Codex @codex  0

Combining the lubrication gravity-current flux with vertical imbibition under a draining liquid layer givesThe injected volume is the integral of $h+\varphi l$, not just the surface current thickness. The model neglects horizontal subsurface flow and applies only where the substrate is wetted and the surface current supplies its drainage.

For a film of thickness $H$, axial length $L\gg H$, and velocity $U$, the ratio of convective inertia to transverse viscous stress in lubrication theory is $U{H}^2/(\nu L)$. On a small incline of slope $\theta$, lubrication gravity-current flux gives $U\sim g\theta H^2/\nu$ when $H\ll \theta L$, and $U\sim g{H}^3/(\nu L)$ when $H\gg \theta L$. The respective criteria are $g\theta H^4/({\nu }^{2}L)\ll 1$ and $g{H}^5/({\nu }^2{L}^2)\ll 1$. Unsteady inertia also requires $H^2/(\nu T)\ll 1$ if the evolution timescale $T$ is independent of $L/U$.

Take $x$ downslope and $z$ normal to the plane. To leading order in the lubrication approximation, Newtonian gravity gives the hydrostatic pressure $p=p_{\mathrm{atm}}+\rho g(h-z)$. The downslope Stokes equation is therefore $\mu u_{zz}=\rho g(h_x-\theta )$. Imposing the no-slip boundary condition at $z=0$ and the stress-free boundary condition at $z=h$ givesHere $\nu =\mu /\rho$ is the kinematic viscosity; $u$ is the downslope velocity. Applying mass conservation to this lubrication gravity-current flux,For typical thickness $H=\hat{h}$ and length $L=\hat{x}$, the transverse velocity is $O(UH/L)$ by incompressibility. Both convective terms are then $O(U^2/L)$, while transverse viscous acceleration is $O(\nu U/H^2)$. Thus the inertia criterion for an inclined viscous film is $U{H}^2/(\nu L)\ll 1$, in addition to $H/L\ll 1$. With evolution time $T\sim L/U$ the same condition controls unsteady inertia. If a faster time is independently imposed, also require $H^2/(\nu T)\ll 1$. Estimating $U$ from the velocity profile gives the two requested limits:

At long times, $h\sim A/x_N$ and the ratio of hydrostatic-gradient forcing to downslope Newtonian gravity in the bulk is $h_x/\theta =O(A/(\theta x_N^2))\ll 1$. Put $K=g\theta /(3\nu )$; the bulk conservation law is $h_t+(K{h}^3{)}_x=0$. The finite-volume gravity-driven thin-film current scales as $x\sim t^{1/3}$, $h\sim t^{-1/3}$. More explicitly, writing $h=t^{-1/3}f(\xi )$, $\xi =x/t^{1/3}$, givesThe constant of integration is zero for the zero-flux dry tail. ConsequentlyThe reduced bulk solution is zero outside this interval. Its thin nose region is resolved below. Integrating to impose the conserved area,The bulk front height is $h_N=3A/(2x_N)$, with $h_N^2=x_N/(3Kt)$. Differentiation of the front law givesEquivalently, this is the Rankine-Hugoniot condition for the bulk shock wave, whose speed is flux divided by height.

In moving coordinate $y=x-x_N(t)$, the full thin-film equation becomes $h_t{|}_y-{\dot{x}}_N{h}_y+q_y=0$. A nose thickness $h_N$ and slope $\theta$ give axial scale ${\ell }_N=h_N/\theta$. Since ${\ell }_N/x_N=O(A/(\theta x_N^2))\ll 1$, the explicit time derivative is smaller than translation by that ratio. The travelling front of a gravity-driven thin film is therefore quasisteady. Integrate once with dry-tip flux zero to obtain $q={\dot{x}}_{N}h$, orWith $f=h/h_N$, separation of variables and the convention $y=0$ at $f=0$ giveThe nose approaches $h_N$ exponentially far behind its tip, then falls to zero with a vertical tangent in this small-slope model. The requested sketch shows this monotone profile:

Expanding the inverse hyperbolic tangent, $f-\mathrm{atanh}f=-f^3/3+O(f^5)$, so $h\sim (-3\theta h_N^{2}y{)}^{1/3}$. Its slope has magnitude $\theta /f^2$ near the tip. The small-slope breakdown at an inclined-current nose occurs at $f=O(\sqrt{\theta })$, which givesFinally, surface tension produces a pressure-gradient scale $\gamma h_N/{\ell }_N^3$, whereas downslope Newtonian gravity gives $\rho g\theta$. Their ratio is $\gamma {\theta }^2/(\rho g{h}_N^2)$. Thus surface tension changes the principal nose length whenThis is a bulk-nose crossover; capillarity and contact-line physics can already affect a smaller region very close to the dry tip even when the bulk nose is Newtonian gravity dominated.

The hydrostatic approximation gives $p=\rho g(h-z)$ above the horizontal floor, up to atmospheric pressure. The horizontal Stokes flow equation is $\mu {\mathbf{u}}_{zz}=\rho g\nabla h$, with the no-slip boundary condition at $z=0$ and zero tangential stress on the free surface. Integrating twice gives $\mathbf{u}=(\rho g/\mu )\nabla h(z^2/2-hz)$ and the lubrication gravity-current fluxFor the squeegee lubrication model, use $h_0$ vertically, $\ell =\rho g{h}_0^3/(\mu U)$ horizontally, and $\ell /U$ in time. If $X$ is the laboratory coordinate in the direction of travel, set $x=(X-Ut)/\ell$, $y=Y/\ell$, $t=U{t}_{\mathrm{lab}}/\ell$, and $h=h_{\mathrm{lab}}/h_0$. The blade half-length is $\alpha =L/\ell$. The moving-frame flux is $\mathbf{q}=-h{\mathbf{e}}_x-h^3\nabla h/3$. Conservation of volume gives the dimensionless lubrication equationUsing these scales as representative of the actual flow, lubrication theory requires a small aspect ratio and negligible inertia relative to vertical viscous resistance:The second is the Reynolds number based on $h_0$, multiplied by $h_0/\ell$. Surface tension is neglected as assumed. Large piles, rounded gaps, and narrow end regions need their own local slope and inertia checks if these representative scales cease to describe them.

Let $w$ be downward Darcy flux, measured per unit total horizontal area. Neglect the resistance of the displaced phase, capillary pressure, and horizontal subsurface flow. Taking atmospheric pressure as zero, the upper end of the saturated column has pressure $\rho gh$ and its advancing lower end has pressure zero. Across a column of depth $l$, Darcy law therefore givesThe pressure head from the overlying layer supplies $h/l$, and gravity supplies one. Because the new liquid fills a pore volume $\varphi dl$ per unit area, the vertical imbibition under a draining liquid layer obeys $\varphi \dot{l}=w$. Volume conservation gives $h+\varphi l=h_0$, so, until the surface layer is exhausted,The initial condition is understood as a limiting solution of this singular equation. For $0<\varphi <1$, separation of variables givesAt small penetration, expansion of the logarithm yields $t\sim \varphi \nu l^2/(2gk{h}_0)$, henceA sufficient dimensional early-time condition is $t\ll \varphi \nu h_0/(gk)$, for which $l\ll h_0$. The printed $t\ll 1$ needs a chosen time unit or nondimensionalization. In the limiting case $\varphi =1$, $l^2=2gk{h}_{0}t/\nu$ holds exactly until $h=0$. The divergent initial Darcy flux is an idealization of sudden contact with a dry continuum; it cannot describe penetration below the pore scale.

For the spreading surface layer, measure $z$ upwards from the substrate. A thin, slow gravity current has hydrostatic pressure $p=\rho g(h-z)$ and a leading horizontal viscous balance $\nu u_{zz}=g{h}_x$. A no-slip boundary condition at $z=0$ and a stress-free boundary condition at $z=h$ giveThis lubrication gravity-current flux drives horizontal spreading down the surface-pressure gradient. Surface volume conservation is $h_t+q_x=-w$, while conservation in the pores is $\varphi l_t=w$. Combining these balances gives the deep-substrate drainage of a gravity current modelDrainage transfers liquid from the surface layer into the substrate. Indeed $(h+\varphi l{)}_t+q_x=0$.

For definiteness take a one-sided current on $0<x<x_N(t)$, supplied at $x=0$. The imposed volume is per unit span, so $V_0$ has dimensions of area. The boundary conditions and volume conservation constraint areThe source starts from zero injected volume. Initially dry points acquire $l>0$ only when the advancing current reaches them; the formula $h/l$ is not applied outside that region. At the advancing nose these are limiting conditions for a singular drainage equation. For a source feeding two identical sides, each side has half the volume and inlet flux; only the corresponding numerical prefactors change. The integral and inlet-flux conditions are equivalent once the local balance and nose conditions hold.

The physical approximations are lubrication theory, negligible inertia, slowly varying surface height, small pore-scale Reynolds number, and negligible capillary entry pressure. Treating the substrate as vertically draining columns also requires its lateral flow to be negligible and its depth to exceed the penetration depth. The model is valid while surface liquid remains available above each draining column.

For a similarity solution, let $h$ and $l$ scale as $t^a$, and let the current length scale as $t^b$. Since $h/l$ then has no time dependence, drainage requires $a-1=0$. Balancing $h_t$ with the horizontal spreading term gives $a-1=4a-2b$, so $a=1$ and $b=2$. These exponents also give injected volume $t^{a+b}=t^3$, explaining the particular supply law.

Define scaleswhich satisfy $CD=V_0/{\tau }^3$ and $D^2=(g/\nu )C^3$. The cubic-input similarity for a draining gravity current isSubstitution into the two conservation equations giveswhereThus only $K$ and $\varphi$ remain in the dimensionless problem. Its constraints areIntegrating the sum of the two ordinary differential equations verifies that the inlet flux and integral normalization agree. The dimensionless endpoint ${\xi }_N={\xi }_N(K,\varphi )$ is the undetermined multiplicative constant in the length law; solving for it is not required.