Every ideal class of this real quadratic number field contains an integral ideal of ideal norm at most , by the diamond form of the Minkowski convex body theorem. The only possible norms are one, two and three. The sole prime ideal above two has norm two and is principal, generated by , whose field norm is two. The prime three is inert, since is irreducible modulo three, so there is no ideal of norm three. Every class therefore has a principal small representative, and the ideal class group is trivial.
This illustrates why the small-ideal bound can prove a class number without listing arbitrary ideals: only prime ideals of a few possible norms need to be tested. Real quadratic fields require the absolute field norm; the generator here happens to have positive norm.
Let be the Minkowski embedding of a number field applied to a nonzero fractional ideal. Under the metric , its covolume is . For ordinary coordinate Lebesgue measure , its covolume is instead . Here is the field discriminant, and the absolute norm of a fractional ideal is positive and multiplicative. The formula follows by taking the embedding determinant of an integral basis, then using the index of an integral ideal and scaling to handle a fractional ideal.
Let denote the field discriminant, and put . Let be the number of real field embeddings and the number of conjugate pairs of nonreal field embeddings, so . The Minkowski bound for ideal classes provides a nonzero integral ideal satisfying
Rearranging gives the Minkowski lower bound for a number-field discriminant
Because and , this is at least
Apply the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality to :
It follows that
where for was used. Thus
The source writes . If denotes the embedding determinant, its square is ; if it denotes the field discriminant, the displayed result also implies the stated inequality. The conclusion therefore does not depend on that notational convention.
To compute the Ideal class group of Q of square root thirty-five, put . The ring of integers of a quadratic field formula gives , and the field discriminant is . Both field embeddings are real, so the Minkowski bound for ideal classes is
Every ideal class therefore has an integral ideal representative of ideal norm at most five. By prime ideal factorization and multiplicativity of the ideal norm, the ideal class group is generated by prime ideals of ideal norm at most five.
Apply the Dedekind factorization theorem to . At two and five it has a repeated linear factor, giving
At three, has no root, so itself is a prime ideal of ideal norm nine, outside the bound. These are all the relevant prime ideals: a prime ideal of ideal norm four would have to lie above two with residue degree two, but the factorization above two has only the single factor of degree one. Consequently and generate, and each has order of a group element dividing two.
The algebraic integer has field norm . It belongs to both and . Hence its principal ideal is contained in . Both have ideal norm ten, so
It follows that , and the ideal class group is generated by one element of order of a group element at most two.
Finally, is not a principal ideal. If with , the equality of ideal norm and absolute field norm would imply
Modulo five this requires or , whereas squares modulo five are . Thus , proving
This computes the ordinary ideal class group, with no positivity restriction on generators.
Let . The polynomial is Eisenstein at three, so the number field has degree of a field extension three. Use the permitted ring of integers , whose integral basis is . The field traces , , , and give
There is one real field embedding and one conjugate pair of nonreal field embeddings. The Minkowski bound for ideal classes is therefore
Every ideal class has an integral ideal representative of ideal norm at most four, so it is enough to show that every prime ideal of ideal norm at most four is a principal ideal.
Modulo two,
where the quadratic factor is an irreducible polynomial over the finite field . The Dedekind factorization theorem gives
Now
Thus , by containment and equality of ideal norms, and cancellation in the second identity gives . This explicitly handles the prime ideal of ideal norm four, as well as the one of ideal norm two.
Modulo three the polynomial is , so
These exhaust the prime ideals of ideal norm at most four. Every bounded representative factors into the listed principal ideals, and hence is a principal ideal. Therefore the Class group of Q of cube root of three is
Put and . The ring of integers is , and the fundamental discriminant is . For a reduced positive definite binary quadratic form of discriminant , reduction gives
The coefficient is even; checking and , with the usual nonnegative sign choice at boundary equalities, leaves precisely
The correspondence between proper quadratic forms and ideal classes therefore gives . All four classes equal their inverses, since inversion replaces by . Hence
The three nontrivial classes may be represented by the ramified prime ideals , and . They square to principal ideals and satisfy . None is principal: an integral generator of norm , or would require to equal that number, which is impossible. The relation then makes the three classes distinct, consistently with the four-form calculation.
Consider
The three rational square classes are independent, so . Their radical product is , so and ; the extension is abelian. To verify that it is unramified, rather than assuming that radical adjunctions are harmless at , use the conductor-discriminant formula. The seven quadratic subfields have fundamental discriminants
The formula gives
The discriminant tower identity now gives
Thus the relative discriminant is the unit ideal and no finite prime ramifies. The base has no real places, so there is no infinite ramification to check. This unramified abelian degree-four extension has degree , and part (i) proves
This is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus thirty.
Next translate prime representation into an ideal class. For , we claim
If a representation exists, lies in and has . The integral ideal has norm , so it is a prime ideal . Its class is . Conversely, if , the product is principal, say . Since this ideal lies in , its generator has the form with integers . Taking norms gives , proving the reverse implication. This is prime representation via an ideal class, and it proves sufficiency as well as necessity.
Identify the required class in through the Artin map. We can use the explicit representation : has norm , so the prime above obtained from has class . Its Frobenius in the multiquadratic extension acts on the three radicals with signs
Their product is one, so this automorphism fixes . Because is abelian, for any unramified rational prime that splits in , the Frobenius at either prime of of norm is its rational Frobenius restricted to . The Artin isomorphism therefore makes the required class condition equivalent to
Conversely, these signs already imply splitting in , since their product is . No extra splitting condition is missing.
The supplementary law for , quadratic reciprocity for and , and then the Chinese remainder theorem turn these sign conditions into
Their four simultaneous residue classes modulo are . Finally, is represented by , whereas and cannot be represented: gives a value at least , and gives twice a square. We have proved the complete criterion
Since , the ring of integers is with discriminant . Write and . Reduction of modulo two gives a double root, and modulo five gives the roots . Thus , , and . Directly , since . The element belongs to and and has field norm ten, so equality of ideal norms gives
The Minkowski bound is , so every ideal class contains an integral ideal of ideal norm at most five. Three is inert and gives no prime ideal of ideal norm three; ideals of ideal norm four are , principal. Thus the class group is generated by , and the displayed relations make every class either trivial or . The class is nontrivial: a generator would have field norm , but would give or , neither a quadratic residue. Hence the class number is two.
The unit has field norm . To show it is fundamental, suppose is a positive real embedding of a unit . Its conjugate is , so is a positive integer less than two. Thus , and forces . Only is greater than one, contrary to the strict inequality. Therefore no smaller unit exceeds one. Multiplying any positive unit by a suitable power of puts it in , proving that all units are .
An element of field norm has principal ideal or by prime ideal factorization. The first is generated by ; the second by , of field norm . Two generators of the same principal ideal differ by a unit. Therefore all, and only, the integer solutions are
The two displayed signs are independent; multiplication by a norm-minus-one unit exchanges the two field norm signs.
The ideal class group of a number field is the group of nonzero fractional ideals of its ring of integers under multiplication, modulo the subgroup of principal fractional ideals. For degree and pairs of complex embeddings, the Minkowski bound for ideal classes states that each class contains an integral ideal with
There are only finitely many integral ideals of bounded ideal norm: as sublattices of the free abelian group of integers, they have bounded index, and finitely many subgroups have any fixed index. Thus the ideal class group is finite.
Choose a nonzero integral ideal in the inverse of any desired ideal class. For the nonzero element supplied by the norm bound, is integral, belongs to the desired class and satisfies
There are only finitely many integral ideals of bounded norm: identify with as an additive group, so ideals of norm are among its subgroups of index , of which there are finitely many. Since every ideal class has one of these bounded-norm representatives, the ideal class group is finite.
Here a divisor is a modulus of a number field, rather than an arbitrary real-weighted divisor. Write
where is a nonzero integral ideal, the finite multiplicities are nonnegative integers, and is a set of real Archimedean places. The multiplicity of a place in a modulus is at the finite place corresponding to , is at a real place in , and is at every other infinite place. In particular complex places have multiplicity .
Let be the group of nonzero fractional ideals prime to . Put
Let consist of the principal ideals with . The generalized ideal class group is the ray class group
Let be the unit group, let be the group of ray units, and define the residue and signature group of a modulus
The first factor is omitted when . There is a group homomorphism recording the unit's finite residues and its signs. Its kernel is .
Let consist of all principal fractional ideals prime to , and put . The two short exact sequences are
and
For the first short exact sequence, weak approximation for number fields realizes every choice of finite unit residues and real signs by some prime to . Send that data to the class of in . Changing without changing its residues and signs multiplies it by an element of , so the map is well-defined. Its kernel consists exactly of data arising from units: if with , then . This gives . For the second short exact sequence, forget the ray conditions. Its kernel is , and weak approximation for number fields gives a representative prime to for every ideal class. These are the two parts of the ray class exact sequence.
For , the ring of integers of a quadratic field is . The finite modulus is trivial and both real places occur, so is the narrow ideal class group and . The two field embeddings send to and . The given unit is positive at both places, since ; the unit is negative at both. Thus the unit signature map has image
The given ideal class group has order . The second short exact sequence therefore gives
To determine the group structure, retain the ideal that generates the ordinary ideal class group. We have : all generators , and lie in , while
puts in . Since is totally positive, in the narrow ideal class group. Its image in the ordinary ideal class group is nontrivial, so has order exactly .
The class of the principal ideal is a nontrivial element of . Its two signs are , and multiplying by a unit can only reverse both signs or neither, so no generator of this ideal is totally positive. Its square is , which does have a totally positive generator. Thus is another element of order , distinct from because its ordinary ideal class is trivial. These two elements are independent and generate all four classes. Consequently
The nontrivial ordinary ideal class already has a lift of order , so the extension in the second short exact sequence splits; it cannot be cyclic of order .
Write . The field trace gives a nondegenerate -bilinear trace pairing
The inverse different, or codifferent, is the trace-dual lattice
It contains , because the trace of an element integral over belongs to the integrally closed ring . It is stable under multiplication by : if and , then . Nondegeneracy of the trace pairing and finite generation of show that this trace dual is a finitely generated -module spanning . Therefore it is a fractional ideal of .
Its inverse
is the different ideal. Since , every such lies in ; hence is an integral ideal of .
The discriminant ideal is locally generated by
where is a local -basis of . Equivalently, it is the image of the determinant of the trace pairing
This formulation makes the definition independent of a basis, since changing a basis multiplies its discriminant by the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix.
The asserted identity of ideals can be checked after localization at every nonzero prime ideal of . We may therefore assume that is a discrete valuation ring and choose a basis of . Let be its trace-dual basis, so ; this is a basis of . If , then
Thus the determinant measuring the inclusion is . The determinant description of the norm of a fractional ideal consequently gives
Localization then proves the equality over the original Dedekind domain.
Finally, the determinant-of-pairing map identifies the invertible -module with the discriminant ideal. Hence in the ideal class group
up to the harmless inverse caused by the convention used to identify invertible modules with fractional ideals. In either convention the class is a square.
Distinct prime-power ideals are pairwise comaximal. For comaximal ideals, product equals intersection, so induction gives
The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives the ring isomorphism
The ideal approximation theorem, proved by applying this Chinese-remainder map one prime power deeper, supplies
Equivalently, at every prime dividing .
Since , the fractional ideal
is an integral ideal and is a principal ideal. At every ,
, so .
Choose and with . Then
. For any ,
Thus
so every ideal of has a generating set of two elements.
Minkowski convex body theorem states that a centrally symmetric convex measurable subset of with volume greater than times the covolume of a full Euclidean lattice contains a nonzero lattice point. The equivalent closed-boundary form follows by compactness for compact convex bodies.
The set is centrally symmetric. It is convex because for , the triangle inequality gives . It is a diamond of area . For the embedded nonzero integral ideal , the given covolume is . Hence Minkowski convex body theorem applies when
For the resulting nonzero , write , . Then
Decrease to . A fixed slightly larger diamond contains only finitely many lattice points, so one nonzero recurs along a sequence of such values. Passing to the limit proves
Given a target ideal class , choose an integral ideal in . Since , the ideal is integral, belongs to , and has ideal norm
For , every ideal class thus has an integral representative of norm at most . The only possibilities are norms one, two or three. The prime two ramifies, giving the unique ideal of norm two . The element has field norm , so , making it principal. The prime three is inert because is an irreducible polynomial; its prime ideal has norm nine, so there is no ideal of norm three. Every possible small representative is principal, proving class number one for Q square root of fourteen. Therefore
Work in , since . First must be odd: if it were even, coprimality would make odd, so , which cannot be an odd power for . Thus is odd too. Also no odd prime can divide both and . Such a prime does not divide , and square-freeness of gives , whereas is divisible by . Hence .
Put . Suppose a prime ideal divides both and , and let be the rational prime below it. It then contains and . The case is impossible because is odd. If is odd, the first inclusion gives , and makes nonzero in the residue field. The second inclusion therefore gives , so , contradicting the previous paragraph. Thus and are coprime ideals. In particular they generate the unit ideal, the precise meaning of coprimality here; no unique factorization of elements is assumed.
Their product is . Unique prime ideal factorization and disjoint prime support imply for an integral ideal . In the ideal class group, . Since does not divide the class number, Lagrange's theorem forces . Write . Equality of the principal ideals gives . The only units are , since a unit satisfies and . Both signs are th powers for odd , so they can be absorbed into the generator:
Apply the class-number obstruction from a ramified odd exponent. For the equation with and , compare the coefficients of in this identity. The coefficient on the right is
Its term is divisible by , and every term contains a factor , so the whole coefficient is divisible by . The coefficient on the left is one, a contradiction. Thus there are no positive integer solutions under the stated class-number and divisibility assumptions.
Finally,
The integer is square-free, is two modulo four, and is divisible by three. If its imaginary quadratic class number were not divisible by three, the preceding result with would prohibit this solution. Consequently
Choose a nonzero integral ideal whose class is ; one can multiply the fractional inverse by a suitable nonzero integer to obtain such a . By the given bound choose with . Put . Since , multiplication by makes an integral ideal. Its class is , and multiplicativity of ideal norms gives
This proves the class representative bound without accidentally constructing a representative of the inverse class instead.
To determine the Ideal class group of Q of square root minus thirty-four, write . The given integral basis has discriminant , so the imaginary-quadratic bound is . Every class therefore has a representative of ideal norm at most seven, and factoring such representatives shows that the ideal class group is generated by prime ideals of ideal norm at most seven.
Two ramifies: let , with . Three is inert because is irreducible modulo three, so its prime ideal ideal norm is nine and supplies no small generator. At five and seven the roots are , so the primes of ideal norm five and seven are conjugate pairs. Set and . Their conjugates have inverse ideal classes. No new prime ideal has ideal norm four, since the only prime above two has residue degree one; six is not a prime power. Thus generate the ideal class group.
The element field norms and , together with reduction at the split primes, give
The ideal norm products verify both exponents. Consequently and , so the whole group is generated by and its order divides four. The class is not trivial: a generator would be an element of the ring of integers of field norm two, but has no integer solution. Since , its order is exactly two. Hence has order four and
For integral solutions of x squared minus two equals y cubed, the equation implies , so . If were even, then would be even and would be two or six modulo eight, whereas would be zero modulo eight. Thus and are odd. Also : otherwise , which is not a cubic residue modulo nine. Reducing modulo three then gives . Consequently
Put and . Its field norm is . The principal ideals and are coprime. Indeed a common prime ideal has underlying rational prime dividing . The displayed gcd excludes two and three, so both two and are invertible modulo that prime ideal. The difference therefore implies , contradicting .
Their product is , so unique factorization of ideals in a number field and coprimality imply for an integral ideal . In the given ideal class group of order two, implies . Hence with integers . Equality of principal ideals gives . The only units are , and both are cubes, so the sign can be absorbed into . Taking norms, and using , gives
The coefficient of gives . Eliminating with the field norm identity yields
The denominator is nonzero for integral . Polynomial division makes the integrality obstruction especially clear:
If is integral, the reciprocal must be an integer, forcing . The only integral possibility is . Then , the field norm gives , and the real coefficient in the cube gives . Both pairs directly satisfy the original equation. Therefore all integral solutions are
ideals are coprime when , equivalently for some , . Always . If , then , giving in the coprime case. For nonzero integral ideals, the Chinese remainder theorem gives , and taking finite cardinalities yields .
For a nonzero prime ideal, the chain of finite-index inclusions gives
by the given hypothesis. Distinct nonzero prime ideals are maximal and coprime, as are their positive powers. Unique factorization of ideals in a number field therefore gives . Exponents add under ideal multiplication, proving multiplicativity for arbitrary nonzero integral ideals. This is the standard domain of the finite ideal norm used here.
For the Dedekind factorization theorem, choose an integral primitive element of with monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element , and assume the rational prime does not divide the index . Factor
over , with distinct monic irreducible factors. For integer polynomial lifts , the distinct prime ideals above are , and
Thus the residue degree is , the ramification index is , and . The index restriction is essential to this direct factorization formula.
For , the ring of integers is , so the index is one and the theorem applies to every prime. Modulo two, , giving one prime ideal of ideal norm two. For an odd rational prime, a prime ideal has ideal norm if the polynomial splits, and ideal norm if it is irreducible. In the former case the supplied condition forces or ; in the latter case every odd square is one modulo eight. Consequently
The odd part of any ideal norm is thus one or three modulo eight, because . Multiplication by a power of two leaves possible residues for exponent zero, for exponent one, for exponent two, and for exponent at least three. Hence for every nonzero integral ideal.
The product of ideals consists of finite sums with , . Ideal divisibility means for an integral ideal ; in this ring it is equivalent to . The ideal norm is , equivalently its additive lattice index.
If the prime ideal divides but does not divide , choose . For every , , so primality gives . Thus , proving .
Every nonzero proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal , which is prime. Then , so . Norm multiplicativity gives because . Induction on the positive integer gives a prime-ideal factorization, ending at norm one. For uniqueness, a prime in one factorization divides some prime in the other. Every nonzero prime ideal is maximal, since its quotient is a finite integral domain and hence a field. The two primes therefore coincide. Cancel that common factor using the permitted cancellation law, and continue. This proves uniqueness up to order.
The finite additive group has order , so that integer annihilates the class of . Therefore
In particular an ideal of norm contains . Such ideals correspond to certain additive subgroups of the finite group , so there are finitely many. Finiteness of these quotients follows from an integral basis; a nonzero ideal contains a nonzero principal ideal, whose index is the absolute field norm of its generator.
For the computation put . The Kummer-Dedekind theorem says that when does not divide the power-basis index, a factorization gives , with each factor having norm . The given full power basis has index one. Since and ,
Here and . A prime ideal dividing an ideal of norm lies above or , and these are all the prime ideals above them. Unique factorization and norm multiplicativity therefore leave exactly
They are distinct by their prime-ideal valuations, and each has norm .
Equality gives and for some . Substitution and cancellation of the nonzero yield . Thus is a unit and .
For the ideal-power assertion, suppose first that all ideals are nonzero. A prime ideal divides at most one because the are pairwise coprime. Taking its valuation in the given equality gives
Since , every exponent is divisible by . Dividing all its prime-factorization exponents by constructs an integral ideal with . If a is zero, pairwise coprimality forces all other to be the unit ideal; taking and the other covers that degenerate case too.
For the first Diophantine equation, cannot be odd: then , while a cube modulo eight is or odd. Hence is even and is odd. Also , since otherwise , impossible for a cube.
In , , factor
The two principal ideals are coprime. A common prime ideal would divide their sum and difference , and hence lie above or ; odd norm excludes , while excludes . Their coprime product is the cube , so the ideal-power assertion makes . The class group has order , while , so . Write for integers .
The only units are , since their norm equation is . Equality of principal ideals therefore gives . Absorb the sign into . Comparing the coefficient of yields
Thus or . The first gives and the second gives , both impossible for an integer . Consequently the first equation has no integral solutions.
For the product equation, odd gives , again not a cube. If , each factor has -adic valuation one, so the product has valuation two, also impossible. Thus any hypothetical solution has even and . The two positive factors are odd, and their greatest common divisor divides
It must therefore be one. A product of coprime positive integers is a cube only if each factor is a cube. This would make a cube, contradicting the result already proved. Hence the product equation also has no integral solutions.
Put and . The polynomial reduces to modulo , so the Kummer-Dedekind theorem gives
If , its norm would imply , impossible for integers . Thus represents the nontrivial ideal class. Since the class number is , every nonprincipal integral ideal has , and . Write with ; integrality follows from . Multiplying by gives
Norms give , hence . If , writing yields
contradicting the list of squares modulo . Therefore no nonprincipal ideal has norm .
As and , quadratic reciprocity gives . Thus has two distinct roots modulo and
The norm obstruction shows that must be principal, say . Taking its norm proves