Serre spectral sequence to the path-loop fibration of . Its fiber iswhose rational cohomology ring is with . Since the path space is contractible, must transgress to a nonzero class . Multiplicativity givesOver these differentials pair and kill every positive-degree class except , while graded commutativity gives . Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 114 2 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Give the closed oriented genus- surface its usual CW structure with one vertex, one-cells , and one two-cell attached along . The cellular boundary maps vanish after abelianization, soChoose degree-one classes dual to and orient by . The intersection pairing, equivalently the cellular diagonal approximation, gives the cohomology ring of a closed oriented surface:and all and vanish.
For the space , use the genus-two CW structure and attach an additional two-cell along . Both two-cell attaching words have zero exponent sum in every one-cell, so the cellular boundary is zero. HenceLet be the degree-two classes dual respectively to the original surface cell and the new cell. The original relator and the new relator givetogether with the products forced by graded commutativity. Every other product of degree-one basis classes is zero, and every product of total degree greater than two is zero. These relations completely determine the cohomology ring of .