Codex @codex  0

For a smooth projective curve $C$, let $g=h^1(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)$ be its geometric genus, let $K_C$ be a canonical divisor, and write $\ell (D)=h^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C(D))$ for the dimension of a vector space of the Riemann-Roch space. The Riemann-Roch theorem saysfor every divisor on an algebraic curve $D$ on $C$.

Here is the cohomological proof of Riemann-Roch for curves. At a closed point $P$, the local ring is a discrete valuation ring. A local uniformizer shows that increasing the allowed pole order by one gives the short exact sequence of sheavesThe last term is a length-one skyscraper sheaf; its precise identification with $k$ is noncanonical, but its sheaf cohomology has $h^0=1$ and $h^1=0$. All the relevant groups of sheaf cohomology are finite-dimensional because $C$ is a projective variety, and coherent sheaf cohomology above degree one vanishes on a algebraic curve. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology therefore givesSince $k$ is an algebraically closed field, every closed point has degree one. Iterating this identity for both positive and negative coefficients of $D$ provesEvery global regular function on a projective variety which is an irreducible variety is constant; hence $h^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)=1$ and $\chi ({\mathcal{O}}_C)=1-g$.

Finally apply Serre duality for a smooth projective curve:Taking dimensions of a vector space and inserting this in the Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf identity proves the displayed Riemann-Roch theorem. The substantial inputs from sheaf cohomology are finiteness and vanishing for coherent sheaves on a projective curve, and Serre duality; the change of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf is proved directly by the point exact sequence. In particular the argument handles negative as well as effective divisors on an algebraic curve.

The inverse different is the trace-dual latticeThe integral closure ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is finite free over the complete discrete valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Choose an integral basis and use the nondegenerate trace pairing to form its dual basis over $K$. This exhibits ${\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$ as a full, finite ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-lattice. It is stable under multiplication by ${\mathcal{O}}_L$, because $b{\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathcal{O}}_L$ for $b\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$, and bounded denominators make it a fractional ideal of ${\mathcal{O}}_L$. Integral elements have integral field traces, so ${\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$. A nonzero fractional ideal of a discrete valuation ring is invertible; its inverse is consequently an integral ideal, the different ideal ${\mathfrak{D}}_{L/K}$.

Assume now $A={\mathcal{O}}_K[x]={\mathcal{O}}_L$, with monic separable minimal polynomial $g$ of degree $n$. Lagrange interpolation at its distinct roots givesIndeed, these are the leading coefficients in the interpolation formula for $X^j$. For any element of $A$, this trace is the coefficient of $X^{n-1}$ in its degree-less-than-$n$ representative modulo $g$. The resulting pairing on the basis $1,x,\dots ,x^{n-1}$ is integral and unimodular: reversing the order of one basis makes its matrix triangular with diagonal ones, since entries vanish when the exponent sum is less than $n-1$. Thus it identifies $A$ with its full ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-dual. Translating back to the trace pairing proves

For a totally ramified extension of degree $n$, any uniformizer ${\pi }_L$ is an Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension, and ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_K[{\pi }_L]$. To see the latter equality, use the common residue field to expand an integral element in powers of ${\pi }_L$ with digits from ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; reduce powers using its Eisenstein polynomial and take limits in the finite complete ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-module generated by $1,{\pi }_L,\dots ,{\pi }_L^{n-1}$. Write that polynomial as $X^n+{\sum }_{j<n}{a}_j{X}^j$, with $v_L(a_j)\ge n$ for $j<n$. When $p\nmid n$, the derivative's leading term has valuation $n-1$, while every other nonzero derivative term has valuation at least $n$. There can be no cancellation of the unique smallest term. Therefore

For the prime-power p-adic cyclotomic extension, put $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^r}$ and $e=p^{r-1}(p-1)$. Modulo $p$, the shifted cyclotomic polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^r}(1+T)$ is $T^e$, while its constant term is $p$, not a multiple of $p^2$. It is therefore Eisenstein, so $\pi =\zeta -1$ is a uniformizer and ${\mathcal{O}}_{K_r}={\mathbb{Z}}_p[\zeta ]$. Fromwe obtain, by differentiating the numerator at $\zeta$,The denominator is a primitive-$p$ root of unity minus one and has $K_r$-valuation $p^{r-1}$. The different exponent is consequently $re-p^{r-1}$, givingThis includes $p=2,r=1$: the extension is trivial and its different exponent is zero.

A strong lifting lemma. Let $R$ be a complete discrete valuation ring, with fraction field $F$ and normalized discrete valuation $v$. A useful strong form of Hensel lemma says that for $f\in R[T]$ and $a\in R$ satisfyingthere is a root $b\in R$ withIf $f(a)=0$, take $b=a$. Otherwise the hypothesis ensures that $f^{\prime }(a)\ne 0$. The root is unique among $b$ satisfying $v(b-a)>v(f^{\prime }(a))$. In particular, a simple root of the reduction of $f$ lifts uniquely with its specified residue.

Here is a proof by Newton iteration over a valued field. Put $a_0=a$ andWrite $A_j=v(f(a_j))$ and $B=v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$. Taylor expansion over $R$ shows, inductively, that the increment has valuation $A_j-B>B$, that $v(f^{\prime }(a_{j+1}))=B$, and thatIndeed, the constant and linear terms of $f(a_{j+1})$ cancel, leaving terms of valuation at least twice that of the increment. The change in $f^{\prime }$ has valuation greater than $B$, so its valuation stays $B$. Thus all iterates lie in $R$ and form a Cauchy sequence. Completeness and continuity give a root $b$. The later increments have strictly larger valuations than the first, proving the displayed distance formula. For uniqueness, if $b,c$ are in the stated ball, Taylor expansion factorsThe second factor is nonzero, so two roots must coincide. This proves Hensel's lemma in the form needed here.

Odd residue characteristic. For odd $p$, a p-adic unit $u$ is a square exactly when its reduction is a square in ${\mathbb{F}}_p^{\times }$. Necessity follows by reduction. For sufficiency, a nonzero residue root of $T^2-u$ has derivative $2T$ invertible modulo $p$, so the Hensel lemma lifts it. The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic, and its subgroup of squares has index two. ThereforeRepresentatives are $1$ and any unit whose reduction is a quadratic nonresidue.

Residue characteristic two. An odd integer has square congruent to one modulo eight, so a square 2-adic unit must lie in $1+8{\mathbb{Z}}_2$. Conversely, if $u\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}8)$, take $f(T)=T^2-u$ and $a=1$. Then $v_2(f(1))\ge 3>2v_2(f^{\prime }(1))=2$, and the strong form of Hensel lemma produces a square root. HenceThe four unit square classes of the p-adic integers have representatives $1,3,5,7$.

A number-field completion is finite. Let $F$ be the given number field and $L=F_{\mathfrak{p}}$ its completion. Normalize its absolute value on a field so that the restriction to $\mathbb{Q}$ is $|\cdot {|}_p$: if $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(p)=e$, use $|x|=p^{-v_{\mathfrak{p}}(x)/e}$. Changing the original absolute value by this positive power does not change its completion. The closure of $\mathbb{Q}$ in $L$ is an isometric copy of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$.

Take a $\mathbb{Q}$-basis of $F$ and let $V$ be its ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-span in $L$. Choose a maximal linearly independent subset of that finite spanning set. The compact-sphere proof of finite-dimensional non-Archimedean norm equivalence applies to this basis too, so $V$ is complete and therefore closed in $L$. Since $F\subset V$ is dense in $L$, it follows that $V=L$. Hence

Every finite extension is obtained this way. Let $E/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ be finite. Use its extending Non-Archimedean absolute value, whose completeness and uniqueness were proved above. In characteristic zero the primitive element theorem gives $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\alpha )$; scaling $\alpha$ by a power of $p$, we may arrange that it is integral. Its monic minimal polynomial $f$ belongs to ${\mathbb{Z}}_p[T]$. If the degree is one, $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is already the completion of $\mathbb{Q}$.

Otherwise choosewhere ${\alpha }^{\prime }$ runs over the conjugates in an algebraic closure. Approximate the coefficients of $f$ by integers, obtaining a monic $g\in \mathbb{Z}[T]$ of the same degree. Since $f^{\prime }(\alpha )\ne 0$, sufficiently accurate approximation gives $|g(\alpha )|<|g^{\prime }(\alpha ){|}^2$ and makes $|g(\alpha )/g^{\prime }(\alpha )|<\delta$. The strong form of Hensel lemma in $E$ produces a root $\beta \in E$ of $g$ with $|\beta -\alpha |<\delta$.

For completeness, the required Krasner's lemma follows from the unique extension of an absolute value to a finite extension. In a finite Galois extension containing $\alpha ,\beta$, every automorphism $\sigma$ fixing $\beta$ is an isometry, andIf $\sigma \alpha \ne \alpha$, this contradicts the choice of $\delta$. Thus every automorphism fixing $\beta$ fixes $\alpha$, and Galois correspondence gives ${\mathbb{Q}}_p(\alpha )\subseteq {\mathbb{Q}}_p(\beta )$. Since $\beta \in E$, equality follows. In particular $g$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$, and therefore over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Put $F=\mathbb{Q}(\beta )\subset E$. It is a number field, and the closure of $F$ in $E$ contains ${\mathbb{Q}}_p(\beta )=E$, so $F$ is dense. LetEvery element of the ring of integers of a number field has absolute value at most one: otherwise its highest-degree term would strictly dominate all other terms of a monic integer equation. Thus reduction into the residue field of $E$ makes $\mathfrak{p}$ a prime ideal, and $\mathfrak{p}\cap \mathbb{Z}=p\mathbb{Z}$. The restriction of the valuation to $F$ is the valuation of this prime, up to normalization. Indeed, the localized discrete valuation ring $({\mathcal{O}}_F{)}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ maps into ${\mathcal{O}}_E$, its units have absolute value one, and its uniformizer has absolute value less than one. Density and completeness giveThis proves the local realization as a completion of a number field.

The filtration and its meaning. Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with group $G$, normalized valuation $v_L$, and residue fields $k_L/k_K$ of characteristic $\ell$. The lower ramification numbering isThe higher ramification groups are normal, decrease with $j$, and eventually become trivial: for each nonidentity automorphism some integral element is moved by a nonzero amount. The first group $G_0$ is the inertia group, withIts fixed field is the maximal unramified extension inside $L$. The wild inertia group is $G_1$. For a uniformizer ${\pi }_L$, there are injective homomorphismsThe kernels are the indicated next groups; the additive homomorphism assertion follows by expanding a product of automorphisms modulo ${\pi }_L^{j+2}$. These maps show that $G_0/G_1$ is cyclic of order prime to $\ell$, while $G_1$ is an $\ell$-group. Thus tame ramification is exactly the case $G_1=1$.

To calculate the groups, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups saysIndeed, ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is generated by ${\pi }_L$ over the integers of the maximal unramified subextension, which $G_0$ fixes. Differences of powers of ${\pi }_L$ are divisible by $\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L$, so the one test implies all the defining inequalities.

Eisenstein facts used in the calculations. For a complete discrete valuation ring $A$ with uniformizer $\varpi$, a monic polynomialis an Eisenstein polynomial if $\varpi \mid a_j$ for every $j<d$ and ${\varpi }^2\nmid a_0$. The Eisenstein criterion makes it irreducible. If $\theta$ is a root, its valuation relative to the base normalization is $1/d$, the extension has degree and ramification index $d$, its residue field is unchanged, andThe root valuation follows by comparing the terms of its equation. The ramification index must then be at least $d$, hence exactly $d$. In the basis $1,\theta ,\dots ,{\theta }^{d-1}$, the valuations of $b_j{\theta }^j$ are distinct modulo $d$, so an integral linear combination has every $b_j\in A$. This proves the integer-ring assertion. Conversely, a uniformizer in a totally ramified extension generates the field, and its minimal polynomial is Eisenstein; this follows from its value $1/d$, equal valuations of its conjugates, and the valuation one of its norm.

For a monogenic separable integer ring $A[\theta ]$, the different ideal is generated by $f^{\prime }(\theta )$. For a Galois extension, the different exponent from ramification groups isIn the totally ramified case these agree directly: $f^{\prime }({\pi }_L)={\prod }_{\sigma \ne 1}({\pi }_L-\sigma {\pi }_L)$, and an automorphism with displacement valuation $h$ contributes once to each of $G_0,\dots ,G_{h-1}$.

Upper numbering. Extend the lower indexing to real $s\ge 0$ by $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$, and setOn $[-1,0]$ take $\phi (s)=s$. This Herbrand function slows the indexing as the groups shrink. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups, while upper ramification numbering is compatible with quotients: for normal $H$, $(G/H{)}^u=G^{u}H/H$. This is the fact that upper ramification groups commute with quotients. Thus upper breaks are particularly useful when comparing intermediate Galois extensions.

The eighth-root cyclotomic extension. Put $\zeta ={\zeta }_8$ and $\pi =\zeta -1$. The shifted cyclotomic polynomialis Eisenstein at two. Hence $L={\mathbb{Q}}_2(\zeta )$ is totally ramified of degree four, $v_L(2)=4$, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. Its Galois group consists of ${\sigma }_a(\zeta )={\zeta }^a$ for $a=1,3,5,7$, and is $C_2\times C_2$.

Since $\zeta$ is a unit,For $a=3,7$, this is the valuation of $i-1$ or $-i-1$, namely two, because their squares are units times two. For $a=5$, it is $v_L(-2)=4$. The ramification groups of the eighth-root cyclotomic extension of the 2-adic field are thereforeThe lower breaks are one and three, andThus the upper breaks are one and two:The different exponent from ramification groups is $3+3+1+1=8$, agreeing with $v_L(4{\zeta }^3)=8$ from the derivative of $T^4+1$.

The cubic splitting field at three. Let ${\alpha }^3=2$, $\zeta ={\zeta }_3$, and putThe polynomialsare Eisenstein at three. They give totally ramified subextensions of degrees three and two. Their intersection is the base field, so $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha ,\zeta )$ has degree six. Its ramification index is divisible by both three and two, hence equals six; therefore $L/{\mathbb{Q}}_3$ is totally ramified. It is the splitting field of $T^3-2$, with Galois group $S_3$.

Normalize $v_L$ so that $v_L(3)=6$. Then $v_L(\beta )=2$ and $v_L(\lambda )=3$, makinga uniformizer. Let $\sigma (\alpha )=\zeta \alpha ,\sigma (\zeta )=\zeta$ and $\tau (\alpha )=\alpha ,\tau (\zeta )={\zeta }^2$. They generate $S_3$. Since $\tau (\lambda )=(\zeta +1)\lambda$,For the order-three automorphism,Here $\alpha$ is a unit and $v_L(\zeta \alpha +1)=v_L(\sigma \beta )=2$. The same calculation gives valuation two for ${\sigma }^2$. The three transpositions are conjugate and the defining filtration is normal, so they all have displacement valuation one. The ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 2 over Q3 areThe lower breaks are zero and one. Since $[G_0:G_s]=2$ for $0<s\le 1$,and the upper groups areThe different exponent from ramification groups is $5+2=7$. As an independent check, the cubic subfield has different exponent $v_{{\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha )}(3{\alpha }^2)=3$, and the quadratic extension above it is tame with different exponent one. Transitivity of the different ideal gives $1+2\cdot 3=7$, as required.

Use the simple-root form of Hensel lemma: if $F\in {\mathbb{Z}}_p[T]$ and $t_0\in {\mathbb{Z}}_p$ satisfy $F(t_0)\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}p)$ and $F^{\prime }(t_0)\not\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}p)$, there is a unique $t\in {\mathbb{Z}}_p$ with $F(t)=0$ and $t\equiv t_0(\mathrm{mod}p)$. More generally the same assertion holds over a complete discrete valuation ring, with its maximal ideal in place of $(p)$.

Every nonzero 3-adic number has a unique expressionIndeed its normalized P-adic valuation fixes $k$, and its unit residue modulo three fixes $ϵ$. Cubing is an automorphism on $\{1,-1\}$, so it remains to compute the cube map on the principal units.

For $t\in {\mathbb{Z}}_3$,Thus $U_1^3\subseteq U_2:=1+9{\mathbb{Z}}_3$. Conversely, given $1+9a\in U_2$, apply Hensel lemma toModulo three it is $T-a$, and $F^{\prime }(T)=1+6T+9T^2$ is always a unit. The residue root $a\mathrm{mod}3$ therefore lifts, giving $t$ with $(1+3t{)}^3=1+9a$. HenceThis is the cube map on 3-adic principal units. Introducing $T$ is essential: applying simple-root lifting directly to $X^3-u$ would fail because its derivative is divisible by three at every unit.

The map $1+3t\mapsto t\mathrm{mod}3$ induces an isomorphism $U_1/U_2\cong (\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},+)$, since multiplication adds the first principal-unit digits modulo three. The valuation factor contributes $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ independently, so the cube-class group of the 3-adic numbers isExplicit generators are the classes of $3$ and $4=1+3$. Representatives are $3^a{4}^b$ with $0\le a,b<3$. The class of $3$ is detected by valuation modulo three, and that of $4$ by its nonzero first principal-unit digit, so the two generators are independent.

Fix a non-Archimedean local field $K$, its valuation ring $R={\mathcal{O}}_K$, a uniformizer $\pi$, and a residue field with cardinality $q$. The construction below applies both in mixed and equal characteristic. A one-dimensional commutative formal group law is $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ with identity, associativity and commutativity, and $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ higher-degree terms. It has a unique formal inverse. Its morphisms are series $h(T)\in TR[[T]]$ with $h(F(X,Y))=G(h(X),h(Y))$; a unit linear coefficient makes such a morphism invertible by recursive coefficient comparison. Evaluating its integral series on the maximal ideal of a finite extension of $K$ is legitimate because the series converge there.

Choose a Lubin–Tate series $f(T)$ satisfyingA useful choice is $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$. The Lubin–Tate functional equation lemma constructs a unique series with any prescribed linear form $\ell$ and satisfyingHere is its coefficient argument. If terms below degree $d$ have been found, the unknown homogeneous degree-$d$ term appears with multiplier $\pi -{\pi }^d$. The already known error has every coefficient divisible by $\pi$: after reduction, the equation becomes $H(X{)}^q=H(X_1^q,\dots ,X_r^q)$, valid because the residue coefficients lie in ${\mathbb{F}}_q$. Since $\pi -{\pi }^d$ is $\pi$ times a unit for $d\ge 2$, the next term is uniquely determined and integral. Recursion proves existence and uniqueness.

Use $\ell =X+Y$ to construct $F_f$, and $\ell =aT$ to construct $[a{]}_f$ for every $a\in R$. Uniqueness gives $F_f(X,0)=X$ and $F_f(0,Y)=Y$. Comparing $[a{]}_f(F_f(X,Y))$ with $F_f([a{]}_f(X),[a{]}_f(Y))$, which satisfy the same functional equation and have the same linear form, proves that $[a{]}_f$ is an endomorphism of the law. The same uniqueness applied to three variables proves associativity: $F_f(F_f(X,Y),Z)$ and $F_f(X,F_f(Y,Z))$ have the same linear form and functional equation. It also proves commutativity and the identitiesThus this Lubin–Tate formal group is equipped with an action of the whole ring $R$, not only its integers. For a unit $a$, the inverse of $[a{]}_f$ is $[a^{-1}{]}_f$. The same recursion, with two series for the fixed $\pi$, gives a unique strict Lubin–Tate change of series. Its integral series and inverse converge on torsion points, so it identifies their torsion fields. We may compute with $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$ without losing the general construction for that uniformizer.

Write $f_0(T)=T$ and $f_n=f^{\circ n}$. The Lubin–Tate torsion of level $n$ isFor $n\ge 1$, its primitive points are the roots ofThis is a monic polynomial of degree $D_n=(q-1)q^{n-1}$. Modulo $\pi$ it is $T^{D_n}$, and its constant coefficient is exactly $\pi$. Thus the Eisenstein layers of Lubin–Tate torsion are Eisenstein polynomials. A root ${\lambda }_n$ generates a totally ramified extension of degree $D_n$, and has $v_K({\lambda }_n)=1/D_n$ in the uniquely extended valuation. Also $f_{n-1}({\lambda }_n{)}^{q-1}=-\pi \ne 0$, so it has exact level $n$.

The mapis well-defined and injective. If $a={\pi }^{r}u$ with $r<n$ and $u$ a unit, then $[a]{\lambda }_n=[u]f_r({\lambda }_n)\ne 0$, because $[u]$ is invertible and ${\lambda }_n$ is primitive. Conversely every multiple of ${\pi }^n$ kills it. The image therefore contains $q^n$ distinct roots of the degree-$q^n$ polynomial $f_n$, so it is all of ${\Lambda }_n$. This proves, without merely assuming the torsion cardinality,Its primitive generators are exactly $[a]{\lambda }_n$ with $a\in (R/{\pi }^{n}R{)}^{\times }$.

Define the Lubin–Tate extension $K_{\pi ,n}=K({\Lambda }_n)$. Every integral endomorphism series evaluated at ${\lambda }_n$ converges in the complete field $K({\lambda }_n)$, so all torsion points already lie there. HenceIt is the splitting field of $f_n$, which has $q^n$ distinct roots by the module calculation. Thus it is Galois. Every K-automorphism preserves the uniquely extended absolute value on a field, hence is continuous and commutes with limits of the integral endomorphism series. Its automorphisms therefore commute with the endomorphism action and send a primitive generator to a primitive generator. There is a unique unit class $a_{\sigma }$ such that $\sigma ({\lambda }_n)=[a_{\sigma }]{\lambda }_n$. The Lubin–Tate Galois action on primitive torsion gives an injective homomorphismBoth sides have order $D_n=(q-1)q^{n-1}$, so it is an isomorphism. In particular every finite layer is abelian and totally ramified.

For an example, take $K={\mathbb{Q}}_p$, $\pi =p$, and the equally admissible series $f(T)=(1+T{)}^p-1$. Its formal group law is the formal multiplicative group $F(X,Y)=X+Y+XY$, with $[a](T)=(1+T{)}^a-1$ for $a\in {\mathbb{Z}}_p$. The binomial polynomials make its coefficients integral. Its level-$n$ torsion points are $\zeta -1$ with ${\zeta }^{p^n}=1$. Thus the Lubin–Tate cyclotomic example gives $K_{p,n}={\mathbb{Q}}_p({\mu }_{p^n})$ and Galois action $\zeta \mapsto {\zeta }^a$. The order formula includes $p=2,n=1$, when the first field and its Galois group are trivial over ${\mathbb{Q}}_2$.

Finally choose primitive points compatibly, $[\pi ]{\lambda }_{n+1}={\lambda }_n$. They exist by taking a root of $f(T)-{\lambda }_n$ in the algebraic closure; its roots have positive valuation and exact level $n+1$. Then $K_{\pi ,n}\subseteq K_{\pi ,n+1}$, and restriction of Galois automorphisms corresponds to reduction of unit classes. The Lubin–Tate tower $K_{\pi }={\bigcup }_n{K}_{\pi ,n}$ consequently has the topological Galois groupThe final isomorphism uses completeness of the discrete valuation ring $R$. This computes the finite-layer and infinite-tower Galois groups directly from the formal action and the primitive Eisenstein polynomials.

For $Q=\phi (P)$, the local ring of a nonsingular curve at $Q$ is a discrete valuation ring. Choose a uniformizer $t$ there. The ramification index of a morphism of curves isEquivalently, ${\phi }^{\ast }t=u{z}^{e_P}$ for a local uniformizer $z$ at $P$ and a unit in a ring $u$. A different choice $t^{\prime }=vt$ changes its pullback by a unit in a ring, so the index is well-defined. This local definition applies also to inseparable morphisms; conclusions involving separability or tame ramification require those extra hypotheses.

A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian ring $D$ which is an integral domain, is an integrally closed domain, and has Krull dimension one. Explicitly, every ideal is finitely generated; every element of the fraction field that is an integral element over $D$ already belongs to $D$; and every nonzero prime ideal is a maximal ideal, with $D$ itself not a field.

With this convention, an equivalent local characterization is that $D$ is a Noetherian integral domain that is not a field and whose localization at a prime ideal $D_P$ is a discrete valuation ring for every nonzero prime ideal $P$. The integrally closed domain condition rules out singularities such as those represented by the subring $k[t^2,t^3]\subset k[t]$, where $t$ is integral but missing.

Some conventions also include fields by allowing Krull dimension at most one; the conclusions about ideals below remain valid under that convention.

For a discrete valuation ring $A$,Let $\pi$ be a uniformizer, so its unique nonzero maximal ideal is $\mathfrak{m}=(\pi )$. We use the defining description of a discrete valuation ring: it is a non-field local ring that is a principal ideal domain, and every nonzero element is $u{\pi }^n$ for a unit $u$ and an integer $n\ge 0$.

Every nonzero proper ideal is therefore $({\pi }^n)$ for some $n\ge 1$. Such an ideal is a prime ideal only when $n=1$: for $n\ge 2$, $\pi {\pi }^{n-1}\in ({\pi }^n)$ while neither factor belongs to $({\pi }^n)$. The ideal $(\pi )$ is prime because it is maximal. Also $(0)$ is prime because $A$ is an integral domain. Thusand the longest strict chain has length one.

The original PDF asks about a discrete valuation ring; the local TeX transcription's phrase “discrete variable $X$” is an extraction error.

First consider the preliminary cohomological facts. The exam's term flabby means flasque sheaf: every restriction map is surjective. For open sets $V\subseteq U$, lift a section of ${\mathcal{F}}_3(V)$ to ${\mathcal{F}}_2(V)$ using the given surjectivity when ${\mathcal{F}}_1$ is flasque. Extend that lift to $U$ using the flasque sheaf ${\mathcal{F}}_2$, then project to ${\mathcal{F}}_3(U)$. This proves that ${\mathcal{F}}_3$ is a flasque sheaf.

One construction of a flasque resolution starts with the sheaf ${\mathcal{C}}^0(\mathcal{F})(U)={\prod }_{P\in U}{\mathcal{F}}_P$, with pointwise restriction. It is a sheaf of abelian groups with surjective restrictions, and sending a section to all its germs embeds $\mathcal{F}$ in it. Repeating on the cokernels constructs an exact sequencewith each ${\mathcal{I}}^j$ flasque. Define sheaf cohomology by the cohomology of the cochain complex of global sections of such a resolution; the groups are independent of the chosen flasque resolution. If $\mathcal{F}$ is itself flasque, the quotient result just proved makes every successive cokernel flasque. Applying the assumed surjectivity of sections to each successive short exact sequence of sheaves proves exactness of the global-section complex in positive degrees. Thus $H^i(X,\mathcal{F})=0$ for $i>0$.

Now let $K=k(X)$ be the function field of the smooth algebraic curve. Its divisor class group isHere ${\nu }_P$ is the discrete valuation of the discrete valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,P}$, and $\mathrm{Prin}(X)$ consists of the principal divisor elements $\mathrm{div}(f)$. These sums have finite support: on a finite affine cover, represent $f$ as a fraction of regular functions; each nonzero numerator or denominator has only finitely many zeros on a curve, since a proper closed subset of a Noetherian one-dimensional irreducible space is finite.

For a divisor on an algebraic curve $D={\sum }_P{n}_{P}P$, define the line bundle associated to a divisor byIn this expression the valuation condition applies to nonzero $f$. If $t_P$ is a uniformizer, the stalk is $t_P^{-n_P}{\mathcal{O}}_{X,P}$. Shrinking around $P$ removes all other zeros and poles of $t_P$ and all other points in the support of $D$, so this also gives an actual local generator. Thus ${\mathcal{O}}_X(D)$ is a locally free sheaf of rank one. Multiplication gives an isomorphismon every stalk. If $D=\mathrm{div}(g)$, then ${\mathcal{O}}_X(D)=g^{-1}{\mathcal{O}}_X$, so the construction factors through a homomorphism $\mathrm{Cl}(X)\to \mathrm{Pic}(X)$.

It is injective: if ${\mathcal{O}}_X(D)$ is trivial, an isomorphism from ${\mathcal{O}}_X$ supplies a nonzero global rational generator $h$. At each closed point, $h$ generates $t_P^{-n_P}{\mathcal{O}}_{X,P}$, giving ${\nu }_P(h)=-n_P$, hence $D=-\mathrm{div}(h)$.

It is surjective: take a line bundle $\mathcal{L}$ and a nonzero rational section $s$, obtained by choosing a frame on any nonempty trivializing open set. If $e_i$ is a local frame, write $s=f_i{e}_i$ with $f_i\in K^{\ast }$. Since changes of frame are units, ${\nu }_P(f_i)$ is independent of the frame near $P$. A finite trivializing cover shows that these numbers have finite support. Set $D={\sum }_P{\nu }_P(f_i)P$. The map $f\mapsto fs$ gives ${\mathcal{O}}_X(D)\cong \mathcal{L}$, because at $P$ the condition ${\nu }_P(f)+{\nu }_P(f_i)\ge 0$ is exactly regularity of $fs$. Replacing $s$ by $gs$ changes $D$ by $\mathrm{div}(g)$, so this construction is well defined on classes. This proves the divisor class group and Picard group of a smooth curve identification

Put $\mathcal{Q}={\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$, the quotient in sheaves of abelian groups, where ${\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }$ is the sheaf of nonzero rational functions on an irreducible variety and ${\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$ is the sheaf of units of the structure sheaf. At a closed point, the discrete valuation induces an isomorphismThe kernel consists precisely of the units of the discrete valuation ring, and surjectivity follows by taking powers of a uniformizer.

A global section of $\mathcal{Q}$ is locally represented by nonzero rational functions. Since $X$ has a finite affine cover and is Noetherian, it is quasi-compact, so finitely many such representatives suffice. Each has only finitely many zeros and poles; consequently the valuations of the section define a finite divisor on an algebraic curve. A section with zero valuation at every closed point is zero in every stalk and therefore zero. This gives an injective mapIt is surjective as well. For $D={\sum }_P{n}_{P}P$, take a rational uniformizer $t_P$ at each point of its finite support. On a sufficiently small neighborhood of $P$, the function $t_P^{n_P}$ has the prescribed divisor there: remove the other points in its zero and pole set and the other support points of $D$. On the complement of the support use the rational function $1$. On overlaps these representatives have the same valuations at every point, so their ratios are units everywhere on the overlap, and their classes in $\mathcal{Q}$ agree. The sheaf gluing axiom now supplies a global section. ThusSince $X$ is irreducible, $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast })=K^{\ast }$. Under this identification the map to $\Gamma (X,\mathcal{Q})$ is $f\mapsto \mathrm{div}(f)$. Its image is exactly the group of principal divisor elements, and hence