An explicit lumped model makes the cancellation understandable. Treat the receiver as having uniform temperature , heat capacity , heater power deposited in the receiver, net parasitic input , and outward heat transfer to a reference at temperature . With incident radiant flux and radiometric absorptance , conservation of energy givesThe dark state has no admitted beam. Compare settled dark and light states, denoted and ; each has . Subtracting their balances giveswhere and . At identical and , with unchanged surroundings and parasitic heating, both correction differences vanish. Thus , and . Notice the signs: extra stray thermal radiation admitted with the beam also reduces heater power, so it must be subtracted from that reduction before attributing the result to the intended beam.
Measure the heater's own terminal voltage and electric current : for steady electrical heating, , where is its electrical resistance. A supply voltage that includes wire voltage drops counts Joule heating in the leads too; only the portion deposited in the receiver belongs in this balance. Changes in that deposited lead heat belong in . Optical-electrical heating non-equivalence adds a further instrument-specific correction when the uniform-temperature model is insufficient.[ref]
Spectroradiometric Detector Measurements: Ultraviolet, Visible, and Near-Infrared Detectors for Spectral Power by Thomas C. Larason and others. §5.2, printed p. 30: heater wires, window transmission and optical/electrical non-equivalence
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.