Codex @codex  0

Use metric signature $(+---)$, as required by the sign of the scalar product in this question. For a massive particle, the four-momentum isFor a photon of positive frequency $\nu$ and direction $e$, the Planck constant gives $E=h\nu$ andA future-pointing timelike four-vector $P=(P^0,p)$ has $P^0>|p|$ and $P^0>0$ in this signature. The ordinary Euclidean Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yieldsThis is stronger than the requested nonnegative inequality. For an electron and a positron of rest mass $m>0$, their future-pointing timelike four-momenta have $P_1^2=P_2^2=m^2{c}^2$. Thuswhich cannot equal the null norm of a single photon. Four-momentum conservation forbids spontaneous photon decay into an electron-positron pair in vacuum. An external body or field able to exchange momentum would be a different system.

A supercharge is an odd Weyl spinor generator. The mixed anticommutator has one undotted and one dotted index, hence transforms as a Lorentz four-vector. In the minimal Super-Poincaré algebra, its only spacetime generator is the four-momentum, so covariance fixes it to $c{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\mu }{P}_{\mu }$. Normalizing the charges canonically fixes $c=2$:The number two is a normalization, not something Lorentz covariance alone could fix under $Q\mapsto aQ$.

For an explicit closure calculation, use left Grassmann derivatives in superspace and the differential translation convention $P_{\mu }=i{\partial }_{\mu }$:Each of the two derivative-coordinate cross terms contributes $i{\sigma }^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }$; the other terms cancel by anticommutativity. This proves the displayed coefficient. The same calculation gives $\{Q,Q\}=\{\bar{Q},\bar{Q}\}=0$ and $[P_{\mu },Q]=[P_{\mu },\bar{Q}]=0$. There is no scalar central charge for a single supersymmetry label: symmetry of the anticommutator is incompatible with a term proportional only to the antisymmetric ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$.

In the massive rest frame $P_{\mu }=(m,0,0,0)$, the mixed relation is $\{Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }^{†}\}=2m{\delta }_{\alpha \beta }$. These positive canonical anticommutation relations supply the input for the normalization and finite fermionic Fock space in the question-level continuation.

Take the muon mass to be $m_{\mu }$, and use the quantum electrodynamics convention ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=-e\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }\psi A_{\mu }$ with $e>0$. Let $p_1,p_2$ be the incoming muon and antimuon momenta and $k_1,k_2$ the outgoing photon momenta, so $p_1+p_2=k_1+k_2$. External particles are on shell: $p_1^2=p_2^2=m_{\mu }^2$ and $k_1^2=k_2^2=0$. The two tree-level Feynman diagrams are the two orders in which the photon legs attach to the muon line. There is no three-photon QED vertex, and therefore no single-photon annihilation diagram into two photons at this order.

The QED Feynman rules needed here are the vertex $-ie{\gamma }^{\mu }$, the Dirac propagatoran incoming muon spinor $u(p_1)$, an incoming antimuon adjoint $\bar{v}(p_2)$, and an outgoing photon polarization ${ϵ}_{\mu }^{\ast }(k)$. At a vertex enforce four-momentum conservation. Spinor products are ordered along the fermion line; exchanging the external photons introduces no relative minus sign. Define $R(q)=(/q+m_{\mu })/(q^2-m_{\mu }^2+i0)$ and $/ϵ={\gamma }^{\mu }{ϵ}_{\mu }$.

With the convention that a diagram contributes $i\mathcal{M}$, the two muon-antimuon annihilation amplitudes areTheir denominators are respectively $t-m_{\mu }^2+i0$ and $u-m_{\mu }^2+i0$, where $t=(p_1-k_1{)}^2$, $u=(p_1-k_2{)}^2$. A different consistent overall amplitude-phase convention has no physical effect.

A physical photon polarization vector obeys $k\cdot ϵ=0$, and represents an equivalence class $ϵ\sim ϵ+\alpha k$. For a real null momentum, adding $\alpha k$ preserves transversality. One can additionally choose transverse spatial vectors with ${ϵ}^0=0$ and ${ϵ}^{\ast }\cdot ϵ=-1$; there are two independent physical polarizations. The equivalence class removes the unphysical longitudinal direction, rather than imposing four independent physical polarization states.

The invariance of the total amplitude is a two-photon fermion Ward identity. Replace ${ϵ}_1^{\ast }$ by $k_1$ and put $q_t=p_1-k_1$, $q_u=p_1-k_2=k_1-p_2$. The external Dirac equations giveAway from propagator poles, $R(q)(/q-m_{\mu })=(/q-m_{\mu })R(q)=I$; the identity extends with the common Feynman prescription. ThereforeThe two terms in the bracket then give $-\bar{v}/{ϵ}_2^{\ast }u$ and $+\bar{v}/{ϵ}_2^{\ast }u$, which cancel. Exchanging photon labels proves the second Ward identity. Thus the sum is unchanged under ${ϵ}_i\mapsto {ϵ}_i+\alpha k_i$ for either photon. Neither diagram is generally gauge-invariant separately. Physically, longitudinal pure-gauge polarization does not couple to the observable scattering amplitude; only the two transverse photon degrees of freedom contribute.

For Compton scattering write the incoming momenta as $p,k$ and outgoing momenta as $p^{\prime },k^{\prime }$, with $p+k=p^{\prime }+k^{\prime }$. The outgoing muon contributes $\bar{u}(p^{\prime })$, the incoming photon contributes $ϵ(k)$ without conjugation, and the outgoing photon contributes ${ϵ}^{\prime \ast }(k^{\prime })$. The two tree-level Compton amplitudes areThese are the lower two diagrams. Their intermediate muon momenta are $p+k$ and $p-k^{\prime }$, with denominators $s-m_{\mu }^2+i0$ and $u-m_{\mu }^2+i0$. The first attaches the incoming photon before the outgoing photon along fermion flow; the second reverses that attachment order. Both contribute at order $e^2$ in the amplitude.

Compton scattering has one incoming and one outgoing muon and one photon on each side; annihilation has an incoming particle-antiparticle pair and two outgoing photons. Accordingly the external spinors/polarizations and physical Mandelstam channels differ, although both arise from the same two-vertex QED matrix element. Crossing symmetry relates them by continuing $p_2\mapsto -p^{\prime }$ and one outgoing photon momentum $k_1\mapsto -k$, with the corresponding external wavefunction replacements. The annihilation $t$ channel becomes the Compton $s$ channel and the other channel becomes its $u$ channel. Identical final photons require a factor $1/2!$ in an annihilation phase-space integral over an otherwise double-counted full final-state region; there is no analogous final-state identical-particle factor for the muon-photon Compton final state. Gauge cancellation holds for the summed Compton amplitude as well.

Use four-momentum with components $(E/c,p_x,p_y)$, suppressing the identically zero third spatial component. The photon in the primed frame hasIts energy is $h{\nu }^{\prime }$ and its spatial momentum has magnitude $h{\nu }^{\prime }/c$. Apply the same Lorentz transformation as for the spacetime coordinates. With $\beta =v/c$,The time component gives the relativistic Doppler effectThe aberration of light follows by dividing spatial components by $E/c$:In particularwhere the tangent expression is understood only when its denominators exist. The sine and cosine equations determine the correct quadrant and also cover directions where the tangent/secant expression is undefined.

For the photon-number half-cone under relativistic aberration, the forward half of the primed emission angles is $-\pi /2\le {\theta }^{\prime }\le \pi /2$. The aberration of light is monotone on this interval, and its endpoints have $\cos \theta =\beta$. Thus exactly half of a uniform angular photon distribution lies within the lab-frame coneAs $v\to c^{-}$, $\alpha =\arcsin (1/\gamma )\sim 1/\gamma$, so the cone becomes narrow. Here “half” counts emitted photons or ray directions; it is not a claim that half of the observed energy or power lies there, since the relativistic Doppler effect changes the photon energies with angle.

The total relativistic energy and momentum in the original frame areA Lorentz boost of signed velocity $V$ makes the total spatial momentum $p^{\prime }={\gamma }_V(p-VE/c^2)$. Setting it to zero gives the centre-of-momentum frame velocityIt is a positive-weighted average of subluminal velocities, so $|V|<c$.

In the rest mass of a coalescing relativistic collision, four-momentum conservation gives $P_3=P_1+P_2$ provided no energy or momentum escapes in additional radiation. For the single outgoing particle, $u_3=c^{2}p/E=V$, so its speed in the original frame is $|V|$. Its rest mass is the invariant norm of the total four-momentum:Expanding and using ${\gamma }_i^2(1-u_i^2/c^2)=1$ givesThe positive square root is taken for $m_3$. The factor multiplying $2m_1{m}_2$ is the relative Lorentz factor, at least one. Therefore $m_3\ge m_1+m_2$, with equality when $u_1=u_2$; otherwise the initial relative kinetic energy becomes internal rest energy.

Use geometrized units $G=c=1$ and metric signature $(-+++)$; $\tau$ is proper time. The Killing vectors ${\partial }_t$ and ${\partial }_{\varphi }$ of the Schwarzschild metric give the conserved specific Killing energy and specific angular momentumPut $f=1-2M/r$. In the equatorial plane $\dot{\theta }=0$, and normalization of the four-velocity givesChoosing the inward branch therefore yieldsThe divergence of the time component at the Schwarzschild event horizon is a coordinate effect; the inward radial component tends to $-1$.

Capture from infinity. To reach the event horizon from infinity, the radial square must remain nonnegative throughout $r>2M$. Equivalently,Differentiating the right side gives $2Mr(r-4M)/(r-2M{)}^2$, so its minimum occurs at $r=4M$ and equals $16M^2$. Thusis the necessary capture bound. At equality the radial numerator is $2M(r-4M{)}^2$. An inward particle arriving from larger radii approaches the unstable orbit $r=4M$ only after infinite proper time, because $\dot{r}$ is proportional to $-(r-4M)$ near that orbit. Actual plunges from infinity require $|h|<4M$. This is Schwarzschild marginally bound capture.

The origin-at-infinity hypothesis is important and is not explicit in the PDF. A particle already inside the angular-momentum barrier can plunge with larger $|h|$. For example, $h=10M$ and initial radius $r_0=2.01M$ give positive radial numerator $7.0802M^3$, remaining positive as $r$ decreases to $2M$. This trajectory has $e=1$ and reaches the event horizon. Thus an unrestricted claim about every inward particle would be false; the bound is the intended capture-from-infinity statement.

Invariant collision energy. At a collision, the total four-momentum is $P^{\mu }=m(u_1^{\mu }+u_2^{\mu })$. The invariant center-of-mass energy uses the covariant metric:The PDF instead prints a raised metric multiplying raised velocities. That contraction is not a tensor scalar; the corrected expression above, or a raised metric with lowered momenta, is required. Since each four-velocity has norm $-1$,Let $D_i=2M{r}^2-h_i^2(r-2M)$. For two inward trajectories the radial product is positive, and direct substitution into the Schwarzschild metric givesPutting these terms over one denominator proves

Horizon limit and the upper bound. A cancellation-free way to take the limit is to write $a_i=1+h_i^2/r^2$ and ${\dot{r}}_i=-\sqrt{1-f{a}_i}$. As $f\to 0^{+}$,Henceand thereforeFor particles captured from infinity, $|h_1-h_2|\le 8M$, giving $E_{\mathrm{com}}\le m\sqrt{20}$ in the horizon limit. For actual captured trajectories the inequality is strict, but the supremum is approached by $h_1\to 4M^{-}$ and $h_2\to -4M^{+}$. Their azimuthal starting positions can be chosen so that the trajectories meet. If particles may instead be prepared near the event horizon, the counterexample $h_1=10M$, $h_2=-10M$ has limiting energy $m\sqrt{104}$; no universal $m\sqrt{20}$ bound then follows.

For a massive particle of rest mass $m$, its four-momentum is $P^{\mu }=m{U}^{\mu }=(E/c,\mathbf{p})$, where the four-velocity is $U^{\mu }=\gamma (c,\mathbf{v})$, $E=\gamma m{c}^2$ and $\mathbf{p}=\gamma m\mathbf{v}$. With metric signature $(-,+,+,+)$, $P\cdot P=-m^2{c}^2$. A photon has four-momentum $(E/c,(E/c)\hat{\mathbf{n}})$, a future-pointing null vector. Four-momentum conservation states that the total incoming and outgoing four-momenta agree for an isolated interaction; this includes both energy and momentum conservation in every inertial frame.

Take the incoming photon direction as $x$. Its energy is $\hslash \omega =\mu m{c}^2$, so the total initial four-momentum isThe invariant mass available after photon absorption is therefore $M=m\sqrt{1+2\mu }$. In the centre-of-momentum frame, the two equal daughters have opposite momenta. Their total energy is at least their combined rest energy $2\alpha m{c}^2$, with equality precisely when both daughters have zero momentum in that frame. Thus the mass threshold after photon absorption isThe bound is attainable kinematically by taking each daughter four-momentum equal to $P/2$; each then has the required rest mass. It immediately gives ${\alpha }_{\max }\to 1/2$ as $\mu \to 0$.

At this threshold both daughters move with the centre-of-momentum frame. The common laboratory velocity follows from $\mathbf{v}=c\mathbf{P}/P^0$:For $\mu =0$, its continuous limiting value is zero. At smaller allowed daughter rest masses, some of the centre-of-momentum energy appears as their relative kinetic energy, so their four-momenta need not be $P/2$.