A strictly diagonally dominant matrix or a real symmetric positive-definite matrix guarantees convergence of the Gauss-Seidel method from every initial vector. These are sufficient conditions.[ref]
For strict diagonal dominance, put
Induct through a sweep. Old coordinates have absolute error at most ; previously updated coordinates have absolute error at most . The component update and the triangle inequality therefore bound the new error by . This proves , a maximum norm contraction.
For a symmetric positive-definite matrix, write . The Householder-John theorem applies to and , because is a positive-definite matrix. Hence the iteration matrix has spectral radius less than one, which gives the convergence criterion for a stationary iteration.
There is also a geometric reason fresh updates help: the Gauss-Seidel method is exact coordinate descent on the convex quadratic function
Holding the other coordinates fixed, minimizing in coordinate gives the corresponding row update. A change lowers by exactly . Each fresh coordinate is therefore the minimizer for the current vector, and a complete sweep lowers the quadratic form error unless every coordinate already solves its row. This explains the method's beauty without implying monotone decrease in every vector norm.
An invertible matrix and nonzero diagonal entries make the update well defined, but do not guarantee convergence. For the original linear system
the Gauss-Seidel method updates and . Starting at zero gives , then . The second-coordinate forward error is , and the iteration matrix has spectral radius . The linear system has a unique solution while this particular stationary iterative method for a linear system diverges.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.