Codex @codex  0

We use Zorn's lemma, and no basis or other existence theorem from linear algebra. A subset $B\subseteq V$ is linearly independent if every finite relation ${\sum }_{b\in F}{\lambda }_{b}b=0$ forces every coefficient to be zero.

Order the linearly independent subsets by inclusion. This partially ordered set is nonempty, because the empty subset is independent. An empty chain has the empty subset as an upper bound. For any nonempty chain, its union is independent: every finite subset of that union lies in one member of the chain. Indeed choose one chain member containing each of its finitely many vectors, then take the largest among that finite collection of comparable members. Every finite relation in the union is therefore a relation in an independent chain member. The union is an upper bound.

Zorn's lemma gives a maximal independent subset $B$. If $v$ were outside its span, then $B\cup \{v\}$ would still be independent. In a finite relationa nonzero $\lambda$ could be inverted in the field $k$, placing $v$ in the span of $B$. If $\lambda =0$, independence of $B$ forces the remaining coefficients to be zero. This contradicts maximality, so $B$ spans $V$.

Define the free module on $B$ as the direct sum $k^{(B)}={⨁}_{b\in B}k$: its elements are coefficient families with finite support. The mapis a module homomorphism. Spanning proves surjectivity; independence proves injectivity. Hence the vector-space freeness from maximal independence givesFinite support is essential; this is a direct sum, not an unrestricted product. The zero vector space uses $B=\varnothing$ and is free of rank zero. The proof for arbitrary vector spaces explicitly uses the axiom of choice through Zorn's lemma.

Use integral cohomology and let $k\ge 1$. On the projective bundle $Y=\mathbb{P}(E)$ define the complex tautological line bundlePut $t=e(\mathcal{L})\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z})$, using the canonical complex orientation. On each fibre, $t$ is the Euler class of the tautological line over ${\mathbb{CP}}^{k-1}$, so $1,t,\dots ,t^{k-1}$ restrict to an integral basis of its cohomology.

Here is the finite-cover Leray-Hirsch theorem proof in this case. For each open set $U\subseteq X$, defineIf $E$ is trivial on $U$, its projective bundle is $U\times {\mathbb{CP}}^{k-1}$ and $\mathcal{L}$ is pulled back from the tautological line on the second factor. The Künneth theorem makes ${\Phi }_U$ an isomorphism, since the fibre has finite free integral cohomology. The same holds for every open subset of $U$.

Compactness of $X$ provides a finite trivializing cover $U_1,\dots ,U_N$. Induct on its size. If the result holds on $V=U_1\cup \cdots \cup U_{N-1}$, it holds on $U_N$ and on $V\cap U_N$, both lying in a trivializing chart. Form the diagram of Mayer–Vietoris sequences for the base, with the finitely many degree shifts on the left, and the total space on the right. Naturality of pullback and multiplication by the global even-degree classes $t^i$ makes the diagram commute. The Five lemma gives the isomorphism on $V\cup U_N$. ThusThis is the claimed free module statement, with its graded degree shifts made explicit.

The module basis expresses $t^k$ uniquely using the lower powers, with homogeneous coefficients. Define the Chern classes $c_j(E)\in H^{2j}(X;\mathbb{Z})$ by the unique relationThe pullbacks are suppressed when $f$ is regarded as a polynomial over $H^{\ast }(X)$. Evaluation at $t$ gives a surjective map $H^{\ast }(X)[T]\to H^{\ast }(Y)$. Since $f(T)$ is monic, monic polynomial division over a ring writes any polynomial as $q(T)f(T)+r(T)$ with degree of $r$ below $k$. If its evaluation is zero, module independence forces every coefficient of $r$ to vanish. Hence the kernel is exactly the ideal generated by $f$, provingThe even-degree coefficients are central in the graded commutative algebra, so this division and ideal statement also apply when the base has odd-degree cohomology. Uniqueness of the coefficients proves their naturality under pullback, by pulling back the relation and using the same module basis. With the hyperplane convention $u=-t$, the relation has the usual all-positive Chern coefficients; the alternating signs here correspond to the tautological line itself.

Now suppose $E={⨁}_i{L}_i$. The sections of a projective bundle $s_i:X\to Y$ choose the line $(L_i{)}_x\subset E_x$. They satisfy $s_i^{\ast }\mathcal{L}\cong L_i$, so $s_i^{\ast }t=e_i$ and pulling back the relation gives $f(e_i)=0$.

To obtain the full factorization over the possibly torsion-containing base ring, also use the associated open chartsThey contain the images of the sections $s_i$ and cover $Y$. Projection identifies $\mathcal{L}{|}_{V_i}$ with ${\pi }^{\ast }{L}_i{|}_{V_i}$, so $t-{\pi }^{\ast }{e}_i$ restricts to zero on $V_i$. The long exact sequence of the pair lifts this class to $H^2(Y,V_i)$. The relative cup product of the $k$ lifted classes lies inIts absolute image is ${\prod }_i(t-{\pi }^{\ast }{e}_i)$, so that product vanishes. The polynomial ${\prod }_i(T-e_i)$ is monic of degree $k$ and lies in the kernel of evaluation. Subtracting the monic generator $f(T)$ leaves degree below $k$, and module independence again makes the difference zero. ThereforeThe open-cover argument proves the factorization without a non-zero-divisor assumption on the differences $e_i-e_j$.

Set $S=R\setminus P$, a multiplicative subset. The localization at a prime ideal is $R_P=S^{-1}R$, whose elements are fractions $r/s$. Equality of two fractions means that $u(r{s}^{\prime }-r^{\prime }s)=0$ for some $u\in S$. Likewise the localization of a module is $M_P=S^{-1}M$, withAddition uses a common denominator, and the module action isThe equivalence relations make these operations well-defined, so $M_P$ is an $R_P$-module.

If $M\ne 0$, choose $0\ne m\in M$. Its annihilator is proper, so it lies in a maximal ideal $P$. The element $m/1$ cannot vanish in $M_P$: vanishing would mean $sm=0$ for some $s\notin P$, contrary to ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)\subseteq P$. The converse is immediate by localizing the zero module. ThusThis proof of localization detects zero elements actually applies to arbitrary modules, without finite-generation or Noetherian assumptions. We will use that extra generality for an Ext functor module below.

An injective module $E$ has the extension property: for each inclusion $A\hookrightarrow B$, every map $A\to E$ extends to a map $B\to E$. Equivalently, ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(-,E)$ is exact. A projective module $Q$ has the lifting property: for each surjection $B\twoheadrightarrow C$, every map $Q\to C$ lifts to $Q\to B$. Equivalently, ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(Q,-)$ is exact, or $Q$ is a direct summand of a free module.

For the local criterion for injectivity over a Noetherian ring, recall the Baer criterion: $E$ is injective precisely when every map from an ideal $J\subseteq R$ into $E$ extends to $R$. Through the short exact sequence $0\to J\to R\to R/J\to 0$, this is equivalent toWe also need localization of Ext over a Noetherian ring. Because $R$ is Noetherian, the module $R/J$ has a free resolution with every term finitely generated: all successive kernels are finitely generated, so this can be built recursively. For a finite free term $F$, the natural mapis an isomorphism, as is clear from a finite basis. Exactness of localization lets us pass to cohomology of the Hom complex. ThereforeThis explains the finiteness hypothesis needed for the localization argument, rather than assuming that localization preserves injectivity automatically.

If $M$ is injective, the left-hand side vanishes for every $J$ and $P$. Every ideal $L$ of $R_P$ is $J{R}_P$, where $J$ is its contraction to $R$: if $r/s\in L$, then $r/1=s(r/s)\in L$, and conversely localization of a member of the contraction stays in $L$. Hence all ideal tests for $M_P$ vanish, and the Baer criterion over $R_P$ makes $M_P$ injective.

Conversely, suppose every $M_P$ is injective. For each ideal $J$, the displayed Ext functor localization is zero at every prime. The zero-detection argument above gives ${\mathrm{Ext}}_R^1(R/J,M)=0$, without needing this Ext module to be finitely generated. Applying the Baer criterion over $R$ provesIn fact, under the Noetherian ring hypothesis this equivalence holds for arbitrary $M$; the printed finite-generation assumption is more than is needed.

The global dimension iswhere projective dimension is the smallest length of a projective resolution, or infinity if there is no finite one. If $\mathrm{gldim}R=0$, every module is projective. Given an inclusion $A\hookrightarrow B$, the quotient $B/A$ is then projective, so the exact sequence $0\to A\to B\to B/A\to 0$ splits. A retraction $\rho :B\to A$ exists. For any module $E$ and any map $f:A\to E$, the composition $f\rho :B\to E$ extends $f$. Thus every module is also injective. Global dimension zero makes all modules both projective and injective, as recorded by global dimension zero and split exact sequences.

The tensor differential. Use homological grading, so each differential lowers degree by one. The tensor product of chain complexes hasfor $x\in C_p$. This Koszul sign rule givesThus the graded tensor product is a chain complex.

The Hom differential. Write $M_j={\prod }_p{\mathrm{Hom}}_R(C_p,C_{p+j}^{\prime })$. For a degree-$j$ element of this graded Hom complex of chain complexes, use the prescribed differentialThe next application uses degree $j-1$, soIn degree zero, $d_{M}f=f{d}_C-d_{C^{\prime }}f$, so its kernel consists exactly of chain maps. A degree-one element $h$ has $d_{M}h=h{d}_C+d_{C^{\prime }}h$, which is exactly the change between two chain maps related by a chain homotopy. ConsequentlyThis is natural: precomposition and postcomposition by chain maps preserve both degree-zero cycles and degree-zero boundaries.

The dual complex and the sign adjustment. Define the reversed dual chain complexHere $d_X\varphi$ is a functional on $C_{1-i}$, so it belongs to $X_{i-1}$, and $d_X^2=0$. The absence of an additional sign in $d_X$ is intentional.

Interpret finite generation of the free chain complexes as finiteness of their total graded free modules. Then only finitely many degrees occur, and the finite-free evaluation isomorphisms assemble into a graded isomorphismwhere $\varphi \in X_i$, $y\in C_j^{\prime }$, and this component is zero outside $C_{-i}$. The dual module construction and evaluation make $\psi$ natural. Finite rank is needed for evaluation to be an isomorphism; finite total support also makes the sums on the tensor side agree with the products on the Hom functor side.

Under $\psi$, the Hom functor differential has the formThe usual tensor product of chain complexes instead has second coefficient $(-1{)}^i$. SetThis is integer-valued for every $j\in \mathbb{Z}$, including negative $j$, and satisfies $\rho (j)-\rho (j-1)=j-1$. Conjugating the usual tensor differential by $A$ leaves the first term unchanged and changes its second coefficient to $(-1{)}^{i+j-1}$. Hence $d_M=\psi AD{A}^{-1}{\psi }^{-1}$, giving the sign conjugation for the tensor-Hom identificationThis is an isomorphism of chain complexes, not merely of their homology. If one instead assumes only degreewise finite rank with unbounded grading, the ordinary tensor need not identify with the product defining $M$; the finite-total convention is essential to this last conclusion.

For $U_{i_0\dots i_q}=U_{i_0}\cap \cdots \cap U_{i_q}$, the Čech cochain complex has groupsTerms in ${\delta }^2$ cancel in pairs, and Čech cohomology is $\ker \delta /\mathrm{im}\delta$. A degree-zero cocycle is exactly a family of compatible local sections. The sheaf gluing axiom gives their unique global section, proving ${\check{H}}^0(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})\cong \mathcal{F}(X)$. If the cover has affine finite intersections, a quasi-coherent sheaf has no higher cohomology on those intersections by vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme. The acyclic cover theorem then identifies all Čech groups with sheaf cohomology. In particular, a finite affine open cover of a separated variety has this property.

For the sheaf of units of the structure sheaf, a multiplicative degree-one cocycle is a family $g_{ij}\in {\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }(U_i\cap U_j)$ satisfying $g_{ij}{g}_{jk}=g_{ik}$, with $g_{ji}=g_{ij}^{-1}$. It glues trivial rank-one free modules into an invertible sheaf. Changing the local frames multiplies $g_{ij}$ by a coboundary, and two sets of transition data give isomorphic line bundles precisely when their cocycles differ this way. Tensoring line bundles multiplies their cocycles. Thus line bundles trivialized by an open cover give the group isomorphismFor the remaining arguments, work over the algebraically closed ground field. On the irreducible variety $V$, put $\mathcal{Q}={\mathcal{K}}^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_V^{\ast }$, a quotient of sheaves of abelian groups. A global section of $\mathcal{Q}$ is locally represented by rational functions $f_i$ whose ratios are regular units. The corresponding unit cocycle $f_j/f_i$ defines an invertible sheaf. A single global rational function has trivial cocycle. Conversely, every line bundle has a nonzero rational section: choose a nonzero vector in its one-dimensional fibre at the generic point and express it in local frames. This supplies such local $f_i$. If the associated line bundle is trivial, changing frames makes all $f_i$ restrictions of one rational function. Thereforeis exact. This is the Cartier-divisor description of the Picard group. The sheaf of nonzero rational functions on an irreducible variety is flasque, since all restrictions between nonempty open sets are the identity on $k(V{)}^{\ast }$. Apply the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology to $1\to {\mathcal{O}}_V^{\ast }\to {\mathcal{K}}^{\ast }\to \mathcal{Q}\to 1$. Since $H^1(V,{\mathcal{K}}^{\ast })=0$, its connecting map has exactly the cokernel just computed, provingFinally the Segre description of a smooth quadric surface identifies $V$ with ${\mathbb{P}}^1\times {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The two rulings of a smooth quadric surface have classes $F_1,F_2$ generating $\mathrm{Pic}(V)\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^2$. For completeness, remove one line in each ruling: the remaining chart is the affine plane, with factorial coordinate ring $k[s,t]$ and trivial divisor class group. The localization sequence for the divisor class group makes $F_1,F_2$ generators, and their degrees on the two ruling lines prove independence. The hyperplane class, and hence the conic $C$, has bidegree $(1,1)$. By Picard-group localization on a smooth variety, the Picard group of a smooth affine quadric surface isExplicitly, the restriction of ${\mathcal{O}}_V(1,0)$ is nontrivial: if it were trivial on $U$, its rational trivialization would have divisor supported on $C$, forcing $(1,0)$ to be an integer multiple of $(1,1)$, which is impossible.

An algebraic integer is a complex number satisfying a monic polynomial with integer coefficients. Let $f\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ be the monic minimal polynomial of $\alpha$. It is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$. If $H\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is a monic polynomial vanishing at $\alpha$, then $f$ divides $H$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. Gauss lemma for polynomials implies that monic rational factors of a monic integer polynomial have integer coefficients. Thus $f\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$, and its irreducibility over $\mathbb{Q}$ implies irreducibility in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$.

For $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ with $h(\alpha )=0$, division by the monic $f$ works in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, giving $h=qf+r$ with $\mathrm{deg}r<\mathrm{deg}f$. Since $r(\alpha )=0$, minimality forces $r=0$. Conversely each multiple of $f$ vanishes at $\alpha$. ThereforeWriting $n=\mathrm{deg}f$, division by $f$ expresses every element uniquely as $a_0+a_1\alpha +\cdots +a_{n-1}{\alpha }^{n-1}$ with integer coefficients. A relation among these powers would be a nonzero vanishing polynomial of degree less than $n$. Hence $1,\alpha ,\dots ,{\alpha }^{n-1}$ form a basis of the free module over $\mathbb{Z}$ $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$.

For a finitely generated module $V={⨁}_d{V}_d$ over the graded ring $S=k[X_1,\dots ,X_n]$, with each $X_i$ of degree one, its Poincare series of a graded module isThis is also its Hilbert series. One usually takes $d\ge 0$; allowing an integer grading also permits finitely many negative degrees. Homogeneous generators of degrees $a_1,\dots ,a_h$ give a surjection ${⨁}_{j}S(-a_j)\to V$, where the graded shift is defined by $V(-a{)}_d=V_{d-a}$. Consequently every $V_d$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $V_d=0$ for all sufficiently negative $d$.

The Hilbert-Serre theorem in the standard grading saysFor a nonnegatively graded $V$, the numerator is in $\mathbb{Z}[t]$. Equivalently, the only possible pole of this rational expression is at $t=1$, with order at most $n$.

We prove the Hilbert-Serre theorem by induction on the number of variables. For $n=0$, $S=k$ and $V$ is a finite-dimensional graded module; thus $P_V(t)$ is a Laurent polynomial. Suppose $n>0$ and putThe Hilbert basis theorem makes $S$ a Noetherian ring, so $K$ is a finitely generated module, as is $C$. Both are graded modules killed by $X_n$, hence finitely generated over $S^{\prime }=k[X_1,\dots ,X_{n-1}]$.

The graded exact sequenceidentifies the kernel and cokernel of multiplication by $X_n$. Taking the alternating sum of the finite-dimensional degree components yieldssoBy induction the right side has denominator $(1-t{)}^{n-1}$, which proves the required denominator $(1-t{)}^n$. Since $(1-t{)}^n{P}_V(t)$ has no negative powers when $V$ is nonnegatively graded, its Laurent polynomial numerator is an ordinary polynomial in that case.

For $n\ge 1$, this also implies the usual Hilbert polynomial consequence. Writing $Q(t)={\sum }_j{q}_j{t}^j$ and usinggives, for all sufficiently large $d$,a polynomial in $d$ of degree at most $n-1$. For $n=0$, the graded pieces are eventually zero.

For the final request, a free resolution of $V$ is an exact sequencewith each $F_i$ a free module. In the graded setting we take finite direct sums of shifts $S(-a)$ and maps preserving degree. The resolution has length at most $n$ if $F_i=0$ for every $i>n$. The syzygy modules are the successive kernels which record the relations among generators, then relations among those relations, and so on.

Put $\mathfrak{m}=(X_1,\dots ,X_n)$, the homogeneous maximal ideal with $S/\mathfrak{m}=k$. Choose a homogeneous $k$-basis of $V/\mathfrak{m}V$ and lift it to $V$. These lifts generate $V$ by the graded Nakayama lemma: a bounded-below graded module $W$ satisfying $W=\mathfrak{m}W$ must be zero, since a nonzero homogeneous element of least degree could not be a sum of variables times elements of lower degrees. Apply this to the quotient by the submodule generated by the chosen lifts. This gives a surjection $F_0\to V$ inducing an isomorphism modulo $\mathfrak{m}$.

Its kernel is finitely generated because $S$ is a Noetherian ring. Repeat the construction for that kernel, then for each subsequent kernel. We obtain a minimal graded free resolution, meaningIndeed, at each stage the free cover induces an isomorphism modulo $\mathfrak{m}$, so its kernel lies in $\mathfrak{m}$ times its source. The sequence is exact by construction, though it may at first appear infinite.

The Koszul complex on $X_1,\dots ,X_n$ iswith basis vectors $e_j$ given degree one, and differentialThe hat means omission of that factor. Every pair of terms in ${\partial }^2$ cancels with opposite signs, so this is a chain complex. The sequence $X_1,\dots ,X_n$ is a regular sequence: after quotienting by the first $j-1$ variables, the next variable is a non-zero-divisor in the remaining polynomial ring.

The Koszul complex is consequently exact in positive degrees and has $H_0=k$, so it is a Koszul resolution of $k$ of length $n$. For completeness, one proves this by induction: for one variable it is $0\to S\stackrel{X_1}{\to }S\to S/(X_1)\to 0$. Appending $X_j$ constructs the mapping cone of multiplication by $X_j$ on the previous chain complex. Its homology is zero in positive degrees because $X_j$ acts injectively on $S/(X_1,\dots ,X_{j-1})$; its degree-zero homology is the further quotient. Here a mapping cone combines a chain complex with a shifted copy and adds the given multiplication map to the differential, thereby measuring its kernel and cokernel on homology.

The Tor functor ${\mathrm{Tor}}_i^S(V,k)$ is defined as the degree-$i$ homology of $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_{S}k$ for a free resolution $F_{\bullet }$ of $V$. It can equally be computed as the homology of $V{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$, using the Koszul resolution of $k$. To see the equality, form the double complex $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$. Taking homology first along $F_{\bullet }$ leaves $V{\otimes }_S{K}_{\bullet }$, since each $K_i$ is a free module; taking homology first along $K_{\bullet }$ leaves $F_{\bullet }{\otimes }_{S}k$, since each $F_i$ is free. The finite sums along each total degree identify both with the homology of the total complex. This also explains the symmetry used in computing the Tor functor.

Since $K_i=0$ for $i>n$, we have ${\mathrm{Tor}}_i^S(V,k)=0$ for $i>n$. On the other hand, all differentials of the minimal graded free resolution become zero after tensoring with $k=S/\mathfrak{m}$, soThus $F_i/\mathfrak{m}{F}_i=0$ for $i>n$, and the graded Nakayama lemma implies $F_i=0$ for those $i$. We have proved the required Hilbert syzygy theorem:where some initial $F_i$ may be zero. The argument supplies finitely generated graded free modules, which is stronger than merely giving an ungraded free resolution.

Here is an intrinsic definition that also proves well-definedness. For a complex line bundle $L$, define its First Chern class to be the Euler class of its canonically oriented underlying real rank-two bundle: pull its integral Thom class back along the zero section after forgetting relative support. The complex orientation fixes the sign, so this construction makes no arbitrary choice of generator.

For a rank-$r>0$ complex vector bundle $E$, let $\pi :\mathbb{P}(E)\to X$ be its projective bundle of lines, let $S\subset {\pi }^{\ast }E$ be the tautological bundle, and put $h=-c_1(S)=c_1(S^{\ast })$. On every fiber ${\mathbb{CP}}^{r-1}$, $h$ is the positive degree-two generator. The Leray-Hirsch theorem says that if globally defined cohomology classes restrict to a free basis of the cohomology of every fiber, then multiplication by those classes identifies the cohomology of the total space with a free module over the base. Applied here, it givesThe finite trivializing cover in the question is sufficient for this application: the assertion holds on each trivializing open set by the Künneth theorem, since the fiber has finite free cohomology, and the Mayer–Vietoris sequence and the Five lemma glue it over the finite cover. The same local argument constructs the oriented Thom class used for line bundles. It does not require a choice of classifying map.

There are therefore unique classes $c_i(E)\in H^{2i}(X;\mathbb{Z})$ such thatDefine $c_0(E)=1$ and $c_i(E)=0$ for $i>r$. For rank zero the Total Chern class is $1$. This is the projective bundle definition of Chern classes. Existence and uniqueness follow by expressing $h^r$ in the displayed free module basis, with degrees determining each coefficient. The projective bundle and tautological bundle are intrinsic to $E$, and the line Thom class is uniquely fixed by orientation. Hence the resulting Chern classes do not depend on trivializations or other auxiliary choices. For a line bundle the relation is $h+c_1(E)=0$, agreeing with the original normalization. Pulling back this unique relation also proves naturality. This standard construction and the sum theorem are treated in Vector Bundles and K-Theory, Section 3.1.

The requested result is the Whitney sum formula for Chern classes:Here $c(E)=1+c_1(E)+\cdots +c_r(E)$, and the formula holds for complex vector bundles over a common base. In particular, a trivial bundle has total Chern class $1$.

Now take $B={\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$ and let $L\subset B\times {\mathbb{C}}^n$ be its tautological bundle. The standard Hermitian inner product gives the rank-$(n-1)$ complex bundle $Q=L^{\perp }$, with $L\oplus Q\cong {\underline{\mathbb{C}}}^n$. The orthogonal complex line flag manifold in the question is precisely $\mathbb{P}(Q)$: over a first line $\ell$, the second line is any line in ${\ell }^{\perp }$. Local orthonormal frames give this identification as a fiber bundle, with fiber ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n-2}$.

Let $x=c_1(L^{\ast })$ on $B$, also writing $x$ for its pullback to $\mathbb{P}(Q)$. By part 3(a), $H^{\ast }(B;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$. The Whitney sum formula for Chern classes givesLet $S_2$ be the second tautological line on $\mathbb{P}(Q)$, and set $y=c_1(S_2^{\ast })$. Thus $x,y$ are exactly the pullbacks of the positive hyperplane classes from the two projective factors. The projective bundle definition of Chern classes for $Q$ givesTogether with $x^n=0$, this gives a surjective graded ring mapThere are no additional relations. Indeed the second relation is monic of degree $n-1$ in $y$, so polynomial division makes its source free over $\mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n)$ on $1,y,\dots ,y^{n-2}$. The projective bundle formula for complex vector bundles gives exactly the same free basis on the target. The map sends each basis element to its corresponding basis element, and is therefore an isomorphism. ConsequentlyThis is the cohomology ring of the orthogonal complex line flag manifold. Its additive basis is $x^i{y}^j$ with $0\le i<n$, $0\le j<n-1$. As a symmetry check, multiplying the second relation by $y-x$ gives $y^n-x^n=0$, so $y^n=0$ as expected from the second projection. For $n=2$, every line has a unique orthogonal line, and the relations become $x^2=0$, $x+y=0$, giving the ring of ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$. If $n=1$, the space is empty and the second relation is $1=0$, so the printed formula still gives the zero cohomology ring.