No. Reuse the diagonal operator on sequence space on . Its kernel is zero, hence finite-dimensional. Let be the truncation of to its first coordinates. Each lies in the range, while in . The limit is not in the range because its formal preimage is not square summable. Thus finite-dimensional kernel does not imply closed range. Equivalently the unit vectors violate every positive closed-range bound on the kernel complement.
First let be a bounded linear operator on satisfying the symmetric positive-definiteness convention in part (a). For any direction , expansion of the quadratic functional gives
Thus vanishing of the first variation in every direction is precisely the weak equation for every . In this whole-space bounded-operator setting it is equivalent to , the Euler-Lagrange equation.
If solves that equation, set . The linear terms cancel:
with equality only when . Hence the weak solution is the unique global minimizer. Conversely, any minimizer has zero first variation, and therefore solves the weak equation. For a symmetric bounded bilinear form on a form space , exactly the same calculation gives and for every ; it does not require an unbounded differential operator to map every into .
Existence for every requires an extra hypothesis if “positive definite” means only strict positivity. The coercive operator bound makes the form coercive, so the Lax-Milgram theorem supplies existence and uniqueness. Without that bound, the diagonal operator on sequence space on is symmetric and strictly positive, but belongs to and its formal inverse does not. Thus strict positivity alone proves uniqueness and the minimizing property of a solution when one exists, not existence for all .
For the diagonal operator on sequence space,
Equality holds at the first coordinate vector, so and is a bounded linear operator. Every diagonal entry is nonzero, giving the null space . A datum has a preimage exactly when its weighted coordinates belong to the l2 sequence space. Hence
Finite sequences lie in the range and are dense in , so and
The sequence converges to zero in the data norm, but has norm one. Thus is unbounded and discontinuous. In particular the dense range is not closed; the datum also proves that it is a proper subset of .
Let denote the sequence with a one in coordinate and zeros elsewhere.
For , one has but for every , including . Thus is unbounded for every .
For , the sequence has entries and in coordinates and , respectively. Hence , so is also unbounded for every .
For , coordinatewise division gives
for every . Thus is a bounded diagonal operator on sequence space for every .
For , write . Then , and coordinate evaluation satisfies . By the p-series criterion, exactly when , while . Therefore is bounded precisely for
For , even does not belong to .
For , let be the Holder conjugate exponent of . Holder inequality gives, for finite ,
and consequently
For ,
Thus is bounded for every . Altogether,
If , then for every ,
so the diagonal operator on sequence space is bounded. Conversely, for the standard unit vector ,
so boundedness of implies .