If , monotonicity already gives , so assume . Suppose for a contradiction that . By the mean value theorem, some satisfies
The Margulis–Russo formula identifies this derivative with the appropriately normalized total influence, so is bounded solely in terms of . The -biased Friedgut junta theorem then supplies, for any small , a Boolean -junta with and
Because is monotone, , hence when . It follows that
For some assignment on with , therefore, . Monotonicity and imply . Choose , set , and take . Then
contradicting -quasirandomness. Thus .
Choose . Then and . The mean value theorem states that a continuous function on a closed interval, differentiable in its interior, has an interior derivative equal to its endpoint difference quotient. It gives with
Here , , and the right-hand side tends to by differentiability at . If exists, the same values must tend to . Uniqueness of the limit of a sequence gives
Thus a derivative cannot have a removable discontinuity at a point where the original function is differentiable. The proof also excludes an infinite limit of a function there, since the displayed difference quotients have a finite limit of a sequence.
The fixed-point iteration stays inside because maps that interval to itself. A fixed point satisfies , so and
Only is admissible; fails the unsquared equation. With , the mean value theorem gives the error bound
Induction yields , since . Therefore, for every allowed starting value,
This estimate proves convergence directly, without assuming in advance that the sequence has a limit.
Set . This function is continuous on . Since takes values in ,
The intermediate value theorem therefore supplies with , equivalently . This includes the possibility that one endpoint is already a fixed point.
For uniqueness, the mean value theorem gives, for any ,
If both and are fixed points, then
Since , this forces . Thus there exists exactly one fixed point. When , the conclusion follows immediately from ; otherwise the argument above applies. The contraction mapping estimate also proves convergence of the associated fixed-point iteration, as used next.
For , we have . Taking the nonnegative square root gives
The derivative is
so
In particular, the mean value theorem makes a contraction mapping on this interval.
The polynomial factors as , so is a multiple root of multiplicity two. The Newton root-finding iteration is
For , cancelling a factor gives
This expression extends continuously to . Let . On this closed interval,
Thus is increasing, and
By the mean value theorem, for all . The contraction mapping theorem states that a contraction mapping from a nonempty complete metric space into itself has a unique fixed point, and every fixed-point iteration converges to it. The closed interval with ordinary Euclidean distance is complete, and , so
In fact . The Newton iteration at a multiple root here has linear convergence, since . Thus the convergence assertion is true for the simplified fixed-point iteration, and for the usual Newton root-finding iteration that stops upon reaching an exact root of a polynomial. If one insists on applying the unsimplified quotient at every step, it is undefined for the allowed starting value , since both and vanish there; that literal version of an infinite sequence requires the stated stopping convention or continuous extension.
Take any . By differentiability implies continuity, is continuous on , and it is differentiable on . The mean value theorem gives for which
Therefore : is a nondecreasing function, which is the non-strict meaning of increasing here.
The mean value theorem states: if a real-valued function is continuous on a closed interval , where , and differentiable on , then there is with
We prove the symmetric derivative criterion for monotonicity using an antiderivative. Fix and define
The fundamental theorem of calculus gives because is continuous. For each interior ,
Since , the definition of symmetric derivative gives such that for . Therefore, for ,
We next show that is a convex function. On any closed interval let be the affine function joining to . If were positive anywhere, the extreme value theorem would give a positive maximum at an interior point . For every sufficiently small , that maximum would imply
The affine function contributes zero to this symmetric difference, contradicting the strict positive inequality above. Thus on every such interval, exactly convexity.
For a differentiable convex function, secant slopes bound endpoint derivatives. Explicitly, the chord inequality at and at , followed by , gives
So is nondecreasing. If for some , monotonicity would make constant on , forcing for , a contradiction. Consequently : is strictly increasing. This proof requires no continuity of and never applies the ordinary mean value theorem to a merely symmetrically differentiable function.
We verify that the augmented partition of an interval in part i has vanishing mesh of a partition. Define for . Its derivative is
Since for , we have . The mean value theorem therefore gives
The appended interval has length , so for the augmented partition of an interval.
The sine is continuous, hence Riemann integrable on . By the Riemann sum convergence theorem, , using the fundamental theorem of calculus and the cosine antiderivative. As , the answer is
Rearrange the polynomial equation as a fixed point equation:
First establish existence and uniqueness of the target root of a polynomial. Since is a continuous function, and , the intermediate value theorem gives a root of a polynomial . Moreover for all real , so is strictly increasing and this is its only real root of a polynomial.
For ,
so maps the closed interval into itself. Also
The mean value theorem therefore gives on the closed interval: is a contraction mapping. For any starting value , all iterates remain in that closed interval, and since ,
Thus the fixed-point iteration converges to the unique real root of a polynomial from every . This explicit error estimate proves the needed convergence directly.
The constancy theorem states that a differentiable function on an interval whose derivative vanishes everywhere is constant. At any included endpoints, continuity there is understood.
Indeed, take arbitrary in the interval. The mean value theorem applies on and gives . Every pair of values is equal, proving the assertion. The interval hypothesis ensures that the whole segment lies in the domain.
The mean value theorem states that if is continuous on and differentiable on , where , there is such that
No continuity assumption on the derivative is needed.
By the mean value theorem, for all real . Thus is a contraction mapping on the complete metric space . Starting from arbitrary , define . Induction gives . For , the triangle inequality and a geometric series yield
Hence is a Cauchy sequence and completeness of the real numbers supplies a limit . The Lipschitz continuity of implies . Thus the limit is a fixed point, independently of the initial value. If were another, would force . This proves the contraction mapping theorem in this setting, with error estimate
For the natural logarithm, . The chord slope is . Hence the mean value theorem point satisfies , giving
It lies strictly between one and two. For example, lies strictly between and one.
The chord through the endpoints is the straight line . At , the tangent line is
These two straight lines have the same slope, as required by the mean value theorem. Since , the natural logarithm is a concave function: its graph lies above the chord and below this tangent line.
Figure 1.
The mean value theorem for the logarithm on the interval from one to two
. The chord and the tangent line at are parallel. The marked point lies on the graph of the natural logarithm. Details.
Assume and reorder the interpolation nodes increasingly as . The polynomial interpolation error vanishes at all of them. Rolle's theorem supplies
These points are distinct because their containing intervals are disjoint. Thus is a polynomial of polynomial degree at most that interpolates the function at the interpolation nodes .
Apply the polynomial interpolation error theorem to with these interpolation nodes. Since the th derivative of is , for every there is a with
For the equality is zero on both sides; otherwise the same auxiliary-function and repeated-Rolle's theorem proof applies. This also covers , where is a constant polynomial and the proof is the ordinary mean value theorem for .
Writing gives the genuine error bound
The first formula is sharper, but its intermediate interpolation nodes depend on ; the last bound eliminates those unknown locations. This is derivative interpolation error from Rolle points.
For and every real ,
where was used. The mean value theorem therefore proves Lipschitz continuity in with constant .
Let . The explicit Euler method and the exact-solution identity from part (i) give
Using the requested local truncation error bound , including at , yields
Iteration and the finite geometric series give
Since and ,
Keeping the stronger bound from part (i) improves the same proof to . The requested inequality follows already from the weaker bound.