A function is differentiable at when the finite limit
exists. A derivative need not be continuous. For example,
is differentiable everywhere and , but for ,
which has no limit at zero.
The mean value theorem states that if is continuous on and differentiable on , then some satisfies
True. If everywhere, the mean value theorem applied between any two distinct points gives
Thus is Lipschitz continuous and hence uniformly continuous. No continuity of is needed: differentiability of gives continuity on each finite closed interval and is exactly the hypothesis needed for the mean value theorem there.
A contraction mapping satisfies for all , with one fixed . The contraction mapping theorem states that such a map on a nonempty complete metric space has a unique fixed point and that every sequence of iterates converges to it.
Choose and put . Iteration gives , so for ,
Thus the iterates form a Cauchy sequence and converge by completeness to . The Lipschitz bound gives continuity of , hence . Two fixed points satisfy , forcing equality of the points. Passing also gives the usual geometric error estimate. For , convergence occurs after one application.
If is a contraction mapping, let be its unique fixed point. The commutation identity gives , so uniqueness implies . Any fixed point of is a fixed point of , giving uniqueness, without even assuming continuous. On the complete discrete metric space , the map , has constant second iterate but is not a contraction: .
For the specified function, on because it starts at zero and has derivative . Therefore maps the complete half-line into itself. Its derivative satisfies
The mean value theorem therefore makes it a contraction of constant at most . Hence
A function has a Frechet derivative at if there is a linear map such that
The remainder condition is a limit in all directions at once, not merely the existence of partial derivatives.
For the stated scalar two-variable result, fix and choose a small rectangle contained in the open set . Split the increment into two coordinate segments. Applying the one-dimensional mean value theorem on each segment yields
for , omitting a term if its increment is zero. Subtract . By continuity of the partial derivatives, for any the remainder has modulus at most for sufficiently small increments. This proves differentiability, with Jacobian matrix .
Away from the origin the specified rational function has a nonzero denominator and is smooth. At the origin, and , so the partial derivatives are , . Any Frechet derivative there would therefore be . However,
Thus
The failure is not merely a failure of continuity: at the origin, so the function is continuous there.
The chain rule for Frechet derivatives states that if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then
The composition on the right is a composition of linear maps, equivalently a product of Jacobian matrices in coordinates.
Apply the chain rule to the affine function . The resulting derivative is
If the two partial derivatives agree everywhere, . The mean value theorem makes constant on . Define , which is itself differentiable by the chain rule. Taking gives , and therefore
No continuity of the partial derivatives beyond the assumed differentiability is needed.
Put , and . The mean value theorem gives on the bounded state range. Fix a final time and let and . Choose a smooth increasing function equal to zero on and one on . For small , define
Its two nonnegative derivative contributions imply . Therefore .
Use the nonnegative test , where , it is one up to just before , decreases smoothly to zero near , and remains zero afterward. The Kato inequality for scalar conservation laws gives
because the other interior contribution is nonpositive. At Lebesgue times , the temporal approximate identity tends to ; take a countable sequence and use dominated convergence on the bounded cone. This yields
for almost every . This is local L1 contraction for scalar conservation laws. It uses only local integrability, so the bounded data need not have finite global norm. If , the flux difference is zero and the same proof uses a stationary interval.
The multiplication of a distribution by a smooth function is . If is a Schwartz function, the Leibniz rule shows that is a continuous map , so is a tempered distribution. When both and are radial, , and
Thus Multiplication by a radial Schwartz function preserves radial tempered distributions.
For the convolution of a tempered distribution with a Schwartz function, set
Translations of depend smoothly on in the Schwartz space, so this is a smooth function with . The bound for by finitely many seminorms, together with , proves
Thus the function also defines a tempered distribution. For a radial function , put . Then , so
Hence Convolution with a radial Schwartz function preserves radial tempered distributions.
Smoothing alone need not give a Schwartz function: for the constant tempered distribution and a Schwartz function with integral one, . The radial Schwartz approximation of tempered distributions therefore combines smoothing with a large-radius cutoff. Choose a nonnegative radial mollifier , supported in the unit ball with integral one, and a radial cutoff function equal to one on the unit ball. Put
Each is a smooth function of compact support, hence a Schwartz function, and the two invariance calculations above make it radial.
It remains to prove convergence, including the simultaneous changes of both scales. With , the distributional convolution pairing is
For every fixed , the Leibniz rule, rapid decay outside the radius- ball, and the chain rule for give
Convolution by is uniformly bounded in for , because its shifts have size at most one. The mean value theorem applied to similarly gives
Splitting the error into the convolved cutoff error and the approximate identity error proves
If , this yields
Consequently
weakly, and even in the strong dual topology, since is uniformly bounded on every subset of the Schwartz space that is a bounded set in a topological vector space. No assertion that itself is rapidly decreasing is needed.
The mean value theorem says that if is continuous on and differentiable on , then for some .
For and ,
The mean value theorem gives .
For the second inequality put . It becomes . The difference satisfies and
Thus .
For a sequence trapped between the fixed barriers, let bound their absolute values and put . The mean value theorem gives
The global Schauder estimate, including the fixed boundary data , and imply
Apply the supplied Hölder interpolation inequality with . Its remaining supremum-norm term is bounded by , yielding
If , the stronger bound without a previous-iterate term holds directly. The constant depends on the fixed domain, exponent, barriers, boundary data and , independently of .
The space of test functions is . A sequence converges to when all functions eventually have compact support in one compact set and every derivative converges uniformly:
A distribution is a continuous linear functional on this space of test functions. Equivalently, for each compact set , there are and a finite integer such that
The integer is permitted to depend on . The usual weak convergence of distributions is
Thus the convergence convention on the distribution space is its weak dual topology.
For the principal-value reciprocal distribution, the symmetric truncations can be written
The numerator is near zero by the mean value theorem, and the integrand vanishes for large because has compact support. For ,
Consequently the Cauchy principal value defines a distribution of order of a distribution at most one.
The function has local integrability, since , and therefore defines a distribution. For its distributional derivative, remove and use integration by parts on both remaining intervals:
The boundary term is and tends to zero. The omitted integral of tends to zero by local integrability. Hence the distributional derivative of the logarithmic modulus satisfies
Symmetric truncation is essential to this normalization of the principal-value reciprocal distribution.
The intermediate value theorem states that if is continuous and lies between and , then some satisfies .
Assume and let
The least-upper-bound property makes well defined. If , continuity gives points immediately to the right of in , contradicting that is an upper bound. If , continuity gives a left neighborhood of disjoint from , contradicting the definition of the supremum. Thus . The endpoint and reversed-order cases follow directly or by replacing with .
The mean value theorem states that if is continuous on and differentiable on , then some satisfies
For the functions in the question, the definition of the derivative makes continuous at and continuous at , with
If the middle secant slope equals , take . If it exceeds , the intermediate value theorem applied to gives with , and we take . If it is below , apply the theorem to to obtain with , and take . In every case
The mean value theorem on this subinterval then produces with
This is the Darboux theorem for derivatives for the stated pair of derivative values.
The function is uniformly continuous on . Its derivative satisfies
so the mean value theorem gives
Thus the function is Lipschitz, which implies uniform continuity.
Rolle theorem states that if is continuous on the closed interval between two distinct points, differentiable between them, and has equal endpoint values, then vanishes at an interior point.
Let and, for , put
Then and for . Applying Rolle's theorem successively times gives a point , , where . Hence
which is the stated Taylor theorem with Lagrange remainder.
If , the case gives . Thus is constant; equivalently this is the immediate corollary of the mean value theorem.
Rolle theorem: if is continuous on , differentiable on , and , then for some . Indeed, the extreme value theorem gives a maximum and minimum. If both occur only at the endpoints then is constant; otherwise an interior extremum satisfies by comparing the two-sided difference quotients.
Mean value theorem: if is continuous on and differentiable on , then some satisfies
Apply Rolle's theorem to
which has .
Let
Then . Since is not linear, for some . If , the mean value theorem on gives a point with
If , apply it on to obtain
In either case , and therefore
A map between metric spaces is a contraction mapping if some satisfies for all .
The Banach fixed-point theorem states that a contraction from a nonempty complete metric space to itself has a unique fixed point. Indeed, for ,
so the geometric-series estimate makes Cauchy. Completeness gives a limit , continuity gives , and
proves uniqueness.
Every solution of lies in . The cosine maps this complete interval into itself and, by the mean value theorem, has Lipschitz constant at most there. It therefore has exactly one real fixed point.
The mean value inequality says that on a convex domain, a uniform derivative bound implies . Equip with the maximum norm and take
For , elementary cosine bounds give
so . The maximum absolute row sum of
is at most . The mean value inequality makes a contraction on the complete set , so it has a fixed point.
If are two solutions with the same boundary values, put . The mean value theorem gives
Therefore with zero boundary data. Apply the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators to and with zeroth-order coefficient . It follows that , proving uniqueness.
For , the function is differentiable at if there is a linear map such that
The linear map is unique and is the Frechet derivative . The function is continuously differentiable at if it is differentiable on a neighbourhood of and the map , with values in the space of linear maps equipped with the operator norm, is continuous at .
If is linear, then
Consequently at every . The derivative is a constant function of , hence is continuous, so every linear map is continuously differentiable everywhere.
The mean value inequality says that if the line segment lies in and
then
To prove it, put . The claim is immediate if . Otherwise set and apply the one-dimensional mean value theorem to the real-valued function
For some , the chain rule gives
as required.
Now suppose that is open and connected and that for every . Every point has an open ball contained in . The mean value inequality with shows that is constant on each such ball, so is locally constant. Fix . The level set
is nonempty and open in ; its complement is also open because is locally constant. Since is connected, . This proves the zero derivative on a connected open set result: is constant.
The inverse function theorem states that if is continuously differentiable, , and is an invertible linear map, then there are open neighbourhoods of and of such that is a bijection whose inverse is continuously differentiable.
For the curve in the question, define the continuously differentiable function
Then
The implicit function theorem, which follows from the inverse function theorem applied to , therefore gives an open interval containing , an open neighbourhood of , and a continuously differentiable, hence continuous, function such that